Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomies: an 11-year population-based study

PURPOSE

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) result in major morbidity and incidental mortality. There is a lack of unselected population-based cross-sectional studies on the incidence, management, and outcomes of BDI. We hypothesised that due to improved imaging capabilities and collective laparoscopic experience, BDI incidence will decrease over the study period and compare favourably with contemporary literature.

METHODS

After IRB approval, all cholecystectomies performed at national public healthcare facilities between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. BDIs were classified according to the Strasberg classification. The follow-up period ranged from 36 to 156 months.

RESULTS

A total of 241 BDIs of 29,739 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) resulted in overall, minor, and major BDI incidence rates of 0.81%, 0.68%, and 0.13%, respectively. No significant decline in the BDIs was noted during the study period. Drainage in 66 (42.6%) and cases ERCP stent placement in 65 (41.9%) cases were equally used in Strasberg A lesions. Suture over T-tube in 20 (42.6%) and ERCP stenting in 19 (40.4%) cases were used in Strasberg D lesions. Roux-en-Y hepatojejunostomy (RYHJ) was performed in 30 (88.9%) of Strasberg E lesions. There were 27 (11.2%) patients with long-term bile duct strictures after BDI management. The overall mortality rate of BDIs and subsequent complications was 4.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The annual incidence of iatrogenic bile duct injury over an 11-years' time after laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not decline significantly. We noted an overall BDI incidence of 0.81% comprising of 0.68% minor and 0.13% of major lesions. The management of injuries met contemporary guidelines with comparable outcomes.

Detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Cholecystectomy represents one of the most performed surgical procedures. Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are a dangerous complication of this intervention. With the advent of the laparoscopy, the rate of BDIs showed a growing trend that was partially justified by the learning curve of this technique.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was conducted on Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published up to October 2022 that analyzed the intraoperative detection and management of BDIs diagnosed during cholecystectomy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

According to the literature, approximately 25% of BDIs is diagnosed during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the clinical suspicion of BDI, an intraoperative cholangiography is performed to confirm it. Complimentary technology, such as near-infrared cholangiography, can be also adopted. Intraoperative ultrasound represents a useful tool to furtherly define the biliary and the vascular anatomy. The proper classification of the type of BDI allows to identify the correct treatment. When a good expertise in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery is available, a direct repair is performed with good outcomes both in case of simple and complex lesions. When the local resources are limited or there is a lack of dedicated surgical experience, patient referral to a reference center shows better outcomes. In particular, complex vasculo-biliary injuries require a highly specialized treatment. The key elements to transfer the patients are a good documentation of the injury, a proper drainage of the abdomen, and an antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

BDI management requires a proper diagnostic process and prompt treatment to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this feared complication occurring during cholecystectomy.

Initial management of suspected biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Although rare, iatrogenic bile duct injury (BDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be devastating to the patient. The cornerstones for the initial management of BDI are early recognition, followed by modern imaging and evaluation of injury severity. Tertiary hepato-biliary centre care with a multi-disciplinary approach is crucial. The diagnostics of BDI commences with a multi-phase abdominal computed tomography scan, and when the biloma is drained or a surgical drain is put in place, the diagnosis is set with the help of bile drain output. To visualize the leak site and biliary anatomy, the diagnostics is supplemented with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The location and severity of the bile duct lesion and concomitant injuries to the hepatic vascular system are evaluated. Most often, a combination of percutaneous and endoscopic methods is used for control of contamination and bile leak. Generally, the next step is endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for downstream control of the bile leak. ERC with insertion of a stent is the treatment of choice in most mild bile leaks. The surgical option of re-operation and its timing should be discussed in cases where an endoscopic and percutaneous approach is not sufficient. The patient's failure to recover properly in the first days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy should immediately raise suspicion of BDI and this merits immediate investigation. Early consultation and referral to a dedicated hepato-biliary unit are essential for the best outcome.

Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons

BACKGROUND

Obtaining a clear Critical View of Safety helps prevent bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which can be improved with a structured Safe Critical View of Safety curriculum. We aimed to determine whether the improvement in obtaining Critical View of Safety postcurriculum is retained long-term.

METHODS

A safe Critical View of Safety curriculum was previously implemented for all surgeons who perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a regional health system. Recordings of laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases were collected 1 year after completion of the curriculum, deidentified and randomly ordered, and then graded by 2 blinded expert surgeons using a 6-point Critical View of Safety assessment tool.

RESULTS

A total of 12 surgeons with average experience of 17.9 ± 6.3 years in practice participated in the study. The majority (83%) had performed >700 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and 4 surgeons (33%) reported 2 or more bile duct injuries in their career. Controlling for gallbladder pathology, Critical View of Safety scores improved from 1.7 ± 0.4 to 4.0 ± 0.4 (P < .001) immediately after completion of the curriculum. However, there was a small decrease in Critical View of Safety score after 1 year (3.2 ± 0.3 from 4.0 ± 0.4, P = .055), while still significantly higher compared to precurriculum (3.2 ± 0.3 vs 1.7 ± 0.4, P < .001). Acute care surgeons had lower Critical View of Safety retention scores compared to general surgeons (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.3 ± 0.4, P = .01) and minimally invasive surgeons (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.8 ± 0.5, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

A structured curriculum helped improve practicing surgeons' attainment of obtaining the Critical View of Safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, this improvement decreased after 1 year, suggesting some decay in knowledge retention over time. Therefore, continued educational interventions on Critical View of Safety and safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be needed to enhance long-term retention.

Which Is More Effective: Laparoscopic or Open Partial Cholecystectomy?

