Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators

Unveiling the Power of Magnetic-Driven Regenerative Medicine: Bone Regeneration and Functional Reconstruction

To improve the treatment outcomes for large bone defects and osteoporosis, researchers have been committed to reducing bone loss and accelerating bone regeneration through cell transplantation, biomaterial intervention, and biophysical stimulation over the past few decades. Magnetism, as a noninvasive biophysical stimulus, has been employed in the repair of the musculoskeletal system, achieving a series of promising results. In this review, we provide a retrospective analysis and perspective of research on magnetic-driven bone regeneration and functional reconstruction. This review aims to delineate safe and efficient magnetic application modalities and to summarize the potential mechanisms by which magnetism regulates the behavior of skeletal lineage cells, thereby providing insights for the expansion and translational application of magnetic-driven regenerative medicine.

Results of Lower Limb Bone Lengthening by Using Motorized and Magnet-Driven Intramedullary Nails to Treat Limb Length Discrepancy

INTRODUCTION

Limb length discrepancies (LLDs) can be treated with limb lengthening using external fixation or intramedullary nails, such as PRECICE or FITBONE. PRECICE is a magnetically driven titanium nail, while FITBONE is a motorized nail; both use an external remote control. This study aimed to determine the complications, compensation of length difference, time needed for compensation, and healing outcome of bone lengthening using motorized or magnet-driven intramedullary nails among non-cosmetic limb lengthening cases.

METHODS

 This retrospective study was derived from a single surgeon's practice at a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Between 2009 and 2020, 15 patients with LLDs, with a mean age of 25.43 years (range 16-35 years), were identified. The study included congenital, post-traumatic, idiopathic, and acquired causes of LLDs. Outcomes were measured using complete lengthening and healing indices, which need the presence of three intact cortices out of four.

RESULTS

All patients achieved correction of their limb length without any device failure or nail breakage. The achieved limb length for all patients averaged 38.4 mm, ranging from 21 to 60 mm. No intraoperative complications were observed. Postoperatively, one patient reported knee stiffness, and another developed deep venous thrombosis. Duration of distraction (average 43.93 days, range 30-66 days) and the mean healing index was 32 days/cm for both the femur and tibia.

CONCLUSION

 This study confirms that intramedullary nail PRECICE 2 and FITBONE systems are reliable and effective lengthening devices for treating lower LLDs and deformities. These devices significantly reduce complications and achieve excellent outcomes.

What's new in pediatric lower limb reconstruction?

The last years brought many advances relevant to lower limb reconstruction. It feels like guided growth has been looked at from every angle, and still there are new emerging concepts like rotational guided growth waiting to be validated. New hexapod external devices are more accurate and easier to use, and new unilateral fixators allow for more versatile and stable fixation and lengthening. Intramedullary nail lengthening has found its place as a standard procedure for various diagnoses in children and young adults. First results of new and exciting approaches like extramedullary implantable nail lengthening and lengthening plates have been reported. Pharmaceutical treatment has changed the course of certain diseases and must be integrated and considered when making a reconstructive treatment plan. As reconstructive surgery is rapidly advancing so are the technical options for prosthetic fitting, which makes it difficult for caregivers as well as for parents to make the decision between reconstruction and amputation surgery for the most severe cases of congenital deficiencies. This review is highlighting new developments of lower limb reconstruction and is reviewing the current literature.

Is it possible to achieve multiplanar correction of complex deformities around the knee in children and adolescents using a monolateral external fixator?

PURPOSE

To present the technique of correction of multiplanar deformities around the knee in children and adolescents using the monolateral external fixator. Also, to evaluate the results of the technique regarding radiological correction, time to union, and possible complications.

METHODS

A total of 29 patients (47 limbs) were prospectively included in the study (14 males and 15 females). Their median age was 13 years (range, 7-17). All patients had at least a 2-plane deformity around the knee which was corrected using a monolateral external fixator. The primary outcome measure was deformity correction (correction of mechanical axis deviation (MAD) in both the coronal and sagittal planes with correction of rotational deformities). The secondary outcome measures included bony union, radiographic, and functional results (assessed by using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score).

RESULTS

The median pre-operative MAD improved from 6.3 to 0.4 cm post-operatively. According to the ASAMI scoring system, the radiographic scoring was excellent in all cases (100%), and the functional scoring was excellent in 22 cases (89.7%) and good in three cases (10.3%).

