Right Hepatectomy in Patients over 70 Years of Age: An Analysis of Liver Function and Outcome

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Hepatectomy in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Analysis of 229 Cases from a Developing Country

Background

The number of elderly patients with HCC who undergo liver resection is increasing. Because of the advanced age of the patients, increased postoperative morbidity and reduced overall survival are expected in this population. The study aim was to compare clinicopathologic and operative features, short- and long-term outcomes among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients from three age groups undergoing potentially curative liver resection in a developing country.

Methods

Prospectively collected data relating to 229 patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection from January 2009 until December 2018 were analyzed. The patients were divided into two age groups: G1 was below 70 years old (n=151) and G2 was 70 years old and older (n=78). Demographic, clinical, operative data, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were performed.

Results

The mean overall morbidity rate of the patients was 31.1% (G1), and 46.2% (G2) by age group. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the G2 group (p=0.03). There was no difference in major morbidity between the two groups (p=0.214). No significant difference in mortality rate and overall survival was found between the study groups (p=0.280, p=0.383). Both age ≥70 years (ie, G2 group) and liver cirrhosis were identified as prognostic factors for postoperative morbidity, and a Child-Pugh score B as a negative prognostic factor for overall survival. In subgroup analysis of patients with cirrhosis, age ≥70, diabetes mellitus and perioperative transfusion were identified as prognostic factors for postoperative morbidity.

Conclusion

The study confirmed the safety and feasibility of liver resection in elderly patients with HCC. However, appropriate patient selection among the elderly is mandatory in order to improve short- and long-term outcomes.

Impact of Ageing on Hepatic Malignancy Resection: Is Age Really a Risk Factor for Mortality?

BACKGROUND

With an ageing population, it is paramount for surgeons to comprehend the implications of age on surgical outcomes. This study aims to identify the effects of age on perioperative outcomes post-hepatectomy.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2017, 357 hepatectomies were performed in our centre for malignancy. Data recorded include demographic, histopathology and perioperative outcomes. Patients were divided into three age groups (Group 1 < 65 years, Group 2 65-74 years, Group 3 ≥ 75 years).

RESULTS

With increasing age, there was a trend towards patient having: ASA ≥ 3 (from 32.1% to 60.9%, p < 0.0001), clear margins (from 80.4% to 88.3%, p = 0.2256), days of hospitalisation (from 9.5 ± 6.9 to 12 ± 8.0, p = 0.0003), days of ICU admission (from 2.3 ± 2.8 to 2.8 ± 12.9, p = 0.0790) and morbidity (from 39% to 58.5%, p = 0.0073). Cardiovascular complications and postoperative delirium increase with age. There was no significant difference in mortality across the three groups. Univariate and bivariate binary logistic regressions found no association between mortality and age. When adjusted for age, 30- and 90-day mortality was significantly associated with Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, length of hospital and cardiac complications. Additionally, 90-day mortality was significantly associated with ASA score ≥3, mass of liver resected, length of ICU stay and hepatobiliary, pulmonary and genitourinary complications.

CONCLUSION

Increased age is associated with increased post-hepatectomy complications, prolonged hospital stay and ICU admission. However, age itself is not a contraindication for hepatectomy and is not associated with increased mortality. Good histopathology outcomes and low mortality rates are achievable with careful patient selection and appropriate perioperative management.

Liver resections between 2014 and 2020 in the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland

Lausanne University Hospital is in the Francophone part of Switzerland and services a catchment population of about 1 million people. We recorded and analyzed baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes for 400 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection there between January 2014 and February 2020. Their pathological results were primary liver cancer (including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma): 21.8%, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer): 5.3%, liver metastases: 51.8%, echinococcosis: 10.8%, adenoma: 3.0%, and other diagnoses: 7.5%. Global morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 1) was 45.5% with major complication (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3) identified in 81 patients (20.3%). Of the 400 patients, two died within 30 days of surgery (0.5%) and five died within 90 days (1.3%). The 2017-2019 subgroup had a significantly greater percentage of patients aged ≥ 75 years (20.5%) than did the 2014-2016 subgroup (10.9%; p = 0.011) and a higher percentage of laparoscopic procedures than the earlier subgroup (2014-2016: 9.2%, 2017-2019: 32.5%; p < 0.001). We conclude that as the patient population ages, preoperative management and surgical techniques should be constantly improved.

