1
|
Kato H, Horiguchi A, Ohtsuka T, Nanashima A, Unno M, Wakai T, Miura F, Isayama H, Hirooka Y, Aoki T, Yamamoto H, Yasuda I, Endo I. Annual report of Japanese biliary tract cancer registry from 2021: Focus on the rate of R0 resection, postoperative complications, and site of lymph node metastasis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2025; 32:339-349. [PMID: 40091189 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.12129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to clarify the current treatment status for biliary tract cancers based on data from the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan. METHODS Total 3895 cases of biliary tract cancers registered in the NCD during 2021 were included. We identified the rates of resection, R0 resection, postoperative complications, and incidences of lymph node metastasis for gallbladder carcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal bile duct carcinoma, and ampullary carcinoma. RESULTS The number of biliary tract cancers registered in the NCD during 2021 was 3895 (1775 in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, 1422 in gallbladder carcinoma, and 698 in ampullary carcinoma). In gallbladder carcinoma, the resection (89.59%) and R0 resection rates (87.99%) were favorable, and the complication rate (6.05%) was lower than that of others. However, the postoperative complication rate could be higher in T3-T4 cases and when extrahepatic bile duct resection was performed concomitantly. Lymph node metastasis was frequently seen in 12.60% at the No. 13a lymph node. In perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the R0 resection (69.82%) and complication rates (16.75%) were significantly lower and higher, respectively. In distal cholangiocarcinoma and ampullary carcinoma, metastasis was observed in approximately 2% and 10% of the dissected No. 16b1 para-aortic lymph nodes, respectively. In conclusion, although short-term surgical outcomes for biliary tract cancers in Japan might be acceptable, the significantly lower R0 resection and higher complication rates of perihilar cholangiocarcinomas indicate additional challenges for surgeons in the future and should continue to be monitored by the Japanese Society of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Kato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akihiko Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takao Ohtsuka
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nanashima
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Wakai
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Miura
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Hirooka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Taku Aoki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hirose Y, Sakata J, Nomura T, Takano K, Takizawa K, Miura K, Ishikawa H, Toge K, Ando T, Abe S, Kawachi Y, Ichikawa H, Shimada Y, Wakai T. Prognostic relevance of lymph node metastasis in pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: Rational extent and number-based nodal classification for regional lymphadenectomy. Surgery 2025; 180:109099. [PMID: 39823650 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2024] [Revised: 11/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the rational extent of regional lymphadenectomy and evaluated the prognostic impact of number-based regional nodal classification in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS This study included 191 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The nos. 8, 12a-b-c-p, 13, 14, and 17 nodes were dissected routinely. The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on prognostic stratification performed using number-based nodal classification was evaluated. RESULTS The incidence of metastasis in the routinely dissected nodes was 1.0-25.7%, with 5-year overall survival of 0-36.4% in patients with metastasis. The incidence of metastasis in the no. 12p nodes, which were not included in regional nodes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer or International Union Against Cancer staging systems, was 5.8% with a 5-year overall survival of 36.4% in patients with metastasis. When our dissected nodes were adopted (P < .001), number-based nodal classification predicted overall survival better than when regional nodes defined by the International Union Against Cancer or American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems were used (nos. 8, 12a-b, 13, 14, and 17 nodes with or without no. 9 nodes; P = .004 each). The 5-year overall survival in patients with pN0, pN1 (1-3 positive nodes), and pN2 (≥4 positive nodes) disease was 57.4%, 37.3%, and 13.6%, respectively (P < .001). The pN classification was an independent prognostic factor (pN1, P = .009; pN2, P < .001). CONCLUSION The nos. 8, 12a-b-c-p, 13, 14, and 17 nodes should be prioritized as the rational extent of regional lymphadenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma for accurate staging. Number-based regional nodal classification is suitable for prognostic stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hirose
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/Yuki_HIROSE
| | - Jun Sakata
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Nomura
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kabuto Takano
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/kabutac2
| | - Kazuyasu Takizawa
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/takikiiiiii
| | - Kohei Miura
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/Kohei_Miura
| | - Hirosuke Ishikawa
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/Issy91491683
| | - Koji Toge
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/koji_toge
| | - Takuya Ando
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/UIiizrTzKPPIgw
| | - Shun Abe
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/shunmidori0710
| | - Yusuke Kawachi
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ichikawa
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/hichikawa7011
| | - Yoshifumi Shimada
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. https://twitter.com/YoshifumiShima
| | - Toshifumi Wakai
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malik AK, Davidson BR, Manas DM. Surgical management, including the role of transplantation, for intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:108248. [PMID: 38467524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma are life threatening disease with poor outcomes despite optimal treatment currently available (5-year overall survival following resection 20-35%, and <10% cured at 10-years post resection). The insidious onset makes diagnosis difficult, the majority do not have a resection option and the high recurrence rate post-resection suggests that occult metastatic disease is frequently present. Advances in perioperative management, such as ipsilateral portal vein (and hepatic vein) embolisation methods to increase the future liver remnant volume, genomic profiling, and (neo)adjuvant therapies demonstrate great potential in improving outcomes. However multiple areas of controversy exist. Surgical resection rate and outcomes vary between centres with no global consensus on how 'resectable' disease is defined - molecular profiling and genomic analysis could potentially identify patients unlikely to benefit from resection or likely