Sepsis with multiple abscesses after massive autologous fat grafting for augmentation mammoplasty: a case report

Bilateral breast infection following total breast reconstruction with autologous fat transfer (AFT): A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Total breast reconstruction with autologous fat transfer (AFT) has a low complication rate. Fat necrosis, infection, skin necrosis and hematoma are the most common complications. Infections are usually mild and manifested by a unilateral red painful breast and treated with oral antibiotics with or without superficial irrigation of the wound.

CASE PRESENTATION

One of our patients reported an ill-fitting pre-expansion device several days after surgery. This was due to a severe bilateral breast infection following a session of total breast reconstruction with AFT despite perioperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Surgical evacuation was performed in combination with both systemic and oral antibiotic treatment.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Most infections can be prevented in the early post-operative period with antibiotic prophylaxis. If an infection does occur, it is treated with antibiotics or superficial irrigation of the wound. A delay in identification of an alarming course could be reduced by monitoring the fit to the EVEBRA device, implementing video consultations on indication, limiting the means of communication and better informing the patient on what complications to monitor. The recognition of an alarming course following a subsequent session of AFT is not guaranteed after a session without complication.

CONCLUSION

Besides temperature and redness of the breast, a pre-expansion device that doesn't fit can be an alarming sign. Patient communication should be adapted as severe infections can be insufficiently recognized by phone. Evacuation should be considered when an infection does occur.

Postoperative Antibiotics Confer No Protective Association After Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Autologous fat grafting after breast reconstruction is a commonly used technique to address asymmetry and irregularities in breast contour. While many studies have attempted to optimize patient outcomes after fat grafting, a key postoperative protocol that lacks consensus is the optimal use of perioperative and postoperative antibiotics. Reports suggest that complication rates for fat grafting are low relative to rates after reconstruction and have been shown to not be correlated to antibiotic protocol. Studies have additionally demonstrated that the use of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics do not lower the complication rates, stressing the need for a more conservative, standardized antibiotic protocol. This study aims to identify the optimal use of perioperative and postoperative antibiotics that optimizes patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart who underwent all billable forms of breast reconstruction followed by fat grafting were identified via Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients meeting inclusion criteria had an index reconstructive procedure at least 90 days before fat grafting. Data concerning these patient's demographics, comorbidities, breast reconstructions, perioperative and postoperative antibiotics, and outcomes were collected via querying relevant reports of Current Procedural Terminology; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision; National Drug Code Directory, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Antibiotics were classified by type and temporal delivery: perioperatively or postoperatively. If a patient received postoperative antibiotics, the duration of antibiotic exposure was recorded. Outcomes analysis was limited to the 90-day postoperative period. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of age, coexisting conditions, reconstruction type (autologous or implant-based), perioperative antibiotic class, postoperative antibiotic class, and postoperative antibiotic duration on the likelihood of any common postoperative complication occurring. All statistical assumptions made by logistic regression were met successfully. Odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

From more than 86 million longitudinal patient records between March 2004 and June 2019, our study population included 7456 unique records of reconstruction-fat grafting pairs, with 4661 of those pairs receiving some form of prophylactic antibiotics. Age, prior radiation, and perioperative antibiotic administration were consistent independent predictors of increased all-cause complication likelihood. However, administration of perioperative antibiotics approached a statistically significant protective association against infection likelihood. No postoperative antibiotics of any duration or class conferred a protective association against infections or all-cause complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides national, claims-level support for antibiotic stewardship during and after fat grafting procedures. Postoperative antibiotics did not confer a protective benefit association against infection or all-cause complication likelihood, while administering perioperative antibiotics conferred a statistically significant increase in the likelihood that a patient experienced postoperative complication. However, perioperative antibiotics approach a significant protective association against postoperative infection likelihood, in line with current guidelines for infection prevention. These findings may encourage the adoption of more conservative postoperative prescription practices for clinicians who perform breast reconstruction, followed by fat grafting, reducing the nonindicated use of antibiotics.

Case report: Axilla fibroadenoma – An atypical presentation

Introduction

Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast tumor among women between 15 and 35 years, however, a fibroadenoma arising from accessory breast tissue is a rare occurrence.

Case presentation

We encountered this uncommon presentation in a 37 years old female with a gradually increasing left axillary lump associated with discomfort. On ultrasound it was a 17.3 mm × 10.6 mm x 17.5 mm well defined solid nodule with internal vascularity, BiRADS IVa lesion. Core biopsy revealed fibroepithelial lesion and the patient electively underwent excisional biopsy. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of fibroadenoma, which was completely excised.

Clinical discussion

Approximately half of all breast lumps in women are diagnosed as fibroadenomas, making it the most common benign breast mass. Nonetheless, an axillary mass has several differentials such as lymphadenopathy, lipoma or sebaceous cyst, while a fibroadenoma developed from ectopic breast tissue in the axilla is an unusual condition. Masses in axilla like ectopic breast tissue are clinically significant as they undergo physiological changes like the normal breast tissue like pain and discomfort during pregnancy, lactation and menstruation. This tissue may also undergo pathological changes and may pose a diagnostic challenge.