Short-term autonomy and survival after hepatectomy in the elderly

AIM

To study morbi-mortality, survival after hepatectomy in elderly patients, and influence on their short-term autonomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted between 2002 and 2017 comparing patients less than 65 years old (controls) to those more than 65 years old (cases) from a prospective database, with retrospective collection of geriatric data. Cases were divided into three sub-groups (65-70 years, 70-80 years and>80 years).

RESULTS

Four hundred and eighty-two patients were included. There was no age difference in number of major hepatectomies (P=0.5506), length of stay (P=0.3215), mortality at 90 days (P=0.3915), and surgical complications (P=0.1467). There were more Grade 1 Clavien medical complications among the patients aged over 65 years (P=0.1737). There was no difference in overall survival (P=0.460) or disease-free survival (P=0.108) according to age after adjustment for type of disease and hepatectomy. One-third of patients had geriatric complications. The "home discharge" rate decreased significantly with age from 92% to 68% (P=0.0001). Early loss of autonomy after hospitalization increased with age, 16% between 65 and 70 years, 23% between 70 and 80 years and 36% after 80 years (P=0.10). We identified four independent predictors of loss of autonomy: age>70 years, cholangiocarcinoma, length of stay>10 days, and metachronous colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients had the same management as young patients, with no difference in surgery or survival, but with an increase in early loss of autonomy.

Survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases in octogenarians and sexagenarians compared to their respective age-matched national population

Background

The aim of the current study was to investigate survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in octogenarians. The survival of octogenarian patients was compared to the survival of the national population of octogenarians and the survival of sexagenarians, the latter representing the average-age patient undergoing resection of CLM.

Methods

Octogenarian and sexagenarian were defined as person 80-89 and 60-69 years of age, respectively. Survival analyses of patients who underwent resection of CLM between 2002 and 2014 were performed. Data from Statistics Norway were used to estimate the survival of the age-matched national population of octogenarians (ageM-Octo) and the age-matched national population of sexagenarians (ageM-Sexa).

Results

During the study period, 59 octogenarians underwent resection of CLM. The majority of patients underwent a minor liver resection (n=50). In octogenarians, the 5-year survival was 32.5% and 66.3% [difference, 33.8 percentage points (pp)] in patients and ageM-Octo, respectively. The 10-year survival was 14.1% and 31.2% (difference, 17.1 pp) in patients and ageM-Octo, respectively. In sexagenarians, the 5-year survival was 50.9% and 96.2% (difference, 45.3 pp) in patients and ageM-Sexa, respectively. The 10-year survival was 35.7% and 90.3% (difference, 54.6 pp) in patients and ageM-Sexa, respectively. The 5-year cancer-specific survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after resection of CLM in octogenarians were 43.1% and 32.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

After resection of CLM, the survival was poorer in octogenarians than in sexagenarians. However, the difference between the survival curves of patients and their age-matched population was smaller in octogenarians. In practice, this finding may indicate a greater benefit of resection in the elderly than the survival rates alone would suggest.

Minimally invasive liver resection for primary and metastatic liver tumors: influence of age on perioperative complications and mortality

BACKGROUND

As minimally invasive technique becomes more popular, an increasing number of elderly patients were considered for minimally invasive liver resection (MILR). Limited physiologic reserve remains a major concern, which frequently leads surgeons to recommend nonresectional alternatives. We sought to evaluate complications and outcomes of elderly patients undergoing MILR.

METHODS

Eight hundred and thirty-one patients who underwent MILR were classified into groups A, B, and C based on age [(< 70, n = 629), (70-79, n = 148), (≥ 80, n = 54) years old, respectively].

RESULTS

Gender distribution, BMI, and cirrhotic status were comparable among all groups. Groups B and C had higher MELD (p = 0.047) and ASA (p = 0.001) scores. Operative time (170, 157, 152 min; p = 0.64) and estimated blood loss (145, 130, 145 ml; p = 0.95) were statistically equal. Overall postoperative complications were greater in groups B and C (12.9 and 9.3 vs. 6.5%, respectively). Complications in group C were all minor. Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were higher in group B when compared to group A (6.8 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.43). There was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary complications, thromboembolic events, ICU admissions, and transfusion rates seen in groups B and C when compared to group A. Duration of hospital stay was statistically longer in groups B and C (3.6, 3.5 vs. 2.5 days, p = 0.0012). 30- and 90-day mortality rates were comparable among the groups, irrespective of age.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of greater preoperative comorbidities and ASA score, there was no significant increase in postoperative morbidity after minimally invasive liver resection in patients ≥ 70 years of age.

