Prolonged Portal Triad Clamping Increases Postoperative Sepsis after Major Hepatectomy in Patients with Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome and/or Steatohepatitis

Outcomes of Simultaneous Resection of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors with Synchronous Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of synchronous resection of liver metastases (LM) from small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NET).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing resection for LMs from SB-NETs from January 1997 and December 2018 was performed.

RESULTS

There were 44 patients with synchronous SB-NET and LMs. Perioperative and 90-day mortality values were zero, and the morbidity rate was 27%. The median overall survival (OS) was 128.4 months (CI 95% 74.0-161.5 months) with 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 100%, 83%, 79%, and 60%, respectively. Not achieving surgical treatment for LM was the unique independent factor for survival (HR 6.50; CI 95% 1.54-27.28; p = 0.01) in patients with unresected LMs having OS and 10-year survival rates (42 months, 33%) versus patients undergoing liver resection (152 months, 66%)(p = 0.0008). The recurrence rate was 81.8% and associated with longer OS and 5-year survival rates when limited to the liver [223 months (61%) vs 94 months (87%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous resection of SB-NETs with synchronous LMs was safe and associated with considerable long-term survival even in the presence of bilobar disease. However, recurrence after resection was common (81%) but associated with longer survival rates when limited to the liver.

Prognostic Impact of Pedicle Clamping during Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases

Pedicle clamping (PC) during liver resection for colorectal metastases (CRLM) is used to reduce blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The effect on long-term oncologic outcomes is still under debate. A retrospective analysis of the impact of PC on ABT-demand regarding overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in 336 patients undergoing curative resection for CRLM was carried out. Survival analysis was performed by both univariate and multivariate methods and propensity-score (PS) matching. PC was employed in 75 patients (22%). No increased postoperative morbidity was monitored. While the overall ABT-rate was comparable (35% vs. 37%, p = 0.786), a reduced demand for more than two ABT-units was observed (p = 0.046). PC-patients had better median OS (78 vs. 47 months, p = 0.005) and RFS (36 vs. 23 months, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed PC as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.60; p = 0.009) and RFS (HR = 0.67; p = 0.017). For PC-patients, 1:2 PS-matching (N = 174) showed no differences in the overall ABT-rate compared to no-PC-patients (35% vs. 40%, p = 0.619), but a trend towards reduced transfusion requirement (>2 ABT-units: 9% vs. 21%, p = 0.052; >4 ABT-units: 2% vs. 11%, p = 0.037) and better survival (OS: 78 vs. 44 months, p = 0.088; RFS: 36 vs. 24 months; p = 0.029). Favorable long-term outcomes and lower rates of increased transfusion demand were observed in patients with PC undergoing resection for CRLM. Further prospective evaluation of potential oncologic benefits of PC in these patients may be meaningful.

Complex liver resection under hepatic vascular exclusion and hypothermic perfusion with versus without veno-venous bypass: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

While hypothermic liver perfusion has been shown to improve parenchymal tolerance to complex resections in patients requiring prolonged hepatic vascular exclusion (HVE), the benefit of associated veno-venous bypass (VVB) in this setting remains poorly evaluated.

METHODS

All patients undergoing liver resection requiring HVE and hypothermic liver perfusion for at least 55 min between 2006 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with (VVB+) or without VVB (VVB-).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were analyzed, including 13 VVB+ and 14 VVB-. Median HVE duration was similar in VVB+ and VVB- patients (96 vs. 75 min, respectively). VVB+patients had longer operative time (460 vs. 375 min, p = 0.023) but less blood loss (p = 0.010). Five (19%) patients died postoperatively from liver failure or sepsis, without difference between groups. Postoperative major morbidity rate was similar between VVB+ and VVB- patients (30% vs. 50%, respectively) such as rates of liver failure, haemorrhage, renal insufficiency and sepsis, but VVB- patients experienced more respiratory complications (64% vs. 15%, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

During liver resection under HVE and hypothermic liver perfusion, use of VVB allows for reducing blood loss and postoperative respiratory complications. VVB should be recommended in case of liver resection with prolonged HVE.

Risk score to predict biliary leakage after elective liver resection

Background

Biliary leakage remains a major cause of morbidity after liver resection. Previous prognostic studies of posthepatectomy biliary leakage (PHBL) lacked power, population homogeneity, and model validation. The present study aimed to develop a risk score for predicting severe PHBL.

Methods

In this multicentre observational study, patients who underwent liver resection without hepaticojejunostomy in one of nine tertiary centres between 2012 and 2015 were randomly assigned to a development or validation cohort in a 2 : 1 ratio. A model predicting severe PHBL (International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C) was developed and further validated.