to benefit from targeted therapies. FDG-PET scanning has also improved the ability to detect metastatic disease preoperatively and avoid futile resection. However tumours frequently invade major vasculo-biliary structures, with resection and reconstruction associated with significant morbidity and mortality even in specialist centres. Liver transplantation has been investigated for very selected patients for the last decade and yet the selection algorithm, surgical approach and both value of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies remain to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the contemporary management of intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Polyakov AN, Patyutko YI, Granov DA, Bazin IS, Rutkin IO, Korshak AV, Turlak AS, Podluzhny DV. [Prognostic factors and preoperative therapy in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2025:5-13. [PMID: 39902503 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20250115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify prognostic factors and role of preoperative therapy for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed the results of surgical and combined treatment of IHCC between 1999 and 2023. Immediate and long-term outcomes were evaluated depending on negative prognostic factors and additional therapy. RESULTS The study included 195 patients. Postoperative complications grade ≥III were observed in 35 (17.9%) case. Mortality rate was 3.1% (n=6). Thirty-eight patients (19.5%) underwent treatment before surgery, 109 (55.9%) ones - after surgery. The median overall survival was 31 months, 5-year overall survival - 32.0%. The following factors worsened overall survival: node size ≥8 cm (HR 1.45; 95% CI 0.97-2.17), invasion (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.07-2.47), multiple lesion (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.00-2.28). R1 resection worsened disease-free survival (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.14-3.10). Lymph node metastases decreased overall (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.27- 3.04) and disease-free survival (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.63-3.44). Two and more negative factors worsened overall (p=0.0013) and disease-free survival (p=0.0005). Absence of adjuvant therapy worsened overall (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.41-3.20) and disease-free survival (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.99-2.04). There was a trend towards higher overall (p=0.088) and progression-free survival (p=0.029) in case of preoperative therapy (n=195). In unfavorable prognosis group, preoperative therapy (n=33) was superior to standard treatment (resection+capecitabine after surgery, n=26). There was a trend towards higher overall survival (p=0.066) and significantly better progression-free survival (17 vs 13 months, p=0.018). CONCLUSION Negative prognostic factors for resectable IHCC are lesion size ≥8 cm, intrahepatic and regional metastases, invasion into neighboring structures, R1 resection. Combination of negative factors worsened prognosis. Adjuvant therapy improved postoperative outcomes. Preoperative therapy may be advisable in case of negative factors and high risk of R1 resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Polyakov
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu I Patyutko
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - D A Granov
- Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Moscow, Russia
| | - I S Bazin
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - I O Rutkin
- Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Korshak
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A S Turlak
- Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Moscow, Russia
| | - D V Podluzhny
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agrawal S, Naik N, Priyanka P. Impact of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy (RPLN) on the Outcomes of Locally Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer (GBC) Following Chemotherapy (CT) or Chemotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemoradiotherapy (CTRT). J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 56:7. [PMID: 39425807 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01124-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy is considered a metastatic disease in GBC; however, some surgical series of radical surgery with enlarged RPLN who underwent RPLN dissection have shown results marginally inferior to those without enlarged RPLN. Radiological RPLN comprises a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC. There is dilemma in the intent of treatment to be offered in such cases. We are reporting our series of outcome of GBC with RPLN treated with first-line CT followed by consolidation CTRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Non-metastatic locally advanced GBC with good performance status (KPS ≥ 80) were initiated on first-line CT (cisplatin-gemcitabine), and thereafter, responders were evaluated by CECT-angiography and PET-CT scan for resectability. If found unresectable, they were offered consolidation CTRT to a dose of 45 Gy by conventional fractionation (3D-CRT technique) along with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m2 to GBC and regional lymphatics including RPLN. Thereafter, boost dose of 9 Gy/5# was given to GBC only. Response assessment was done using CECT abdomen by RECIST criteria v 1.1. Outcomes (overall survival) of the two groups (RPLN vs non-RPLN) were computed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and chi-square tests using SPSS v 20. RESULTS Among 189 patients of advanced non-metastatic GBC recruited from 2011 to 2022, 80 had RPLN. The demographic features of both groups were comparable. Overall, 68% of the patients were women, 30% underwent upfront stenting for obstructive jaundice, and 90% had T3 and T4 disease. Only 10% had undergone upfront laparoscopic staging and had pathologically proven RPLN. Forty percent of the patients received four cycles of CT only and 50% of the patients received six cycles or more and 33% received CTRT. By RECIST criteria, 10% vs 16% achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 41% achieved partial response (PR), 16% vs 15% achieved stable disease (SD), 2.7% vs 6% had disease progression (PD), and 14.5% vs 3.7% were non-evaluable in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. 12% vs 6% could undergo radical surgery in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group (p = 0.03). The median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7.6-10.3 months) vs 10 months (95% CI 8-9.8 months) (p = NS) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. In those who received CT only, the median OS was 7 months vs 8 months, while in those who received CT followed by CTRT, the median OS was 14 months vs 13 months (p = 0.65) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Based on this analysis, we conclude that RPLN constitutes a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC and has outcomes similar to those without RPLN if treated with radical intent. RPLN should not be considered a metastatic disease and should be treated with radical intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushma Agrawal
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India.