Impact of age on short-term outcomes of liver surgery: Lessons learned in 10-years' experience in a tertiary referral hepato-pancreato-biliary center

We investigate the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy according to different age intervals, identify the clinical factors related to surgical outcomes, and propose clinical risk scores for severe morbidity and mortality based on the clinical factors.Eight hundred three patients undergoing liver resection were divided into 3 groups: young patients (YP), <65 years (n = 387), elderly patients (EP), from 65 to 74 years (n = 279); very-elderly patients (VEP), ≥75 years (n = 137).Severe morbidity was 10.6%, 12.2%, and 17.5% (P = .103), and mortality was 0.3%, 1.4%, and 4.4% (P = .002) in group YP, EP, and VEP, respectively. Ischemic heart disease, cirrhosis, major hepatectomy, biliary tract-associated procedure, and red blood cells (RBC) transfusion ≥3 U were related with severe morbidity. Ischemic heart disease, cirrhosis, major hepatectomy, and RBC transfusion were independent risk factors for postoperative mortality. Age did not result an independent factor related to mortality and severe morbidity. Two different scores were developed and have proved to be statistically related with severe morbidity and mortality. Moreover, in patients with score ≥2, severe morbidity increased from 24.2% in YP, to 29.3% in EP, and to 40.0% in VEP, P = .047. Likewise, mortality increased from 2.3% in YP, to 7.0% in EP, and to 22.7% in VEP, in patients with score ≥2, P = .017.Age alone should not be considered a contraindication for hepatectomy. We identified factors and proposed 2 scores that can be useful to stratify the risk of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. Moreover, severe morbidity and mortality increases according to the different age intervals in patients with scores ≥2.

Time-dependent impact of age and comorbidities on long-term overall survival after liver resection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Advanced age and comorbidities are known to be associated with increased perioperative risks after liver resection. However, the precise impact of these variables on long-term overall survival (OS) remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the confounder-adjusted, time-dependent effect of age and comorbidities on OS following hepatectomy for primary and secondary malignancies.

METHODS

From a prospective database of 1.143 liver resections, 763 patients treated for primary and secondary malignancies were included. For time-varying OS calculations, a Cox-Aalen model was fitted. The confounder-adjusted hazard was compared with mortality tables of the German population.

RESULTS

Overall, age (P = 0.003) and comorbidities (P = 0.001) were associated with shortened OS. However, time-dependent analysis indicated that age and comorbidities had no impact on OS within 39 and 55 months after resection respectively. From this time on, a significant decline in OS was shown. Subgroup analysis indicated an earlier increase of the effect of age in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (17 months) than in those with colorectal metastases (70 months). The confounder-adjusted hazard of 70-year-old patients was increased post-operatively but dropped 66 months after surgery, and the risk of death was comparable to the general population 78 months after resection. At this time, one-third of patients aged 70 years and older were still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to long-term outcome, liver resection for both primary and secondary malignancies should not be categorically denied due to age and comorbidities. This information should be considered for the patient selection process and informed consent.

Thirty-day mortality leads to underestimation of postoperative death after liver resection: A novel method to define the acute postoperative period

BACKGROUND

Postoperative mortality commonly is defined as death occurring within 30 days of surgery or during hospitalization. After resection for liver malignancies, this definition may result in underreporting, because mortality caused by postoperative complications can be delayed as the result of improved critical care. The aim of this study was to estimate statistically the acute postoperative period (APP) after partial hepatectomy and to compare mortality within this phase to standard timestamps.

METHODS

From a prospective database, 784 patients undergoing resection for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies between 2003 and 2013 were reviewed. For estimation of APP, a novel statistical method applying tests for a constant postoperative hazard was implemented. Multivariable mortality analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The APP was determined to last for 80 postoperative days (95% confidence interval 40-100 days). Within this period, 55 patients died (7.0%; 80-day mortality). In comparison, 30-day mortality (N = 32, 4.0%) and in-hospital death (N = 39, 5.0%) were relevantly less. No patient died between postoperative days 80 and 90. The causes of mortality within 30 days and from days 30-80 did not greatly differ, especially regarding posthepatectomy liver failure (44% vs 39%, P = .787). Septic complications, however, tended to cause late deaths more frequently (43% vs 25%, P = .255). Comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3; P = .046), increased preoperative alanine aminotransferase activity (P = .030), and major liver resection (P = .035) were independent risk factors of 80-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

After liver resection for primary and secondary malignancies, 90-day rather than 30-day or in-hospital mortality should be used to avoid underreporting of deaths.

