National survey of fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis: current practice lacks a sound evidence base

Construction of a nursing management program for early fluid resuscitation in patients with acute pancreatitis: a Delphi study in China

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

To construct a set of scientific and feasible nursing management protocols for early fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients that can be used to guide clinical practice and enhance the treatment efficacy in these patients.

BACKGROUND

Fluid resuscitation is a key means of early treatment for AP patients and has become a clinical consensus. Nurses are important practitioners of fluid resuscitation, and there is a lack of specific enforceable nursing management programs.

METHODS

Through literature research, on-site research, semi-structured interviews, and other preliminary preparations of the first draft of the nursing management program for early fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis, the Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of correspondence with medical and nursing experts, and then statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen and 14 questionnaires were distributed in two rounds, respectively, and 15 and 14 questionnaires were recovered, respectively. The positive coefficient of experts was 100%, the authority coefficient was 0.970 and 0.975, respectively; the coefficient of variation coefficient was 0.05-0.21 and 0.00-0.20, respectively; the expert coordination coefficients of all levels of indices in this study are 0.166-0.335 and 0.189-0.364, respectively. The P values of the first, second, and third level indices are < 0.05 according to the test of Kendall's harmony coefficient. A total of 5 primary indicators, 11 secondary indicators, and 36 tertiary indicators were used to construct the Nursing Management Program for Early Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The constructed nursing management plan for early fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis patients puts forward clear requirements and standards for nursing care in the early stage of AP treatment. This plan is scientific, represent good clinical practice, are feasible for nurses to follow, and construct a standardized protocol for the management of early fluid resuscitation in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Adherence to Guidelines Influenced the Mortality, Hospital Stay, and Health Care System Costs in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

The primary end point was the compliance rate with guidelines. The secondaries were mortality, hospital stay, and costs.

METHODS

This study included 1904 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP): group A, diagnosed before 2013, and group B, after 2013.

RESULTS

The compliance rate was 0.6%. The compliance rates increased for fluid resuscitation (3.3% vs 13.7%, P < 0.001), for antibiotics use (21.9% vs 28.1%, P = 0.002), for oral feeding (55.0% vs 49.7%, P = 0.007), and for correct use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (83% vs 91.9%, P < 0.001). Compliance to severity assessment with computed tomography (odds ratio [OR], 0.4; P = 0.029), parenteral nutrition recommendations (OR, 0.3; P = 0.009), and early surgery (OR, 0.3; P = 0.010) reduced the mortality. Compliance to antibiotic therapy (OR, 0.6; P < 0.001), correct use of parenteral nutrition (OR, 0.3; P < 0.001), correct use of ERCP (OR, 0.5; P < 0.001), and early surgery (OR, 0.3; P = 0.010) reduced hospital stay. The compliance reduced the costs for parenteral nutrition (P < 0.001), correct use of ERCP (P = 0.011), and surgery (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The adherence to guidelines for AP was low. Compliance could reduce mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and costs.

Non-compliance to practice guidelines still exist in the early management of acute pancreatitis: Time for reappraisal?

INTRODUCTION

Earlier national surveys on the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) had reported non-compliance to practice guidelines. In the past decade, several guidelines were revised based on new evidence. In this multicenter international survey, we aimed to evaluate the practice patterns of early management of AP and compliance to the revised treatment guidelines across different disciplines and practice environments.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire was sent via email to a target population of 654 that constituted of medical and surgical gastroenterologists, physicians and general surgeons, paediatricians from academic and non-academic centres across 30 countries. Other than demographic variables, the questionnaire contained items pertaining to early management of AP, such as, assessment at admissions and within first 72 h s, details regarding analgesics, IV hydration, oral/enteral feeding and antibiotic use.

RESULTS

The response rate was 46.2% and after exclusions, a total of 297 participant's responses were analysed. Majority of the participants were from Asia, followed by Europe and the Americas. 181 (60.9%) claimed to follow practice guidelines, out of which 59 (32.6%) followed more than one. On further probing, only 41.9% were actually compliant to feeding and 59.7% to antibiotic guidelines. Even though participants opted for aggressive hydration, early feeding and avoidance of prophylactic antibiotics, there were non-compliance and discrepancies in titration of fluid therapy, indications of feeding and antibiotic use.

DISCUSSION

Discrepancies and non-compliance still appear to exist in the early management of AP due to lack of strong evidence. We discuss ways that could improve compliance to the existing guidelines until stronger evidence comes to the fore.