| | - Nagendra Naik
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India
| | - Parul Priyanka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gundavda K, Chopde A, Pujari A, Reddy B, Pawar A, Ramaswamy A, Ostwal V, Patkar S, Bhandare M, Shrikhande SV, Chaudhari VA. Prognostic Impact of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Resected Non-Pancreatic Periampullary Cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:7052-7063. [PMID: 39031265 PMCID: PMC11413064 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15847-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery remains debatable in para-aortic lymph node (PALN, station 16b1) metastasis in non-pancreatic periampullary cancer (NPPAC). This study examined the impact of PALN metastasis on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in NPPAC. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with NPPAC who were explored for PD with PALN dissection was performed. Based on the extent of nodal involvement on final histopathology, they were stratified as node-negative (N0), regional node involved (N+) and metastatic PALN (N16+) and their outcomes were compared. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2022, 153/887 PD patients underwent a PALN dissection, revealing N16+ in 42 patients (27.4%), of whom 32 patients underwent resection. The 3-years overall survival (OS) for patients with N16+ was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-60%), notably lower than the 67% (95% CI 53-83.5%; p = 0.007) for those without PALN metastasis. Stratified by nodal involvement, the median OS for N+ and N16+ patients was similar (28.4 months and 26.2 months, respectively). The N0 subgroup had a significantly longer 3-years OS of 87.5% (95% CI 79-96.7%; p = 0.0051). Interestingly, 10 patients not offered resection following N16+ identified on frozen section had a median survival of only 9 months. The perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing PD with PALN dissection were similar to standard resections. CONCLUSION In a select group of patients with NPPAC, PD in isolated PALN metastasis was associated with improved OS. The survival in this group of patients was comparable with regional node-positive patients and significantly better than palliative treatment alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaival Gundavda
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Chopde
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Avinash Pujari
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Bhaskar Reddy
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Akash Pawar
- Department of Biostatistics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Manish Bhandare
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikram A Chaudhari
- Division of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kang J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Kim JY, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Nahm JH, Park WS, Park E, Park JK, Park JM, Song BJ, Shin YC, Ahn KS, Woo SM, Yu JI, Yoo C, Lee K, Lee DH, Lee MA, Lee SE, Lee IJ, Lee H, Im JH, Jang KT, Jang HY, Jun SY, Chon HJ, Jung MK, Chung YE, Chong JU, Cho E, Chie EK, Choi SB, Choi SY, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Choi HJ, Hong SM, Hong JH, Hong TH, Hwang SH, Hwang IG, Park JS. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:161-202. [PMID: 38679456 PMCID: PMC11128785 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Sun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jingu Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Young Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hae Nahm
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Suk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eunkyu Park
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byeong Jun Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Shin
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Hospital, Immuno-Oncology Branch Division of Rare and Refractory Center, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huisong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jun
- Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min Kyu Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Services Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eunae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Korea Universtiy Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Yeon Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ji Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Jeong Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aggarwal A, Goel S, Sayed AI, Goel V, Talwar V, Singh S. Interaortocaval Lymph Node Metastasis in Gall Bladder Cancer: Is It Regional Node or Metastatic Disease? J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:1252-1260. [PMID: 36729244 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00914-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Interaortocaval or para-aortic lymph node (IACLN) metastasis in gall bladder cancer (GBC) is usually a contraindication to curative resection with a prognosis similar to liver or peritoneal metastases. However, few authors have reported survival similar to regional lymph node (RLN) positive disease after curative resection in these patients. This study aims to analyse the role of curative surgery in such cases. METHODS Data of all patients operated for GBC from 2012 to 2019 was retrieved. Survival of the IACLN- and RLN-positive patients was compared and factors associated with recurrence and survival were analysed. RESULTS Patients were divided in RLN-positive (n = 47) and IACLN-positive (n = 17) group. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, median disease-free survival (18 vs 13 months) and median overall survival (27 vs 20 months) were inferior (p = 0.06) in IACLN group. But it was higher than the patients who received only palliative therapy (median OS, 14 months). Lack of adjuvant therapy was a significant factor for disease recurrence. CONCLUSION Selected cases of GBC with IACLN metastases can achieve meaningful survival after curative resection and adjuvant therapy. Survival was inferior to RLN-positive cases but it was higher than the patients who received only palliative chemotherapy. This concept needs further evaluation in a prospective study with larger number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Aggarwal
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi, 110085, India
| | - Shaifali Goel
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi, 110085, India
| | - Assif Iqbal Sayed
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi, 110085, India
| | - Varun Goel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi, 110085, India
| | - Vineet Talwar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi, 110085, India
| | - Shivendra Singh
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi, 110085, India.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Long X, Wu H, Yang L, Xu H, Dai J, Wang W, Xia L, Peng J, Zhou F. Recommendations of the clinical target volume for the para-aortic region based on the patterns of lymph node metastasis in patients with biliary tract cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:893509. [PMID: 36408169 PMCID: PMC9668861 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.893509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even though the clinical target volume (CTV) in biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients has been proposed by several previous studies, the para aortic CTV for BTC is still not well-defined. The objective of this study was to determine the precise delineation of the para aortic CTV for BTC according to the distribution pattern and failure pattern of lymph nodes. METHODS Computed tomography (CT)-, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)-generated images of patients with BTC from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The distribution patterns of lymph nodes in different regions were summarized. The diagnosed para aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) were manually mapped to standard axial CT images. The asymmetric CTV expansions from the para aortic were defined according to the distance from the volumetric centre of lymph node to the most proximal border of aorta. RESULTS A total of 251 positive lymph nodes were found in the study cohort (n = 61 patients, 92 PALN). All PALNs were projected onto axial CT image of the standard patient. PALNs were concentrated in the 16a2 and 16b1 regions, and the involvement rates were 17% and 13% respectively. Therefore, the upper boundary of 16a2 and the lower boundary of 16b1 were defined as the cranial and caudal border of para aortic CTV, respectively. For the study cohort, the mean distance from the volume center of all lymph nodes in 16a2 and 16b1 to the proximal border of the aorta was 9 mm (range 4-24) in the front, 7 mm (range 3-14) on the left, and 12 mm (range 5-29) on the right. For the validation cohort (n=19 patients, 56 PALN), the mean distance from the center of the lymph node to the border of the aorta were both 10 mm on the left (range 5-20) and right (range 6-23). The mean distance in front of the aorta was 9 mm (range 5-23). Finally, a CTV expansion from the aorta of 18 mm in the front, 12 mm on the left, and 24 mm on the right resulted in 96% (73/76) coverage of PALNs in the study cohort. At the time of the validation, the described CTV could include 96% (47/49) of recurrent PALNs in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS The involvement rates of PALNs in 16a2 and 16b1 were the highest. Based on the distribution of PALNs, a new para-aortic CTV was defined to construct a more accurate target volume for adjuvant radiotherapy in BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jin Peng
