Santulli enterostomy revisited: indications in adults

Outcome of Santulli enterostomy in patients with immaturity of ganglia: single institutional experience from a case series

Background

Immaturity of ganglia (IG) is an extremely rare disease and always requires surgical intervention in the neonatal period, but without guidelines to choose the ideal enterostomy procedure, the timing of stoma closure remains controversial. The aim of this study was to report our experience using Santulli enterostomy for the treatment of nine infants diagnosed with IG.

Methods

Patients who underwent Santulli enterostomy and were diagnosed with IG in our center between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively studied. Temporary stoma occlusion and a 24-h delayed film of barium enema (BE) were performed to evaluate intestinal peristalsis function to determine the timing of stoma closure. The demographic data, clinical and radiological findings, stoma occlusion and stoma closure results were explored.

Results

A total of 9 infants underwent Santulli enterostomy and were diagnosed with IG postoperatively. Their median gestational age at birth was 36 weeks (range 31–42), and their median birth weight was 2765 g (range 1300–3400). All patients had symptom onset in the neonatal period, including abdominal distension and biliary vomiting. Eight patients showed obvious small bowel dilatation in the plain films, except for one patient’s films that suggested gastrointestinal perforation with free gas downstream of the diaphragm. BE was performed in 6 patients, all of which had microcolons. The median age at operation was 3 days (range 1–23). Seven patients had an obvious transitional zone (TZ) during laparotomy, and the position of the TZ was 25–100 cm proximal above the ileocecal (IC) valve. Immature ganglion cells were present in the colon in 7 patients and the terminal ileum in 6 patients. The median age of successful stoma occlusion was 5 M (range 2–17) and 8 M (range 4–22) at ostomy closure. There was little or no barium residue in the 24-h delayed film of BE before stoma closure, and all patients were free of constipation symptoms during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Santulli enterostomy appears to be a suitable and efficient procedure for IG, combined with temporary stoma occlusion and 24-h delayed film of BE to evaluate the recovery of intestinal peristalsis function.

Comparison of Outcomes between Two Surgical Techniques for Patients with Intestinal Neuronal Dysplasia

Objective

Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is a serious congenital intestinal disease with a prevalence of 1/5000. HSCR remains one of the most severe congenital malformations of the abdominal organs in children that require complex reconstructive surgery. This study is aimed at investigating the clinical analysis of ileal Santulli stoma and ileal double-lumen stoma in children diagnosed with intestinal neuronal dysplasia (IND).

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on the children who were admitted to our hospital for intestinal obstruction from January 2014 to January 2019, underwent fistula operation and fistula closure operation, and were diagnosed with IND. According to the different modes of fistula, the children were divided into ileal Santulli stoma group and ileal double-lumen stoma group. The body weight of the children in the two groups during the second stage of fistula closure operation was compared. The number of hospitalizations due to enteritis and dehydration during the two operations was compared.

Results

A total of 23 cases (12 males and 11 females) were included in this study, including 10 cases in the Santulli group and 13 cases in the ileal double-lumen stoma group. There were no significant differences in baseline data and fistula location between the two groups. Compared with the ileal double-lumen stoma group, the Santulli stoma group had significantly higher weight of fistula precursor (P < 0.05), the interval between two operations was shorter (P < 0.05), there is less hospitalization for enteritis and dehydration during the two operations (P < 0.05), and there is less economic cost after fistula (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The clinical effect of ileum Santulli fistula is significantly better than double-lumen ileum fistula, which is not only beneficial to the growth and development of children after the first fistula but also can shorten the time of fistula closure, reduce the incidence of dehydration, and reduce the economic burden of family members. Therefore, it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

The safety and effectiveness of Santulli enterostomy in neonatal intestinal conditions

BACKGROUND

As an end stoma, Santulli enterostomy provides early restoration of intestinal continuity without formal laparotomy. Short amputation of the common limb enables closure on a side to restore anatomic continuity without sacrificing valuable intestine; additionally, the procedure is simple and safe. Most newborns who require enterostomy might benefit from Santulli enterostomy; however, several pediatric surgeons lack information regarding this procedure. Therefore, we have reviewed our experience about Santulli enterostomy and explore the advantages and indications in neonatal intestinal conditions.

METHODS

The clinical data of 76 neonates who underwent enterostomywere obtained. The patients were divided into two groups: the Santulli group with 33 cases who underwent Santulli enterostomy, and the control group with 43 cases who underwent double- or single-lumen ostomy. The general data of the two groups were analyzed, and the perioperative/postoperative complications, clinical data and the long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the demographic informations, the level of enterostomy, the rate of high-sight stoma, the operative time and bleeding of enterostomy between the two groups. Compared to the control group, the operative time of ostomy closure was less in the Santulli group (53.00 vs. 152.47, P < 0.001). The duration of parenteral nutrition (27.45 vs. 44.56, P = 0.010), the mean interval of initial enterostomy to stomal closure (131.21 vs. 216.42, P < 0.001), and length of stay (46.00 vs. 67.60, P = 0.007) were shorter, while the incidence of postoperative complications and hospitalization costs (11.21 vs. 15.49, P = 0.006) were lower. The Santulli procedure can reduce the morbidity of high output ostomy (2 vs. 10, P = 0.042) and short bowel syndrome (3 vs. 132, P = 0.025), shorten the discrepancy of diameter between the proximal and distal segments, maximize the available intestine, and monitor the movement of the distal bowel. The length of incision was shorter, and the catch-up growth was significantly faster in the Santulli group.

