1
|
Stanek LW, Cascio WE, Barzyk TM, Breen MS, DeLuca NM, Griffin SM, Melnyk LJ, Minucci JM, Thomas KW, Tulve NS, Weaver CP, Cohen Hubal EA. Environmental public health research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A blueprint for exposure science in a connected world. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2024:10.1038/s41370-024-00720-8. [PMID: 39550492 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-024-00720-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
Exposure science plays an essential role in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) mission to protect human health and the environment. The U.S. EPA's Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA) within the Office of Research and Development (ORD) provides the exposure science needed to characterize the multifaceted relationships between people and their surroundings in support of national, regional, local and individual-level actions. Furthermore, exposure science research must position its enterprise to tackle the most pressing public health challenges in an ever-changing environment. These challenges include understanding and confronting complex human disease etiologies, disparities in the social environment, and system-level changes in the physical environment. Solutions will sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. Our objectives for this paper are to review the role of CPHEA exposure science research in various recent decision-making contexts, to present current challenges facing U.S. EPA and the larger exposure science field, and to provide illustrative case examples where CPHEA exposure science is demonstrating the latest methodologies at the intersection of these two motivations. This blueprint provides a foundation for applying exposomic tools and approaches to holistically understand real-world exposures so optimal environmental public health protective actions can be realized within the broader context of a One Health framework. IMPACT STATEMENT: The U.S. EPA's Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment exposure research priorities reside at the intersection of environmental decision contexts and broad public health challenges. The blueprint provides a foundation for advancing the tools and approaches to holistically understand real-world exposures so optimal environmental protection actions can be realized. A One Health lens can help shape exposure research for maximum impact to support solutions that are transdisciplinary and must engage multiple sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay W Stanek
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA.
| | - Wayne E Cascio
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Timothy M Barzyk
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Michael S Breen
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Nicole M DeLuca
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
- Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Shannon M Griffin
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, 45268, USA
| | - Lisa Jo Melnyk
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, 45268, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Minucci
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Kent W Thomas
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Nicolle S Tulve
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Christopher P Weaver
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| | - Elaine A Cohen Hubal
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27707, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qamar W, Qayum M, Nisa WU, Khaleeq N, Ali A. Promoting transdisciplinary collaboration in academia: uniting for climate-resilient health. FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE 2024; 6. [DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2024.1304643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2024]
Abstract
In a world where some regions are directly experiencing the effects of the climate change, while others are more vulnerable; this article dives into the deep and frequently catastrophic impact of the climate change on vulnerable countries. This review emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary academic collaboration, including social scientists, healthcare professionals, engineers, policy experts, and climate scientists, and underscores academia’s potential role in advancing climate-resilient health systems in these areas. The study promotes inclusive research that prioritizes at-risk groups, involves communities, and supports culturally sensible methodologies. Beyond their traditional tasks, academia has an obligation for action, learning, innovation, and change. To address the complex health concerns brought on by the planetary crisis, collaboration across academic fields and in tandem with communities, governments, and international organizations is crucial. Ongoing collaboration between academia, governments, and stakeholders is crucial to developing healthcare systems and technologies that are climate resilient. The complex role of academia involves developing pioneering solutions in healthcare for a sustainable future, advocating for policies based on evidence, and educating the next generation of professionals.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tong R, Zhang B. Cumulative risk assessment for combinations of environmental and psychosocial stressors: A systematic review. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 2024; 20:602-615. [PMID: 37526127 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
With the growing awareness of stressors, cumulative risk assessment (CRA) has been proposed as a potential method to evaluate possible additive and synergistic effects of multiple stressors on human health, thus informing environmental regulation and protecting public health. However, CRA is still in its exploratory stage due to the lack of generally accepted quantitative approaches. It is an ideal time to summarize the existing progress to guide future research. To this end, a systematic review of the literature on CRA issues dealing with combinations of environmental and psychosocial stressors was conducted in this study. Using typology and bibliometric analysis, the body of knowledge, hot topics, and research gaps in this field were characterized. It was found that research topics and objectives mainly focus on qualitative analysis and community settings; more attention should be paid to the development of quantitative approaches and the inclusion of occupational settings. Further, the roles of air pollution and vulnerability factors in CRA have attracted the most attention. This study concludes with views on future prospects to promote theoretical and practical development in this field; specifically, CRA is a multifaceted topic that requires substantial collaborations with various stakeholders and substantial knowledge from multidisciplinary fields. This study presents an overall review as well as research directions worth investigating in this field, which provides a historical reference for future study. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:602-615. © 2023 SETAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruipeng Tong
- School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Boling Zhang
- School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Greenhouse gas emissions are increasing global warming significantly, hence the need for manufacturing companies to include sustainability strategies in their supply chain to reduce emissions generated by their operations. This article aims to provide a systematic literature review on integrating sustainability issues into inventory management models to support scholars and practitioners in decision-making processes according to their market requirements. Thus, this paper discusses the most relevant papers published on inventory management topics that consider environmental criteria such as greenhouse gas emissions, ecological quality controls, unsold inventory, and fixed carbon costs. Therefore, we have extended the literature review to incorporate sustainability considerations in inventory models involving an industry’s environmental and social effects. As a result, in this article, a detailed analysis of the existing literature and related weaknesses provide meaningful discussions on crucial issues for future field research avenues in the field.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nicholas PK, Breakey S, McKinnon S, Eddy EZ, Fanuele J, Starodub R. A CLIMATE: A Tool for Assessment of Climate-Change-Related Health Consequences in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Nurs 2020; 47:532-542.e1. [PMID: 33280889 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is an urgent public health problem that has looming implications and associated deleterious health consequences. The intersection of climate change and health has broad implications for health professionals in a variety of settings but especially for ED settings. Climate change is already affecting human health and health systems-which includes impacts on ED care. Disaster response and emergency preparedness are critically important public health interventions in our climate-changing world, and the contributions of emergency nurses are essential. Disaster preparedness, environmental emergency response, and health emergency management are important elements of emergency nursing and are explicated in Sheehy's Emergency Nursing Principles and Practices, 7th Edition. The purpose of this article is to present an overview of a clinical tool and mnemonic, A CLIMATE, developed by the authors with application to a case review. It is imperative that the nursing profession-particularly emergency clinicians-address the intersection of climate and health to engage in the assessment, intervention, management, evaluation, education, and referral of those who present to emergency departments with potential climate-related health impacts.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Lei X, Long R, Zhao J. Green Credit, Financial Constraint, and Capital Investment: Evidence from China's Energy-intensive Enterprises. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2020; 66:1059-1071. [PMID: 32793991 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01346-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The green credit policy is an important green financial tool that can achieve the win-win scenario with economic development and environmental protection through the reasonable allocation of credit resources. Using the green credit guidelines (GCGs) in China as a quasi-natural experiment, this study explored the impacts of the green credit policy on the capital investment of energy-intensive enterprises in a difference-in-differences framework and established the mediation effect model to analyze the mechanisms. The empirical results showed that the capital investment of energy-intensive enterprises was significantly reduced after the promulgation of the GCGs. Considering the intermediary paths along with the green credit policy on energy-intensive investment through financial constraints, the total bank loans and long-term bank loans played partial intermediary roles, whereas the short-term bank loans as mediator variable showed no significant intermediary effect. The findings of this study illustrated that the green credit policy has been well implemented and promoted in China. It inhibited energy-intensive investment, which is of great significance to improving the efficiency of resource utilization and promoting green and low-carbon development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanli Wang
- School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Xiaodong Lei
- School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Ruyin Long
- School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, PR China.
| | - Jingjing Zhao
- School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|