Results

A total of 2218 procedures were included. PHBL of any severity and severe PHBL occurred in 141 (6·4 per cent) and 92 (4·1 per cent) patients respectively. In the development cohort (1475 patients), multivariable analysis identified blood loss of at least 500 ml, liver remnant ischaemia time 45 min or more, anatomical resection including segment VIII, transection along the right aspect of the left intersectional plane, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy as predictors of severe PHBL. A risk score (ranging from 0 to 5) was built using the development cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0·79, 95 per cent c.i. 0·74 to 0·85) and tested successfully in the validation cohort (AUROC 0·70, 0·60 to 0·80). A score of at least 3 predicted an increase in severe PHBL (19·4 versus 2·6 per cent in the development cohort, P < 0·001; 15 versus 3·1 per cent in the validation cohort, P < 0·001).

Conclusion

The present risk score reliably predicts severe PHBL. It represents a multi-institutionally validated prognostic tool that can be used to identify a subset of patients at high risk of severe PHBL after elective hepatectomy.

Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is a major surgery with significant mortality and morbidity. Specialists have tested various methods in attempts to limit blood loss, transfusion requirements, and morbidity during elective liver resection. These methods include different approaches (anterior versus conventional approach), use of autologous blood donation, cardiopulmonary interventions such as hypoventilation, low central venous pressure, different methods of parenchymal transection, different methods of management of the raw surface of the liver, different methods of vascular occlusion, and different pharmacological interventions. A surgeon typically uses only one of the methods from each of these seven categories. The optimal method to decrease blood loss and transfusion requirements in people undergoing liver resection is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different interventions for decreasing blood loss and blood transfusion requirements during elective liver resection.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index Expanded to September 2015 to identify randomised clinical trials. We also searched trial registers and handsearched the references lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing different methods of decreasing blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in people undergoing liver resection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified trials and collected data. We assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane domains. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method in WinBUGS 1.4, following the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance documents. We calculated the odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for the binary outcomes, mean differences (MD) with 95% CrI for continuous outcomes, and rate ratios with 95% CrI for count outcomes, using a fixed-effect model or random-effects model according to model-fit. We assessed the evidence with GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 67 randomised clinical trials involving a total of 6197 participants. All the trials were at high risk of bias. A total of 5771 participants from 64 trials provided data for one or more outcomes included in this review. There was no evidence of differences in most of the comparisons, and where there was, these differences were in single trials, mostly of small sample size. We summarise only the evidence that was available in more than one trial below. Of the primary outcomes, the only one with evidence of a difference from more than one trial under the pair-wise comparison was in the number of adverse events (complications), which was higher with radiofrequency dissecting sealer than with the clamp-crush method (rate ratio 1.85, 95% CrI 1.07 to 3.26; 250 participants; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence). Among the secondary outcomes, the only differences we found from more than one trial under the pair-wise comparison were the following: blood transfusion (proportion) was higher in the low central venous pressure group than in the acute normovolemic haemodilution plus low central venous pressure group (OR 3.19, 95% CrI 1.56 to 6.95; 208 participants; 2 studies; low-quality evidence); blood transfusion quantity (red blood cells) was lower in the fibrin sealant group than in the control (MD -0.53 units, 95% CrI -1.00 to -0.07; 122 participants; 2; very low-quality evidence); blood transfusion quantity (fresh frozen plasma) was higher in the oxidised cellulose group than in the fibrin sealant group (MD 0.53 units, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.71; 80 participants; 2 studies; very low-quality evidence); blood loss (MD -0.34 L, 95% CrI -0.46 to -0.22; 237 participants; 4 studies; very low-quality evidence), total hospital stay (MD -2.42 days, 95% CrI -3.91 to -0.94; 197 participants; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence), and operating time (MD -15.32 minutes, 95% CrI -29.03 to -1.69; 192 participants; 4 studies; very low-quality evidence) were lower with low central venous pressure than with control. For the other comparisons, the evidence for difference was either based on single small trials or there was no evidence of differences. None of the trials reported health-related quality of life or time needed to return to work.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Paucity of data meant that we could not assess transitivity assumptions and inconsistency for most analyses. When direct and indirect comparisons were available, network meta-analysis provided additional effect estimates for comparisons where there were no direct comparisons. However, the paucity of data decreases the confidence in the results of the network meta-analysis. Low-quality evidence suggests that liver resection using a radiofrequency dissecting sealer may be associated with more adverse events than with the clamp-crush method. Low-quality evidence also suggests that the proportion of people requiring a blood transfusion is higher with low central venous pressure than with acute normovolemic haemodilution plus low central venous pressure; very low-quality evidence suggests that blood transfusion quantity (red blood cells) was lower with fibrin sealant than control; blood transfusion quantity (fresh frozen plasma) was higher with oxidised cellulose than with fibrin sealant; and blood loss, total hospital stay, and operating time were lower with low central venous pressure than with control. There is no evidence to suggest that using special equipment for liver resection is of any benefit in decreasing the mortality, morbidity, or blood transfusion requirements (very low-quality evidence). Radiofrequency dissecting sealer should not be used outside the clinical trial setting since there is low-quality evidence for increased harm without any evidence of benefits. In addition, it should be noted that the sample size was small and the credible intervals were wide, and we cannot rule out considerable benefit or harm with a specific method of liver resection.