Does the Implementation of a Clinical Care Pathway Have an Impact on Early Intravenous Fluid Therapy of Acute Pancreatitis?: A Pilot Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVES

Early intravenous fluid (IVF) resuscitation is crucial in the management of acute pancreatitis; variation in IVF prescription practice had been demonstrated. This pilot study aims to assess whether the implementation of an Acute Pancreatitis Care Pathway (APCP) produces a change toward a more adequate IVF regimen in the first 24 hours.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, from July 2015 to February 2016 (group 1) and from September 2017 to March 2018 (group 2), were considered. The APCP was developed between March 2016 and August 2017. Median IVF rate, volume, and type infused in the first 24 hours, were compared between groups. Nonparametric data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test, differences in frequencies with the McNemar test; significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included, 36 in each group. In the first 24 hours, the median IVF rate was 177 mL/h vs 225 mL/h (P = 0.004); Ringer lactate infusion was 30% vs 77.8% (P = 0.0003). The median total IVF volume did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the APCP has the potential to lead to a successful change in early IVF resuscitation practice.

Impact of early aggressive fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Acute pancreatitis management guidelines recommend early aggressive hydration to improve clinical outcomes. We aim to evaluate the influence of early fluid therapy (total intravenous fluids in the first 24 h [IVF/24hrs]) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted for acute pancreatitis between July 2011 to December 2015. IVF/24hrs was categorized into 3 groups according to tertiles. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of persistent organ failure and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were included: Conservative (IVF/24hrs < 2.8L, n = 102), Moderate (IVF/24hrs 2.8-4.475L, n = 105) and Aggressive (IVF/24hrs ≥ 4.475, n = 103). Most patients (80.6%) were African Americans, 91.3% had mild acute pancreatitis (BISAP score ≤ 2). The Aggressive IVF group had higher incidence of persistent organ failure (16.5% vs 4.9% and 7.6%, p = 0.013), and longer length of hospital stay (9.2 ± 10.7 vs 6.5 ± 7.3 and 6.8 ± 5.7 days, P = 0.032). However, IVF/24hr did not correlate with length of hospital stay (PCC 0.08, p = 0.174). On multivariate analysis, only organ failure at admission was an independent predictor of persistent organ failure (OR 16.1, p < 0.001). Persistent organ failure and local complications were found to be the only independent predictors in-hospital mortality (OR 27.6, p < 0.001 and OR 16.95, p = 0.001 respectively). There was no difference in clinical outcomes in African Americans compared to other races.

CONCLUSIONS

More aggressive early IVF therapy in a predominantly mild acute pancreatitis cohort, was not associated with improvement in persistent organ failure, length of hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality.

Early Rapid Fluid Therapy Is Associated with Increased Rate of Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Hemoconcentrated Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hematocrit is a widely used biomarker to guide early fluid therapy for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), but there is controversy over whether early rapid fluid therapy (ERFT) should be used in hemoconcentrated patients. This study investigated the association of hematocrit and ERFT with clinical outcomes of patients with AP.

METHODS

Data from prospectively maintained AP database and retrospectively collected fluid management details were stratified according to actual severity defined by revised Atlanta classification. Hemoconcentration and "early" were defined as hematocrit > 44% and the first 6 h of general ward admission, respectively, and "rapid" fluid rate was defined as ≥ 3 ml/kg/h. Patients were allocated into 4 groups for comparisons: group A, hematocrit ≤ 44% and fluid rate < 3 ml/kg/h; group B, hematocrit ≤ 44% and fluid rate ≥ 3 ml/kg/h; group C, hematocrit > 44% and fluid rate < 3 ml/kg/h; and group D, hematocrit > 44% and fluid rate ≥ 3 ml/kg/h. Primary outcome was rate of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV).

RESULTS

A total of 912 consecutive AP patients were analyzed. ERFT has no impact on clinical outcomes of hemoconcentrated, non-severe or all non-hemoconcentrated AP patients. In hemoconcentrated patients with severe AP (SAP), ERFT was accompanied with increased risk of NPPV (odds ratio 5.96, 95% CI 1.57-22.6). Multivariate regression analyses confirmed ERFT and hemoconcentration were significantly and independently associated with persistent organ failure and mortality in patients with SAP.

CONCLUSIONS

ERFT is associated with increased rate of NPPV in hemoconcentrated patients with SAP.

