Patient-related outcome measurements after operative and conservative management of traumatic proximal adductor longus avulsion injuries

Acute Adductor Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review on Diagnostic Imaging, Treatment, and Prevention

BACKGROUND

Controversies remain regarding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of acute adductor injuries in athletes.

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic imaging, treatment, and prevention of acute adductor injuries based on the most recent and relevant scientific evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify articles studying acute adductor injury in athletes. Inclusion criteria were original publication on acute adductor injury in amateur or professional athletes, level 1 to 4 evidence, mean patient age >15 years, and results presented as return-to-sport, pain, or functional outcomes. Quality assessment was performed with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement or the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria. Articles were grouped as imaging, treatment, prevention focused, or mixed.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies published between 2001 and 2021 were selected, involving 594 male patients with a mean age 26.2 years (range, 16-68 years). The most frequent sports were soccer (62%), basketball (14%), futsal (6%), American football (3%), and ice hockey and handball (2%). Risk factors for acute adductor injury were previous acute groin injury, adductor weakness compared with the uninjured side, any injury in the previous season, and reduced rotational hip range of motion. The frequency of complete adductor muscle tears on magnetic resonance imaging was 21% to 25%. For complete adductor tears, the average time to return to play was 8.9 weeks in patients treated nonoperatively and 14.2 weeks for patients treated surgically. Greater stump retraction was observed in individuals treated surgically. Partial acute adductor tears were treated nonoperatively with physical therapy in all studies in the present systematic review. The average time to return to play was 1 to 6.9 weeks depending on the injury grade. The efficacy of adductor strengthening on preventing acute adductor tears has controversial results in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Athletes with partial adductor injuries returned to play 1 to 7 weeks after injury with physical therapy treatment. Nonoperative or surgical treatment is an acceptable option for complete adductor longus tendon tear.

Surgical Reattachment of Rare Proximal Adductor Avulsion Injury in a Female Athlete: A Case Report

CASE

A 54-year-old female professional equestrian sustained a traumatic right groin injury with disabling groin pain. Magnetic resonance images indicated a proximal adductor avulsion injury with a 3.2-cm tendon retraction. Surgical reattachment of the fibrocartilage avulsion with suture anchor repair was subsequently performed.

CONCLUSION

Adductor avulsion injuries have been rarely reported in female athletes. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate a successful return to preinjury levels of daily function and sports performance after surgery for a female athlete. Surgical reattachment should be considered for the management of proximal adductor avulsion injuries in elite female athletes.

One-Year Clinical and Imaging Follow-up After Exercise-Based Treatment for Acute Complete Adductor Longus Tendon Avulsions in Athletes: A Prospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Complete avulsions of the adductor longus tendon are serious injuries, yet we have few data to inform clinical decisions on management. Previous studies are limited by a lack of detailed follow-up.

PURPOSE

To describe detailed clinical and imaging measures 1 year after complete proximal adductor longus avulsion injuries in athletes who received exercise-based treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 16 adult male competitive athletes were included in this study <7 days after an acute adductor longus tendon avulsion injury. All athletes were advised to complete a supervised standardized criterion-based rehabilitation protocol. Standardized clinical examination, a modified Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse Injury Questionnaire (OSTRC-O), and detailed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment were performed after inclusion, on the day of completion of the treatment protocol (return to sport), and at 1-year follow-up after injury.

RESULTS

One player was lost to follow-up. Median return-to-sport time was 69 days (interquartile range [IQR], 62-84). One player had an early reinjury and performed an additional rehabilitation period. One-year follow-up was completed a median from 405 days (IQR, 372-540) after injury. The median HAGOS score was 100 for all subscales (IQRs from 85-100 to 100-100), and the median OSTRC-O score was 0 (IQR, 0-0). The median range of motion symmetry was 100% (IQR, 97%-130%) for the bent-knee fall-out test and 102% (IQR, 99%-105%) for the side-lying abduction test. Side-lying eccentric adduction strength symmetry was 92% ± 13% (mean ± SD), and median supine eccentric adduction strength symmetry was 93% (IQR, 89%-105%). MRI results at 1-year follow-up showed that from the original complete discontinuity in all cases, 10 athletes (71%) had partial tendon continuity, and 4 (29%) had complete tendon continuity.

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgically treated athletes with a complete acute adductor longus avulsion returned to sport in 2 to 3 months. At the 1-year follow-up after injury, athletes had high self-reported function, no performance limitations, normal adductor strength and range of motion, and signs of partial or full tendon continuity as shown on MRI. This indicates that the primary treatment for athletes with acute adductor longus tendon avulsions should be nonsurgical as the time to return to sport is short, there are good long-term results, and there is no risk of surgical complications.

Surgical repair techniques, functional outcome, and return to sports after apophyseal avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity in adolescents

Purpose

Among juvenile apophyseal avulsion injuries of the pelvis in adolescents, fractures of the ischial tuberosity are rare but sustainably debilitating. Also because informations on surgical repair options are very sparse and so far limited to general reviews, reports of individual cases or heterogeous small case series, practitioners, patients and their parental environment still feel a comprehensible hesitation regarding operative treatment. Therefore we intended to investigate patient related outcome measurements and return to sports rates after different types of surgical intervention in an own case series, so far unprecendented in its size.

Methods

Patient data of adolescents that underwent surgical intervention for a displaced apophyseal avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity between 01/2015 and 12/2019 in our institution were gathered. Patients were then evaluated using the hamstring injury specific Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT). Furthermore the return to sports level in comparison to the particular pre-injury level was rated.

Results

Eleven adolescents with an acute or chronic mean fragment dislocation of 3.3 cm (SD ± 1.7) underwent surgical intervention in the assigned period. The mean post-operative PHAT score was 86.9 (0–100, SD ± 11.9) and thus good to excellent. The majority of adolescents (10/11) was able to return to their pre-injury sports, whereas 63.6% achieved full or nearly full level.

Conclusions

Surgical refixation or restoration of aphoyseal avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity result in good to excellent outcomes and return to sport rates, irrespective of the type of intervention. Here prompt diagnosis with a timely intervention seems more promising than delayed interventions in chronic cases. Beyond 1.5 cm of fragment displacement affected patients should be counselled for surgical intervention.

Surgical versus conservative management of traumatic proximal adductor longus avulsion injuries: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Proximal avulsion injuries of the adductor longus have been managed both conservatively and operatively with good clinical outcomes, but there is no consensus on which option yields the best results. Thus, the present study aimed to review the available literature, comparing the outcomes and the time to return to sports with different management options.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was conducted in September 2020. All the clinical trials investigating the management of traumatic proximal adductor longus avulsion injuries were considered for inclusion. Only studies reporting data from athletes were considered. The outcomes of interest were the time to return to sport and return to preinjury activity level.

RESULTS

Data from 46 patients were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 24.6 ± 23.8 months. The study population was represented by male athletes with a mean age of 30.0 ± 4.8. Mean stump retraction was 3.3 ± 0.6 cm in the surgical and 1.7 ± 0.6 in the conservative cohort (P = 0.07). The rate of patients returning to prior activity level was similar in the two groups, but surgically treated patients required a longer time to return to sport (3.9 ± 1.5 months vs. 2.2 ± 1.0 months, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Conservative management for traumatic avulsion of the proximal adductor longus insertion may produce shorter time to return to sport. Both conservative and operative strategies allowed to achieve similar pre-injury activity level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.