Objective: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, partial cholecystectomy is usually preferred when the anatomic exploration is not enough to prevent bile duct injury and other complications. Some surgeons choose laparoscopically to perform partial cholecystectomy, whereas others convert to open surgery. In this study, we aim to discuss and compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) and open partial cholecystectomy (OPC). Materials and Methods: The data of 4712 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed. A total of 98 patients who had partial cholecystectomy were included in the study. Patients were examined in two groups according to whether the procedure was open or laparoscopic. The first group of patients was named the OPC group (n = 52), and the second group of patients was the LPC group (n = 46). The data of the two groups were comparatively analyzed. Results: The mean operative time and the postoperative hospital stay, respectively, were 118.2 minutes and 4.8 days in the OPC group, and 87.3 minutes and 2.55 days in the LPC group (P < .005 and P = .005). It was found that wound infection decreased by 83.1% (P = .026; odds ratio [OR] = 0.169) in the LPC group compared with the OPC group, and the probability of developing incisional hernia decreased by 81.1% (P = .014; OR = 0.189). At least one complication was observed in 17 patients in the OPC group and in 7 patients in the LPC group (P = .045). The probability of developing complications in any patient was 63% lower in the LPC group (P = .049; OR = 0.370). Conclusions: The indications that cause the surgeon to perform partial cholecystectomy are inherently open to complications, regardless of the surgical technique used. However, the laparoscopic operation has advantages such as shorter operation time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, lower risk of wound infection and incisional hernia rate, and lower complication rate than the open procedure. However, if the team performing the surgery does not have enough experience, they should never hesitate to switch to open cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic Ultrasound and Safe Navigation Around the Shrunken Gallbladder

Background: The contracted gallbladder may predispose to a higher rate of biliary or vasculobiliary injury (VBI). It is usually associated with unclear anatomy due to chronic inflammation and fibrosis in the hepatoduodenal ligament region. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) can very effectively delineate anatomical conditions during cholecystectomy. Our study aimed to compare the visual and ultrasonographic navigation around the shrunken gallbladder. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 612 patients qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The shrunken gallbladder was diagnosed intraoperatively in 13 patients (2.1%). In 6 patients, the only intraoperative navigation method was a visual evaluation of anatomical conditions, and in 7 patients, the method was LUS. Results: The operating time and the length of hospital stay after surgery were significantly lower, the number of conversions was insignificantly lower, and the number of successful visualization of anatomical conditions was significantly higher in the LUS group. We did not observe any bile duct and VBI in patients with the shrunken gallbladder. Conclusions: The combination of the fundus-first and subtotal cholecystectomy with LUS navigation might be an effective proposal when coming across the shrunken gallbladder.

Management of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries without operative mortality at Jakarta tertiary hospital in Indonesia - A cross-sectional study

Background

Bile duct injuries (BDI) can occur after a cholecystectomy procedure performed by any surgeons. These ensured a poor experience for patients and surgeons and marred the minimally invasive surgery approach, which should have promised rapid recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the management of BDI following cholecystectomy procedure in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, as a tertiary hospital.

Method

Descriptive retrospective cross-sectional design was used on open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed between January 2008 and December 2018. This study is reported in line with STROCSS 2019 Criteria.

Result

A total of 24 patients with BDI were included, with female preponderance (62,5%) with a median age 45 (21–58) years. Sixteen post-laparoscopy cases were classified according to Strasberg classification; 6 cases were type E3, 2 cases each of type E1 and E2, and one case each of Strasberg C and D. The remaining 4 were Strasberg A. Eight post-open cases were classified based on Bismuth criteria: 4 cases of Bismuth I, 1 case of Bismuth II, and 3 cases of Bismuth III. Five cases were presented with massive biloma, 7 with jaundice, and 10 cases with biliary-pancreatic fluid production through the surgical drain. The average time of problem recognition to patient's admission was 19 (7–152) days and admission to surgery was 14 days. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in 18 cases, choledocho-duodenostomy in 2 cases, and primary ligation cystic duct in 4 cases. Post-operative follow-up showed 2 patients had recurrent cholangitis, 2 superficial surgical site infection, and 2 relaparotomy due to bile anastomosis leakage and burst abdomen. The median length of hospital stay was 38 (14–53) days with zero hospital mortality. No stricture detected in long term follow-up.

Conclusion

Common bile duct was the most frequent site of BDI, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy reconstruction performed by HPB surgeons on high volume center results in a good outcome.

•

The common bile duct was the most frequent site of BDI

•

Reconstruction of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy side-to-side by HPB surgeons on high volume center results in a good outcome with zero operative mortality

•

One third of BDI cases referred to our center occurred after open approach. This data can be used as an information for evaluation of General Surgery Training Program in order to improve learning curve thus reduce rate of iatrogenic injury in open cholecystectomy

•

Delay of treatment and reconstruction mostly in intermediate phase (2–12 weeks after event) can be advantageous for patients with optimal preoperative support.

•

It is essential to evaluate the surgical difficulty appropriately and standardize treatment strategies to reduce serious complications.

Bile Duct Injuries during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Management and Outcome

The aim of this study is to analyze our experience with the management of bile duct injuries (BDIs) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). From 1996 to 2004, 21 patients with BDI after LC were treated in our department. The BDIs were graded according to the classification of Strasberg. Ten patients had minor BDI. Minor injuries were classified as A in six and D in four patients. In three patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy and stent placement was adequate treatment. Six patients required laparotomy and bile duct ligation or suturing, and one patient underwent laparoscopy with additional ligation of a duct of Luschka. Eleven patients had major BDIs. These injuries were classified as E1 in two, E2 in three, E3 in four, and E4 in two patients. Among the patients with a major BDI, Roux- en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed. After a median follow-up of 69.45 months, no evidence of biliary disease has been detected among our patients. BDIs should be managed in a specialist unit where surgeons skilled to perform such repairs should undertake definitive treatment. Roux- en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is the procedure of choice in the management of major BDIs as it is accompanied by satisfactory results.

Excision of a part of the bile duct as an iatrogenic injury typical for laparoscopic cholecystectomy - characteristics, treatment and long-term results, based on own material

Introduction

Cholecystectomy is associated with the risk of bile duct injury (BDI). The nature of the injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) cases seems to be more serious.

Aim

We present an analysis of long-term results of the treatment of patients who underwent operations at our department due to iatrogenic excision of a part of the bile duct (EPBD).

Material and methods

Out of all 120 patients treated for BDI in our department we selected a group of 40 with EPBD. In all cases the corrective operation was hepaticojejunostomy. The median follow-up time was 157 (56–249) months. We evaluated risk factors for EPBD during LC compared to open cholecystectomy (OC).

Results

Among bile duct injuries referred to our centre, EPBD occurred more frequently during LC (46.7%) compared to OC (11%), p < 0.001. Injuries located in the hepatic hilum occurred more often in the case of LC (68.6%) than OC (20%), p = 0.056. We did not find a difference in the frequency of EPBD between LC and OC groups depending on the presence of acute or chronic cholecystitis. The narrow common hepatic duct was reported more frequently in the LC (68.6%) vs. OC (20%) group, p = 0.056. Satisfactory long-term reconstructive treatment results were observed in 36 (90%) of 40 patients.