Outcomes of liver resection for haemorrhagic hepatocellular adenoma

BACKGROUND

Intratumoral bleeding and/or intraperitoneal rupture occurs in up to 20% of patients with hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). Hepatectomy in the presence of haemorrhagic HCA has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. This study evaluates the outcomes of hepatectomy for haemorrhagic HCA at a single institution.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 2012, 52 consecutive patients underwent liver resection for HCA. Among them, 14 patients were resected for haemorrhagic (H)-HCAs (including 9 cases of intratumoural bleeding and 5 cases of intraperitoneal bleeding) and 38 for non-haemorrhagic (NH)-HCAs.

RESULTS

The preoperative characteristics were similar between the two groups except for younger age (p = .001) and shorter duration of hormonal use (p = .001) in (H)-HCAs. There were no mortalities. Intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, and postoperative morbidity were comparable between the two groups of patients (p = ns). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in (H)-HCAs (p = .03). In all the resected H-HCAs, pathology showed central haemorrhagic changes with tumoral cells at the periphery of the lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection for H- and NH-HCAs can be achieved with no mortality and comparable short-term outcomes.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis with synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer: Who will benefit from complete cytoreductive surgery?

PURPOSE

Selection of patients for resection of synchronous liver metastases (LM) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a debated issue since morbidity of this surgery is not negligible. We aimed to define overall survival (OS) prognostic criteria in patients undergoing PC surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and LM resection.

METHODS

This monocentric and comparative study included all consecutive patients operated for LM (LM group, n = 77), PC (HIPEC group, n = 18) and PC + LM (LM + HIPEC group, n = 9) from January 2007 to May 2011. Characteristics of the 3 groups were prospectively collected and retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 56,5 months. Major morbidity and mortality were respectively 14% and 3%. Two-year disease free and overall survival rates were respectively 23% and 76%. There were significantly more Dindo grade III-IV complications in LM + HIPEC group. In multivariate analysis, grade II and III preoperative chemotherapy-induced toxicity and size of LM were identified as poor OS prognostic factors whereas response to preoperative chemotherapy significantly increases OS. OS was not different (p = 0.235) between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Toxicity to preoperative chemotherapy and size of LM were identified as poor prognostic factors in patients undergoing simultaneous PC and LM surgery. These criteria could help in better selecting patients for such extensive surgery.

Effects of clamping procedures on central venous pressure during liver resection

BACKGROUND

Various clamping procedures are used to decrease bleeding during liver resections but their effect on central venous pressure (CVP) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the variations of the CVP during two different clamping procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (19 males, 10 females) who had Pringle maneuver (PM) and clamping of the inferior vena cava below the liver (IVCC) during major liver resections.

RESULTS

Mean decrease of the CVP after PM, IVCC, and PM+IVCC was 0.84 ± 1.37, 2.17 ± 2.13 and 3.17 ± 2.56 cmH20, respectively (P=0.02, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). IVCC was more effective in inducing a decrease of the CVP than PM alone (P<0.05). The combination of both PM and IVCC induced the greatest decrease but not to a level of significance compared to IVCC alone (P=0.25).

CONCLUSION

IVCC remains the more efficient procedure to lower the CVP. However, although PM is commonly used to control vascular inflow within the liver its significant influence on the CVP could participate to the reduction of bleeding during liver resections.

Safety and outcome of combined liver and pancreatic resections

Background

In Western countries, combined liver and pancreatic resections (CLPR) are performed rarely because of the perceived high morbidity and mortality rates. This study evaluated the safety and outcomes of CLPR at a tertiary European centre for hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

Methods

A review of two prospectively maintained databases for pancreatic and liver resections was undertaken to identify patients undergoing CLPR between January 1994 and January 2012. Clinicopathological and surgical outcomes were analysed. Univariable and multivariable analyses for postoperative morbidity were performed.

