Implications of transaxillary breast augmentation: lifetime probability of breast cancer development and sentinel node mapping interference

Influence of previous breast surgery in sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to review the feasibility of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with previous surgery for breast cancer, as well as to examine the factors that may interfere with sentinel node detection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 91 patients with breast cancer and previous breast surgery, and who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. Patients were divided into two groups according to their previous treatment: aesthetic breast surgery in 30 patients (group I) and breast-conserving surgery in 61 (group II). Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after an intra-tumour injection in 21 cases and a peri-areolar injection in 70 cases. An analysis was made of lymphatic drainage patterns and overall sentinel node detection according to clinical, pathological and surgical variables.

RESULTS

The overall detection of the sentinel lymph node in the lymphoscintigraphy was 92.3%, with 7.7% of extra-axillary drainages. The identification rate was similar after aesthetic breast surgery (93.3%) and breast-conserving surgery (91.8%). Sentinel lymph nodes were found in the contralateral axilla in two patients (2.2%), and they were included in the histopathology study. The non-identification rate in the lymphoscintigraphy was 7.7%. There was a significantly higher non-detection rate in the highest histological grade tumours (28.6% grade III, 4.5% grade I and 3.6% grade II).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with previous breast surgery is feasible and deserves further studies to assess the influence of different aspects in sentinel node detection in this clinical scenario. A high histological grade was significantly associated with a lower detection.

Comparison of Limited and Full Dissection Abdominoplasty Using Laser Fluorescence Imaging to Evaluate Perfusion of the Abdominal Skin

BACKGROUND

In an effort to reduce risk, some surgeons promote a limited dissection abdominoplasty technique. They believe that preserving musculocutaneous perforators improves blood supply to the overlying abdominal tissue and that improved vascularity avoids seromas and reduces wound healing problems. Laser fluorescence imaging is a new method that allows quantitative measurements of perfusion.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive women undergoing abdominoplasty agreed to participate in this prospective study. The inclusion rate was 100 percent. The SPY Elite Intraoperative Perfusion Assessment System was used to quantitate flap perfusion. Patients served as their own controls to avoid confounders. All patients received superwet infusions followed by liposuction of the abdomen and flanks. First, a limited dissection was performed, preserving medial musculocutaneous perforating blood vessels and the Scarpa fascia on the lower abdomen. The rectus fascia was repaired in all cases. A temporary superficial fascial wound closure was performed. The patient was imaged after injection of the contrast agent. The dissection was then extended to a full abdominoplasty and the Scarpa fascia was removed from the lower abdomen. The patient was reimaged. Wound tension was also measured.

RESULTS

Complications included one distal deep venous thrombosis, one infection, and one seroma. There were no cases of marginal necrosis or dehiscence. There was no significant difference (p < 0.05) in perfusion measurements comparing the limited and full dissections. Wound tensions were significantly less (p < 0.001) in the full-dissection group.

CONCLUSION

The limited dissection abdominoplasty does not provide a significant improvement in perfusion compared with a full dissection.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Prospective clinical study of 551 cases of liposuction and abdominoplasty performed individually and in combination

BACKGROUND

Despite the popularity of these procedures, there are limited published prospective studies evaluating liposuction and abdominoplasty. Lipoabdominoplasty is a subject of recent attention. Several investigators have recommended alternative techniques that preserve the Scarpa fascia in an effort to reduce complications, particularly the risk of seromas.

METHODS

Over a 5-year period, 551 consecutive patients were treated with ultrasonic liposuction alone (n = 384), liposuction/abdominoplasty (n = 150), or abdominoplasty alone (n = 17). In lipoabdominoplasties, the abdomen and flanks were first treated with liposuction. A traditional flap dissection was used for all abdominoplasties. Scalpel dissection was used rather than electrodissection. A supine "jackknife" position was used in surgery to provide maximum hip flexion, allowing a secure deep fascial repair.

