Septum-Inferior-Medial (SIM)-Based Pedicle: A Safe Pedicle with Well-Preserved Nipple Sensation for Reduction in Gigantomastia

Sensory preservation in reduction mammoplasty using the nipple-areola complex-carrying pedicle technique for gigantomastia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Gigantomastia is a disabling condition characterized by excess breast tissue. Historically, free nipple graft (FNG) has been preferred, prioritizing the nipple-areola complex (NAC) vascularity. The NAC-carrying pedicle technique, which is most commonly used in case of hypertrophy of the breast, has been suggested as a viable alternative for gigantomastia according to recent evidence, with reduced rates of NAC necrosis and improved outcomes. Nevertheless, a detailed outcome evaluation of the technique in terms of sensory preservation is currently lacking. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk of sensory loss associated with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique in cases of gigantomastia.

Methods

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search identified studies reporting postoperative sensitivity with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique in resections exceeding 1000 g of adipo-glandular tissue. Then, a proportion meta-analysis was conducted to assess the pooled rate of sensation loss through the NAC-carrying pedicle technique.

Results

Seventeen studies (843 patients, 1685 breasts) met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed an exceptionally low risk of sensory loss with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique (1.3%; 95% confidence interval: 0.7-2.0), without significant statistical heterogeneity.

Conclusion

This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of sensory preservation with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique in gigantomastia. The NAC-carrying pedicle technique emerges as the first choice, offering safety and favorable functional outcomes. Surgical caution remains crucial with the option to switch to FNG as required, ensuring patient safety and procedure success. Further research on the impact of different NAC-carrying pedicle techniques on sensory preservation is warranted.

Investigating the relationship between sensation and satisfaction in reduction mammaplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammaplasties are among the plastic surgery procedures with the highest rates of patient satisfaction. However, the loss of postoperative sensation in the breast and nipple-areolar complex remains a concern. In light of increasing interest in nerve-preservation techniques, we sought to investigate the relationship between retained sensation with overall satisfaction in reduction mammaplasty in current literature.

METHODS

The authors systematically reviewed all studies that reported postoperative sensation and satisfaction in patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty, using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus databases in October 2023. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality using an NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Meta-analyses of proportions were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 48 studies met the eligibility criteria. The median quality assessment score was 8/10. For 28 studies eligible for statistical analysis, random effects pooled proportion for patients that retained preoperative sensation was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87), and for patients that report postoperative satisfaction was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97). Overall, the studies reported a relatively wide range of sensation outcomes with consistently high satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review suggest that other surgical factors (e.g., relief of macromastia symptoms, aesthetic appearance) play a greater role in patient satisfaction compared to sensation retention in reduction mammaplasty. Wide variability in assessment methodologies for both sensation and satisfaction was noted. Standardizing and objectifying measurement techniques, particularly for sensation, will help further characterize the relationship between sensation and satisfaction in future studies.

Variability in Postoperative Nipple Sensation by Dermoglandular Pedicle in Bilateral Breast Reduction

BACKGROUND

Decreased nipple sensation following reduction mammoplasty can negatively affect a variety of patient-centered outcomes. This observational study examined the impact of dermoglandular pedicle type on subjective postoperative nipple sensation.

METHODS

A total of 178 women who underwent a bilateral reduction mammoplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2023 and completed an 11-item survey assessing subjective postoperative nipple sensitivity across various tactile modalities were included. Patient-reported nipple sensations were compared across pedicle type and subgrouped by resection volume.

RESULTS

Of the included survey respondents, 72% (128) underwent reduction with an inferior pedicle and 28% (50) with a superior or superomedial pedicle. Over 92% of patients reported the preservation of postoperative nipple sensation. Compared to the inferior pedicle, the superior pedicle cohort reported decreased nipple sensitivity to light touch (56% vs 30%, respectively) and temperature (30% vs 15%). In resection weights greater than 500 grams, the superior pedicle cohort was less satisfied with postoperative nipple sensation (84% vs. 58%), reported decreased sensation in light touch (58% vs 24%), pressure (50% vs 21%), and experienced more numbness and tingling (17% vs 1.4%) (all p-values ≤0.05).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients maintain some sensation after reduction mammoplasty; however, approximately 10% reported a relative decrease in subjective nipple sensation. Pedicle choice did not significantly affect sensory recovery in resection weights of less than 500 grams. When a greater resection weight is anticipated, the inferior pedicle may be associated with more favorable nipple sensation outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

"Toward Breast Reinnervation- What is our Endpoint" A systematic review of normal breast sensibility

BACKGROUND

To restore breast sensibility, some centers are offering nerve reconstruction as a component of implant and flap-based breast reconstruction. To interpret and contextualize the results of these procedures, it is necessary to understand the normal range of breast sensibility, the factors that affect it, and the best methods for its objective measurement.