Hemoconcentration is associated with early faster fluid rate and increased risk of persistent organ failure in acute pancreatitis patients

BACKGROUND

Controversies existed surrounding the use of hematocrit to guide early fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis (AP). The association between hematocrit, early fluid therapy, and clinical outcomes in ward AP patients needs to be investigated.

METHODS

Data from prospectively maintained AP database and retrospectively collected details of fluid therapy were analyzed. Patients were stratified into three groups: Group 1, hematocrit < 44% both at admission and at 24 h thereafter; Group 2: regardless of admission level, hematocrit increased and >44% at 24 h; Group 3: hematocrit >44% on admission and decreased thereafter during first 24 h. "Early" means first 24 h after admission. Baseline characteristics, early fluid rates, and clinical outcomes of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 628 patients, Group 3 had a higher hematocrit level, greater baseline predicted severity, faster fluid rate, and more fluid volume in the first 24 h compared with Group 1 or 2. Group 3 had an increased risk for persistent organ failure (POF; odds ratio 2, 95% confidence interval [1.1-3.8], P = 0.03) compared with Group 1 after adjusting for difference in baseline clinical severity scores, there was no difference between Group 2 and Group 3 or Group 1. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that hemoconcentration and early faster fluid rate were risk factors for POF and mortality (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemoconcentration is associated with faster fluid rate and POF in ward AP patients. Randomized trials comparing standardized early fast and slow fluid management is warranted.

Learning to prescribe intravenous fluids: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Prescribing intravenous (IV) fluid therapy is a core skill expected of qualified doctors at the point of graduation, but medical graduates often feel ill-equipped to perform this task. This lack of preparedness contributes to treatment-related patient harm. This scoping review maps the current state of published evidence about how junior doctors prescribe IV fluid therapy and learn how to do it.

METHODS

We searched five electronic databases and grey literature from 1994 until June 2016 for articles describing any aspect of IV fluid prescribing practice or its education. A total of 63 articles were selected for analysis. Using the WHO Guide to Good Prescribing to categorize the extracted findings, our review focuses on prescribing IV fluids in adult generalist settings.

RESULTS

Most articles studied IV fluid prescribing from the perspective of the doctor. Junior clinicians struggled to conceptualize IV fluid prescribing as a 'whole task' in authentic work settings and lacked support. Educational interventions to improve IV fluid prescribing often focused on enhancing prescriber knowledge about fluid and electrolyte balance rather than execution of the prescribing task.

CONCLUSIONS

Our understanding of IV fluid prescribing as a holistic integrated skill is patchy, as is its performance. Current IV fluid prescribing education appears insufficient to foster safe and effective practice. For education to achieve the ultimate goal of safer prescribing in workplaces, we need a clearer understanding of how healthcare professionals prescribe IV fluids in real world practice.

Effect of Intravenous Fluids and Analgesia on Dysmotility in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Analgesia and intravenous fluid resuscitation are cornerstones of initial patient management in acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim was to investigate the effect of intravenous fluids and analgesia on gastrointestinal motility in the early course of AP.

METHODS

Gastrointestinal dysmotility was assessed using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). One-way analysis of variance and analysis of covariance were conducted, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, severity of AP, preexisting diabetes mellitus, and time from first symptom onset to hospital admission.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients with AP were prospectively enrolled. Opioid analgesia, when compared with nonopioid analgesia, was significantly associated with increase in total GCSI score in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. There was no significant difference between aggressive and nonaggressive fluid resuscitation in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. A combination of opioids and any intravenous fluids was associated with a significantly increased total GCSI score compared with opioids and no intravenous fluids in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Duration of symptoms was the confounder that significantly affected 6 of 9 studied associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous fluids and analgesia significantly affect motility independent of severity and other covariates. Guidelines on prudent use of opioids and fluids in AP need to be developed, particularly taking into account duration of symptoms from onset to hospitalization.

Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis remains a clinical challenge, despite an exponential increase in our knowledge of its complex pathophysiological changes. Early fluid therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and is universally recommended; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the type, rate, amount and end points of fluid replacement. Further confusion is added with the newer studies reporting better results with controlled fluid therapy. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of fluid depletion in acute pancreatitis, as well as the rationale for fluid replacement, the type, optimal amount, rate of infusion and monitoring of such patients. The basic goal of fluid epletion should be to prevent or minimize the systemic response to inflammatory markers. For this review, various studies and reviews were critically evaluated, along with authors' recommendations, for predicted severe or severe pancreatitis based on the available evidence.