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Fuxiang Zhou
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273395. [PMID: 36048817 PMCID: PMC9436049 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ghosh NK, Rahul R, Singh A, Sharma S, Kumar A, Singh RK, Behari A, Kumar A, Kapoor VK, Saxena R. Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in Gallbladder Cancer: As Bad as Distant Metastasis. South Asian J Cancer 2022; 11:195-200. [PMID: 36588607 PMCID: PMC9803534 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ashish SinghBackground Regarding gallbladder cancer (GBC) there is conflicting evidence in the literature whether retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases (RLNM) should be considered as regional nodal metastasis or as distant metastasis (DM) and the jury is out on radical curative surgery in presence of RLNM. This is an analysis of GBC patients, to see the effect of RLNM on survival and to compare with that of patients with DMs. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients of GBC with RLNM (interaortocaval and paraaortic) or DM on frozen section biopsy at surgery, between January 2013 and December 2018. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 22.0). Survival in these two groups (RLNM and DM) was compared with log-rank test. A p -value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 235 patients with ostensibly resectable GBC underwent surgical exploration. The planned curative resection was abandoned in 91 (39%) patients because of RLNM ( n = 20, 9%) or DM ( n = 71, 30%) on frozen section biopsy. Demographic profile and blood parameters were similar. The median survival for RLNM and DM groups were 5 (range 2-26) and 6 (range 2-24) months, respectively, with no significant difference on log-rank test ( p = 0.64). There was no 3-year or longer survivor in either group. Conclusion Due to similar poor survival in presence of RLNM or DM, RLNM should be considered as the equivalent of DM. This study strengthens evidence to avoid curative surgery in patients with RLNM. These lymph nodes should be sampled preoperatively, if suspicious on imaging, for fine-needle aspiration cytology and at surgery, as a routine for frozen section histological examination before initiating curative resection to avert a futile exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalini Kanta Ghosh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rahul Rahul
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Supriya Sharma
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ashok Kumar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rajneesh Kumar Singh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Anu Behari
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ashok Kumar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Vinay Kumar Kapoor
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rajan Saxena
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sahu R, Sharma P, Kumar A. An Insight into Cholangiocarcinoma and Recent Advances in its Treatment. J Gastrointest Cancer 2022; 54:213-226. [PMID: 35023010 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00728-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignant disease of the epithelial cells of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. This review focuses on various aspects of cholangiocarcinoma such as its associated causes, treatment criteria, and more. METHODS Although it remains a rare malignancy and is the second most common primary malignancy of the liver, the incidence is increasing, especially the incidence of intrahepatic CCA. Several studies suggested that surgery is not only solution; recently, reported targeted drugs may have the potential to become an alternative option. RESULTS This review provides an overview of the current scenario of targeted therapies for CCA, which were tabulated with their current status and it also included its associated causes and its treatment criteria. CONCLUSION Because of its rarity and complexity, surgery remains the preferred treatment in resectable patients. Howerver, the studies suggested that the recently reported drugs may have the potential to be an alternative option for the treatment of CCA and related complications. In addition, this review will certainly benefit the community and researcher for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Sahu
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Medical & Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India
| | - Praveen Sharma
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Medical & Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ajay Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Knowledge Park-II, 201306, Greater Noida, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liang L, Li C, Wang MD, Xing H, Diao YK, Jia HD, Lau WY, Pawlik TM, Zhang CW, Shen F, Huang DS, Yang T. The value of lymphadenectomy in surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1575-1586. [PMID: 34160742 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01967-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). There is still no consensus on the value of lymphadenectomy despite evidence indicating lymph node (LN) status is an important prognostic indicator for postoperative long-term survival. We sought to perform a meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence on the value of lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing surgery for PHC. The PubMed (OvidSP), Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before July 2020 that reported on lymphadenectomy at the time of surgery for PHC after curative surgery. 7748 patients from 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No survival benefit was identified with increased number of LN resected (all P > 0.05). Meanwhile, overall LN status was an important prognostic factor. Patients with lymph node metastasis had a pooled estimate hazard ratio of death that was over two-fold higher than patients without lymph node metastasis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.65-2.59, P < 0.001). The examination of 5 LNs on histology was associated with better staging of lymph node status and stratification of patients into positive or negative LN groups. While the extent of LN dissection was not associated with a survival benefit, examination of more than 5 LNs better staged patients into positive or negative LN groups with a lower risk of nodal understaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming-Da Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Xing
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong-Kang Diao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hang-Dong Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, ShatinHong Kong SAR, N.T, China
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
- School of Clinical Medicine, Hangzhou Medical College No, 481, Binwen Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
- Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nitta N, Ohgi K, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, Yamamoto Y, Ashida R, Otsuka S, Sasaki K, Uesaka K. Prognostic Impact of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 2020; 45:581-589. [PMID: 33079246 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05834-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) with paraaortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of PALNM in resected EHCC. METHODS The present retrospective study included 410 patients, including 16 patients with PALNM, who underwent surgical resection of EHCC between September 2002 and December 2018. These were compared to 9 patients in whom EHCC was not resected due to PALNM. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were investigated to identify the prognostic factors in resected EHCC. RESULTS The overall survival in the resected patients with PALNM was significantly better than that in unresected patients (median survival time [MST] 33.7 vs. 16.7 months, p=0.009) and was not significantly worse than that of patients with regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) (MST 33.7 vs 36.0 months, p=0.278). The multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, male sex, tumor location (perihilar), residual tumor status, histological grade, microscopic venous invasion, and regional LNM as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in survival between the resected patients with PALNM and patients with regional LNM, and PALNM was not a significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Surgical resection may be considered an acceptable approach for EHCC with PALNM in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhito Nitta
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Katsuhisa Ohgi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan.