Hepatectomy in elderly patients: does age matter?

BACKGROUND

With the increase in average life expectancy in recent decades, the proportion of elderly patients requiring liver surgery is rising. The aim of the meta-analysis reported here was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy in elderly patients.

METHODS

An extensive electronic search was performed for relevant articles that compare the outcomes of hepatectomy in patients ≥70 years of age with those in younger patients prior to October 2012. Analysis of pooled data was performed with RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight observational studies involving 15,480 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with the younger patients, elderly patients experienced more complications (31.8 vs 28.7 %; P = 0.002), mainly as a result of increased cardiac complications (7.5 vs 1.9 %; P < 0.001) and delirium (11.7 vs 4.5 %; P < 0.001). Postoperative major surgical complications (12.6 vs 11.3 %; P = 0.55) and mortality (3.6 vs 3.3 %; P = 0.68) were comparable between elderly and younger patients. For patients with malignancies, both the 5-year disease-free survival (26.5 vs 26.3 %; P = 0.60) and overall survival (39.5 vs 40.7 %; P = 0.29) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative major surgical complications, mortality, and long-term results in elderly patients seem to be comparable with those in younger patients, suggesting that age alone should not be considered a contraindication for hepatectomy.

Impact of aging on morbidity and mortality after liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgery involving elderly patients is becoming increasingly common due to the rapid aging of societies all over the world. The objective of this study was to elucidate the prognostic differences between elderly and young patients who undergo liver resection. A systematic review based on the PRISMA flow diagram was conducted. Ovid Medline and PubMed were used to search for relevant literature published between January 2000 and March 2013, and the modified MINORS score was used to assess the methodological quality. In cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and miscellaneous liver tumors, the morbidity and mortality rate did not differ significantly between the elderly and young patients. For patients with colorectal metastatic liver cancer, the mortality of the young patients was 2.7 times lower than that of elderly patients. Our review of high-quality retrospective studies was able to elucidate the clinical risks of age on the outcomes after liver surgery in specific patient populations.

Validation of hepatectomy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the elderly population have not been defined to date.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted with 104 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC from 2005 to 2010. The patients were divided into two groups, the elderly group (age, ≥75 years; n = 22) and the nonelderly group (age, <75 years; n = 82), for comparison of short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

More patients were categorized as preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 1 in the elderly group (32 %) than in the nonelderly group (6 %) (P = 0.003). Complications with a Clavien-Dindo classification of grade 3a or higher were more frequently observed in the elderly group (41 %) than in the nonelderly group (17 %) (P = 0.006). Multivariate logistic regression showed ECOG performance status 1 as the only independent predictor of complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3a or higher. The in-hospital mortality rates were similar between the two groups (P = 0.20). During a median follow-up period of 47 months, the unadjusted 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were similar in the elderly (25 %) and nonelderly (33 %) groups (P = 0.80). Multiple tumors and high alpha-fetoprotein levels emerged as independent negative indicators of recurrence-free survival using multivariate Cox analyses. The adjusted risk for recurrence was not elevated in the elderly group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.68; P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the more frequent occurrence of complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade of 3a or higher among the elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC, their mortality and recurrence rates were comparable with those of the nonelderly patients. Therefore, age alone is not a determinant of surgical candidacy for HCC.

Poor outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with ascites infected by methicillin-resistant staphylococci

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the association between infectious ascites, clinical parameters and treatment outcomes after hepatectomy.

METHODS

Of 891 patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2006 and 2013, 74 who underwent paracentesis for bacterial cultivation of postoperative ascites after hepatectomy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients, 42 had positive bacterial cultures (positive group) and 32 patients had negative cultures (negative group). Hospital mortality was significantly higher in the positive group than in the negative group [9/42 (21.4%) vs. 2/32 (6.3%); P = 0.035]. Hospital mortality associated with each bacterial strain was as follows: methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) (5/13, 38.5%), staphylococci (2/11, 18.2%), enterococci (2/12, 16.7%), Enterobacter (0/3, 0%), Klebsiella (0/2, 0%), and others (0/1, 0%). Cox proportional multivariate analysis revealed that MRS infection in ascites was the only risk factor of hospital death (HR = 5.08, P = 0.041) and MRS wound infection was the only risk factor to predict MRS infection in ascites (HR = 5.67, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative MRS infection in postoperative ascites after hepatectomy is a potentially fatal complication; therefore, the prevention of MRS wound infection is critical to decrease postoperative hospital mortality.

