Impact of Patient- and Disease-Specific Factors on SLNB in Breast Cancer Patients. Are Current Guidelines Justified?

Impact of Tumor Localization and Method of Preoperative Biopsy on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping After Periareolar Nuclide Injection

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether tumor localization and method of preoperative biopsy affect sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection after periareolar nuclide injection in breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

767 breast cancer patients were retrospectively included. For lymphscintigraphy periareolar nuclide injection was performed and the SLN was located by gamma camera. Patient and tumor characteristics were correlated to the success rate of SLN mapping. SLN marking failed in 9/61 (14.7%) patients with prior vacuum-assisted biopsy and 80/706 (11.3%) patients with prior core needle biopsy. Individually evaluated, biopsy method (p = 0.4) and tumor localization (p = 0.9) did not significantly affect the SLN detection rate. Patients with a vacuum-assisted biopsy of a tumor in the upper outer quadrant had a higher odds ratio of failing in SLN mapping (OR 3.8, p = 0.09) compared to core needle biopsy in the same localization (OR 0.9, p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor localization and preoperative biopsy method do not significantly impact SLN mapping with periareolar nuclide injection. However, the failure risk tends to rise if vacuum-assisted biopsy of a tumor in the upper outer quadrant is performed.

Factors influencing the identification rate of the sentinel node in breast cancer

Sentinel node biopsy is a widely accepted alternative to primary axillary lymph node dissection for ipsilateral nodal assessment in breast cancer. We have performed a retrospective chart review in 713 consecutive patients with primary, operable breast cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy in order to identify factors that determine the sentinel node identification rate. Chi-squared test, univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the influence of different factors on the sentinel identification rate. Among the factors investigated, tumour size was correlated with sentinel lymph nodes detection rates (multiple logistic regression, P= 0.002). In addition, the patient's age showed to be a significant influencing factor (multiple logistic regression, P= 0.006). Body mass index and grade only exhibited a significant correlation with the identification rate in the univariate (P= 0.041, P= 0.025), but not in the multivariate analysis (P= not significant). All associations were found to be independent of the site of injection. Interestingly, surgeons with intermediate expertise (11-20 prior dissections) had the highest detection rates (P= 0.004). We conclude that sentinel identification rates are higher in larger tumours and in younger patients, independent of the injection site. Surgical experience in sentinel node dissection is not linearly correlated with higher identification rates.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in two Burgundy districts: prospective multicentric study on 528 breast cancers during the year 2005

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to assess development of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in two Burgundy districts during the year 2005.

METHODS

All women undergoing breast surgery as primary care between 1 January 2005 and 1 January 2006 were eligible for inclusion. Eleven surgeons from five different breast-treatment centres took part in this prospective multicentric study. As our objective was to evaluate practices, patients were not randomized and surgeons were free to choose treatment patterns.

RESULTS

The 528 enrolled cases account for 90% of all new breast cancers in 2005 in Cote d'Or and Saône et Loire. Half of these patients (286) fulfilled requirements for SLNB. The others (242) had primary full axillary clearance (AC). Four of our five centres offer double-detection of sentinel lymph nodes as well as intraoperative pathology examination. Most tumours were invasive ductal carcinomas, with an average size of 12 mm in the SLNB group (T1C) and 22 mm in the AC group (T2). Two or three lymph nodes were removed during each SLNB procedure. Whereas most SLNB studies report around 25% positive nodes, we barely recorded 18.5% (53 of our 256 patients). Moreover, 2/3 of these node-positive patients had optimal care since additional axillary clearance was done right away.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become routine practice in our Burgundy area. It is mainly dedicated to early stage breast cancer with limited metastatic risk. Our surgeons follow the most recent guidelines and indications are the same regardless of treatment centre.

Patterns of axillary surgical care for breast cancer in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Population-based overall patterns of surgical management of the axilla in women with operable breast cancer during the era of adoption of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) were studied.

METHODS

Women with operable breast carcinoma residing in 14 geographic areas of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries (1998-2004, n=239,661) were assessed for axillary surgical patterns of care.

RESULTS

Use of SLNB increased from 11 to 59%. Use of no axillary surgery decreased from 14 to 6.6%. In pathologic node-negative women, use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) decreased from 94 to 36%. Independent factors most associated with failure to receive SLNB included diagnosis year (2000: 62%; 2004: 29%), surgery (mastectomy: 64%; breast-conserving surgery: 36%), tumor size (T3: 71%; T2: 56%; T1: 40%), age (>or= 70 years: 50%; <70 years: 45%), grade (high: 42%; low: 38%), urbanity (non-large metropolitan area: 49%; large metropolitan area: 42%), and, by quartile, poverty (highest: 47%; lowest: 35%), and white-collar employment (lowest: 56%; highest: 47%). In pathologic node-positive women who had SLNB, failure to undergo completion ALND increased from 20% in 1998 to 32% in 2004. Patients with smaller, lower-grade tumors, and those with smaller size of nodal metastasis, lack of extracapsular extension, age >or= 70 years, increased linguistic isolation, African-American or Hispanic race/ethnicity, and white-collar employment were less likely to undergo completion ALND.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of the axilla changed dramatically during the period of rapid adoption of SLNB. Patterns of care suggest both appropriate and inappropriate selection for SLNB and ALND.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal

AIM

Although 15-25% of patients with anal cancer present with superficial inguinal lymph node metastases but the routine application of groin irradiation is controversial because of serious side effects. Inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be used to select patients appropriately for inguinal radiation. The study evaluates the efficiency and clinical impact of SLNB.

METHODS

Forty patients with anal cancer underwent 1 ml Tc(99m)-Nanocolloid injection in four sites around the tumour. Patients with inguinal radio colloid enrichment were selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Lymph node status was examined by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as immunohistochemistry-staining. All SLN-positive patients were scheduled for inguinal radiation; SLN-negative patients with T1 and early T2 tumours were not scheduled for inguinal radiation.

RESULTS

SLN were detected in 36/40 patients. Three common patterns of lymphatic drainage were observed: mesenterial, iliacal and inguinal. Twenty patients with inguinal SLN underwent SLN-biopsy. 6/20 patients were SLN-positive. In 10/20 patients SLNB altered the therapy plan--four patients with T1-tumours and positive SLN had additional groin irradiation, whereas 6 patients with small T2-tumors and tumour-free inguinal SLN did not undergo inguinal irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Inguinal sentinel node biopsy in anal cancer is efficient and could assist in the decision for inguinal radiation. The validity and safety of the proposed therapeutic algorithm has to be proven by a larger, prospective study.