Conclusions

Excision of a part of the bile duct occurs more often during LC than OC. It is often located in the hepatic hilum. Presence of a narrow common hepatic duct is a risk factor for EPBD during LC. Large diameter hepaticojejunostomy is a reconstructive procedure that promises good long-term results.

Current practices and future prospects for the management of gallbladder polyps: A topical review

A gallbladder polyp is an elevation of the gallbladder mucosa that protrudes into the gallbladder lumen. Gallbladder polyps have an estimated prevalence in adults of between 0.3%-12.3%. However, only 5% of polyps are considered to be "true" gallbladder polyps, meaning that they are malignant or have malignant potential. The main radiological modality used for diagnosing and surveilling gallbladder polyps is transabdominal ultrasonography. However, evidence shows that other modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound may improve diagnostic accuracy. These are discussed in turn during the course of this review. Current guidelines recommend cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps sized 10 mm and greater, although this threshold is lowered when other risk factors are identified. The evidence behind this practice is relatively low quality. This review identifies current gaps in the available evidence and highlights the necessity for further research to enable better decision making regarding which patients should undergo cholecystectomy, and/or radiological follow-up.

Population-Based Studies Should not be Used to Justify a Policy of Routine Cholangiography to Prevent Major Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Iatrogenic bile duct injury at time of cholecystectomy is a rare but devastating event. A twofold higher frequency of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy without cholangiography is reported in population-based studies. Some interpret this as a cause-and-effect relationship and thus mandate routine cholangiography. A critical appraisal of population studies is required to determine whether these studies are suitable in determining the role of routine cholangiography. The literature search was performed using combinations of the forced search terms "duct injury", "population" and "cholangiography" to identify population-based studies assessing the relationship between cholangiography and iatrogenic bile duct injury. All seven population-based studies reported a numerically higher rate of bile duct injury when an intraoperative cholangiogram was not obtained during cholecystectomy. Five predate the critical view technique. Only one was limited to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All studies identified cholangiography as a likely marker for disease severity or surgical technique. Six studies did not demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship by not including effect modifiers. The only study to address confounders reported the same rate of injury irrespective of the use of cholangiography. Critical appraisal of population-based studies does not support their use in justifying a policy of routine cholangiography to prevent major bile duct injury.

Presence of Aberrant Anatomy Is an Independent Predictor of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of an aberrant anatomy diagnosed with MR cholangiography on the occurrence of bile duct injury. Although many authors report that aberrant anatomy is a strong risk factor for the occurrence of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy, no reports have examined the incidence of aberrant anatomy and its association as an independent risk factor for bile duct injury while controlling for potential confounding factors. This study involved 1289 patients. All images of MR cholangiography were reviewed and the findings, including the presence of aberrant anatomy, thickening of the gallbladder wall, and cystic duct stones—which may be related to the occurrence of bile duct injury—were recorded. The surgical outcome was compared according to the presence or absence of an aberrant anatomy and the predictive factors for bile duct injury were investigated. Aberrant anatomy was present in 11.2% of cases. The incidence of bile duct injury was significantly higher in patients with aberrant anatomy compared with patients without (3.5% versus 0.3%). By multivariate analysis, the presence of an aberrant anatomy and thickening of the gallbladder wall was an independent predictor for bile duct injury occurrence [odds ratio (OR) =16.56, P = 0.001; OR = 10.96, P = 0.006, respectively]. The presence of an aberrant anatomy and thickening of the gallbladder wall is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of bile duct injury.

A retrospective analysis of endoscopic treatment outcomes in patients with postoperative bile leakage

OBJECTIVE:

Bile leakage, while rare, can be a complication seen after cholecystectomy. It may also occur after hepatic or biliary surgical procedures. Etiology may be underlying pathology or surgical complication. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can play major role in diagnosis and treatment of bile leakage. Present study was a retrospective analysis of outcomes of ERCP procedure in patients with bile leakage.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent ERCP for bile leakage after surgery between 2008 and 2012 were included in the study. Etiology, clinical and radiological characteristics, and endoscopic treatment outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS:

Total of 31 patients (10 male, 21 female) were included in the study. ERCP was performed for bile leakage after cholecystectomy in 20 patients, after hydatid cyst operation in 10 patients, and after hepatic resection in 1 patient. Clinical signs and symptoms of bile leakage included abdominal pain, bile drainage from percutaneous drain, peritonitis, jaundice, and bilioma. Twelve (60%) patients were treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and nasobiliary drainage (NBD) catheter, 7 patients (35%) were treated with ES and biliary stent (BS), and 1 patient (5%) was treated with ES alone. Treatment efficiency was 100% in bile leakage cases after cholecystectomy. Ten (32%) cases of hydatid cyst surgery had subsequent cystobiliary fistula. Of these patients, 7 were treated with ES and NBD, 2 were treated with ES and BS, and 1 patient (8%) with ES alone. Treatment was successful in 90% of these cases.

CONCLUSION:

ERCP is an effective method to diagnose and treat bile leakage. Endoscopic treatment of postoperative bile leakage should be individualized based on etiological and other factors, such as accompanying fistula.

Prevention and acute management of biliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Expert consensus statement

Gallstone disease is very common and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures all over the world. Parallel to the increase in the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies, bile duct injuries also increased. The reported incidence of bile duct injuries ranges from 0.3% to 1.4%. Many of the bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are not due to inexperience, but are the result of basic technical failures and misinterpretations. A working group of expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons, an endoscopist, and a specialist of forensic medicine study searched and analyzed the publications on safe cholecystectomy and biliary injuries complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the organization of Turkish Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Association. After a series of e-mail communications and two conferences, the expert panel developed consensus statements for safe cholecystectomy, management of biliary injuries and medicolegal issues. The panel concluded that iatrogenic biliary injury is an overwhelming complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an important issue in malpractice claims. Misidentification of the biliary system is the major cause of biliary injuries. To avoid this, the "critical view of safety" technique should be employed in all the cases. If biliary injury is identified intraoperatively, reconstruction should only be performed by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons. In the postoperative period, any deviation from the expected clinical course of recovery should alert the surgeon about the possibility of biliary injury.

Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A way of getting out of trouble

Aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones. In the presence of moderate to severe inflammation when dissection of the cholecystohepatic triangle cannot be safely achieved, laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) has been proposed as an alternative to open conversion to prevent bile duct injuries. The aim of this study is to review our experience of the technique. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the upper gastrointestinal surgical unit at Westmead Hospital was undertaken. The study included all emergency and elective cases during a period from February 2012 to February 2014. Demographic, clinical, operative and postoperative characteristics including operative technique, placement of a drain, complications, length of hospital stay and histopathology were collected. Results: A total of 404 patients underwent LC during the two year study period of which 23 were LPC's. Patients who underwent LPC tended to be older and more likely of the male gender. These patients were also more likely to be an emergency operation and have a higher ASA grade compared to the LC group. Length of stay and operative time tended to be longer. There were five (22%) bile leaks postoperatively and all were successfully managed with postoperative ERCP and stenting. The major complication rate was 35% (8/23) with no bile duct injury or perioperative mortality. Conclusion: This current case series adds further evidence to suggest that LPC is a viable alternative to conversion in cases of difficult LC.

Iatrogenic common bile duct injuries: Increasing complexity in the laparoscopic era: A prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Iatrogenic bile duct injury (BDI) is the most significant associated complication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Little is known about the evolution of the pattern of BDI in the era of laparoscopy. The aim of the study is to assess the pattern of post-LC BDIs managed in a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

Post-LC BDI referred over two decades were studied. Demographic data, type of BDI (classified using the Strasberg System), clinical symptoms, diagnostic investigations, timing of referral, post-referral management and morbidity were analysed. The pattern of injury, associated vascular injuries rate and their management were compared over two time periods (1992-2004,2005-2014).

RESULTS

78 BDIs were referred. During the second time period Strasberg A injuries decreased from 14% to 0 and Strasberg E1increased from 4% to 23%, the rate of associated vascular injury was six time higher (3.6% versus 22.7%), more patients had an attempted repair at the index hospital (16% versus 35%) sand fewer patients could be managed without surgical intervention at the referral hospital (28% versus 4%).

CONCLUSION

Complexity of referred BDIs and rate of associated vascular injuries have increased over time. These findings led to more patients managed requiring surgical intervention at the referral hospital.

How often do surgeons obtain the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND

The reported incidence (0.16-1.5 %) of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is higher than during open cholecystectomy and has not decreased over time despite increasing experience with the procedure. The "critical view of safety" (CVS) technique may help to prevent BDI when certain criteria are met prior to division of any structures. This study aimed to evaluate the adherence of practicing surgeons to the CVS criteria during LC and the impact of a training intervention on CVS identification.

METHODS

LC procedures of general surgeons were video-recorded. De-identified recordings were reviewed by a blinded observer and rated on a 6-point scale using the previously published CVS criteria. A coaching program was conducted, and participating surgeons were re-assessed in the same manner.

RESULTS

The observer assessed ten LC videos, each involving a different surgeon. The CVS was adequately achieved by two surgeons (20 %). The remaining eight surgeons (80 %) did not obtain adequate CVS prior to division of any structures, despite two surgeons dictating that they did; the mean score of this group was 1.75. After training, five participating surgeons (50 %) scored > 4, and the mean increased from 1.75 (baseline) to 3.75 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CVS criteria were not routinely used by the majority of participating surgeons. Further, one-fourth of those who claimed to obtain the CVS did so inadequately. All surgeons who participated in training showed improvement during their post-assessment. Our findings suggest that education of practicing surgeons in the application of the CVS during LC can result in increased implementation and quality of the CVS. Pending studies with larger samples, our findings may partly explain the sustained BDI incidence despite increased experience with LC. Our study also supports the value of direct observation of surgical practices and subsequent training for quality improvement.

Strategies to decrease bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been performed clinically for more than 20 years. However, the incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) remains high despite attempts to prevent and reduce it. The aim of this study was to use an intraoperative unfavorable factors ratings system to identify unfavorable intraoperative factors and evaluate the effectiveness of application of the system in reducing BDI during LC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2010, 780 patients who underwent LC were reviewed retrospectively, including 384 LC patients without graded treatment of intraoperative unfavorable factors (GTIUF) during 2009 and 396 LC patients with routine GTIUF during 2010.

RESULTS

BDI was decreased significantly after routine GTIUF (5 cases without GTIUF versus 0 cases with routine GTIUF; P=.029). There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. The mean operation duration of the routine GTIUF group was prolonged significantly (P<.0001). Laparoscopic cholecystitis grading, GTIUF, and doctor's experience were important factors affecting the duration of operation (P<.0001, P<.0001, and P<.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

GTIUF is an effective method that emphasizes identification of the course of the extrahepatic bile duct and reduces the occurrence of BDI, especially for inexperienced operators.

Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

Background

Whether intraoperative cholangiography can prevent iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy remains controversial.

Methods

Data from the national Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery, GallRiks (May 2005 to December 2010), were analysed for evidence of iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Patient- and procedure-related risk factors for bile duct injury with a focus on the rate of intended intraoperative cholangiography were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 51 041 cholecystectomies and 747 bile duct injuries (1·5 per cent) were identified; 9008 patients (17·6 per cent) were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. No preventive effect of intraoperative cholangiography was seen in uncomplicated gallstone disease (odds ratio (OR) 0·97, 95 per cent c.i. 0·74 to 1·25). Operating in the presence (OR 1·23, 1·03 to 1·47) or a history (OR 1·34, 1·10 to 1·64) of acute cholecystitis, and open surgery (OR 1·56, 1·26 to 1·94), were identified as significant risk factors for bile duct injury. The intention to perform intraoperative cholangiography was associated with a reduced risk of bile duct injury in patients with concurrent (OR 0·44, 0·30 to 0·63) or a history of (OR 0·59, 0·35 to 1·00) acute cholecystitis.

Conclusion

Any proposed protective effect of intraoperative cholangiography was restricted to patients with (or a history of) acute cholecystitis.

Predictors of incidental gallbladder cancer in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

At the time of diagnosis, most patients with gallbladder cancer are in advanced stage and the cancer is unresectable. Long-term survivors are usually seen in a small number of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer. This study aimed to identify preoperative predictors of incidental gallbladder cancer in elderly patients.

