Tibial tuberosity-tibial intercondylar midpoint distance measured on computed tomography scanner is not biased during knee rotation and could be clinically more relevant than current measurement systems

The diagnostic value of TT-TG and TT-ME distances in the assessment of patellofemoral instability

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the application value of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG distance) and tibial tubercle-midepicondyle distance (TT-ME distance) on CT images in patellofemoral instability, and further investigate the association between knee joint rotation angles and patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed CT image data of 59 patients with patellar dislocation (case group) and 39 normal knee joints (control group). We measured the TT-TG distance, TT-ME distance, and knee joint rotation angle (KJRA) of both groups, and the related indicators were analyzed using single-factor/multi-factor binary logistic stepwise regression analysis. Two senior radiologists were assigned to assess the inter-rater reliability. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Finally, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the diagnostic efficiency of these indicators in patellofemoral instability.

RESULTS

The results found significant differences between both groups in terms of TT-TG distance, TT-ME distance, KJRA angle, age, location, and gender (P < 0.05). In terms of inter-rater reliability, TT-TG distance and TT-ME distance ratios showed an excellent correlation between observers (TT-TG inter-rater ICC 0.969, TT-ME inter-rater ICC 0.955). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that except for location and gender, all other factors significantly affected patellofemoral instability (P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the TT-ME distance, age, and KJRA angle were statistically significant factors related to patellofemoral instability, with TT-ME distance being a risk factor for patellofemoral instability (OR value 1.572, P value 0.000). Moreover, the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the diagnostic capability of the TT-ME distance for detecting patellofemoral instability was higher than that of the TT-TG distance and KJRA (AUC were 0.912, 0.851, and 0.735, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The TT-ME distance, age, and knee joint rotation angle are factors that affect patellofemoral instability. The TT-ME distance has better diagnostic efficiency for patellofemoral instability compared to the TT-TG distance and knee joint rotation angle.

Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove and the roman arch method for tibial tubercle lateralisation are reliable and distinguish between subjects with and without major patellar instability

PURPOSE

Patellofemoral (PF) instability recurrence depends on several factors including the relative lateralisation of tibial tubercle (TT) regarding the trochlear groove (TG). TT relative lateralisation quantification has long been a topic of debate. Multiple measuring techniques have been described including TT-trochlear groove (TT-TG), TT-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) and TT-roman arch (TT-RA), with no clear consensus regarding the most reliable index or pathologic threshold. We set out to determine the normal value range of each index and their association with age, sex and PF instability status. Also, this study aims to determine a reliable pathologic distance threshold to effectively predict patellar dislocation.

METHODS

Skeletally mature patients up to 45 years of age who presented a CT Scan and an MRI of the same knee between 2014 and 2018 were included and divided into subgroups based on history of PF instability. Three indexes (TT-TG, TT-PCL and TT-RA) were assessed by two independent observers blinded to instability history. ROC curves were performed for each index to obtain the cut point that better predicts instability. Univariate and multivariate models adjusted by age, sex, instability history and type of imaging technique were performed to test the influence of these variables.

RESULTS

208 patients were included. Mean age was 27.93 ​± ​8.48 years, 67.3% were female and 71 patients (34.1%) presented major instability history. Good or excellent inter and intraobserver reliability was found for all three indexes. All indexes presented significantly different distributions between subjects with and without major instability (p ​< ​0.001), except for TT-PCL. Different cut point values differing between imaging modalities were found: 11.4 ​mm for MRI TT-TG, 17 ​mm for CT TT-TG, 15.6 ​mm for MRI TT-RA and 18.2 ​mm for CT TT-RA.

CONCLUSIONS

All indexes studied had good or excellent inter and intraobserver reliability. Measurements between imaging techniques (CT and MR) are not interchangeable. Both TT-TG and TT-RA correctly distinguish between subjects with and without major instability, while TT-PCL does not, recommending caution when evaluated on its own. Specific threshold values depending on imaging technique should be considered for surgical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Diagnostic Test.

Reliability of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance for Assessing Tibial Tubercle Lateralization: A Study Comparing Different Anatomic References

Background

The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement used to quantitatively assess tibial tubercle lateralization (TTL), and it has important reference value for the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD). However, TT-TG distance accuracy has been questioned, so many new parameters have been proposed.

Purpose

To compare which of the TT-TG, tibial tubercle-midepicondyle (TT-ME), tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA), tibial tubercle-tibial intercondylar midpoint (TT-TIM), and tibial tubercle-mid inter-epicondyle trochlea intersection (TT-MIELTI) distances better reflect TTL in patients with PD.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 96 patients who had undergone surgery for PD and 96 patients without PD (controls) were included in the study. The patients had all undergone computed tomography examination. The TT-TG, TT-ME, TT-RA, TT-TIM, TT-MIELTI distances and the TTL distance were measured independently by 2 surgeons in a blinded and randomized fashion. The t test was used to detect whether the parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups. The TTL distance was used as a reference value for lateralization of tibial tubercle. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between the defined measurements.

Results

The intra- and interobserver reliability of the defined measurements was excellent. All parameters except for TT-TIM distance were significantly larger in the PD group than the control group (P < .01 for all). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.601) between the TT-TG distance and TTL, and other parameters were less correlated with TTL.

Conclusion

Among 5 the parameters tested, the TT-TG distance still had the highest correlation with TTL and was able to reflect TTL better in patients with PD. The role of TT-TIM distance in the assessment of PD needs further study.

CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle lateralization in patients with patellar dislocation were not equivalent but could be interchangeable

PURPOSE

To compare the values and the relationship of tibial tubercle lateralization measurements between computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Sixty patients with patellar dislocation who underwent both CT and MRI of the same knee joint from November 2021 to February 2022 were included in our study. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to evaluate the reliability of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA), and tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance measurements. The values of CT and MRI measurements using the same bony landmarks were compared for the difference. Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to assess the correlation between CT and MRI measurements. Finally, the estimated values obtained from the regression equation were compared with the actual values obtained from the radiological measurement to evaluate the accuracy of the equations.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with patellar dislocation who underwent both CT and MRI of the same knee joint were included in this study. The included measurements showed excellent agreement with ICCs > 0.9. TT-TG distance measured on CT (19.5 ± 5.1 mm) had a mean of 7.1 mm higher than that on MRI (12.4 ± 4.7 mm) (P < 0.001). The mean value of TT-RA distance was 22.5 ± 3.7 mm on CT and 16.7 ± 4.9 mm on MRI (P < 0.001), showing a mean difference of 5.8 mm. The values of TT-TG distance measured by CT and MRI were significantly correlated (R = 0.5, P < 0.001). The values of TT-RA distance between these two modalities showed a better correlation than that of TT-TG distance (R = 0.6, P < 0.001). The interchange values of TT-TG distance and TT-RA distance between CT and MRI can be obtained using regression equations (TT-TG distance: y = 0.6x + 12.3; TT-RA distance: y = 0.5x + 14.4).

CONCLUSION

The values of tibial tubercle lateralization measured by MRI may be underestimated compared with those measured by CT. Although the values measured on CT and MRI are not equivalent, the value in the other modality can be estimated. Therefore, an additional CT scan for tibial tubercle lateralization evaluation may not be necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Anatomical Components Associated With Increased Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance

Background:

Increased tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is an important indicator of medial tibial tubercle transfer in the surgical management of lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). Changes to TT-TG distance are determined by a combination of several anatomical factors.

Purpose:

To (1) determine the anatomical components related to increased TT-TG distance and (2) quantify the contribution of each to identify the most prominent component.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included were 80 patients with recurrent LPD and 80 age- and body mass index–matched controls. The 2 groups were compared in TT-TG distance and its related anatomical components: tibial tubercle lateralization (TTL), trochlear groove medialization, femoral anteversion, tibiofemoral rotation (TFR), tibial torsion, and mechanical axis deviation (MAD). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to evaluate the association between increased TT-TG distance and its anatomical parameters, and factors that met the inclusion criteria of P < .05 and r ≥ 0.30 were analyzed via stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis to predict TT-TG distance.

Results:

The LPD and control groups differed significantly in TT-TG distance, TTL, TFR, and MAD (P < .001 for all). Increased TT-TG distance was significantly positively correlated with TTL (r = 0.376; P < .001), femoral anteversion (r = 0.166; P = .036), TFR (r = 0.574; P < .001), and MAD (r = 0.415; P < .001), and it was signficantly negatively correlated with trochlear groove medialization (r = −0.178; P = .024). The stepwise multivariable analysis revealed that higher TTL, excessive knee external rotation, and excessive knee valgus were statistically significant predictors of greater TT-TG distance (P < .001 for all). The standardized estimates that were used for evaluating the predictive values were larger for TFR compared with those for TTL and MAD.

Conclusion:

TTL, TFR, and MAD were the main independent anatomical components associated with increased TT-TG distance, with the most prominent component being TFR. The association of TT-TG distance to each component analyzed in our study may help guide surgical planning.

Reliability of the Tibial Tubercle-Roman Arch Distance for Evaluating Tibial Tubercle Malposition and Predicting Patellar Dislocation via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

The tibial tubercle (TT)–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance has low reproducibility in patients with a dysplastic trochlea, whereas the clinical value of the TT–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance remains controversial.

Purposes:

To establish a method to assess the position of the TT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using the TT–Roman arch (TT-RA) distance, compare this method with the TT-TG and TT-PCL distance, and provide the pathological threshold value of the TT-RA distance in patients with patellar dislocation.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The TT-RA distance, TT-TG distance, and TT-PCL distance were measured on MRI scans in 70 patients with a history of patellar dislocation and 70 healthy individuals. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of each measurement parameter were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity and the interrelationship of the 3 measurement parameters were investigated using Pearson correlation and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The pathological threshold values of these measurements were calculated according to the data of healthy individuals. Finally, logistic regression analysis was performed using these values.

Results:

Patients with patellar dislocation had a greater TT-RA distance compared with healthy individuals (18.05 ± 4.16 vs 13.86 ± 2.90 mm; P < .001). The TT-RA distance had a stronger diagnostic capacity, with an area under the curve of 0.802 compared with 0.625 for TT-PCL distance. Excellent reproducibility was seen for TT-RA distance measurement at any degree of trochlear dysplasia (all intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] >0.90). The inter- and intraobserver ICCs of the TT-TG distance measurements were extremely low for Dejour type D dysplasia (ICC, 0.509 and 0.616, respectively). The pathological TT-RA distance threshold was calculated as 19.5 mm. Logistic regression showed that patients with a TT-RA distance >19.5 mm were 11.7 times more likely to sustain patellar dislocation than were those with TT-RA distance less than this value.

Conclusion:

The TT-RA distance was a more reliable parameter with which to evaluate TT position than was TT-TG distance in patients with trochlear dysplasia. The TT-PCL distance was the least reliable among the 3 parameters studied.