Cardiopulmonary and haemodynamic changes during total hip arthroplasty

The influence of bone cement and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class on cardiovascular status during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fracture: A multicenter, prospective, case-control study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how bone cement and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification influence the cardiovascular system in elderly patients with femoral-neck fractures treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty. Therefore, we performed a case-control study to investigate these questions and compared the following:≥ASA III with≤ASA II patients who underwent cemented hemiarthroplasty; and cemented with cementless hemiarthroplasty in≥ASA III patients.

HYPOTHESIS

ASA classification influences the cardiovascular system during cemented hemiarthroplasty and bone cement influences intraoperative blood pressure [IBP] in patients rated≥ASA III.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, prospective study included patients with acute displaced femoral-neck fractures. Baseline data, medical history, anesthesia, FiO₂, vasopressor use, femoral component, IBP, SpO₂, and complications were evaluated. Of 200 patients, 100 were cemented (mean age, 77±10 years), and 100 were cementless (mean age, 78±9 years). Cemented hemiarthroplasty employed a third-generation technique (plugging, irrigating, drying and filling the canal with cement under pressurization).

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased significantly during cementing, versus pre-rasping in≤ASA II patients (from 117.9±24.5 [range, 65-199] to 106.9±20.3 [range, 59-172]; p=0.007), in≥ASA III patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 110.4±17.9 [range, 79-157]; p=0.006), and post-stem-insertion, versus pre-rasping in≤ASA II patients (from 117.9±24.5 [range, 65-199] to 103.9±20.7 [range, 53-178]; p=0.0004), and in≥ASA III patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 111.2±24.6 [range, 70-156]; p=0.009). In≥ASA III patients, SBP decreased significantly during cementing or rasping, versus pre-rasping in cemented patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 110.4±17.9 [range, 79-157]; p=0.006), in cementless patients (from 115.0±17.7 [range, 85-150] to 100.7±15.7 [range, 75-142]; p=0.004), and post-stem-insertion, versus pre-rasping in cemented patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 111.2±SD [range]; p=0.009), and in cementless patients (from 115.0±17.7 [range, 85-150] to 89.4±17.5 [range, 58-140]; p<0.0001). There were no lethal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicate a similar hemodynamic change intraoperatively between≤ASA II patients and≥ASA III patients in the cemented group, and between patients with cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty in the≥ASA III patients. With modern hemiarthroplasty techniques, bone cement might be as safe as cementless techniques in elderly,≥ASA III patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, multicenter case-control cohort study.

Intraoperative blood pressure changes during cemented versus uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: a multi-center cohort study : The effect of bone cement for bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with uncemented about the change of intraoperative blood pressure and the incidence of major complications in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multiple center prospective cohort study included only patients with acute displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden stage III or IV). All patients were treated with cemented or uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using modified Hardinge or Watson-Jones approach in the lateral decubitus position. Baseline data, medical history, type of anesthesia, FiO₂ value, the number of vasopressor using during operation, femoral component, intraoperative blood pressure, SaO₂, and major complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 164 patients (45 males and 119 females), 86 underwent cemented and 78 underwent uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Baseline medical histories were similar in both groups. In both the cemented and uncemented groups, intraoperative systolic blood pressure significantly decreased during cementing or rasping (106.3 and 103.6 mmHg) and after femoral component insertion (103.3 and 99.1 mmHg) compared to before rasping (120.7 and 116.4 mmHg) (p < 0.0001, respectively). Donaldson's grade seemed more favorable in uncemented group than in cemented group during cementing or rasping, during stem insertion; however, no patients experienced the lethal complication in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative blood pressure did not change during cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthrplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. If the standard modern cement technique was performed during operation, bone cement is a safe and acceptable for elderly patients who have a lot of medical histories.

Perioperative pulmonary circulatory changes during bilateral total hip arthroplasty under regional anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The transient and rarely clinically relevant effect of bone and cement embolization during unilateral joint arthroplasty is a known phenomenon. However, available studies do not address events surrounding bilateral total hip arthroplasties, during which embolic load is presumably doubled. To elucidate events surrounding this increasingly used procedure and assess the effect on the pulmonary hemodynamics in the intraoperative and postoperative periods, we studied 24 subjects undergoing cemented bilateral total hip arthroplasty during the same anesthetic session.

MATERIALS

Twenty-four patients without previous pulmonary history undergoing cemented bilateral total hip arthroplasty under controlled epidural hypotension were enrolled. Pulmonary artery catheters were inserted and hemodynamic variables were recorded at baseline, 5 mins after the implantation of each hip joint, 1 hr and 1 day after surgery. Mixed venous blood gases and complete blood counts were analyzed at every time point.

RESULTS

An increase in pulmonary vascular resistance was observed after the second but not the first hip implantation when compared with values at incision. Pulmonary vascular resistance remained elevated 1 hr after surgery. Pulmonary artery pressures were significantly elevated on postoperative day 1 compared with those at baseline. The white blood cell count increased in response to the second hip implantation but not the first compared with incision.

CONCLUSIONS

The embolization of material during bilateral total hip arthroplasty is associated with prolonged increases in pulmonary artery pressures and vascular resistance, particularly after completion of the second side. Performance of bilateral procedures should be cautiously considered in patients with diseases suggesting decreased right ventricular reserve.