Comparing less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture via sinus tarsi approach

A Mid-Term Result of the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures with the Use of Intramedullary Nailing

Background: Intra-articular calcaneal fracture (CF) treatment is associated with a high risk of complications, but closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) is a minimally invasive alternative for treatment. Methods: Forty-eight patients treated with CRIF and CALCAnail® due to intra-articular CF between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed to check union time, complication rate, and functionality after the intervention. Functional and pain outcomes were assessed, including the Maryland Foot Score (MFS), American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale questionnaires, and the numerical pain scale (NRS) at mid-term follow-ups 2-5 years after the intervention. Results: Intervention increased median Böhler's angle from 21.5° to 32° (p < 0.01). The median bone union time was 12 weeks. The risk of malunion was higher in patients with Sanders type 4 (RR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.11-4.72) and those operated on later than the 2nd day after injury (RR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.08-4.09). Patients with at least one of the comorbidities (nicotinism, diabetes, obesity) had a higher risk of intensive pain (NRS > 3) 2-5 years after surgery (RR = 1.69; 95% CI 1.06-2.68), and 84% were satisfied with their treatment. Other complications included complex regional pain syndrome in two patients (4%), malunion in three (6%), and surgical site infection in two (4%). The MFS had a median score of 85 points, while that of the AOFAS was 82 points. Conclusions: CRIF, with the use of the CALCAnail® implant, allows doctors to restore anatomical relationships around the subtalar joint, resulting in good clinical and functional results.

A simple modified technique for screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture through a sinus tarsi approach: a comparison with plate fixation

BACKGROUND

Plates and screws are frequently used for the fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture (DIACF). In this study, we compared the outcomes of a modified screw fixation technique with plate fixation via a sinus tarsi approach (STA).

METHODS

A series of 187 DIACF patients who were treated via an STA using a plate fixation (n = 81) or a screw fixation (n = 106) were included. Screw fixation was done with two 2.7 mm screws and two 6.5 mm cannulated screws. Outcomes were evaluated radiographically and clinically. Clinical evaluations included pain assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and functional assessment by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire and Foot Function Index (FFI).

RESULTS

The mean final VAS was smaller in the screw group (P = 0.01). The mean AOFAS and FFI scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.17 and P = 0. 19, respectively). The mean improvement of Bohler's angle, but not the Gissane's angle, was significantly greater in the screw group (P = 0.014 and P = 0.09, respectively). The mean improvement of calcaneal length and height were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.78 and P = 0.22, respectively). The hardware removal rate was 14.8% in the plate group and 3.8% in the screw group (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The modified screw fixation method provides lower pain, better radiographic outcome, and lower rate of hardware removal compared to plate fixation in the treatment of DIACF.

Comparison between screw fixation and plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains a subject of debate, particularly regarding the superiority between screw fixation and plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach (STA). This review aims to determine the preferred treatment for DIACF and compare the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery options.

METHODS

Our study involved thorough searches across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, to identify all relevant publications on distal intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus (DIACFs) that were fixed using cannulated screws or plates via STA. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, we evaluated several outcomes, including post-operative function, radiological measurements, and complications.

RESULT

A total of 728 patients from 7 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 435 patients underwent screw fixation via STA, and 373 patients underwent plate fixation via STA. The study found no statistically significant differences between the screw fixation and the plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach (STA) in terms of AOFAS scores, Bohler's angle, Gissane's angle, sural nerve injury, secondary subtalar arthrodesis and reoperation. Compared with screw fixation, plate fixation via STA can reduce reduction loss of Bohler's angle (WMD = - 1.64, 95% CI = [- 2.96, - 0.31], P = 0.06, I2 = 59%), lower the incidence of fixation failure (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.13, 0.81], P = 0.78, I2 = 0%), and decrease intra-articular step-off (WMD = - 0.52, 95% CI = [- 0.87, - 0.17], P = 0.66, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Plate fixation demonstrates superior capability in restoring calcaneal width, maintaining Bohler's angle, and minimizing intra-articular step-off, thereby maintaining better reduction of the subtalar articular surface. In addition, plate fixation exhibits the modest complication rate and a low incidence of fixation failure. Therefore, we recommend the use of plate fixation through the STA, especially for complex and comminuted intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

Implant Choice and Outcomes of the Sinus Tarsi Approach for Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures

BACKGROUND

Operative fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is considered the gold standard, for which multiple fixation methods are available. This study compares the (functional) outcome of screw fixation (SF), plate fixation (PF), and anatomical plate fixation (APF) via the sinus tarsi approach (STA).