Results

Fifty consecutive patients with a median age of 58 (range 20–81) years underwent CLPR. Indications for surgery were neuroendocrine carcinoma (16 patients), biliary cancer (15), colonic cancer (5), duodenal cancer (1) and others (13). The type of pancreatic resection included pancreaticoduodenectomy (30), distal pancreatectomy (17), spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (2) and total pancreatectomy (1). Twenty-three patients had associated major hepatectomies, 27 underwent minor liver resections and 11 had associated vascular resections. Mortality and morbidity rates were 4 and 46 per cent respectively. Univariable and multivariable analysis showed no differences in postoperative morbidity in relation to extent of liver resection or type of pancreatic resection. Use of preoperative chemotherapy was the only independent risk factor associated with postoperative morbidity (P = 0·021).

Conclusion

CLPR can be performed with fairly low morbidity and mortality rates. Postoperative outcomes were not affected by the extent of liver resection or the type of pancreatic resection. Patients receiving chemotherapy should be evaluated carefully before surgery is considered.

Hepatic pedicle clamping does not worsen survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) has been demonstrated to be effective for short-term outcomes during hepatic resection. However, HPC-induced hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury can accelerate the outgrowth of hepatic micrometastases in experimental studies. The conclusive evidence regarding effects of HPC on long-term patient outcomes after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has not been determined.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed to identify studies evaluating the oncological effects of HPC after hepatic resection for CRLM. The main outcome measures were intrahepatic recurrence (IHR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects models to compute odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Four studies, with a total of 2,114 patients (73.7% HPC, 26.3% non-HPC), matched the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses revealed that IHR (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.69-1.11; P = 0.27), DFS (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.70-1.10; P = 0.27) and OS (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.79-1.24; P = 0.90) did not differ significantly between the HPC and non-HPC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides persuasive evidence that HPC during hepatic resection for CRLM has no significant adverse oncological outcomes. HPC should be considered an option during parenchymal liver resection from current available evidence.

Carrier-bound fibrin sealant compared to oxidized cellulose application after liver resection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of post-operative complications between those patients that received TachoSil to the transection surface of the liver vs. those that received Surgicel.

METHODS

Retrospective study of a prospective database in a tertiary hospital. Primary endpoints were overall complications. Secondary endpoints were liver surgery-specific composite endpoint, major complications and hospital stay. Uni- and multivariate analysis of predictive factors for complications and subgroup analysis were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three liver resections were performed between 9 November 2007 and 2 November 2011: 64 with TachoSil and 69 with Surgicel application. Both groups were equivalent concerning demographic, clinical and major intra-operative data. No significant differences were observed in overall complication rate (62.5% vs. 62.3%), liver surgery-specific composite endpoint (12.5% vs. 18.8%), major complication rate (18.7% vs. 24.6%) and median hospital stay (13 vs. 10 days) for TachoSil and Surgicel application, respectively. Predictive factors for complications in multivariate analysis were: American Society of Anesthesiology Score ≥3 and duration of surgery >240 min. Subgroup analysis found a reduced complication rate with TachoSil for major hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest that the routine use of TachoSil after a liver resection does not reduce the overall complication rate compared with Surgicel application. However, TachoSil may be beneficial in a major hepatectomy.

Hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: no impact on survival or hepatic recurrence

BACKGROUND

Hepatic pedicle clamping is often used during liver resection. While its use reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements, the long-term effect on survival and recurrence has been debated. This study evaluates the effect of hepatic pedicle clamping [i.e., Pringle maneuver (PM)] on survival and recurrence following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent R0 resection for CRLM from 1991 to 2004 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Operative, perioperative, and clinicopathological variables were analyzed. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and liver recurrence (LR). Disease extent was categorized using a well-defined clinical risk score (CRS). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients given preoperative systemic chemotherapy and postoperative pump chemotherapy.

RESULTS

This study included 928 consecutive patients with median follow-up of 8.9 years. PM was utilized in 874 (94%) patients, with median time of 35 min (range 1-181 min). On univariate analysis, only resection type (p<0.001) and tumor number (p=0.002) were associated with use of PM. Younger age (p=0.006), longer operative time (p<0.001), and multiple tumors (p=0.006) were associated with prolonged PM (>60 min). There was no association between DFS, overall survival (OS) or LR and Pringle time. Neither the CRS nor use of neoadjuvant therapy stratified disease-related outcome with respect to use of PM.

CONCLUSIONS

PM was used in most patients undergoing resection for CRLM and did not adversely influence intrahepatic recurrence, DFS, or OS.