RESULTS

The complication rate after liposuction was 4.2% vs 50% for patients treated with an abdominoplasty. Approximately half of the abdominoplasty complications were minor scar deformities, including widened umbilical scars (17.3%) that were revised. The seroma rate after abdominoplasties was 5.4%; there were no seromas after liposuction alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipoabdominoplasty may be performed safely, so that patients may benefit from both modalities. The seroma rate is reduced by avoiding electrodissection, making Scarpa fascia preservation a moot point. A deep fascial repair keeps the abdominoplasty scar within the bikini line. Deep venous thrombosis and other complications may be minimized with precautions that do not include anticoagulation.

[Special considerations in breast cancer treatment of an augmented breast]

Breast augmentation surgery involving the use of implants has been one of the most popular plastic surgical procedures for decades. As the multi-million female population who received breast implants ages, the risk of cancer is increasing rapidly, therefore the incidence of malignant disease in association with breast implants will increase as well. Although there is no relationship between tumor development and implants, these cases require special considerations in diagnostics, therapy and follow-up methods. Appropriate multidisciplinary treatment of tumors in augmented breasts corresponding with modern oncoplastic principles can only be accomplished based on adequate oncological, breast and plastic surgical knowledge. Supposing a possible increase of this condition in Hungary, too, authors provide a wide review of the literature on the special oncological and esthetic considerations, for the first time in Hungarian language.

Breast augmentation: Part III--preoperative considerations and planning

The past four decades since the introduction of silicone mammary prostheses have seen significant improvements in their quality and durability. Advances in our understanding of the aetiopathology and prevention of adverse capsular contracture (ACC) have occurred such that surgical technique itself has now probably become the single most important determinant of both immediate and long-term outcome. Considered a simple, and in some quarters mindless, procedure it has evolved such that high-quality short- and stable long-term results are now expected. Whilst the fundamentals of breast augmentation (BA) remain, evolutionary philosophies confront today's surgeon with a wealth of options. Of fundamental importance has been the paradigm shift from a purely, or predominantly, volumetric, through biodimensional to a tissue-based approach. With BA, more than any other aesthetic procedure, possessing more variables, choice and influential external factors a thorough understanding of the myriad options available is essential. This review seeks to cover the key elements in obtaining an optimal primary result. It provides a rational basis for the selection of an option tailored to both the patient and the individual tissue characteristics in addition to the pertinent medico-legal issues.

Improvements in transaxillary breast augmentation

BACKGROUND

Roughly 90% of breast augmentations are done through the submammary approach, yet patients, given the choice, sometimes choose the transaxillary approach, with the inconspicuous scar hidden in the axilla. Because the transaxillary approach is technically demanding and is performed relatively rarely, many plastic surgeons never master the technique.

METHODS

From 1988 to 2009, 140 patients underwent transaxillary breast augmentation by the author, who developed several innovations and improvements for planning of this operation, its technical execution, and postoperative care. Among these innovations are a new implant selection system, the "boomerang incision," the technique for inserting anatomic teardrop-shaped implants through the axilla, submuscular and subfascial implant placement, a new instrument called the breast implant pusher, and use of intermittent regional postoperative analgesia.

RESULTS

Implementation of the aforementioned modifications and innovations improved the overall quality and consistency of surgical results. It was proved that anatomically shaped breast implants could be inserted through the axillary incision and correctly positioned in the subfascial and submuscular location. The transaxillary technique is contraindicated for patients with ptotic, asymmetric, or tubular breasts.

CONCLUSION

Transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty without routine endoscopic assistance is a safe method with predictable results and a high rate of patient satisfaction. The transaxillary technique offers the advantage of locating the surgical scar off the breast. It requires closer supervision during the first few postoperative months compared with the submammary or periareolar technique because it is more difficult to place and maintain implants at the proper level using the transaxillary approach.

Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion

BACKGROUND

During the last decades transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) has gained worldwide acceptance. Breast augmentation via transaxillary access endoscopically assisted in the subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular planes has been previously described. Although TBA is a well-studied procedure, few reports exist concerning the subfascial plane of implant insertion and none exist comparing the three different planes of insertion by TBA.

METHODS

A perspective study to evaluate the outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction of TBA using the three different planes of implant insertion was performed during 2004-2005. Fifty-three patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were randomly divided into three groups corresponding to the three planes of silicone insertion. All patients had a silicone texturized implant that ranged from 190 to 300 cc. Overall satisfaction with the breast appearance after TBA was rated on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is poor, 2 is fair, 3 is good, 4 is very good, and 5 is excellent. The evaluation was made at the follow-up times of 6 months and 3 years.