METHODS

A total of 4014 patients of more than 44 years old who had undergone cholecystectomy at our department from January 2000 to December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate modalities were used to identify the predictive factors of incidental gallbladder cancer.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of the 4014 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases were histologically diagnosed as having incidental gallbladder cancer. Multivariate analysis identified that elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 combined with carcinoembryonic antigen and/or carbohydrate antigen 125 (P=0.045), a gallbladder polyp greater than or equal to 1.2 cm (P=0.043) and focal gallbladder wall thickening of more than or equal to 5 mm (P=0.002) were predictive factors of incidental gallbladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with these predictive factors and intraoperative frozen section should be considered to rule out carcinoma.

Subtotal Cholecystectomy and Open Total Cholecystectomy: Alternatives in Complicated Cholecystitis

Subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) is an alternative to open total cholecystectomy (OTC) when variable anatomy or other intraoperative findings preclude safe dissection of Calot's triangle. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes between SC and OTC in patients with complicated cholecystitis, cases that could not be completed with the original surgical approach and required intraoperative conversion to either SC or OTC. All cases of cholecystectomy converted to SC or OTC from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative laboratory values, imaging studies, and clinical demographics were compared between the two groups. The outcome variables analyzed included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay as well as intraoperative complications. In this study, 214 cases of complicated cholecystitis were analyzed; 63 SC and 151 laparoscopic converted to OTC. From the SC group, 46 (73%) were converted to open, 12 (19%) were primary open, and five (8%) were done laparoscopically. There were no statistically significant differences in demographics, preoperative serologic markers, or intraoperative findings ( P > 0.05). Five (3.3%) common bile duct (CBD) injuries occurred in the OTC group, whereas none occurred in the SC group. Overall there were 23 (15.2%) complications in the OTC group and nine (14.3%) in the SC group. The aggregate severe complication rate (CBD injury, vascular injury, gastrointestinal injury) was significantly higher in the OTC group (0.0 to 7.9%, P = 0.036). In conclusion, SC may be considered as a safe alternative in complicated cholecystitis.

Is emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis safe in a low volume resource poor setting?

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis have not been documented in the low-volume, resource-poor Caribbean setting.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This study was carried out in a low-resource setting across three islands in the Anglophone Caribbean.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of all consecutive patients who had emergency LC for acute cholecystitis over 82 months were examined. The data were extracted and analysed using SPSS version 14.

RESULTS

There were 74 patients with acute cholecystitis at a mean age of 45 (SD 11.8) years. The mean duration of operation was 99 (SD 45) min. There were 3 (4.1%) conversions and 6 (8.1%) complications. No bile duct injuries or deaths were recorded. There was more morbidity in patients with complicated disease, longer mean operation times and longer mean intervals between admission and operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent LC for acute cholecystitis is effective and safe in a low-volume setting in the Caribbean. However, the operations are technically demanding and should be performed by trained laparoscopic surgeons.

Impact of routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy on bile duct injury

BACKGROUND

The role of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in the diagnosis, prevention and management of bile duct injury (BDI) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to determine the value of routine IOC in the diagnosis and management of BDI sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at a high-volume centre.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a single-institution database was performed. Patients who underwent LC with routine IOC between October 1991 and May 2012 were included.

RESULTS

Among 11,423 consecutive LCs IOC was performed successfully in 95.7 per cent of patients. No patient had IOC-related complications. Twenty patients (0.17 per cent) sustained a BDI during LC, and the diagnosis was made during surgery in 18 patients. Most BDIs were type D according to the Strasberg classification. The sensitivity of IOC for the detection of BDI was 79 per cent; specificity was 100 per cent. All injuries diagnosed during surgery were repaired during the same surgical procedure. Two patients developed early biliary strictures that were treated by percutaneous dilatation and a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with satisfactory long-term results.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of IOC during LC in a high-volume teaching centre was associated with a low incidence of BDI, and facilitated detection and repair during the same surgical procedure with a good outcome.

Abnormal Anatomical Variations of Extra-Hepatic Biliary Tract, and Their Relation to Biliary Tract Injuries and Stones Formation

Background

To determine the most common abnormal anatomical variations of extra-hepatic biliary tract (EHBT), and their relation to biliary tract injuries and stones formation.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 120 patients, who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP), between July 2011 and June 2013. The patients’ ERCP and MRCP images were reviewed and evaluated for the anatomy of EHBT; the medical records were reviewed for demographic data, biliary tracts injuries and stones formation.

Results

Out of 120 patients, 50 were males (41.7%) and 70 were females (58.3%). The mean age was 54 years old (range 20 - 88). Abnormal anatomy was reported in 30% (n = 36). Short cystic duct (CD) was found in 20% (n = 24), left CD insertion in 5% (n = 6), CD inserted into the right hepatic duct (RHD) in 1.7% (n = 2), duct of Luschka in 3.33% (n = 4) and accessory hepatic duct in also 3.33% (n = 4). Biliary tract injuries were reported in 15% (n = 18) and stones in 71.7% (n = 86). Biliary tract injuries were higher in abnormal anatomy (P = 0.04), but there was no relation between abnormal anatomy and stones formation.

Conclusion

Abnormal anatomy of EHBT was found to be 30%. The most common abnormality is short CD followed by left CD insertion. Surgeons should be aware of these common abnormalities in our patients, hence avoiding injuries to the biliary tract during surgery. The abnormal anatomy was associated with high incidence of biliary tract injury but has no relation to biliary stone formation.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits (temporary or permanent relief of symptoms) and harms (recurrence of symptoms, procedure-related morbidity) of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of high-risk individuals with symptomatic gallstones.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded to December 2012 to identify the randomised clinical trials. We also handsearched the references lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) addressing this issue.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors collected data independently. For each outcome, we calculated the P values using Fisher's exact test or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included two trials with 156 participants for this review. The comparisons included in these two trials were percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1 trial; 70 participants) and percutaneous cholecystostomy versus conservative treatment (1 trial; 86 participants). Both trials had high risk of bias. Percutaneous cholecystostomy with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy: There was no significant difference in mortality between the two intervention groups (0/37 versus 1/33; Fisher's exact test: P value = 0.47). There was no significant difference in overall morbidity between the two intervention groups (1/31 versus 2/30; Fisher's exact test: P value = 0.61). This trial did not report on quality of life. There was no significant difference in the proportion of participants requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy between the two intervention groups (2/31 percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus 4/30 delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Fisher's exact test: P value = 0.43). The mean total hospital stay was significantly lower in the percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group compared with the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (1 trial; 61 participants; MD -9.90 days; 95% CI -12.31 to -7.49). The mean total costs were significantly lower in the percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group compared with the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (1 trial; 61 participants; MD -1123.00 USD; 95% CI -1336.60 to -909.40). Percutaneous cholecystostomy versus conservative treatment: Nine of the 44 participants underwent delayed cholecystectomy in the percutaneous cholecystostomy group. Seven of the 42 participants underwent delayed cholecystectomy in the conservative treatment group. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two intervention groups (6/44 versus 7/42; Fisher's exact test: P value = 0.77). There was no significant difference in overall morbidity between the two intervention groups (6/44 versus 3/42; Fisher's exact test: P value = 0.49). The number of participants who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was not reported in this trial. Therefore, we were unable to calculate the proportion of participants who underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy. The other outcomes, total hospital stay, quality of life, and total costs, were not reported in this trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current available evidence from randomised clinical trials, we are unable to determine the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the clinical management of high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis. There is a need for adequately powered randomised clinical trials of low risk of bias on this issue.

