Inferior displacement of greater tuberosity fracture suggests an occult humeral neck fracture: a retrospective single-centre study

Management of greater tuberosity fracture dislocations of the shoulder

Background

Despite extensive literature dedicated to determining the optimal treatment of isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures, there have been few studies to guide the management of GT fracture dislocations. The purpose of this review was to highlight the relevant literature pertaining to all aspects of GT fracture dislocation evaluation and treatment.

Methods

A narrative review of the literature was performed.

Results

During glenohumeral reduction, an iatrogenic humeral neck fracture may occur due to the presence of an occult neck fracture or forceful reduction attempts with inadequate muscle relaxation. Minimally displaced GT fragments after shoulder reduction can be successfully treated nonoperatively, but close follow-up is needed to monitor for secondary displacement of the fracture. Surgery is indicated for fractures with >5 mm displacement to minimize the risk of subacromial impingement and altered rotator cuff biomechanics. Multiple surgical techniques have been described and include both open and arthroscopic approaches. Strategies for repair include the use of transosseous sutures, suture anchors, tension bands, screws, and plates. Good-to-excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes can be achieved with appropriate treatment.

Conclusions

GT fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus represent a separate entity from their isolated fracture counterparts in their evaluation and treatment. The decision to employ a certain strategy should depend on fracture morphology and comminution, bone quality, and displacement.

Closed reduction of glenohumeral dislocations with associated tuberosity fracture in the emergency department is safe

AIM

A fracture of the tuberosity is associated with 16% of glenohumeral dislocations. Extension of the fracture into the humeral neck can occur during closed manipulation, leading some to suggest that all such injures should be managed under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre. The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of reduction of glenohumeral dislocations with tuberosity fractures in the emergency department (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 188 consecutive glenohumeral dislocations with associated tuberosity fractures identified from a prospective orthopaedic trauma database. Patient demographics, injury details, emergency department management and complications were recorded. The method of reduction, sedation, grade of clinician and outcome were documented.

RESULTS

The mean age was 61 years (range 18-96 years) with 79 males and 109 females. The majority of injuries (146, 78%) occurred after a fall from standing height. Closed reduction under sedation in the ED was successful in 162 (86%) cases. Of the remainder, 22 (11%) failed closed reduction under sedation and subsequently went to theatre and 6 (3%) were deemed not suitable for ED manipulation. At presentation 35 (19%) patients had a nerve injury, of which 29 (90%) resolved spontaneously. Two iatrogenic fractures occurred during close manipulation, one in the ED and the other in the operating theatre. Therefore, the risk of iatrogenic propagation of the fracture into the proximal humerus neck was 0.5% if the reduction was performed in the ED, and 1% over-all. More than two attempted reductions predicted a failed ED reduction (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction of glenohumeral dislocations with associated tuberosity fractures in the ED is safe, with a rate of iatrogenic fracture of 1%. These injuries should be managed by those with appropriate experience only after two adequate radiographic views. In cases where there is ambiguity over the integrity of the humeral neck, reduction should be delayed until multiplanar CT imaging has been obtained.