CONCLUSION

The simple monolateral fixator can be an effective tool for multiplanar correction of complex deformities around the knee without limb length discrepancy.

Is fracture management merely a physical process? Exploring the psychological effects of internal and external fixation

BACKGROUND

Internal and external fixation are common surgical procedures for treating fractures. However, the impact of different surgical approaches (including internal and external fixations) on patients' psychological status and Quality of Life (QoL) is rarely examined. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of internal and external fixation on anxiety, depression, insomnia, and overall mental and physical health in Distal Radius Fractures (DRF) patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 96 fracture patients who underwent internal fixation (57 patients) or external fixation (39 patients). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire were used to assess the patients' pain, anxiety, depression, sleep, and QoL before surgery and at seven days, one month, and three months post-surgery.

RESULTS

The VAS scores were significantly lower in the Internal Fixation Group (IFG) than in the External Fixation Group (EFG) on the seventh day and one month postoperatively (P < 0.05). Although both groups showed no significant anxiety, depression, or insomnia before surgery (P > 0.05), the EFG showed significantly higher HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores than the IFG at seven days and one and three months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Additionally, changes in HADS-A, HADS-D, and AIS scores were most significant at day seven post-surgery in the EFG (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the average Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores before surgery (P > 0.05). However, both groups showed positive changes in PCS and MCS scores at postoperative day seven and one and three months postoperatively, with the IFG having significantly higher average PCS and MCS scores compared to the EFG (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to external fixation, internal fixation did not significantly impact patients' emotions regarding anxiety and depression in the early postoperative period, and physical and mental health recovery was better during the postoperative rehabilitation period. Furthermore, when there are no absolute indications, the impact on patients' psychological well-being should be considered as one of the key factors in the treatment plan during surgical approach selection.

Clinical compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic intramedullary nails: a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail in place is contraindicated per the manufacturer due to the concern of implant activation and migration. A prior in vitro study did not confirm these complications only noting that a 3.0 T MRI weakened the internal magnet. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic nail in place was performed to determine if any adverse effects occurred in the clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic lengthening nail in place was performed. The time spent being imaged in the MRI, number of times the patient entered the MRI suite, and the images obtained were recorded. Radiographs were performed before and after the MRI to determine if any hardware complications occurred. The patients were monitored for any adverse symptoms while they were in the suite.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients with 13 nails were identified. Two patients underwent imaging with a 3.0 T MRI while the remaining 10 underwent imaging with a 1.5 T MRI. Each patient entered the MRI suite 2.1 times and spent an average of 84.7 min being imaged in the MRI (range 21-494). No patients noted any adverse symptoms related to the nail while in the suite and no hardware complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

MRI appears to be safe with a magnetic nail in place and did not result in any complications. Given the manufacturer's recommendations, informed consent should be obtained prior to an MRI being performed and a 3.0 T MRI should be avoided when possible if further activation of the nail is required.

Antegrade Intramedullary Femoral Lengthening and Distal Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis for Combined Correction of Leg Length Discrepancy and Coronal Angular Deformity in Skeletally Immature Patients

Leg length discrepancies (LLD) are frequently associated with coronal malalignment. Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (HED) is a well-established procedure for the correction of limb malalignment in skeletally immature patients. For treatment of LLD > 2 cm, lengthening with intramedullary devices gains increasing popularity. However, no studies have investigated the combined application of HED and intramedullary lengthening in skeletally immature patients. This retrospective single-center study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of femoral lengthening with an antegrade intramedullary lengthening nail combined with temporary HED performed in 25 patients (14 females) between 2014 and 2019. Temporary HED through the implantation of flexible staples of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia was either performed prior (n = 11), simultaneously (n = 10) or subsequently (n = 4) to femoral lengthening. The mean follow-up period was 3.7 years (±1.4). The median initial LLD was 39.0 mm (35.0-45.0). Twenty-one patients (84%) presented valgus and four (16%) showed varus malalignment. Leg length equalization was achieved in 13 of the skeletally mature patients (62%). The median LLD of the eight patients with residual LLD > 10 mm at skeletal maturity was 15.5 mm (12.8-21.8). Limb realignment was observed in nine of seventeen skeletally mature patients (53%) in the valgus group, and in one of four patients (25%) in the varus group. Combining antegrade femoral lengthening and temporary HED is a viable option to correct LLD and coronal limb malalignment in skeletally immature patients; however, achieving limb length equalization and realignment may be difficult in cases of severe LLD and angular deformity, in particular.