METHODS

We conducted systematic and comprehensive searches across PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using keywords and controlled vocabulary for the concepts of the breast, nipple, areola, and measurement. The search results were imported into Rayyan QCRI for a blinded screening of titles and abstracts. Studies were evaluated for bias using RevMan 5 software. The results of sensory measurements were pooled, and a quantitative summary of breast sensibility was generated.

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles were identified, including retrospective, cross-sectional, and prospective studies. Although there were some consistent findings across studies, such that breast sensibility is inversely related to breast volume, there was wide variability in the following parameters: population, breast condition, measurement modality, anatomic areas of measurement, and sensibility findings. This heterogeneity precluded the generation of normative breast sensibility measurements. Furthermore, we detected a high degree of bias in most studies, due to self-selection of participants and failure to record patient characteristics that may alter sensibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature lacks consistent data delineating normative values for breast sensibility. Standardized measurements of healthy volunteers with various breast characteristics are necessary to elucidate normative values and interpret efforts to restore sensibility in breast reconstruction.

Three-Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty Technique in the Treatment of Greater Breast Hypertrophy Patients With or Without Breast Cancer: Surgical and Patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammoplasty (RM) is an important procedure in the management of symptomatic greater breast hypertrophy with or without early-stage breast cancer. We aim to introduce a new procedure: the three-pedicle reduction mammaplasty technique.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was reviewed, and two prospectively registered clinical studies were included of all breast hypertrophy patients with or without breast cancer who underwent three-pedicle RM with inverted T incision at West China Hospital or the Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province from 2018 to 2022. Patient demographics, patient-reported cosmetic results, quality of life (QoL), surgical outcomes and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

During a median period of 22.5 months, 101 reduction mammaplasties were performed (Mage= 35.80; MBMI= 27.05). Mean reduction weight was 880.9 g ranging from 423-1630 g per breast. The nipple-to-sternal notch distance (N-SN) at post-operation was significantly shorter than preoperatively (left, 34.51 cm; right, 34.69 cm). Major complications and minor complications were 1.9% (1/52 patients) and 13.5% (7/52 patients), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that BMI > 30 was independent risk factors for a complication. Except for sexual and physical well-being at 1-month post-operation, patients gave a higher score on the BREAST-Q (breast satisfaction, physical well-being, psychosocial well-being) after the operation than before the operation (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The three-pedicle RM technique was demonstrated to be an effective and safe RM procedure for moderate to severe breast hypertrophy patients with or without breast cancer, with the advantages of removing the lesions, reducing hypertrophic breasts and accomplishing mammoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   http://www.springer.com/00266.

The Impact of Reduction Mammaplasty on Breast Sensation: A Systematic Review

Loss of sensation is one of the most feared complications of breast reduction surgery. Although several techniques have been proposed to maximize sensitivity preservation, the scientific literature still reports contradictory findings. This systematic review aimed to assess whether breast reduction mammaplasty is associated with measurable changes in breast sensation. This review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Web of Science (Clarivate, Philadelphia, PA) databases were searched for clinical studies investigating breast sensation after breast reduction mammaplasty. The initial search identified 1523 studies of which 22 articles met our specific inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies are consistent in describing only transient sensation decrease or even sensation improvement after surgery compared to the presurgery condition with any approach, except those investigating outcomes after superior or superolateral pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Nevertheless, the overall quality of evidence is low or very low due to the limited availability of randomized controlled trials or controlled studies and the high risk of bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Narrow inferior-central septum-based pedicle: A safe technique to improve aesthetic outcomes in breast reduction

BACKGROUND

Inferior-central pedicle has some aesthetic drawbacks, including hypertrophic scar along the inframammary fold (IMF), squaring of the breast contours, and propensity to develop long-term 'bottoming-out.' This study aimed to verify if the narrow inferior-central (NIC) septum-based pedicle can allow the surgeon to improve aesthetic outcomes compared with the traditional inferior-central pedicle approach.