METHODS

A total of 239 patients (265 fractured calcanei) who received surgical treatment of a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture via STA between 2011 and 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Böhler angle (BA) measured immediately postoperatively (BA post-OR) and the decrease in BA at 1 year (∆BA) differed significantly in favor of PF/APF compared with SF (BA post-OR: SF vs PF P = .010 and SF vs APF P = .001; ∆BA: SF vs PF P = .032 and SF vs APF P = .042). Implant removal surgery was performed significantly less in the APF group as compared to the SF/PF groups (APF vs SF/PF; 9.9% vs 22.9%/23.7%, P = .015). Surgical site infections and secondary arthrodesis of the subtalar joint occurred equally in the 3 groups. Furthermore, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index score, and EuroQOL-5D-index / visual analog scale score, did not differ notably between SF, PF, and APF.

CONCLUSION

The results show that both PF and APF are favored over SF because of an improved correction of BA measured directly postoperatively, a lower secondary loss of BA and, for APF, a lower implant removal rate. There was no difference in the rate of surgical site infections, need for secondary arthrodesis, nor functional outcome scores between different implants using the STA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Emergency surgery of intra-articular calcaneal fractures using sinus tarsi approach with modified reduction technique

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate emergency surgery of calcaneal fractures using the sinus tarsi approach (STA) with modified reduction technique in terms of complication rates, iconography results and functional outcome.

METHODS

We evaluated the outcomes of 26 patients treated in an emergency using STA with modified reduction technique. For that, we assessed Böhler´s angle, Gissane angle, reduction of the calcaneal body, and posterior facet, the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, complications, preoperative time, operative time, and in-hospital time.

RESULTS

Recovery of calcaneal anatomy and articular surface were found at final follow-up. The mean Böhler´s angle at final follow-up were 30.68° ± 3.69°, of which was 15.02° ± 3.88° preoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean Gissane angle at final follow-up were 114.54° ± 11.16° of which was 88.86° ±10.96° preoperatively (p < 0.001). All cases had the varus/valgus angle of the tuber within 5 degrees. At the final follow-up, the mean AOFAS score was 89.23 ± 4.63, and the VAS score was 22.73 ± 6.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency surgery using STA with modified reduction technique is reliable, effective, and safe for treatment of calcaneal fractures. This technique can bring good clinical outcomes and a low rate of wound complications, reducing the in-hospital time, costs, and accelerating rehabilitation.

Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation are often used to treat intra-articular calcaneus fractures with no consensus on the preferred method. Open techniques have been associated with an increased risk of wound complications, while percutaneous techniques may result in inferior reduction capabilities. These injuries pose a challenge to patients as they often result in poor patient outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed patient outcomes of a single surgeon's experience in treating these injuries at a busy urban Level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Patients with intra-articular calcaneus fractures managed operatively over 10 years with a minimum six-month follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on operative technique: closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Descriptive analysis of each cohort included postoperative infection, the need for repeat operations, development of post-traumatic subtalar arthritis, and reduction capabilities as assessed by Bohler's angle.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included in this study, with 33 patients in the CRPF group and 29 patients in the ORIF group. Infection requiring a return to the operating room occurred in 1 (3%) CRPF and 7 (24%) ORIF patients. Instrumentation was removed in 23 (70%) CRPF and 9 (31%) ORIF patients. Clinical subtalar arthritis developed in 10 (30%) CRPF and 7 (24%) ORIF patients, requiring arthrodesis in 2 (6%) and 5 (17%) patients, respectively. Both techniques had acceptable restoration of Bohler's angle immediately postoperatively and at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation may both be considered for the surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Indications for each technique may vary between surgeons, and each has its own set of risk factors and complications, however, both have been shown to result in an acceptable reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Articular calcaneal fractures: open or minimally invasive surgery, when the medial wall reduction is obtained percutaneously from the lateral side

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of intra-articular calcaneal fractures with medial column displacement treated with different surgical techniques, namely extensile lateral approach (ELA) or sinus tarsi approach (STA), combined with percutaneous medial reduction.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures who were subjected to ELA or STA (45 in STA group and 51 in ELA group) were retrospectively assessed. Reduction of the posterior facet, calcaneal body, Böhler's angle, and Gissane's angle were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analog scale (VAS). The complications, time to surgery, operative time, and blood loss were also assessed.

RESULTS

Incidence of wound complications, post-operative blood drainage, and time to the operation were significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the recovery of calcaneal anatomy and articular surface between the two groups. Similarly, no difference was detected in Böhler's and Gissane's angles between ELA and STA groups (P > 0.05). Finally, there was no difference in AOFAS and VAS scores between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

STA resulted in favourable radiological and clinical results with fewer wound complications and a shorter waiting time when compared to ELA. The percutaneous medial reduction technique is effective in reducing medial column displacement.