Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines in Chinese Patients: A Pivotal, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind and Open-Label Phase Study

Efficacy and Safety of a Newly Developed Botulinum Toxin A (MBA-P01) in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center, Phase III Study with a Subgroup Analysis on Patients with COVID-19

MBA-P01 is a newly developed botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) product designed to provide similar clinical effects as OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A), thereby providing an alternative treatment option for glabellar lines. It is another holotoxin preparation containing BoNT-A1. This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center, Phase III clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBA-P01 compared with OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A). In total, 318 participants were enrolled and received 20 units of MBA-P01 or ONA-BoNT-A on the forehead and glabella. At the 4-week assessment, the primary endpoint revealed no significant difference in the improvement rate of glabellar wrinkles between the two groups, confirming the non-inferiority of MBA-P01 to ONA-BoNT-A. Furthermore, some evaluation variables showed higher improvement rates for MBA-P01 than for ONA-BoNT-A. Adverse reactions and other safety analysis results were considered acceptable. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis of patients with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) showed that the duration of BoNT-A treatment was shorter among those who contracted COVID-19 after BoNT-A treatment compared with those who have not. The limitations of this study include the predominance of female participants and the exclusive enrollment of Korean patients. MBA-P01 is expected to be clinically useful in terms of the efficient and safe reduction of glabellar wrinkles, which will provide patients with additional treatment options.

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for injection to treat moderate or severe glabellar lines: A randomized, multicenter, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in China

BACKGROUND

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for injection (DAXI), a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation, is FDA-approved for glabellar lines treatment. Its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in two Phase III trials (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate DAXI efficacy and safety in Chinese adults with moderate/severe glabellar lines.

METHODS

In this Phase III, randomized (2:1), double-blind trial, Chinese adults with moderate/severe glabellar lines received 40 U DAXI or placebo into the corrugator muscles bilaterally and the procerus. Glabellar line severity was evaluated by investigators (Investigator Global Assessment-Frown Wrinkle Severity [IGA-FWS] scale) and participants (Patient Frown Wrinkle Severity [PFWS] scale) for ≥24 to 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of 2-point composite responders achieving ≥2-point reduction in IGA-FWS and PFWS scores at week 4 post-treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 307 participants received treatment (DAXI, 205; placebo, 102). A significantly greater proportion of participants in the DAXI arm vs the placebo arm achieved a 2-point composite response at week 4: 125 (61.0%) vs 1 (1.0%); difference, 60.0% [95% CI 49.40-66.46]; 2-sided p < 0.0001). At week 4, 94.1% of the DAXI-treated participants achieved an IGA-FWS score 0/1 (none/mild) and 86.3% achieved PFWS 0/1; median time to loss of none/mild on IGA-FWS and PFWS was 23.9 weeks. The benefits of DAXI over placebo through week 24 occurred regardless of the baseline IGA-FWS score, prior botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) exposure, sex or age. DAXI was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSION

DAXI provided durable efficacy and acceptable safety for treating moderate/severe glabellar lines in Chinese participants.

Neuromodulators in Skin of Color: An International Review

BACKGROUND

As the racial/ethnic diversity of the US population grows, it is imperative for dermatologists to recognize the nuances in the aesthetic treatment of diverse populations.

OBJECTIVE

This comprehensive review explores the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in skin of color (SOC) populations and highlights variations in aging patterns, skin properties, and aesthetic concerns in SOC populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of PubMed/MEDLINE databases from 2004 to 2024 was performed using combinations of the terms botulinum toxin, SOC, Fitzpatrick, race/ethnicity, and Asian, Latin American, Caribbean, Middle Eastern, African, and Pacific countries.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles examining the use of BTX-A in SOC populations were identified. Twelve studies were from East Asia, 5 from the United States and/or Canada, 3 from South Asia/Southeast Asia, 2 from South America, and 1 from the Middle East. Available data suggest that BTX-A is efficacious and well tolerated in SOC populations.

CONCLUSION

Increased SOC representation in clinical trials may guide the development of tailored treatment approaches to optimize aesthetic outcomes for patients with SOC. A comprehensive knowledge of the variations in aging patterns, skin properties, and aesthetic concerns across SOC populations is essential for providing culturally sensitive cosmetic dermatologic care for diverse populations.

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) and ABO solution for injection (ASI) for treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines.

METHODS

The EMBASE, PubMed, and web of science databases were systematically searched. Methodological quality was checked using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We also performed statistical analyses using Stata software to examine the efficacy and safety of ABO.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that at maximum frown, the proportion of responders as measured by the investigator's live assessment and subject's self-assessment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines were significantly higher in the ABO and ASI treatment groups than in the placebo group. In addition, from baseline to maximum frown, the ≥1-grade improvement rate in moderate-to-severe glabellar lines severity was also significantly higher in the ABO and ASI treatment groups than in the placebo group. No significant differences in adverse events were found between ABO, ASI and placebo groups, indicating that ABO and ASI have good safety.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO and ASI are effective and safe options for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. More high-quality studies are needed to verify these conclusions.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Botox Application and Iatrogenic Botulism: Panacea or Peril?

Clostridium botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) creates temporary paralysis in the muscles by acting on the muscle-nerve junction. It is injected into the mimic muscles when a decrease in the movements of the mimic muscles is desired. Despite many favorable applications, the use of BoNT-A is not without drawbacks. Although there is no expected serious side effect on health in BoNT-A treatments, various problems can be encountered in patients treated for aesthetic purposes. Botulism is a rare but potentially life-threatening syndrome, which is caused by the toxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum, which acts on the nervous system, vegetative forms of C. botulinum can only survive in anaerobic conditions, while spore forms are common in nature and can withstand harsh conditions. Botulism can stem from bacterial spores which release toxin in the body; in the form of enteric botulism, and wound botulism. The cases that develop 'iatrogenic botulism' after such procedures are usually those receiving high-dose toxin for therapeutic purposes. The treatment of botulism mainly consists of anti-toxin therapy and, if necessary, intensive care to prevent organ failures, including respiratory support. This article aims to cover all these issues related to botulism and other adverse outcomes related to BoNT-A injection in light of the most recent literature.