Primary versus delayed repair for bile duct injuries sustained during cholecystectomy: results of a survey of the Association Francaise de Chirurgie

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injuries (BDIs) sustained during a cholecystectomy still remain a major surgical problem, and it is still not clear whether the injury should be repaired immediately or a delayed repair is preferred.

METHODS

A retrospective national French survey was conducted to compare the results of immediate (at time of cholecystectomy), early (within 45 days after a cholecystectomy) and late (beyond 45 days after a cholecystectomy) surgical repair for BDI sustained during a cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

Forty-seven surgical centres provided 640 cases of bile duct injury sustained during a cholecystectomy of which 543 were analysed for the purpose of the present study. The timing of repair was immediate in 194 cases (35.7%), early in 216 cases (39.8%) and late in 133 cases (24.5%). The type of repair was a suture repair in 157 cases (81%), and a bilio-digestive reconstruction in 37 cases (19%) for immediate repair; a suture repair in 119 cases (55.1%) and a bilio-digestive anastomosis in 96 cases (44.9%) for the early repair; and a bilio-digestive reconstruction in 129 cases (97%) and a suture repair in 4 cases (3%) for late repair. A second procedure was required in 110 cases (56.7%) for immediate repair, 80 cases (40.7%) for early repair (P < 0.05) and in 9 cases (6.8%) for late repair (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The timing of surgical repair for a bile duct injury sustained during a cholecystectomy influences significantly the rate of a second procedure and a late repair should be preferred option.

Bile Duct Injury-from Injury to Repair: an Analysis of Management and Outcome

Despite advances in speciality care, mortality and morbidity remain the most important issues in the management of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries. We analysed the peri-operative management of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries to assess their outcomes. Of 150 patients with post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries, 13 patients who presented with strictured hepaticojejunostomy were excluded from the analysis. The records of the remaining 137 patients were analysed for type of presentation, management and follow-up. Of 137 injuries, 88 were open and 49 were laparoscopic. Various presentations include acute bile duct injury (n = 5), bile collection (n = 45), external biliary fistula (n = 46) and stricture (n = 41). After initial management, three patients died (sepsis, n = 2; pseudoaneurysmal bleed, n = 1). Of 107 patients who underwent definitive repair, three died (portal hypertension, n = 2; sepsis, n = 1). At median follow-up of 30 months, 100 patients had good outcome (grade A, B), and only 4 had bad outcome (grade C, D) as per McDonald grading. Peritonitis and sepsis in the early phase and portal hypertension and cirrhosis in the late phase are the main causes of mortality in patients sustaining bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Successful management in a specialist hepatobiliary centre can limit the morbidity in more than 90 % cases.

Endoscopic approach to the patient with bile duct injury

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is complicated by bile duct injury in 0.3% to 0.6% of cases. These injuries range from simple leaks from the cystic duct stump that can almost always be managed by endoscopic stenting to complex strictures, transections, and even resections of the bile duct, often with concomitant vascular damage leading to ischemia. The management of LC-related biliary injuries requires a multidisciplinary approach involving an endoscopist experienced in the use of ERCP, a skilled interventional radiologist, and a surgeon with specific training in the management of hepatobiliary injuries.

Routine on-table cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this review was to systemically analyse trials evaluating the efficacy of routine on-table cholangiography (R-OTC) versus no on-table cholangiography (N-OTC) in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Randomised trials evaluating R-OTC versus N-OTC in patients undergoing cholecystectomy were selected and analysed.

RESULTS

Four trials (1 randomised controlled trial on open cholecystectomy and 3 on laparoscopic cholecystectomy) encompassing 860 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with and without R-OTC were retrieved. There were 427 patients in the R-OTC group and 433 patients in the N-OTC group. There was no significant heterogeneity among trials. Therefore, in the fixed effects model, N-OTC did not increase the risk (p=0.53) of common bile duct (CBD) injury, and it was associated with shorter operative time (p<0.00001) and fewer peri-operative complications (p<0.04). R-OTC was superior in terms of peri-operative CBD stone detection (p<0.006) and it reduced readmission (p<0.03) for retained CBD stones.

CONCLUSIONS

N-OTC is associated with shorter operative time and fewer peri-operative complications, and it is comparable to R-OTC in terms of CBD injury risk during cholecystectomy. R-OTC is helpful for peri-operative CBD stone detection and there is therefore reduced readmission for retained CBD stones. The N-OTC approach may be adopted routinely for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy providing there are no clinical, biochemical or radiological features suggestive of CBD stones. However, a major multicentre randomised controlled trial is required to validate this conclusion.

Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries?

BACKGROUND

Two decades since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the rate of bile duct injuries still remains higher than in the open cholecystectomy era.

METHODS

The rate and complexity of bile duct injuries was evaluated in 83,449 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 1995 and 2008 in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California system. Fifty-six surgeons who performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the past were surveyed to determine factors that predispose to bile duct injuries.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of bile duct injuries was .10%; 59.5% of the 84 injuries were cystic duct leaks. Incidence varied slightly from .10% (1995-1998) to .08% (1999-2003) and .12% (2004-2008). There was a trend toward more proximal injuries (injury <2 cm from the bifurcation: 14.3% to 44.4% to 50.0% of major injuries). The misinterpretation of anatomy was cited by 92.9% of surgeons as the primary cause of bile duct injuries; 70.9% cited a lack of experience as a contributing factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has an overall low risk of bile duct injuries; the rate remains constant, but injury complexity may have increased over time.