METHODS

Forty breasts underwent NIC-based breast reduction (group A), and 37 underwent traditional inferior-central pedicles (group B). The NIC pedicle was drawn with a width of 3.5-4.5 cm. The recorded measurements were sternal notch to nipple distance (S-N) and nipple to IMF distance (N-IMF) at the time of preoperative markings and follow-up 1, 6, and 18 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

The two groups were homogeneous regarding demographics, operative data, and preoperative S-N and N-IMF distances. Both groups showed no total or partial nipple-areola necrosis. At the 18-month follow-up, S-N (p < 0.00001) and N-IMF (p = 0.00039) distances were statistically different between the two groups, in favour of NIC group A. Changes in N-IMF distances between the 1- and 18-month visits were statistically different among groups (p < 0.0001), with a length variation of + 17.51% and + 28.46%, respectively. Patient satisfaction rate regarding "breast shape" (p = 0.021), "lower pole appearance" (p = 0.00017), and "scar" (p = 0.047) were higher in group A.

CONCLUSION

NIC-based pedicle proved to be a safe procedure and allowed us to overcome limitations that typically characterise the inferior pedicle, i.e., 'bottoming-out' deformity, hypertrophic scar of the lower pole, and squaring of the breast contours.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Double-Unit Superomedio-Central (DUS) Pedicle Inverted-T Reduction Mammaplasty in Gigantomastia: A 7-year Single-Center Retrospective Study

Introduction

Reduction mammaplasty in patients with gigantomastia is challenging. The Double-Unit technique with a Superomedio-Central pedicle and inverted-T incision is the standard technique for reduction mammaplasty in our clinic. The aim of this study was to review our approach in cases with gigantomastia in comparison with the current literature.

Patients and Methods

From 01/2011 to 12/2017, we performed 831 reduction mammaplasties in 630 patients. The Double-Unit  Superomedio-Central  (DUS) pedicle and inverted-T incision was implemented as a standard procedure for gigantomastia. Patient demographics and the outcome parameters complication rate, patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result, nipple sensibility, and surgical revision rate were obtained and retrospectively analyzed.

Results

In 37 patients, 55 reduction mammaplasties were performed with more than 1000 g per breast. Mean resection weight was 1311 g on right side and 1289 g on left side. Mean age was 52.5 years, mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m², mean sternal-notch-to-nipple distance was 38.3 cm. A free NAC graft was necessary in four breasts. Overall complication rate was 14.5%; secondary surgical revision rate was 12.7%. 91% of the patients were “very satisfied” and “satisfied” with the aesthetic result. Nipple sensibility was rated “high” and “medium” in 83%.

Conclusion

The Double-Unit technique with a Superomedio-Central pedicle and inverted-T incision is very effective to achieve volume reduction and aesthetically pleasing reproducible results with a low complication rate in cases with gigantomastia.

Level of Evidence

Level of Evidence This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02351-y.

The Anatomical Study of the Nasal Septal Cartilage with its Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Several rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction procedures require cartilage. Various studies have reported on the nasal septal cartilage as a donor site for Caucasian and Asian populations. However, studies regarding the Thai nasal septal cartilage dimensions are rare. This study aimed to examine the length, height, area, and thickness of the nasal septal cartilage, along with implications of the size and quantity of the available cartilage, for grafting in Thai cadavers.

METHODS

We analyzed the nasal septal cartilage in 42 Thai cadavers. The length, height, area, and thickness were digitally measured using ImageJ 1.52 software, along with the size and area of the available cartilage for grafting after preserving a 10-mm L-strut. Data were compared between sexes.

RESULTS

The mean height, length, and area of the nasal septal cartilage were 30.96 ± 5.90 mm, 26.13 ± 6.90 mm, and 636.10 ± 196.13 mm², respectively. The length did not differ significantly between sexes. However, the height and area in male cadavers were greater than those in female cadavers. The mean thickness ranged from 0.77 to 1.02 mm depending on the area, with the thickest and thinnest areas being the superoposterior and inferoposterior parts, respectively. The mean height, length, and area of the harvestable cartilage were 20.96 mm, 16.13 mm, and 384.84 mm², respectively, after excluding the L-strut.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide major anatomical data of the Thai nasal septal cartilage. Its implication for use of the septal cartilage for grafting is 21 mm in height and 16 mm in length, which is sufficiently safe to maintain nasal support.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Superiomedial Pedicle Breast Reduction for Gigantic Breast Hypertrophy: Experience in 341 Breasts and Suggested Safety Modifications

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammoplasty in patients with gigantic breast hypertrophy runs a high risk of complication. Traditionally, inferior pedicle reductions or free nipple grafting techniques have been recommended for gigantic breasts on the basis of measurements and expected resection weights. The superiomedial pedicle (SMP) technique has been less commonly used, due to concerns of vascular inadequacy. This study examines the outcomes of SMP in large reductions and outlines suggested modifications for enhanced safety.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent SMP breast reduction in our institution between 2005 and 2016. Included are cases with resection weights greater than 800 g.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients with 341 breasts were included. Mean sternal notch to nipple (SNN) distance was mean 35.0 ± 6.6 cm (range 23-44.5) on the left and 34.9 ± 6.6 cm (range 18-46) on the right. Mean resection weight was 1152.2 ± 368.6 g (range 810-2926) on the left and 1159.4 ± 326.6 g (range 800-2528) on the right. The total complication rate was 22.7%. Minor complications occurred in 63 (18.6%) breasts. Major complications occurred in 12 (4.1%) breasts. NAC congestion and partial necrosis occurred in 1.8% and total NAC necrosis in 0.9%.