RESULTS

There were 18 patients enrolled for the subcutaneous TBA (Group A), 18 for the subfascial TBA (Group B), and 17 for the submuscular TBA (Group C). Axillary incision-related complications occurred in 9% of the patients and included formation of a hypertrophic scar and small-wound dehiscence. There was no hematoma formation and no case of infection. There was one patient from Group A who developed seroma and was treated conservatively. Twenty-seven months postoperatively the same patient developed Baker III capsule contracture, which required silicone implant replacement in the subfascial plane. One case of stretch marks in a young nulliparous woman from Group B did not need treatment. One patient from Group A underwent implant exchange because of implant size dissatisfaction. Three patients in Group C had mild distortion of the implant during pectoral contracture. A meta-analysis of patient satisfaction 6 months and 3 years after TBA is presented.

CONCLUSION

Transaxillary breast augmentation provides consistent, satisfactory results with ease of dissection, when properly indicated. Although the subfascial augmentation mammaplasty has all the advantages of the subpectoral and subglandular augmentation mammaplasties and eliminates the disadvantages of increased postoperative discomfort, implant visibility, and distortion, patients of all three groups had similar rates of satisfaction. Further follow-up is needed in order to compare the long-term effects of the three different planes of insertion.

Sentinel node biopsy in patients with previous breast aesthetic surgery

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard method for axillary staging of early breast cancer. Recent studies have focused on questioning the initial contraindication to the technique. There has been insufficient data to recommend SLNB in patients with previous aesthetic breast surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 2001 and June 2007, 70 patients with previous breast aesthetic surgery underwent SLNB. Fifty had a previous breast augmentation and 20 had breast reduction mammoplasty. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy with 99Tc according to our standard technique and sentinel node was identified in all cases.

RESULTS

Mean age at cosmetic surgery was 38 years. Mean number of years from aesthetic surgery to the development of the tumour was 10 years. Forty-nine patients underwent conservative breast surgery and 21 patients underwent mastectomy. The sentinel node identification rate was 100%. SLN was positive in 23 patients (32%); there were 18 cases with macrometastasis and 7 cases with micrometastasis. After median follow-up of 19 months, no axillary recurrences have been observed. We observed two ipsilateral local recurrences, one contralateral tumour and one patient developed lung metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Past history of breast augmentation or reduction is not a contraindication to SLNB technique.

Sentinel lymph node detection and evidence of axillary lymphatic integrity after transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective study using lymphoscintography

BACKGROUND

The transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) technique has gained popularity because of several advantages. However, the impact of the procedure on breast lymphatic drainage and sentinel node (SN) detection remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the lymphatic patterns and SN detection rates after TBA by using lymphoscintigraphy (LSG).

METHODS

Twenty patients (40 breasts) who underwent TBA were evaluated by LSG immediately after periareolar injections of phytate-99 mTc at three time points: before TBA (Pre-LSG) and approximately 30 days (Recent-Post-LSG) and 6 months after TBA (Late-Post-LSG). Statistical analysis considered p \ 0.05 significant, or p \ 0.017 when Bonferroni correction was applied.

RESULTS

All breasts drained primarily to the axillary SN. The binomial test did not show statistical differences in lymphatic drainage patterns between Pre-LSG and Recent-Post-LSG (p = 1), Pre-LSG and Late-Post-LSG (p = 0.625), and Recent-Post-LSG and Late-Post-LSG (p = 0.625). The average number of hot SN was 1.28 in Pre-LSG, 1.10 in Recent-Post-LSG, and 1.23 in Late-Post-LSG, without significant differences (p = 0.202). The average time of the first SN appearance was not significantly different (p = 0.186). Analysis of SN uptake percentage showed a significant difference between Pre-LSG and Recent-Post-LSG (p = 0.009), with a reduction of drainage magnitude in Recent-Post-LSG.

CONCLUSION

The preservation of axillary lymphatic drainage after TBA allowed for SN detection in all studied breasts. It seems that the applied surgical technique played an important role in axillary lymphatic integrity.