CONCLUSION

Santulli enterostomy is a superior procedure in the treatment of neonatal intestinal conditions, in terms of fewer complications, faster catch-up growth, shorter hospitalization time and treatment duration. It should be the procedure of choice in several newborns with intestinal conditions that require ostomy.

Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia

Background

Severe jejunoileal atresia is associated with prolonged parenteral nutrition, higher mortality and secondary surgery. However, the ideal surgical management of this condition remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with severe jejunoileal atresia treated by three different procedures.

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2016, 105 neonates with severe jejunoileal atresia were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 42 patients (40.0%) underwent the Bishop–Koop procedure (BK group), 49 (46.7%) underwent primary anastomosis (PA group) and 14 (13.3%) underwent Mikulicz double-barreled ileostomy (DB group). Demographics, treatment and outcomes including mortality, morbidity and nutrition status were reviewed and were compared among the three groups.

Results

The total mortality rate was 6.7%, showing no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.164). The BK group had the lowest post-operative complication rate (33.3% vs 65.3% for the PA group and 71.4% for the DB group, P = 0.003) and re-operation rate (4.8% vs 38.8% for the PA group and 14.3% for the DB group, P < 0.001). Compared with the BK group, the PA group showed a positive correlation with the complication rate and re-operation rate, with an odds ratio of 4.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57, 10.96] and 12.78 (95% CI: 2.58, 63.29), respectively. The DB group showed a positive correlation with the complication rate when compared with the BK group, with an odds ratio of 7.73 (95% CI: 1.67, 35.72). The weight-for-age Z-score at stoma closure was –1.22 (95% CI: –1.91, –0.54) in the BK group and –2.84 (95% CI: –4.28, –1.40) in the DB group (P = 0.039).

Conclusions

The Bishop–Koop procedure for severe jejunoileal atresia had a low complication rate and re-operation rate, and the nutrition status at stoma closure was superior to double-barreled enterostomy. The Bishop–Koop procedure seems to be an appropriate choice for severe jejunoileal atresia.

Bishop-Koop jejunostomy in an adult following proximal small bowel anastomotic breakdown

This case involves a proximal penetrating small bowel injury and the use of a Bishop-Koop anastomosis in a 33-year-old man. This case highlights the use of alternative methods used to prevent a proximal small bowel stoma in a rural setting. The Bishop-Koop anastomosis was originally designed for neonates in cases of intestinal anomalies such as atresia, volvulus and apple-peel syndrome. A literature search for the use of the Bishop-Koop anastomosis in adults, although scanty, is included in this article. We believe this article will benefit readers and that this method may be considered in breakdown of proximal small bowel injuries, to prevent a high-output stoma.

Early restoration of intestinal continuity in acute mesenteric ischaemia using Bishop-Koop stoma

INTRODUCTION

Acute mesenteric ischaemia frequently requires extensive bowel resection. Primary anastomosis is unsafe necessitating exteriorisation of proximal small bowel and distal colon. Inevitably, therefore, patients are left with high output stomas with concomitant fluid and nutritional problems.

SUBJECTS

We present two cases of acute mesenteric ischaemia both of which required extensive bowel resection. In both patients, we re-established intestinal continuity early by fashioning a Bishop-Koop type of reconstruction.

RESULTS

Both patients had uneventful postoperative recoveries with no stoma-related complication or anastomosis problems. Neither patient required prolonged parenteral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Bishop-Koop procedure may be used safely in a selected group of patients, with potential advantages of early restoration of intestinal continuity and easier closure.

Loss of intestine during stoma closure: an experimental model comparing laparoscopic and conventional techniques

PURPOSE

This study compared laparoscopy-assisted stoma closure (Lap) with conventional closure (Co) to assess loss of intestine.

METHODS

Ileostomies (loop L; single S) were performed 5 cm proximal to the ileocecal junction through a right lower quadrant incision in forty 11-week-old Lewis rats (L = 20, S = 20). Stoma closure was performed 60 days later using laparoscopy (Lap) or conventional closure (Co) in 10 rats each, to give 4 groups, Lap-L, Lap-S, Co-L, and Co-S. End-to-end anastomosis was performed through the stoma site in all rats. Bowel resected from the skin to the anastomosis was termed resected unusable bowel (RUB) and measured blindly. Laparotomy was performed 30 days later to assess the status of the anastomosis and complications.

RESULTS

Average RUB with Lap was significantly shorter; Lap-L (17.8 mm) versus Co-L (23.8 mm), P = 0.002, and Lap-S (10.6 mm) versus Co-S (13.8 mm), P = 0.001. During Co, accidental full-thickness injury to underlying bowel during stoma take-down occurred in 3 Co-L and 2 Co-S rats. All Lap rats were uncomplicated. Average times taken until end of stoma take-down were 6.1 min for Lap-L (3.2 min for trocar insertion, 2.8 min for stoma take-down), 5.6 min for Lap-S (2.8 and 2.7 min), 6.3 min for Co-L (from first incision to stoma take-down), and 5.1 min for Co-S (P = NS). At laparotomy there was no evidence of complications such as wound infection, incisional hernia or anastomotic stenosis in any rat.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that laparoscopy-assisted stoma closure is safe and quick, and results in less loss of intestine during stoma closure.