CONCLUSION

The SMP reduction technique is a safe option for gigantic breast reduction with comparable complication rates to other techniques. Preoperative measurements or resection weights are not reliable risk factors alone. High tissue density may be a significant risk factor. High-risk breasts mandate surgical planning and should be tailored to include technical modifications as described.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Supero-Septum Pedicle Mammaplasty: A New Modification for Reduction Mammaplasty

BACKGROUND

Many techniques have been introduced for reduction mammaplasty and are utilized in diverse frequencies by different surgeons according to patient needs. Each technique is evaluated based on the aesthetic result, longevity, complication rate, and preservation of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensation.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to introduce the new modified technique of supero-septum pedicle mammaplasty (SSPM) that utilizes both the septum and superior pedicle and is suitable for macromastia and gigantomastia cases.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 60 women who underwent SSPM were evaluated in a prospective study after undergoing superior pedicle deepithelialization and resection of the inferior, lateral, and medial segments. In the lateral pillar, a tongue of tissue was preserved for fixation to the medial pectoral fascia through a window created in the superior pedicle at the third intercostal space. Finally, septum pedicle was sutured to the fascia and muscle at the upper border of the sixth rib somewhat medially. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 13 months.

RESULTS

The mean nipple-to-sternal notch (N-SN) distance was 33.05 cm, and the mean NAC elevation was 10.92 cm. Breast reductions varied from 270 to 2800 g per breast. Complications included wound dehiscence (5%), wound infection (2.5%), and partial NAC necrosis (2.5%). At 6 months postoperation, the NAC sensation was significantly better compared with preoperative values (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

SSPM is a relatively safe method of reduction mammaplasty, even for very large breasts, that leads to good aesthetic form along with preserving circulation and sensation of the NAC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Batwing mammoplasty: a safe oncoplastic technique for breast conservation in breast cancer patients with gigantomastia

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of breast cancer with gigantomastia can be challenging when planning breast conservation, as major breast reduction is required. Complex oncoplastic procedures can carry an additional surgical risk in this situation. We suggest batwing mammoplasty as a simple and safe oncoplastic procedure for those patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with gigantomastia diagnosed with breast cancer were included in this prospective cohort study. All underwent batwing mammoplasty and contralateral symmetrisation procedure between May 2016 and June 2018. Patient satisfaction assessed by the Breast-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

All patients had a body mass index above 30kg/m2 with a mean of 36.7kg/m2 (range 31.6-44.9kg/m2). The mean distance from midclavicular point to nipple was 42cm (range 38-50cm). The mean operative time was 83 minutes for procedures done by a single surgeon. Mean specimen weight was 1.2kg (ranging from 1.035-1.63kg). Postoperative complications occurred in 14.2% of patients. Nipple-areola complex viability was not compromised nor sensation impaired. The mean Breast-Q score for patient satisfaction with breasts was 68.6 (range 61-74). The mean score for physiological wellbeing was 77.3 (range 64-84) and the mean score for physical wellbeing was 35 (range 31-40).

CONCLUSION

Batwing mammoplasty is a safe and simple oncoplastic procedure in patients who have breast cancer with gigantomastia. It has short operative time and low complications rate. In our cohort of patients, there was no delay in the delivery of adjuvant treatment. The cosmetic outcome was favourable with a high patient satisfaction.

Comparison of Sensory Changes Following Superomedial and Inferior Pedicle Breast Reduction

BACKGROUND

More attention is focused on sensory outcomes following breast reduction operations. We conducted this prospective, non-randomized study to compare two commonly used breast reduction techniques, superomedial pedicle and inferior pedicle, regarding sensation of the nipple-areolar complex.