Liver resection in the elderly: significance of comorbidities and blood loss

OBJECTIVE

Liver resection is increasingly performed in elderly patients who are suspected of increased postoperative morbidity (PM) and reduced overall survival (OS). Patient selection based on the identification of age-adjusted risk factors may help to decrease PM and OS.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospectively collected data of 879 patients undergoing elective hepatic resection were analyzed. This population was stratified into three age cohorts: >70 years (n = 228; 26 %), 60-69 years (n = 309; 35 %), and <60 years (n = 342; 39 %). Multivariate survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The incidence of severe (p < 0.01) and non-surgical (p < 0.001) postoperative complications was higher in older compared to younger patients. Major estimated blood loss (EBL; p = 0.039) and comorbidities (p = 0.002) independently increased PM. EBL was comparable between all age cohorts. However, preexisting comorbidities, major EBL, and postoperative complications markedly decreased OS in contrast to younger patients. Adjusted for age, independent predictors of OS were comorbidities (HR = 1.51; p = 0.001), major hepatectomy (HR = 1.33; p = 0.025), increased EBL (HR = 1.32; p = 0.031), and postoperative complications (HR = 1.64; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although increased age should not be a contraindication for liver resection, this study accents the avoidance of major blood loss in elderly patients and a stringent patient selection based on preexisting comorbidities.

Diabetes mellitus and increased postoperative risk of acute renal failure after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the risk of surgical mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We identified 2,962 DM patients who underwent a hepatectomy for HCC from 2000 to 2010. The non-DM control cohort consisted of 2,962 patients who also received a hepatectomy during the same period. Age, sex, comorbidities, and year of admission were all matched between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

The prevalence of preoperative coexisting medical conditions was comparable between the DM and non-DM cohorts, except the percentage of patients undergoing major hepatectomy (lobectomy; 18.1 % in the DM cohort vs. 20.4 % in the non-DM cohort; p = 0.02).The hazard ratio (HR) of 30-day postoperative mortality in the DM patients after hepatectomy was 1.17 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.84] after adjustment. The DM cohort exhibited a significantly higher risk of postoperative septicemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.45; 95 % CI 1.06-2.00) and acute renal failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.70; 95 % CI 1.01-2.84) compared with that of the non-DM cohort, but this higher risk was not associated with the increased risk of other major morbidities, including pneumonia, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Further analysis showed that major hepatectomy (lobectomy) in DM patients carried higher risks of septicemia and acute renal failure. In multiple regression models, preoperative diabetes-related comorbidities were not significantly associated with 30-day postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

DM is associated with a significantly high risk of septicemia and acute renal failure, but not with other major complications or mortality, after hepatectomy for HCC.

Functional status determines postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hepatic resections

BACKGROUND

With the aging population and increasing incidence of hepatic malignancies in elderly patients, establishing the safety of hepatic resections is crucial. The present study investigates early postoperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing hepatic resection using a nationally validated database.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files (NSQIP-PUF) for 2005-2009 were used for the retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing hepatic resection. The primary outcome measures were 30-day postoperative mortality, overall complication rate, and serious complication rate. The primary predictor variable was patient age, which was treated as a dichotomous variable (age ≤ 70 years, age ≥ 70 years).

RESULTS

Five thousand seven hundred six patients were included in the final analysis, 1,280 of which were ≥ 70 years of age. Thirty-day postoperative mortality (≤ 70 years 1.9% vs. ≥ 70 years 4.5%, P < 0.0001), serious complications (≤ 70 years 15.2% vs. ≥ 70 years 18.4%, P < 0.006) and overall complications (≤ 70 years 23.1% vs. ≥ 70 years 26.6%, P < 0.01) were more common in the elderly group. Elderly patients had significantly more wound infections, pneumonia, prolonged ventilator support, unplanned re-intubations, renal failure, strokes, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrests, and septic shock. The median length of hospitalization was also significantly longer in the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows significantly higher complication rates and mortality following hepatic resections in elderly patients. These findings should be taken into account when considering hepatectomy in this population.