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Yukiyasu Okamura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Takaaki Ito
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yamamoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Ryo Ashida
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Shimpei Otsuka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| | - Keiko Sasaki
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunto- Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 4118777, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coimbra FJF, Torres OJM, Alikhanov R, Agarwal A, Pessaux P, Fernandes EDSM, Quireze-Junior C, Araujo RLC, Godoy AL, Waechter FL, Resende APD, Boff MF, Coelho GR, Rezende MBD, Linhares MM, Belotto M, Moraes-Junior JMA, Amaral PCG, Pinto RD, Genzini T, Lima AS, Ribeiro HSC, Ramos EJ, Anghinoni M, Pereira LL, Enne M, Sampaio A, Montagnini AL, Diniz A, Jesus VHFD, Sirohi B, Shrikhande SV, Peixoto RDA, Kalil AN, Jarufe N, Smith M, Herman P. BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON INCIDENTAL GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA : ABCD = BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY 2020; 33:e1496. [PMID: 32667526 PMCID: PMC7357549 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental gallbladder cancer is defined as a cancer discovered by histological examination after cholecystectomy. It is a potentially curable disease. However, some questions related to their management remain controversial and a defined strategy is associated with better prognosis. AIM To develop the first evidence-based consensus for management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in Brazil. METHODS Sixteen questions were selected, and 36 Brazilian and International members were included to the answer them. The statements were based on current evident literature. The final report was sent to the members of the panel for agreement assessment. RESULTS Intraoperative evaluation of the specimen, use of retrieval bags and routine histopathology is recommended. Complete preoperative evaluation is necessary and the reoperation should be performed once final staging is available. Evaluation of the cystic duct margin and routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy is recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered and chemoradiation therapy if microscopically positive surgical margins. Port site should be resected exceptionally. Staging laparoscopy before reoperation is recommended, but minimally invasive radical approach only in specialized minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary centers. The extent of liver resection is acceptable if R0 resection is achieved. Standard lymph node dissection is required for T2 tumors and above, but common bile duct resection is not recommended routinely. CONCLUSIONS It was possible to prepare safe recommendations as guidance for incidental gallbladder carcinoma, addressing the most frequent topics of everyday work of digestive and general surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Orlando Jorge M Torres
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Brazil
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anil Agarwal
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Nouvel Hopital Civil, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eduardo de Souza M Fernandes
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - André Luis Godoy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabio Luis Waechter
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gustavo Rego Coelho
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hospital Walter Cantidio, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | | | | | - Marcos Belotto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Rinaldo Danesi Pinto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Santa Catarina, Blumenal, Brazil
| | - Tercio Genzini
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hospital Beneficiência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Agnaldo Soares Lima
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo José Ramos
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hospital NS das Graças, Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - Lucio Lucas Pereira
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Enne
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ipanema Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Adriano Sampaio
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - André Luis Montagnini
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alessandro Diniz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Bhawna Sirohi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Oncology Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Oncology Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Antonio Nocchi Kalil
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Nicolas Jarufe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Universidade Católica, Santiago, Chile
| | - Martin Smith
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Paulo Herman
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ma WJ, Wu ZR, Hu HJ, Wang JK, Yin CH, Shi YJ, Li FY, Cheng NS. Extended Lymphadenectomy Versus Regional Lymphadenectomy in Resectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1619-1629. [PMID: 31147975 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04244-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study is to compare the effects of extended lymphadenectomy (E-LD) and regional lymphadenectomy (R-LD) on outcome after radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). METHODS Data of 290 patients who underwent radical resection of HCCA were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, surgical variables, and tumor and LN characteristics were evaluated for association with survival. RESULTS A total of 63 patients underwent E-LD. Patients who underwent E-LD were more likely to have portal vein embolization (14.3% vs. 5.7%), radical hepatectomy (36.2% vs. 26.0%), higher proportion of M1 patients (22.2% vs. 5.3%), more lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved (17 vs. 7), and positive common hepatic artery lymph nodes (21.4% vs. 12.6%) when compared with R-LD (all P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival for patients who underwent E-LD indicated improvement over patients who underwent R-LD in M0 (33.39 vs. 21.31 months; P = 0.032) and R0 resection (32.97 vs. 21.02 months; P = 0.044) disease, but not observed in M1 disease (P > 0.05). After propensity score matching, E-LD was not associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) even in all subgroup analysis (all P > 0.05). On multivariable analysis, E-LD was associated with improved overall survival, but not after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION E-LD is more likely to be performed in higher stage tumors. E-LD significantly increases LN retrieval, thereby preventing under-staging and improving survival prediction. E-LD should not be adopted for HCCA patients with intraoperatively confirmed distant LN metastases. Future studies are required to further assess whether E-LD should be performed in negative celiac, superior mesenteric, and para-aortic lymph node in HCCA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jie Ma
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
- Laboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Zheng-Ru Wu
- Laboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hai-Jie Hu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun-Ke Wang
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Chang-Hao Yin
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Jun Shi
- Laboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Nan-Sheng Cheng
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Medicine, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li J, Zhou MH, Ma WJ, Li FY, Deng YL. Extended lymphadenectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: What it will bring? World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:3318-3325. [PMID: 32655260 PMCID: PMC7327786 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Lymph node dissection is always a hot issue in radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). There are still controversies regarding whether some lymph nodes should be dissected, of which the para-aortic lymph nodes are the most controversial. This review synthesized findings in the literature using the PubMed database of articles in the English language published between 1990 and 2019 on the effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy including para-aortic lymph nodes dissection in radical resection of HCCA. Hepatobiliary surgeons have basically achieved a consensus that enough lymph nodes should be obtained to accurately stage HCCA. Only a very small number of studies have focused on the effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy including para-aortic nodes dissection on HCCA. They reported that extended lymphadenectomy can bring some survival benefits for patients with potential para-aortic lymph node metastasis and more lymph nodes can be obtained to make the patient's tumor staging more accurate without increasing the related complications. Extended lymphadenectomy should not be adopted for HCCA patients with intraoperatively confirmed distant lymph node metastases. For these patients, radical resection combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be a better choice. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study of regional lymphotomy and extended lymphadenectomy in HCCA should be conducted to guide clinical practice. A standardized extended lymphadenectomy may help to more accurately stage HCCA. Future studies are required to further assess whether extended lymphadenectomy can improve long-term survival in negative celiac, superior mesenteric, and para-aortic lymph node diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Li
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
| | - Meng-Hao Zhou
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
| | - Wen-Jie Ma
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yi-Lei Deng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hempel S, Oehme F, Müssle B, Aust DE, Distler M, Saeger HD, Weitz J, Welsch T. Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastases in non-pancreatic periampullary cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:16. [PMID: 31964383 PMCID: PMC6975057 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-1783-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Resection of the para-aortic lymph node (PALN) group Ln16b1 during pancreatoduodenectomy remains controversial because PALN metastases are associated with a worse prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. The present study aimed to analyze the impact of PALN metastases on outcome after non-pancreatic periampullary cancer resection. Methods One hundred sixty-four patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer who underwent curative pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively investigated. The data were supplemented with a systematic literature review on this topic. Results In 67 cases, the PALNs were clearly assigned and could be histopathologically analyzed. In 10.4% of cases (7/67), tumor-infiltrated PALNs (PALN+) were found. Metastatic PALN+ stage was associated with increased tumor size (P = 0.03) and a positive nodal stage (P < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PALN and non-metastatic PALN (PALN–) was 24.8 and 29.5 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS of PALN+ and pN1 PALN patients (P = 0.834). Patients who underwent palliative surgical treatment (n = 20) had a lower median OS of 13.6 (95% confidence interval 2.7–24.5) months. Including the systematic literature review, only 23 cases with PALN+ status and associated OS could be identified; the average survival was 19.8 months. Conclusion PALN metastasis reflects advanced tumor growth and lymph node spread; however, it did not limit overall survival in single-center series. The available evidence of the prognostic impact of PALN metastasis is scarce and a recommendation against resection in these cases cannot be given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Hempel
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Oehme
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Benjamin Müssle
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela E Aust
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Detlev Saeger
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thilo Welsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Piccolo G, Piozzi GN. Laparoscopic Radical Cholecystectomy for Primary or Incidental Early Gallbladder Cancer: The New Rules Governing the Treatment of Gallbladder Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:8570502. [PMID: 28690639 PMCID: PMC5485370 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8570502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the technical feasibility and oncologic safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy (LRC) for primary or incidental early gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment. METHODS Articles reporting LRC for GBC were reviewed from the first case reported in 2010 to 2015 (129 patients). 116 patients had a preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer (primary GBC). 13 patients were incidental cases (IGBC) discovered during or after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS The majority of patients who underwent LRC were pT2 (62.7% GBC and 63.6% IGBC). Parenchyma-sparing operation with wedge resection of the gallbladder bed or resection of segments IVb-V were performed principally. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was carried out according to the reported depth of neoplasm invasion. Lymph node retrieved ranged from 3 to 21. Some authors performed routine sampling biopsy of the inter-aorto-caval lymph nodes (16b1 station) before the radical treatment. No postoperative mortality was documented. Discharge mean day was POD 5th. 16 patients had post operative morbidities. Bile leakage was the most frequent post-operative complication. 5 y-survival rate ranged from 68.75 to 90.7 months. CONCLUSION Laparoscopy can not be considered as a dogmatic contraindication to GBC but a primary approach for early case (pT1b and pT2) treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Piccolo
- Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Department of Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gu J, Xia L, Xu B, Lu T, Halmurat O, Wang J, Zhang J, Ding Y, Xia Q. Clinical prognostic significance of regional and extended lymphadenectomy for biliary cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:717-25. [PMID: 27094254 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical prognostic significance of regional and extended lymphadenectomy for biliary cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. METHODS A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central Register, Embase, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar between January 1965 and May 2014 with restricted articles for the English language. Data were processed for a meta-analysis by RevMan 5 software. RESULTS Altogether 10 retrospective studies were finally enrolled in our study. For positive para-aortic lymph node group irrespective of regional lymph node metastasis, the overall 1-, 3-, 5-yr pooled RR estimates of survival rates were 2.30, 1.70, and 1.42. There were significant differences between positive para-aortic lymph node group and negative group. For positive para-aortic lymph node group in the setting of regional lymph node metastasis, the overall 1-, 3-, 5-yr pooled RR estimates of survival rates were 1.57, 1.29, and 1.11, respectively. The long-term outcomes referred to 5-yr survival rate were similar between para-aortic lymph node metastasis and regional lymph node metastasis only. DISCUSSION Radical resection with extended lymphadenectomy should be caution in terms of the results of an intraoperative sampling biopsy of para-aortic lymph node, which requires a well-designed, prospective controlled study in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinyang Gu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Xia
- Department of Liver Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Biyun Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Affiliated DrumTower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Tianfei Lu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Obulkasim Halmurat
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated DrumTower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated DrumTower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yitao Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated DrumTower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Qiang Xia
- Department of Liver Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nappo G, Borzomati D, Perrone G, Valeri S, Amato M, Petitti T, Coppola R. Incidence and prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph nodes metastases during pancreaticoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:1001-8. [PMID: 26335256 PMCID: PMC4605339 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard lymphadenectomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for peri-ampullary cancer does not include the routine removal of para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) (station 16, according to the JPS staging system). The aim of this study was to report the incidence and the prognostic value of PALN metastases in patients undergoing PD for peri-ampullary cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent PD and PALN dissection for peri-ampullary cancer were prospectively evaluated. The relationship between clinicopathological factors, including PALN metastases and survival was evaluated at univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS PALN metastases (N16+) were found in 11.1% of cases. At univariate analysis, R1 resection, metastatic nodes different from para aortic (N1) and N16+ significantly affected patients' prognosis. Compared with N16+, the median overall survival (OS) of N0 patients was significantly longer (32 versus 69 months, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas no difference was found between N16+ and N1 patients (32 versus 34 months, respectively) (P > 0.05). At multivariate analysis, only R1 resection reached statistical significance and was confirmed an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS Neoplastic involvement of PALN in peri-ampullary cancer is frequent and, so, their removal during PD could be justified. Moreover, PALN metastases should be not considered an absolute contraindication to radical surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gennaro Nappo
- Department of General Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRome, Italy
| | - Domenico Borzomati
- Department of General Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Perrone
- Unit of Pathology, Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRome, Italy
| | - Sergio Valeri
- Department of General Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRome, Italy
| | - Michela Amato
- Unit of Pathology, Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Coppola
- Department of General Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kambakamba P, Linecker M, Slankamenac K, DeOliveira ML. Lymph node dissection in resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2015. [PMID: 26212390 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is usually unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Only few patients are candidates for a potential curative treatment. For those patients, prognosis is strongly related to negative resection margin and lymph node status. Thus, a certain benchmark of lymph node count is necessary to secure relevant lymph node recovery and to avoid understaging. However, the required minimum number of retrieved lymph nodes remains unclear for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, nodes, metastases edition increased the requirement for the histologic examination of lymph nodes in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients from 3 to 15. The applicability of such recommendation appears difficult and questionable. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the number of retrieved lymph nodes for staging of patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library databases were systematically screened up to December 2014. All studies reporting the number of lymph node count in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were included and assessed for eligibility. RESULTS A total of 725 abstracts were screened and 20 studies were included for analysis, comprising almost 4,000 patients. The cumulative median lymph node count was 7 (2 to 24). A median lymph node count greater than or equal to 15 was reported in 9% of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients and could only be achieved in extended lymphadenectomy. Subgroup analysis revealed a median lymph node count of 7 (range 7 to 9), which was associated with the detection of most lymph node positive patients and showed the lowest risk for understaging patients. Lymph node count greater than or equal to 15 did not increase detection rate of lymph node positive patients. CONCLUSIONS This systematic analysis suggests that lymph node count greater than or equal to 7 is adequate for prognostic staging, while lymph node count greater than or equal to 15 does not improve detection of patients with positive lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patryk Kambakamba
- Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Ksenija Slankamenac
- Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Michelle L DeOliveira
- Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hwang KY, Yoon YI, Hwang S, Ha TY, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Song GW, Jung DH, Lee YJ, Park KM, Lee SG. Survival analysis following resection of AJCC stage III gallbladder carcinoma based on different combinations of T and N stages. KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY 2015; 19:11-6. [PMID: 26155271 PMCID: PMC4494090 DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims According to 7th AJCC TNM staging system, gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) with lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as N1 or N2; thus making the stage IIIB (N1) or IVB (N2). Stage IIIB consists of N1 status with wide coverage of T1-3, but T3N1 group often showed poorer outcomes than T1-2N1 groups. This study intended to assess post-resection prognosis of T3N1 versus other stage III subgroups. Methods We selected 103 patients from our institutional database of GBC who underwent R0 resection between July 1996 and June 2009 and whose GBC was confined to stage T3N0, T1-3N1 or T1-3N2. These patients were stratified into five groups, namely, T3N0 (n=26), T1N1 (n=13), T2N1 (n=35), T3N1 (n=20) and T1-3N2 (n=9), and were followed for ≥5 years or until death. Results Surgical procedures were minor liver resection (n=53), minor liver resection with bile duct resection (n=23), major liver resection (n=12), major liver resection with bile duct resection (n=5), and hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (n=12). Mean follow-up period was 57.2±68.5 months. Overall 5-year survival rate based on all-cause death and cancer-associated death, respectively, was 57.7% and 60.6% in T3N0, 15.4% and 15.4% in T1N1 (n=13), 28.6% and 28.6% in T2N1 (n=35), 5.0% and 5.7% in T3N1 (n=20), and 22.2% and 22.2% in T1-3N2. The survival outcome of T3N1 group was the poorest among the four stage III groups and was comparable to that of stage IVB (p=0.53). Conclusions The prognosis of T3N1 GBC is unusually poor even after R0 resection, thus we suggest extensive LN dissection may be necessary in patients with T3 tumors for accurate prognostic evaluation and radical removal of potential nodal micrometastasis. Further validation of this result is necessary in large patient populations from multiple centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoung-Yeon Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Yong Ha
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Soo Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deok-Bog Moon
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi-Won Song
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hwan Jung
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Joo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang-Min Park
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Gyu Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu GJ, Li XH, Chen YX, Sun HD, Zhao GM, Hu SY. Radical lymph node dissection and assessment: Impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:5150-5158. [PMID: 23964151 PMCID: PMC3746389 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2013] [Revised: 05/11/2013] [Accepted: 07/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the lymph node metastasis patterns of gallbladder cancer (GBC) and evaluate the optimal categorization of nodal status as a critical prognostic factor.
METHODS: From May 1995 to December 2010, a total of 78 consecutive patients with GBC underwent a radical resection at Liaocheng People’s Hospital. A radical resection was defined as removing both the primary tumor and the regional lymph nodes of the gallbladder. Demographic, operative and pathologic data were recorded. The lymph nodes retrieved were examined histologically for metastases routinely from each node. The positive lymph node count (PLNC) as well as the total lymph node count (TLNC) was recorded for each patient. Then the metastatic to examined lymph nodes ratio (LNR) was calculated. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and predictors of outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 26.50 mo (range, 2-132 mo), median DSS was 29.00 ± 3.92 mo (5-year survival rate, 20.51%). Nodal disease was found in 37 patients (47.44%). DSS of node-negative patients was significantly better than that of node-positive patients (median DSS, 40 mo vs 17 mo, χ2 = 14.814, P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between N1 patients and N2 patients (median DSS, 18 mo vs 13 mo, χ2 = 0.741, P = 0.389). Optimal TLNC was determined to be four. When node-negative patients were divided according to TLNC, there was no difference in DSS between TLNC < 4 subgroup and TLNC ≥ 4 subgroup (median DSS, 37 mo vs 54 mo, χ2 = 0.715, P = 0.398). For node-positive patients, DSS of TLNC < 4 subgroup was worse than that of TLNC ≥ 4 subgroup (median DSS, 13 mo vs 21 mo, χ2 = 11.035, P < 0.001). Moreover, for node-positive patients, a new cut-off value of six nodes was identified for the number of TLNC that clearly stratified them into 2 separate survival groups (< 6 or ≥ 6, respectively; median DSS, 15 mo vs 33 mo, χ2 = 11.820, P < 0.001). DSS progressively worsened with increasing PLNC and LNR, but no definite cut-off value could be identified. Multivariate analysis revealed histological grade, tumor node metastasis staging, TNLC and LNR to be independent predictors of DSS. Neither location of positive lymph nodes nor PNLC were identified as an independent variable by multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Both TLNC and LNR are strong predictors of outcome after curative resection for GBC. The retrieval and examination of at least 6 nodes can influence staging quality and DSS, especially in node-positive patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakashima A, Sakabe R, Kobayashi H, Kondo N, Nakagawa N, Sueda T. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 after surgical resection for advanced biliary carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2013; 19:306-13. [PMID: 22270151 DOI: 10.1007/s00534-011-0498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The aims of this study were to evaluate long-term outcomes and to determine prognostic factors for survival in patients with resected biliary carcinoma who received adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy. METHODS Seventy patients with International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage II, III, or IV biliary carcinoma received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of intravenous gemcitabine 700 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oral S-1 60-100 mg/body for seven consecutive days, followed by a 1-week pause of chemotherapy. Patients received up to ten 2-week cycles. Long-term outcomes and predictors of survival with this adjuvant chemotherapy regimen were analyzed. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 47 months. Fifty-six percent of patients had node-positive disease, and 80% of patients underwent R0 resection. Overall and disease-free survival rates were 91 and 81% at 1 year, 56 and 55% at 3 years, and 40 and 46% at 5 years, respectively. Lymph node status (p = 0.025) and surgical margin status (p = 0.033) were independently associated with long-term survival by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy may be a promising strategy for patients with resected biliary carcinoma, and nodal status and surgical margin status may be predictors of survival with this treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Murakami
- Department of Surgery, Division of Clinical Medical Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|