Conclusion

Axillary lumps pose a diagnostic dilemma and accessory breast tissue related pathologies should be considered.

•

Axillary lumps may pose a diagnostic dilemma.

•

Accessory breast tissue may undergo pathological changes and present as benign or malignant breast disease.

•

Ectopic breast tissue should undergo routine annual screening.

Preoperative Risk Factors and Complication Rates of Breast Augmentation With Fat Grafting

BACKGROUND

The current literature on the complications and risk factors of autologous fat grafting (AFG) for breast augmentation is scant and inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to use a large, multicenter database to determine the major complications and risk factors of patients undergoing breast augmentation with AFG in comparison to breast augmentation with implants.

METHODS

Patients undergoing breast augmentation with AFG as well as with implants between January 2, 2017 and July 31, 2019 were identified from the CosmetAssure database (Birmingham, AL). The primary outcome was the occurrence of major complication(s) requiring emergency department visit, hospital admission, or reoperation within 45 days postoperatively. Age, gender, BMI, smoking, diabetes, facility, ASA class, and anesthetic type were evaluated as risk factors.

RESULTS

Among the 76,128 patients enrolled in CosmetAssure, 789 (1.0%) underwent breast augmentation with AFG, in comparison to 18,544 (24.3%) patients with implants. The incidence of any major complication in the AFG cohort and implant cohort was 3.2% and 2.3%, respectively. Infection was significantly higher in the AFG cohort (1.1% vs 0.5%). Tobacco users were more likely to have any complication, infection, and pulmonary dysfunction/hypoxia on univariate analysis. ASA Class III/IV was more likely to have any complication and infection. On multivariate analysis, smoking was an independent risk factor for any complication (relative risk = 17.1) and infection (relative risk = 20.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection and hematoma are the most common major complications in breast augmentation with AFG. Tobacco use is the only independent risk factor for overall complications and infection. Breast augmentation with AFG has a higher infection rate than augmentation with implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Comparative technical analysis of lipoaspirate mechanical processing devices

Fat grafting is a well-established procedure in reconstructive, aesthetic, and regenerative medicine, in particular due to the presence in the adipose tissue of a high concentration of mesenchymal stem cells. The need to reduce fat processing times, for an immediate clinical use and regulatory restrictions on the degree of manipulation of human tissues, has led to the development of numerous devices for the mechanical, nonenzymatic processing of adipose tissue. The aim of this study is to describe the state of the art of mechanical devices used for fat processing, performing a technical analysis of the currently commercially available devices. This should facilitate the development of new devices that improve therapeutic results.

International Expert Panel Consensus on Fat Grafting of the Breast

Background

Autologous fat grafting has broad applications in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery as a natural filler and for its regenerative purposes. Despite the widespread use of fat grafting, there remains no shared consensus on what constitutes the optimal fat grafting technique and its oncological safety. For this reason, the authors of this study have organized a Survey and an International Consensus Conference that was held at the Aesthetic Breast Meeting in Milan (December 15, 2018).

Methods

All studies on fat grafting, both for breast aesthetic and reconstructive purposes, were electronically screened. The literature review led to 17 "key questions" that were used for the Survey. The authors prepared a set of 10 "key statements" that have been discussed in a dedicated face-to-face session during the meeting.

Results

The 10 key statements addressed all the most debated topics on fat grafting of the breast. Levels of evidence for the key statements ranged from III to IV with 2 statements (20%) supported by a level of evidence III and 6 statements (60%) by level of evidence IV. Overall consensus was reached for 2 statements (20%) with >75% agreement reached for 7 statements.

Conclusions

The survey demonstrated a diversity of opinion and attitude among the panelists with regard to technique. Clear recommendations for evidence-based clinical practice for fat grafting use both in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery could not be defined due to the scarcity of level 1 or 2 studies.

Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients: Complications, Biopsy Rates, and Locoregional Cancer Recurrence Rates

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat grafting is widely used for refinements in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. However, there are few studies evaluating outcomes in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of autologous fat grafting after breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive postmastectomy patients who underwent autologous fat grafting after breast reconstruction at a university center over a 5-year period. Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, operative details, complications, incidence of palpable masses, and/or suspicious breast imaging findings requiring biopsy, and locoregional cancer recurrence. Descriptive statistics were generated.

RESULTS

Between January 2008 and July 2013, 108 women and a total of 167 breast reconstructions underwent autologous fat grafting for revision of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Their ages ranged from 22 to 71 years (mean, 48 years). Fat grafts were harvested, processed, and injected using the Coleman technique. The mean number of fat grafting procedures was 1.3 (range, 1-4) per breast. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 57 months (mean, 20.2 months). Fifty-three (31.7%) breasts underwent imaging after autologous fat grafting. Suspicious imaging findings requiring biopsy were discovered in 4 (2.4%) breasts, and clinically palpable lesions combined with suspicious imaging findings requiring biopsy were present in another 4 (2.4%) breasts. All 8 biopsies showed fat necrosis, scar, or oil cysts without evidence of malignancy. One (0.6%) local complication (a wound infection at the recipient site requiring oral antibiotics) after autologous fat grafting was reported. During the limited follow-up period, there were no locoregional cancer recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous fat grafting in conjunction with breast reconstruction resulted in a biopsy rate of 4.8%, and no cases of locoregional cancer recurrence were observed. Based on these preliminary findings, autologous fat grafting appears to be a relatively safe procedure for refinement of the reconstructed breast in postmastectomy patients.

