Proper Skin Management in Breast Augmentation with a Periareolar Incision Prevents Implant Contamination and Biofilm-Related Capsular Contracture

A new type of dual-plane breast augmentation: Redefining parenchyma-muscle interface in high mobile glandular ptotic breast

BACKGROUND

High mobile glandular ptotic breasts present the greatest challenge for implant breast augmentation with suboptimal outcomes occurring frequently. Here, we describe and evaluate an innovative approach for breast augmentation in this breast type. By widely disrupting and redefining the parenchyma-muscle interface, this technique offers opportunities to restore the takeoff point of the breast and improve the fullness of the upper pole, thus producing a "perkier" breast appearance.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed, and 68 patients who underwent breast augmentation with either type III dual-plane or the new approach between January 2015 and January 2021 were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated using different 10-point rating forms. Data on demographic information, surgical details, and relative complication rates were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Upon comparing the aesthetic outcomes and satisfaction, the test group demonstrated better breast shape, nipple-areola position, upper pole contour outcome, and upper pole satisfaction. No post-operative hematoma, seroma, or infection occurred in either groups. No double-bubble deformity occurred in the test group, whereas it occurred in two patients in the control group. The rates of capsular contracture were 1.4% and 1.6%, in the test and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The new approach is a safe surgical method with good aesthetic outcome, high patient satisfaction, and long-lasting result. This approach is a supplement to the dual-plane techniques, to realize the benefits of mastopexy and type III dual-plane breast augmentation.

Microbiologic Profile of Nipple Swab Culture and its Association With Postoperative Complications in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In breast surgeries, a lactiferous duct leading to lactic glands of breast parenchyma allows direct contamination by normal bacterial flora of the nipple-areola complex. Complete blockage of nipple flora from the intraoperative field is almost impossible.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyze the microbiological profile of nipple flora of breast cancer patients who underwent an implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after a total mastectomy, and to evaluate the association of nipple bacterial flora with postoperative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent an implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after a total mastectomy. A nipple swab culture was performed preoperatively. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and complications were compared between positive and negative nipple swab culture groups. Microbiological profile data including antibacterial resistance were collected.

RESULTS

Among 128 breasts, 60 cases (46.9%) had positive preoperative nipple swab culture results. Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for 41.4% of microorganisms isolated. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of postoperative complications revealed that the presence of nipple bacterial flora was a risk factor for capsular contracture. Seven cases of postoperative infection were analyzed. In 2 cases (40% of pathogen-proven infection), the causative pathogen matched the patient's nipple bacterial flora, which was methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis in both cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Nipple bacterial flora was associated with an increased risk of capsular contracture. Preoperative analysis of nipple bacterial flora can be an informative source for treating clinically diagnosed postoperative infections. More studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of active antibiotic decolonization of the nipple.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Biofilm formation is a risk factor for late and delayed complications of filler injection

Introduction

Biofilm formation is a major cause of delayed-graft complications. Similarly to implants, dermal fillers carry the risk of biofilm formation, which can lead to the development of nodules, chronic inflammatory reactions, abscesses and other complications. In this study, we investigated the late or delayed complications associated with biofilm formation on dermal fillers.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed all cases of complications caused by filler injections at a single center between January 2017 and December 2022, the majority of which comprised nodule formation and chronic persistent inflammatory reactions. The risk of biofilm formation with fillers was summarized and analyzed based on the results of bacterial culture and pathological examination.

Results

Sixty-one patients were enrolled, including 42 cases of nodule formation, 15 of chronic inflammatory reactions, and 4 of active infection. Bacterial culture of the tissue samples obtained from seven patients after surgical treatment were positive, and comprised four cases of Staphylococcus aureus, one case of Staphylococcus epidermidis, one case of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and one case of Mycobacterium abscessus. The corresponding histopathological results indicated extensive mononuclear lymphocyte infiltration, with a giant cell reaction in the fibrous connective tissue.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that biofilm formation is a significant risk factor for late and delayed complications following filler injection, and is caused by the contamination of resident bacteria and recessive infection at the injection site.

Introduction of Breast Implants through the Abdominal Route: Analysis of a Cohort

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous breast reshaping and abdominoplasty offer patients the opportunity to undergo body reshaping in a single surgical session involving one anesthesia induction and one incision. In Latin America, abdominal implant placement is an infrequently used technique, likely because there is little evidence on its efficacy and safety. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of implant placement through the abdominal route.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was analyzed, including 350 records of patients who underwent abdominal breast implants from 2013 to 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The procedure was performed under epidural anesthesia.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications were reported. After a minimum 12-month follow-up, complications were detected in 5% of cases; the most frequent was asymmetry (4.6%), followed by abdominal migration and one case of symmastia. During the follow-up period, no capsular contracture was detected in any case. A satisfaction percentage of 98.1% was obtained. The only independent factor associated with complications was distance from the sternal notch to the nipple-areola complex greater than 21 cm.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, mammaplasty with abdominal implant placement was an effective and safe procedure, with reduced risk of infection or capsular contracture and no scarring in or near the breasts for patients with properly selected comorbidities.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Practice Patterns in Primary Breast Augmentation: A 16-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND

As part of the continuous certification process, the American Board of Plastic Surgery collects case data for specific tracer procedures in aesthetic surgery to assess practice improvement by the diplomates. These case-based data provide valuable information on national trends in clinical practice. The current study was performed to analyze practice patterns in aesthetic primary breast augmentation.

METHODS

Breast augmentation tracer data were reviewed from 2005 to 2021 and grouped into an early cohort (EC), from 2005 through 2014, and a recent cohort (RC), from 2015 through 2021. Fisher exact tests and two-sample t tests compared demographic characteristics of the patients, surgical techniques, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Patients in the RC were slightly older (34 versus 35 years; P < 0.001), more likely to have ptosis greater than 22 cm (20% versus 23%; P < 0.0001), less likely to smoke (12% versus 8%; P < 0.0001), and less likely to undergo a preoperative mammogram (29% versus 24%; P < 0.0001). From a technical standpoint, inframammary incisions have become more common (68% versus 80%; P < 0.0001), whereas periareolar incision use has decreased (24% versus 14%; P < 0.0001). Submuscular plane placement has increased (22% versus 56%; P < 0.0001), while subglandular placement has decreased (19% versus 7%; P < 0.0001). Silicone implants are most popular (58% versus 82%; P < 0.0001). Textured implant use increased from 2011 (2%) to 2016 (16%), followed by a sharp decline to 0% by 2021. Trends follow U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals and warnings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights evolving trends in aesthetic breast augmentation over the past 16 years. The most common technique remains a smooth silicone prosthesis placed in the subpectoral plane through an inframammary incision.