METHODS

We prospectively assigned 60 patients with macromastia into the superomedial pedicle group (SMP group, n = 30) or the inferior pedicle (IP group, n = 30) group. Six patients who withdrew from the study and another six patients who did not attend return visits were excluded. Algometry was used to measure the sensation of breast skin, cardinal points of the areola and the nipple. Two-point discrimination was also measured on the areola. Measurements were performed before surgery, at 3 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients in the SMP group and 28 patients in the IP group. The mean ages of the patients were 43.2 ± 12.7 and 45.9 ± 10.8 years, respectively (p = 0.438). The mean BMI of the patients were 32.4 ± 6.7 and 30.4 ± 5.3 kg/m², respectively (p = 0.257). The mean weights of resected tissues were 802.5 (280-2180) versus 773.7 (349.5-1425.0) g, respectively (p = 0.900). Although breast sensation did not change in the SMP group, sensation in the upper medial and lower lateral portions of breast skin was reduced in the IP group. Two-point discrimination test results did not change in either group. The amount of changes in algometry and two-point discrimination tests were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both superomedial and inferior pedicle breast reduction techniques are safe and reliable in terms of sensory changes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Combination of Würinger's Horizontal Septum and Inferior Pedicle Techniques to Increase Nipple-Areolar Complex Viability During Breast Reduction Surgery

BACKGROUND

Breast reduction techniques depend on the vascularity of the pedicle. Preserving vascularity of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is mandatory for reduction mammoplasties, as the NAC is the most important aesthetic and functional unit of the breast. The inferior pedicle technique is the most common method for breast reduction; however, pedicle length may increase after using this technique and cause problems related to NAC viability in gigantomastic and hypertrophic breasts. In this study, we present our technical approach to preserve NAC viability by combining Würinger's horizontal septum and inferior pedicle techniques.

METHODS

This study included 60 women (mean age 39.71 ± 10.52 years) who underwent a breast reduction combining Würinger's horizontal septum and inferior pedicle procedures from April 2012 to January 2016. All patients were marked preoperatively in a standing upright position using a prefabricated Wise-pattern template. The base of the pedicle was marked at the level of the inframammary ridge at a width of 8 cm.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 5.6 ± 3.3 months. The resection weights of the right and left sides were 1406 ± 566 and 1340 ± 563 g, respectively. Venous insufficiency was encountered in five cases (8.3%) and caused partial NAC necrosis in one case (1.6%). No cases of total NAC necrosis were encountered. Fifteen breasts (12.5%) were described as gigantomastic (resection weight >2000 g).

CONCLUSIONS

This combined method may promote safer and more satisfying outcomes from inferior pedicle breast reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Septum-Enhanced Mammaplasty in Inferocentral Pedicled Breast Reduction for Macromastia and Gigantomastia Patients

BACKGROUND

Inferior pedicle and free nipple grafting are commonly used as breast reduction techniques for patients with breast hypertrophy and gigantomastia. Limitations of these techniques are, respectively, possible vascular compromise and total/partial necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). The authors describe the innovative inferocentral pedicled reduction mammaplasty (ICPBR) enhanced by preservation of Würinger's septum for severe hypertrophic breasts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 287 breast reductions performed between January 2001 and 2015, 83 (28.9%) macromastia and gigantomastia patients met the inclusion criteria (breast volume resection ≥400 g-sternal notch-to-nipple distance ≥33 cm) and were included in the study. Patients were stratified according to pedicle type: Group A (51 patients) underwent ICPBR with Würinger's septum preservation; group B (32 patients) underwent IPBR. Groups were compared for NAC vascular complications, surgical revisions, wound-healing period and patient satisfaction at a minimum 6-month follow-up assessed by a five-category questionnaire (breast size, shape, symmetry, texture and scars appearance), with five Likert subscales (1 = poor to 5 = excellent). Descriptive statistics were reported, and comparisons of performance endpoints between groups were performed using Chi-squared, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests, with p value <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Group A and group B had, respectively, a mean age of 48.3 ± 12.4 and 50.1 ± 11.7 years, mean BMI of 23.8 and 24.6, mean weight resected of 560 ± 232 g and 590 ± 195 g, mean sternal notch-to-nipple distance of 35.1 and 34.3 cm, average nipple elevation of 9.7 and 9.5 cm. Among group A and group B, NAC complication rates were, respectively, 6.2 and 24.2% (p = 0.03), surgical revision rates were 33.3 and 60% (p = 1.00), healing time was 15.90 ± 3.2 and 19.03 ± 5.9 days (p = 0.002), and mean patient satisfaction scores were 19.9 ± 2.6 and 18.7 ± 3.4 (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICPBR technique enhanced by Würinger's septum preservation was found to be a reproducible and effective procedure for hypertrophic breasted and gigantomastia patients, improving the reliability of the vascular supply to the inferior-central pedicle. The authors do believe this procedure should be regarded as an innovative and safe option giving optimal aesthetic outcomes in this demanding group of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .