Reappraisal of Surgical Treatment for Radiation Enteritis

[Radiation-induced intestinal injury]

This article addresses theoretical and clinical aspects of radiation-induced intestinal injuries, which complicate radiation therapy for malignant neoplasms of the abdominal and pelvic organs. Many clinical aspects of this issue remain unknown due to the lack of awareness among doctors and patients. Further study of radiation-induced intestinal injuries and the development of personalized approaches to their prevention and treatment represent a relevant direction in internal medicine.

Comparison of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is considered to be the standard treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, the risk of adverse events and postoperative recurrence remains significant. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) compared with nCRT in patients with LARC and to assess the possibility of eliminating radiotherapy on the basis of guaranteed efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of nCRT and nCT for LARC. The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

RESULTS

A total of 2706 patients from seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the nCT and nCRT groups. This study demonstrated a lower rate of infection (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34-0.82; P = 0.005), anastomotic leak (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), tumor regression grade (TRG) 0-1 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.36-0.69; P < 0.0001), preventive diverting ileostomy (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17-1.02; P = 0.05), and leukopenia (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.25-1.01; P = 0.05) in the nCT group. However, there was no significant difference in the other toxic events, such as intestinal obstruction, urinary complications, diarrhea, and surgical or pathological outcomes, such as clinical fistula, sphincter preservation, postoperative mortality (≤ 60 d), R0 resection, ypStage 0-I, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+), or pathological complete response (pCR) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that OS and DFS were not lower in the nCT group than in the nCRT group. In addition, the nCT group had fewer complications. Preoperative nCT is expected to become a standard treatment option for most patients with stage II-III LARC. It is worth noting that radiotherapy cannot be ignored for some patients who need to ensure the conversion effect of neoadjuvant therapy and strongly request to preserve organ function.

Small bowel obstruction: what a gastroenterologist needs to know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intrabdominal adhesions and intestinal hernias are the commonest cause of small bowel obstruction. Small bowel diseases, which cause small bowel obstruction, are rarer and often poses a challenge to gastroenterologists to diagnose and treat. In this review, small bowel diseases, which predispose to small bowel obstruction, are focused on, and their challenges in diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnosis of causes of partial small bowel obstruction is improved with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) enterography. In fibrostenotic Crohn's strictures and NSAID diaphragm disease, endoscopic balloon dilatation can delay the need for surgery if the lesion is short and accessible; however, many may still inevitably require surgery. Biologic therapy may reduce the need for surgery in symptomatic small bowel Crohn's disease wherein the strictures are predominantly inflammatory. In chronic radiation enteropathy, only refractory small bowel obstruction and those with nutritional difficulties warrant surgery.

SUMMARY

Small bowel diseases causing bowel obstruction are often challenging to diagnose and require numerous investigations over a period of time, which often culminate with surgery. Use of biologics and endoscopic balloon dilatation can help to delay and prevent surgery in some instances.

Laparoscopic Proximally Extended Colorectal Resection With Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Late Complications of Chronic Radiation Proctopathy

Background

Chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is a common complication after radiation therapy for pelvic malignancies. Compared with diversion surgery, resection surgery removes the damaged tissue completely to avoid the risks of recurrence and improve patients' outcome. Hence, resection surgery could be an optimal surgical approach when CRP is complicated by late complications. This study aimed to describe a modified surgical procedure of resection surgery and report its preliminary efficacy and safety in treating patients with CRP with late complications.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the patients who were diagnosed with CRP with late complications and underwent the modified surgical procedure of laparoscopic proximally extended colorectal resection with two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis (PE-Bacon) between November 2019 and October 2020 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.

Results

A total of 15 patients were performed the modified laparoscopic procedure of PE-Bacon, of which 1 patient underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open operation for intraoperative massive hemorrhage. Overall, the major (Clavien-Dindo III-V) postoperative complications occurred in 1 patient, anastomotic leakage was observed in 2 (13.3%) patients, and anastomotic stricture was observed in 4 (26.7%) patients. No patient had to be reoperated and died. Up to now, at the average follow-up of (524.40 ± 108.39) days, the preoperative symptoms of 93.3% (14/15) patients were relieved, with nine patients achieved complete remission, five patients only suffered minor symptoms. Because of the progression of radiation uropathy, one patient still had a vesicovaginal fistula as pre-operative complication. Colostomy reversal has been performed on 8 (53.3%) patients at an average postoperative duration of 299.5 ± 92.68 days, among whom only 2 patients suffered from major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) until now.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic PE-Bacon surgery is a safe and feasible surgical procedure for late complications of CRP with low morbidity and high symptom remission rate.

Radiation enteritis: Diagnostic and therapeutic issues

Abdominal pelvic radiation therapy can induce acute or chronic lesions in the small bowel wall, called radiation enteritis. Treatment of acute radiation enteritis is essentially symptomatic; symptoms regress when radiation is discontinued. Conversely, late toxicity can occur up to 30 years after discontinuation of radiation therapy, posing diagnostic problems. Approximately one out of five patients treated by radiation therapy will present clinical signs of radiation enteritis, including obstruction, malabsorption, malnutrition and/or other complications. Management should be multidisciplinary, centered mainly on correction of malnutrition. Surgery is indicated in case of complications (i.e., abscess, perforation, fistula) and/or resistance to medical treatment; intestinal resection should be preferred over internal bypass. The main risk in case of iterative resections is the short bowel syndrome and the need for definitive nutritional assistance.

Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Oncologic Surgery for pelvic exenteration in the treatment of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The primary treatment for locally advanced cases of cervical cancer is chemoradiation followed by high-dose brachytherapy. When this treatment fails, pelvic exenteration (PE) is an option in some cases. This study aimed to develop recommendations for the best management of patients with cervical cancer undergoing salvage PE.

METHODS

A questionnaire was administered to all members of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology. Of them, 68 surgeons participated in the study and were divided into 10 working groups. A literature review of studies retrieved from the National Library of Medicine database was carried out on topics chosen by the participants. These topics were indications for curative and palliative PE, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of tumor resectability, access routes and surgical techniques, PE classification, urinary, vaginal, intestinal, and pelvic floor reconstructions, and postoperative follow-up. To define the level of evidence and strength of each recommendation, an adapted version of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Health Service rating system was used.

RESULTS

Most conducts and management strategies reviewed were strongly recommended by the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines outlining strategies for PE in the treatment of persistent or relapsed cervical cancer were developed and are based on the best evidence available in the literature.

Radiation-induced injury on surgical margins: a clue to anastomotic leakage after rectal-cancer resection with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?

Background

Few studies on anastomotic condition after rectal-cancer resection and its effect on anastomotic leakage (AL) are available up to now. This study aimed to investigate potential radiation-induced injury left on surgical margins of anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and its association with AL.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 161 consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection with nCRT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (nCT) or no neoadjuvant therapy between 2014 and 2015. Tissue samples of resection margins were assessed using a specific histopathological score and microvessel density in submucosa. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Association between AL and histopathological features was analysed.

Results

AL occurred in 13 of 54 patients undergoing nCRT, 5 of 48 patients undergoing nCT and 7 of 59 patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Comparisons after matching showed median (range) histopathological scores as follows: 3 (0–8) vs 0 (0–3) vs 0 (0–2) for the proximal margin (P < 0.001); 4 (2–9) vs 0 (0–4) vs 0 (0–3) for the distal margin (P < 0.001). Correspondingly, mean (SD) microvessel densities were as follows: 21.7 (7.9) vs 27.2 (8.6) vs 27.3 (9.4) for the proximal margin (P = 0.003); 18.1 (9.3) vs 25.2 (12.9) vs 24.9 (7.4) for the distal margin (P < 0.001). Among patients undergoing nCRT, AL was associated with increased histopathological score (P = 0.003) and decreased microvessel density (P = 0.004) on the proximal margin.

Conclusions

Surgical margins of rectal-cancer resection are exposed to certain radiation-induced injury after nCRT. AL is associated with aggravated radiation damage on the proximal margin.

Bowel Radiation Injury: Complexity of the Pathophysiology and Promises of Cell and Tissue Engineering

Ionizing radiation is effective to treat malignant pelvic cancers, but the toxicity to surrounding healthy tissue remains a substantial limitation. Early and late side effects not only limit the escalation of the radiation dose to the tumor but may also be life-threatening in some patients. Numerous preclinical studies determined specific mechanisms induced after irradiation in different compartments of the intestine. This review outlines the complexity of the pathogenesis, highlighting the roles of the epithelial barrier in the vascular network, and the inflammatory microenvironment, which together lead to chronic fibrosis. Despite the large number of pharmacological molecules available, the studies presented in this review provide encouraging proof of concept regarding the use of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy to treat radiation-induced intestinal damage. The therapeutic efficacy of MSCs has been demonstrated in animal models and in patients, but an enormous number of cells and multiple injections are needed due to their poor engraftment capacity. Moreover, it has been observed that although MSCs have pleiotropic effects, some intestinal compartments are less restored after a high dose of irradiation. Future research should seek to optimize the efficacy of the injected cells, particularly with regard to extending their life span in the irradiated tissue. Moreover, improving the host microenvironment, combining MSCs with other specific regenerative cells, or introducing new tissue engineering strategies could be tested as methods to treat the severe side effects of pelvic radiotherapy.

The surgical management of radiation proctopathy

BACKGROUND

There is sparse evidence guiding the optimum surgical management of patients with radiation proctopathy (RP). The purpose of this review is to analyse all the literature on the surgical management of RP in order to guide physicians and surgeons as to when and what surgery should be employed for these patients.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane Library using the MeSH terms "radiation proctopathy", "proctitis", "surgical management", and related terms as keywords was performed. The review included all articles that reported on the surgical management of patients with radiation proctopathy. All relevant articles were cross-referenced for further articles and any unavailable online were retrieved from hard-copy archive libraries. Eighteen studies including one prospective cohort study, fifteen retrospective cohort studies, and three small case series are included.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is indicated for patients with RP for rectal obstruction, perforation, fistulae, or a failure of medical measures to control the symptoms of RP. Surgery centres mainly on diversion version resection. Diversion alone does not remove the damaged tissue leaving the patient at risk of continued complications including bleeding, perforation, occlusion, and abscess formation; however, major resectional surgery carries higher risks. Morbidity and mortality vary 0-44% and 0-11% for diversion only versus 0-100% and 0-14% for resectional surgery. There is no universally agreed surgical first-line approach. The data supports both resection with defunctioning stoma or diversion only as reasonable first-line surgical options for patients requiring surgery for RP.

Impact of Preoperative Radiotherapy on Anastomotic Leakage and Stenosis After Rectal Cancer Resection: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the effect of preoperative radiotherapy on anastomotic integrity remains conflicting in rectal cancer surgery. Prospective comparisons with appropriate controls are needed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative radiotherapy on anastomotic leakage and stenosis after rectal cancer resection.

DESIGN

This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT01211210).

SETTINGS

Data were retrieved from the leading center of the trial, which is a tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS

The full analysis population of 318 patients was included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative radiation (50 Gy per 25 fractions) and 5-fluorouracil infusion, alone (arm A) or combined with oxaliplatin (arm B), or preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin without radiation (arm C).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The rates of anastomotic leakage and stenosis were calculated for each treatment arm. Multivariate analysis was used to verify the effect of preoperative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The treatment arms were comparable in terms of most baseline characteristics, but more diversions were used in the chemoradiotherapy arms. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 20.2% of patients in arm A, 23.6% of patients in arm B, and 8.5% of patients in arm C (p = 0.007). The corresponding rates of stenosis were 17.0%, 18.9%, and 6.8% (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis confirmed the correlation between preoperative radiotherapy and clinical leakage (p = 0.02), which was associated with delayed stenosis (p < 0.001). For patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy, radiation proctitis was identified as an independent risk factor for clinical leakage (p = 0.01) and stenosis (p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations were discrepancies in stoma creation and chemotherapy regimen among the treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiotherapy increases the risk of anastomotic leakage and stenosis after rectal cancer resection. Clinical leakage independently contributes to the development of stenosis.

Enhancing Care of the Survivor of Gynecologic Cancer: Managing the Menopause and Radiation Toxicity

It is expected that there will be 290,000 cases of gynecologic cancers in 2016. Of these cancers, 60,000 will be endometrial and 22,000 will be ovarian-the two most common gynecologic cancers. Endometrial and ovarian cancers occur in menopausal women with mean ages of 60 and 63, respectively. The majority of endometrial cancers are early stage, and 5-year survival is considered good at upwards of 75%. For ovarian cancer, while survival rates have improved, the 5-year survival rate for the most common stage (stage III) is 40%. Thus, a substantial number of patients with gynecologic cancer are menopausal, and a significant number of patients are survivors, particularly of endometrial cancers. It will be important for survivors of gynecologic cancers to receive care tailored to their needs as women and to mitigate gender-specific side effects of their cancer treatment.

Surgical emergencies in oncology

An oncologic emergency is defined as an acute, potentially life threatening condition in a cancer patient that has developed as a result of the malignant disease or its treatment. Many oncologic emergencies are signs of advanced, end-stage malignant disease. Oncologic emergencies can be divided into medical or surgical. The literature was reviewed to construct a summary of potential surgical emergencies in oncology that any surgeon can be confronted with in daily practice, and to offer insight into the current approach for these wide ranged emergencies. Cancer patients can experience symptoms of obstruction of different structures and various causes. Obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract is the most frequent condition seen in surgical practice. Further surgical emergencies include infections due to immune deficiency, perforation of the gastrointestinal tract, bleeding events, and pathological fractures. For the institution of the appropriate treatment for any emergency, it is important to determine the underlying cause, since emergencies can be either benign or malignant of origin. Some emergencies are well managed with conservative or non-invasive treatment, whereas others require emergency surgery. The patient's performance status, cancer stage and prognosis, type and severity of the emergency, and the patient's wishes regarding invasiveness of treatment are essential during the decision making process for optimal management.

Radiation enteritis

Radiation enteritis continues to be a major health concern in recipients of radiation therapy. The incidence of radiation enteritis is expected to continue to rise during the coming years paralleling the unprecedented use of radiotherapy in pelvic cancers. Radiation enteritis can present as either an acute or chronic syndrome. The acute form presents within hours to days of radiation exposure and typically resolves within few weeks. The chronic form may present as early as 2 months or as long as 30 years after exposure. Risk factors can be divided into patient and treatment-related factors. Chronic radiation enteritis is characterized by progressive obliterative endarteritis with exaggerated submucosal fibrosis and can manifest by stricturing, formation of fistulae, local abscesses, perforation, and bleeding. In the right clinical context, diagnosis can be confirmed by cross-sectional imaging, flexible or video capsule endoscopy. Present treatment strategies are directed primarily towards symptom relief and management of emerging complications. Recently, however, there has been a shift towards rational drug design based on improved understanding of the molecular basis of disease in an effort to limit the fibrotic process and prevent organ damage.

Radiation-induced small bowel disease: latest developments and clinical guidance

Ionizing radiation is commonly used to treat a number of malignancies. Although highly effective and now more targeted, many patients suffer side effects. The number of cancer survivors has increased and so there are more patients presenting with symptoms that have arisen as a result of radiotherapy. Radiation damage to small bowel tissue can cause acute or chronic radiation enteritis producing symptoms such as pain, bloating, nausea, faecal urgency, diarrhoea and rectal bleeding which can have a significant impact on patient's quality of life. This review outlines the pathogenesis of radiation injury to the small bowel along with the prevention of radiation damage via radiotherapy techniques plus medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins and probiotics. It also covers the treatment of both acute and chronic radiation enteritis via a variety of medical (including hyperbaric oxygen), dietetic, endoscopic and surgical therapies.

Acute radiation enteritis causing small bowel obstruction

Although much is known about the late intestinal side effects of radiation, comparatively little has been published about its acute complications. We present a case of a small bowel obstruction due to acute radiation enteritis. As radiotherapy continues to expand its role in the management of oncological disease, clinicians should remain alert to the resulting undesired effects.

Management of chronic radiation enteritis with intestinal obstruction

AIM: To evaluate the effect of various treatment methods for chronic radiation enteritis with concurrent intestinal obstruction.

METHODS: The clinical data for 21 patients with chronic radiation enteritis and intestinal obstruction was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS: Five of seven patients who received conservative treatment experienced relapse, and the cure rate was only 28.6%. Fourteen patients who underwent surgical treatment (of them ten patients underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis) had satisfactory outcome, and the cure rate was as high as 90.0%. One patient developed intestinal fistula, and re-operation confirmed that it was caused by residual radiation enteritis.

CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is the best way for treatment of chronic radiation enteritis with intestinal obstruction. All intestinal lesions should be surgically removed to avoid intestinal fistula.

Acute radiation enteritis causing small bowel obstruction

Although much is known about the late intestinal side effects of radiation, comparatively little has been published about its acute complications. We present a case of a small bowel obstruction due to acute radiation enteritis. As radiotherapy continues to expand its role in the management of oncological disease, clinicians should remain alert to the resulting undesired effects.

Practical approaches to effective management of intestinal radiation injury: Benefit of resectional surgery

AIM: To study the outcome of patients undergoing surgical resection of the bowel for sustained radiation-induced damage intractable to conservative management.

METHODS: During a 7-year period we operated on 17 cases (5 male, 12 female) admitted to our surgical department with intestinal radiation injury (IRI). They were originally treated for a pelvic malignancy by surgical resection followed by postoperative radiotherapy. During follow-up, they developed radiation enteritis requiring surgical treatment due to failure of conservative management.

RESULTS: IRI was located in the terminal ileum in 12 patients, in the rectum in 2 patients, in the descending colon in 2 patients, and in the cecum in one patient. All patients had resection of the affected region(s). There were no postoperative deaths, while 3 cases presented with postoperative complications (17.7%). All patients remained free of symptoms without evidence of recurrence of IRI for a median follow-up period of 42 mo (range, 6-96 mo).

CONCLUSION: We report a favorable outcome without IRI recurrence of 17 patients treated by resection of the diseased bowel segment.

Risk of recurrence after surgery for chronic radiation enteritis

Background

Approximately one-third of patients with chronic radiation enteritis (CRE) require surgery, which is associated with a high morbidity rate and a high risk of reoperation. The aim of this study was to report outcome after surgery for CRE.

Methods

Patients with CRE who underwent operation with extensive small bowel resection between 1980 and 2009 were included in the study. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, reoperation for recurrent enteritis and risk factors for reoperation were analysed.

Results

Of 107 patients (94 women; 87·8 per cent) with CRE included in the study, the main indication for surgery was symptomatic stricture (82 patients; 76·6 per cent). Forty-nine ileocaecal resections (45·8 per cent) were performed. Overall and surgical morbidity rates were 74·8 per cent (80 patients) and 28·0 per cent (30) respectively. Fourteen patients (13·1 per cent) underwent reoperation for complications. Reoperation rates for CRE at 1 and 3 years of follow-up were 37 and 54 per cent respectively. Risk factors for reoperation for recurrent enteritis were: emergency surgery (odds ratio (OR) 2·72, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·57 to 4·86), anastomotic leakage (OR 2·53, 1·54 to 4·42) and male sex (OR 3·57, 1·82 to 7·29). The only protective factor for reoperation was ileocaecal resection during the first surgical procedure (OR 4·48, 2·52 to 8·31).

Conclusion

Ileocaecal resection was the only factor that protected against reoperation for recurrent CRE, demonstrating the importance of resecting all damaged tissue in these patients. These results suggest that there is little place for intestinal bypass surgery or adhesiolysis.

Follow-up of double-barreled wet colostomy after pelvic exenteration at a single institution

PURPOSE

Double-barreled wet colostomy consists of simultaneous urinary and fecal diversions into a lateral colostomy and is indicated after pelvic exenteration or in palliative operations, when complete intestinal and urinary reconstruction is not possible. We report experience at our institution with Double-barreled wet colostomy regarding postoperative and long-term morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

All patients who underwent double-barreled wet colostomy construction at our institution from 1980 through 2008 were included in the study. Medical records were reviewed for type and history of the malignant tumor, previous treatments, comorbidity according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, type and length of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative (within 30 days after the operation) and long-term morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The study comprised 41 patients. The underlying disease was a malignant pelvic tumor in 30 patients (primary in 6 and recurrent in 24 patients) and a nonmalignant disease in 11 patients. Surgical mortality was 2.4%, and the postoperative morbidity rate was 65.9%. Double-barreled wet colostomy-related morbidity observed during follow-up included pyelonephritis (9.8%, with renal deterioration due to chronic pyelonephritis in 2.4%), stenosis of the uretero-colonic anastomosis (2.4%), and lithiasis in the urine reservoir (7.3%). Follow-up was discontinued after a mean of 18.6 (SD, 19.9) months in 14 patients who had been referred from other centers. A total of 27 patients were followed in our center for a mean of 32.2 (range, 1-156) months. Of these, 7 patients are currently alive, 1 with recurrent disease; 14 patients died from local or distant recurrence; and 6 patients died of causes other than malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Double-barreled wet colostomy is a safe alternative for patients who need simultaneous urinary and fecal diversion, although the risk of ascending urinary infection must be taken into consideration.

Surgical experience with small bowel damage secondary to pelvic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy are at risk of developing radiation enteritis. This study reviewed patients with radiation enteritis referred to a specialist colorectal unit.

METHODS

Patients referred with radiation enteritis secondary to pelvic radiotherapy (July 2001 to July 2005) were analysed regarding: indication, duration, dosage/fractionation of radiotherapy, nutritional/biochemical assessment, investigation, surgery, histopathology, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy. The median interval between radiotherapy and referral was 17 months. The majority were nutritionally deficient at presentation (haemoglobin < 12 g/l: 91%; magnesium < 0.75 mmol/l: 64%; albumin < 35 g/l: 91%). Eight (73%) patients had either a BMI < 20 or weight loss of >10% within 3 months prior to referral. Radiation enteritis was diagnosed by preoperative radiology, laparotomy and at histopathology. All patients underwent surgery (resection/ilesotomy/bypass) and median post-operative stay was 24 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation enteritis is associated with prolonged symptoms. Majority of patients are undernourished and despite nutritional support a high morbidity is noted.

Laparoscopic pelvic sling placement facilitates optimum therapeutic radiotherapy delivery in the management of pelvic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy has a significant role in the management of pelvic malignancies. However, the small intestine represents the main dose limiting organ. Invasive and non-invasive mechanical methods have been described to displace bowel out of the radiation field. We herein report a case series of laparoscopic placement of an absorbable pelvic sling in patients requiring pelvic radiotherapy.

METHODS

Six patients were referred to our minimally invasive unit. Four patients required radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer, one was scheduled for salvage localised radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy PSA progression and one patient required adjuvant radiotherapy post-cystoprostatectomy for bladder carcinoma. All patients had excessive small intestine within the radiation fields despite the use of non-invasive displacement methods.

RESULTS

All patients underwent laparoscopic mesh placement, allowing for an elevation of small bowel from the pelvis. The presence of an ileal conduit or previous surgery did not prevent mesh placement. Post-operative planning radiotherapy CT scans confirmed displacement of the small intestine allowing all patients to receive safely the planned radiotherapy in terms of both volume and radiation schedule.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic mesh placement represents a safe and efficient procedure in patients requiring high-dose pelvic radiation, presenting with unacceptable small intestine volume in the radiation field. This procedure is also feasible in those that have undergone previous major abdominal surgery.

Radiation Enterocolitis Requiring Surgery in Patients With Gynecological Malignancies

PURPOSE

To identify the characteristics, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of radiation enterocolitis requiring surgery in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 1,349 patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The majority of the patients (88%) were treated with 50 Gy or 50.4 Gy pelvic irradiation in conventional fractionations with anteroposterior fields.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (3.6%) developed radiation enterocolitis requiring surgery. Terminal ileum was the most frequent site (50%) and most of the lesions had stenosis or perforation. On univariate analysis, previous abdominopelvic surgery, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking and primary site had an impact on the complications, and on multivariate analysis, abdominopelvic surgery, DM, and smoking were independent predictors of the complications requiring surgery. After the surgical intervention, the frequency of Grade 2 or more bleeding was significantly lower in patients treated with intestinal resection in addition to decompression than those treated with intestinal decompression alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe radiation enterocolitis requiring surgery usually occurred at the terminal ileum and was strongly correlated with previous abdominopelvic surgery, DM, and smoking. Concerning the management, liberal resection of the affected bowel appears to be the preferable therapy.