Progressive fat necrosis after breast augmentation with autologous lipotransfer: a cause of long-lasting high Fever and axillary lymph node enlargement

Breast augmentation with autologous fat transfer has been widely practiced. However, this procedure is not exempt from complications even after technique refinement. This article aims to describe a case of long-lasting high fever, axillary node enlargement, and upper extremity dysfunction caused by liponecrosis after breast fat injection. Radiological and histological examination confirmed liponecrosis in bilateral breasts. Aspiration, drainage, and irrigation were performed along with empirical antibiotic treatment. The patient has made a full recovery from the operation. Liponecrosis, one of the complications after autologous fat grafting to the breast, may present widely different symptoms and signs. Even experienced surgeons should not underestimate it and caution should be used to maintain safety during and after the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Autologous fat grafting for cosmetic breast augmentation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation is one of the most popular aesthetic surgical procedures. The only potential alternative is autologous fat grafting (AFG), which is not new in principle. This procedure has been used on native breasts since 2009, following the recommendations of some learned societies.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review to determine the current worldwide status of fat grafting for aesthetic breast augmentation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis criteria was conducted using the PubMed, EmBASE, and Cochrane library databases. This protocol was registered at the National Institute for Health Research, Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 42 articles published between 1987 and July 2014 were included. Most of the studies had a low level of evidence, with only one level 2 study, published by Spear (2014), a prospective cohort study which included 10 patients. The publications were from North America, Europe, and Asia. The indications were aesthetic augmentation (92.4%) and congenital malformation (7.6%). Two cases of cancer were reported among the 2023 patients included (0.09%), with a mean follow-up of 22 months, although the follow-up was insufficient for medium- and long-term cancer diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

AFG seems to be a major tool in this field, but we must remain cautious about its systematization for this indication. Preoperative patient selection is essential but underreported. AFG appears particularly relevant in breast malformations. We believe that this method should be practiced within the scope of a national or international registry with proper follow-up of patients.

Breast reconstruction de novo by water-jet assisted autologous fat grafting--a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat grafting has become a frequent, simple, reproducible and low-risk technique for revisional or partial breast reconstruction. The presented European multicenter study describes an optimized treatment and follow-up protocol for the de novo breast reconstruction after total mastectomy by lipotransfer alone.

METHODS

A retrospective European multicenter trial included 135 procedures on 28 (35 breasts) postmastectomy patients (mean 52.4 years). All women were treated with the water-jet assisted fat grafting method (BEAULI™) combined with additional procedures (NAC reconstruction, contralateral mastoplasty) and evaluated with at least 6 months follow-up (mean 2.6 years). Sonography or mammography, clinical examination, patient questionnaire (10-point Likert scale) and digital photographs were carried out.

RESULTS

On average the patients received 4 to 6 procedures each with a single volume of 159 ml (±61 ml) over 21 months (range 9 months to 2.5 years). In total 1,020 ml (±515 ml) fat were grafted till a complete breast reconstruction was achieved. Irradiated patients needed a significantly higher volume than non-irradiated (p<0.041). Main treatment complications were liponecrosis (2.59%), infection (0.74%) and granuloma (0.74%). Patient satisfaction was overall high to very high (96%) and confirmed the good aesthetic results (68%) and the natural softness, contour and shape of the reconstructed breast.

CONCLUSIONS

A complete breast reconstruction with large volume fat grafting is alternatively possible to standard techniques in selected cases. It takes at least 4 to 6 lipotransfers in the course of 2 years. Patients with prior radiotherapy may require even up to 8 sessions over nearly 3 years of treatment.

Applicability and safety of autologous fat for reconstruction of the breast

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat grafting to the breast for cosmetic and reconstructive purposes is still controversial with respect to its safety and efficacy. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the clinical applicability and safety of the technique.

METHODS

An online search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and SciELO was conducted from July 1986 to June 2011. Studies included in the review were original articles of autologous liposuctioned fat grafting to the female breast, with description of clinical complications and/or radiographic changes and/or local breast cancer recurrence.

RESULTS

This review included 60 articles with 4601 patients. Thirty studies used fat grafting for augmentation and 41 for reconstructive procedures. The incidence of clinical complications, identified in 21 studies, was 3·9 per cent (117 of 3015); the majority were induration and/or palpable nodularity. Radiographic abnormalities occurred in 332 (13·0 per cent) of 2560 women (17 studies); more than half were consistent with cysts. Local recurrence of breast cancer (14 of 616, 2·3 per cent) was evaluated in three studies, of which only one was prospective.

CONCLUSION

There is broad clinical applicability of autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction. Complications were few and there was no evidence of interference with follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. Oncological safety remains unclear.