Treatment of Major Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injury: A Long-Term Follow-up Result

The goal of this study is to present the multiple institutions experience comparing the outcome of management between initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgeon and specialist as well as the outcome of different operative procedures to major bile duct injury (BDI) after LC. We have retrospectively collected data of 77 cases of perioperatively detected major BDI in LC at 15 general surgical institutions from 1997 to 2007. We classified 42 cases treated by an experienced biliary surgeon as Group A and 35 cases treated by the initial LC surgeon as Group B. Forty-eight cases were treated with duct-to-duct anastomosis as Group C and 29 cases were treated with Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy as Group D. The median duration of follow-up was 62 months. The outcome of groups was compared. In Group A, 7 of 42 (16.7%) patients developed a failure. Two of seven (28.6%) patients were treated by a secondary operation. In Group B, 24 of 35 (68.6%) patients developed a failure. Seventeen of 24 (70.8%) patients were treated by a secondary operation. One of 35 (2.85%) patients died. The significant differences were observed in failure and secondary operations (16.7 vs 68.6%, P < 0.01 and 28.6 vs 70.8%, P < 0.01). There is no significant difference Group C and Group D in failure rate (28.5 vs 11.7%, P > 0.05). A multiple institutional cooperative methodology between the local surgical institution and tertiary care centers provided a good way to limit further operations, failure. The reconstructive strategy is important and should be selected according to the type of injury and the diagnosed status of major BDI.

Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for gallbladder diseases. However, for various reasons there is a finite chance of conversion to open cholecystectomy in some patients. To assess preoperative factors which might predict the chances of conversion and the intraoperative reason which resulted in the conversion. The SAGAR APOLLO HOSPITAL patient database was searched for patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between July 2003 and November 2006. Sagar Apollo hospital is an urban tertiary care hospital. The records of 526 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed retrospectively. 14 (2.6%) of the 526 patients were converted to open cholecystectomy. Preoperative Alkaline phosphatase values were raised in patients who underwent conversion and were found to be statistically significant. The most common intraoperative reason for conversion was difficulty in delineating the anatomy at the Calot's triangle. It is difficult to preoperatively predict the factors responsible for conversion.

[Hepatobiliary anastomosis techniques]

The success of hepatobiliary anastomoses is influenced by the diameter of the bile duct, the location within the biliary tract, the situation of primary or revision surgery and accompanying infections. The exact preoperative diagnostics of the anatomy of the biliary tract are indispensable for low complication rates. Within reconstructive surgery, hepaticojejunostomy has been established as the standard technique and a biliodigestive anastomosis is performed proximal to the cystic duct and 2-3 cm below the fork in the hepatic duct. In general, end-to-end anastomoses of the common bile duct are not recommended due to the high risk for stenosis. Within the liver hilus an exact preparation of all tubular structures is mandatory. With regard to possible perioperative complications operations on the hepatic duct or segmental bile ducts should be performed in specialized centers. Methods of drainage in hepatobiliary surgery are percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD), internal-external drainage, internal drainage with endoscopic or surgically placed stents, external-internal-external drainage and the T-drain.

Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions

Background

Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dreaded complication of cholecystectomy, often caused by misinterpretation of biliary anatomy. To prevent BDI, techniques have been developed for intraoperative assessment of bile duct anatomy. This article reviews the evidence for the different techniques and discusses their strengths and weaknesses in terms of efficacy, ease, and cost-effectiveness.

Method

PubMed was searched from January 1980 through December 2009 for articles concerning bile duct visualization techniques for prevention of BDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

Nine techniques were identified. The critical-view-of-safety approach, indirectly establishing biliary anatomy, is accepted by most guidelines and commentaries as the surgical technique of choice to minimize BDI risk. Intraoperative cholangiography is associated with lower BDI risk (OR 0.67, CI 0.61–0.75). However, it incurs extra costs, prolongs the operative procedure, and may be experienced as cumbersome. An established reliable alternative is laparoscopic ultrasound, but its longer learning curve limits widespread implementation. Easier to perform are cholecystocholangiography and dye cholangiography, but these yield poor-quality images. Light cholangiography, requiring retrograde insertion of an optical fiber into the common bile duct, is too unwieldy for routine use. Experimental techniques are passive infrared cholangiography, hyperspectral cholangiography, and near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography. The latter two are performed noninvasively and provide real-time images. Quantitative data in patients are necessary to further evaluate these techniques.

Conclusions

The critical-view-of-safety approach should be used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography or laparoscopic ultrasound is recommended to be performed routinely. Hyperspectral cholangiography and near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography are promising novel techniques to prevent BDI and thus increase patient safety.

The prevention of major bile duct injures in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the experience with 13,000 patients in a single center

Major bile duct injury (MBDI) is one of the most serious complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study reports our experience in preventing MBDI during LC. Between September 1991 and August 2004, 13,000 cases of LC were performed at Kunming General Hospital. Systemic strategies, including selection of proper patients for LC based on the surgeons' experience, dissection techniques in Calot's triangle, selective use of laparoscopic ultrasonography, and indication of conversion to an open approach were developed and introduced to avoid MBDI. In our series, the overall incidence of MBDI was 0.085%, 0.60% (3 of 500) over the first period from September 1991 to September 1992, 0.17% (5 of 3000) over the second period from October 1992 to September 1996, and 0.03% (3 of 9500) over the third period from October 1996 to August 2004. The MBDI included transection of the common bile duct (CBD) due to mistaking CBD for cystic duct (n=6), cautery injury (n=3), laceration of the CBD at the junction of cystic duct and CBD (n=1), and clip partially of common hepatic duct due to blind hemostasis (n=1). The incidence of MBDI in our institution is acceptable. We believe the system strategies are effective to avoid MBDI in LC. LC is a safe procedure with an incidence of biliary injury comparable with that for open cholecystectomy.

Aberrant right hepatic duct draining into the cystic duct: clinical outcomes and management

Background. Aberrant right hepatic duct (ARHD) draining into cystic duct (CD) is relatively rare but clinically important because of its susceptibility to injuries during cholecystectomy. These injuries are often-times missed or diagnosed late and as a result can develop serious complications. Methods. Four consecutive patients diagnosed with ARHD draining into CD were identified for inclusion. Results. The mean age of patients was 42.5 years. The diagnosis in one of the patient was incidental during a routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Other three patients were diagnosed post-cholecystectomy- one presented with suspected intra-operative biliary injury, one with persistent bile leak and another with recurrent cholangitis. Inadequate filling of the segment of liver on ERCP with dilation of intrahepatic ducts in the corresponding segment on imaging was present in two patients with complete obstruction of ARHD which was managed surgically. In another patient, the partially obstructed ARHD was managed by endoscopic therapy. Conclusion. ARHD draining into the CD can have varied clinical manifestations. In appropriate clinical settings, it should be suspected in patients with persistence of bile leak early after cholecystectomy, segmental dilation of intrahepatic-bile ducts on imaging and paucity of intrahepatic filling in a segment of liver on ERCP.

[A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholelithiasis--a five-year experience]

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a method of choice in the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis because of less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization and lower cost of treatment. The study was aimed at analysing the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients surgically treated for chronic calculous cholecystitis (symptomatic cholelithiasis).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The research was done in the period from December 2003 to December 2008. In the prospective study of 386 patients, we analyzed operative and postoperative complications, the reasons for conversion to open cholecystectomy, duration of hospitalization and mortality.

RESULTS

The average duration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 31.9 +/- 14.5 min: dissection of adhesions 3.2 +/- 0.7 min., elements of Calot's triangle 9.8 +/- 3.2 min., gallbladder releasing from its bed 12.8 +/- 2.8 min., the abdominal cavity lavage and removal of gallbladder from the abdomen 6.8 +/- 0.9 min. Some operative difficulties emerged in 22 (5.7%) patients--4 (1%) during releasing of gallbladder adhesions from the surrounding structures, 9 (2.3%) during dissection of elements of the Calot's triangle, 6 (1.5%) during gallbladder releasing from its bed, 3 (0.7%) during gallbladder removal from the abdomen. Some post-operative complications, single or associated, occurred in 36 (9.3%) patients: perforation of gallbladder 21 (5.4%), bleeding from gallbladder bed 18 (4.6%)/ injury of extra hepatic bile ducts 1 (0.20%), 9 (2.3%) spillage of stones; 3 (0.7%) conversions were made. The average duration of preoperative and postoperative hospitalization was 1.1 +/- 0.3 and 1.4 +/- 0.5 days, respectively. The pathohistological examination revealed 2 (0.5%) adenocarcinoma of gallbladder. There were no lethal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure and rational choice in the treatment of biliary dyskinesia and symptomatic biliary calculosis with an acceptable rate of conversion.

[Learning curve and iatrogenic injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomies]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to analyze surgeon's proficiency, based on the different aspects of his learning curve as a risk factor for iatrogenic biliary tract injuries associated with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

METHODS

a retrospective study was conducted using the report information from charts of patients January 1992 through December 2007; at Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Analysis from data collected from charts of 2285 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Data from surgeons involved with this type of surgery was also analyzed.

RESULTS

a total of six injuries (0.26%) were found. This result is similar to that found in international publications. All injuries had occurred in the surgeon's second phase of the learning curve with more than 50 video surgeries.

CONCLUSION

it was conclude that Video surgery Certificate and previous training are not related to biliary tract injuries in this series. Surgeon's age was not a risk factor in this study. There was statistical significance between surgeons' experience and injuries.

Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injury (BDI) remains the most serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A Swiss database was used to identify risk factors for BDI and to assess the effect of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC).

METHODS

Data for patients from 114 Swiss institutions who underwent LC for acute or chronic cholecystitis between 1995 and 2005 were used in univariable and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total 31 838 patients, mean(s.d.) age 54·4(15·9) years, were analysed. The incidence of BDI was 0·3 per cent (101 patients), which did not change over time (P = 0·560). Univariable analysis revealed that male patients had a higher risk of BDI (0·5 per cent versus 0·2 per cent in female patients; P = 0·001), as did patients whose operation lasted at least 150 min (1·1 per cent versus 0·1 per cent for operating time of less than 150 min; P < 0·001). Logistic regression confirmed male sex (odds ratio (OR) 1·89, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·27 to 2·81) and prolonged surgery (OR 12·60, 10·87 to 23·81) as independent risk factors. Comparison of groups with and without intraoperative cholangiography showed no difference in the incidence of BDI (both 0·3 per cent; P = 0·755) and BDIs missed during surgery (10 versus 8 per cent; P = 0·737).

CONCLUSION

Male sex and prolonged laparoscopic surgery are independent risk factors for BDI during LC. Frequent use of IOC does not seem to reduce BDI or the number of injuries missed during surgery.

[True video-assisted thoracic surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer]

从出现至今，微创手术对所有的外科分支学科均产生了巨大影响。电视辅助胸腔镜（VATS）肺叶切除术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌于20世纪90年代早期被首次报道，自此在许多医疗中心中逐渐普及。这项较新的技术的支持者列举了该技术在围手术期可能获得的许多有利结果，可能主要是因为该技术可减少手术创伤和应激反应。然而，由于仍缺乏有关长期生存和复发率的详实的临床数据，大部分胸心外科医生仍然持怀疑态度。

“全” VATS的定义目前仍不明确，之前的许多研究将其视为“小切口开胸肺叶切除术”，而非VATS肺叶切除术。在此，我们复习了有关全VATS肺叶切除术的文献，特别关注了直接对比VATS肺叶切除术和传统开胸肺叶切除术的比较研究。

Ergonomics and Technical Aspects of Minimal Access Surgery in Acute Surgery

BACKGROUND

Following the general trend in the evolution of minimal access surgery (MAS), the place of laparoscopy for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the emergency setting is well defined. As for all laparoscopic procedures, the ergonomic and technical aspects of MAS in acute surgery are important issues.

METHODS

Review of the literature.

RESULTS

The ergonomic and technical aspects of emergency laparoscopy include the surgeon's and the patient's position; the operating room setup, including the table, the monitor, and the specific equipment; patient preparation adapted as required to potential changes necessary as adapted to the pathology and conversion; the trocar setup, also adapted to the organ and pathology. Specific needs and variations can be necessary, dependent on the patient status, body build, and the pathology being treated. The operating room used for acute surgery should be adapted to evolving laparoscopic techniques, as well as new intraoperative diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

CONCLUSION

High-tech equipment and associated procedures have modified the needs for a modern operating room setup. Laparoscopic procedures for emergency surgery must make use of well-known ergonomic principles and be adapted to the patient and the pathology.