A Randomized, Prospective, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Effect of Diltiazem Gel on Pain After Hemorrhoidectomy

Impact of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative pain in patients undergoing perianal surgery: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on postoperative pain in patients following perianal surgery.

METHODS

96 patients were randomly assigned to either the taVNS group or the sham stimulation group. Patients received stimulation once 30 min before the operation and once more 24 h after the operation, with each session lasting 30 min. The VAS scores were recorded at 2, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h, as well as 7 days postoperatively. Data were collected on the first change of dressing, the first defecation, the frequency of supplementary analgesia, and the occurrence of adverse reactions. Patient satisfaction was assessed at the time of hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The VAS scores of patients in the taVNS group were significantly lower than those in the sham stimulation group at 2, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, at the time of the first dressing change, and at the time of the first defecation (p < 0.05). The rate of postoperative supplementary analgesic use was significantly higher in the sham stimulation group compared to the taVNS group (p < 0.05). The incidence of urinary retention was lower in the taVNS group (p < 0.05). No adverse reactions like hypotension or bradycardia were observed in either group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the taVNS group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

taVNS effectively alleviates postoperative pain in patients undergoing perianal surgery without increasing the risk of complications.

Protocol of a clinical trial on the effectiveness of pudendal nerve block with and without neurostimulation in reducing posthemorroidectomy pain

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhoidal pathology is the most frequent proctological problem with a prevalence of 44% of the adult population. The most effective treatment is surgery but it also has the highest postoperative pain rate with moderate to severe pain rates of 30-40% during the first 24-48 hours. Here lies the importance of seeking measures to improve this situation, such as the pudendal nerve block with local anesthetic. However, the variability of the pudendal nerve sometimes makes its blockade ineffective and for this reason nerve location methods are sought to achieve a higher rate of success. The main aim of the study is to compare pain in the immediate postoperative period (24 h) after hemorrhoidectomy in patients with pudendal nerve block guided by anatomical references and guided by neurostimulation.

METHODS

The present project proposes the performance of a single-center, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial of efficacy, carried out under conditions of routine clinical practice. Patients over 18 years old with hemorrhoids refractory to medical treatment, symptomatic grade III-IV and grade II hemorrhoids that do not respond to conservative procedures in a third level hospital in Spain and that are subsidiaries of surgery in major ambulatory surgery will be included. Demographic variables, variables on hemorrhoidal pathology, details of surgery, verbal numeric pain scale in the preoperative period and surgical complications will be collected.

RESULTS

Not avaliable until the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The pudendal nerve block guided by anatomical landmarks has been shown to be useful in postoperative pain control after hemorrhoidectomy although the use of the neurostimulator has not been well studied and we believe it may improve outcom.

Efficacy of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction in the Posthemorrhoidectomy Period Trial: Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Frequent early postoperative complications of hemorrhoidectomy are thrombosis and edema of mucocutaneous "bridges."

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of micronized purified flavonoid fraction in preventing complications after elective hemorrhoidectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective unicentral open-label randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

2021-2022 at the Clinic of Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery at Sechenov University (Moscow, Russia).

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids.

INTERVENTIONS

After hemorrhoidectomy, patients were randomly assigned either to standard treatment (peroral nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs and local anesthetics, topical steroids, psyllium, warm sitz baths, and nifedipine gel), referred to as the control group, or to standard treatment with micronized purified flavonoid fraction, referred to as the study group, and followed up for 60 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Thrombosis or edema of mucocutaneous bridges and pain intensity on a visual analog scale оn postoperative days 1-7, 14, 21, and 30; quality of life and patient-assessed treatment effect оn postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 21, and 30; and perianal skin tags оn postoperative day 60.

RESULTS

The data from 50 patients were analyzed (25 in each group). The visual analog scale demonstrated no differences between groups in each follow-up point. Compared to the control group, the patients in the study group had a significantly higher patient-assessed treatment effect оn postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 21, and 30 and a significantly lower rate of thrombosis or edema of mucocutaneous bridges оn postoperative days 1-7 and 14. Patients in the study group had significantly lower rates of perianal skin tags.

LIMITATIONS

Unicenter open-label design.

CONCLUSIONS

Micronized purified flavonoid fraction in the posthemorrhoidectomy period is an effective adjunct to standard treatment that helps reduce the rate of thrombosis and edema of mucocutaneous bridges, improves patient-assessed treatment effect, and prevents postoperative perianal skin tags formation. Micronized purified flavonoid fraction in the posthemorrhoidectomy period is not associated with additional pain relief in comparison with nonmicronized purified flavonoid fraction standard treatment. See Video Abstract .

EFICACIA DE LA FRACCIN DE FLAVONOIDES PURIFICADA MICRONIZADA EN EL PERODO POSTERIOR A LA HEMORROIDECTOMA ENSAYO MOST ENSAYO CONTROLADO, ALEATORIZADO, ABIERTO

ANTECEDENTES:Una complicación postoperatoria temprana frecuente de la hemorroidectomía es la trombosis y el edema de los "puentes" mucocutáneos.OBJETIVO:Investigamos la eficacia de la fracción de flavonoides purificada micronizada en la prevención de complicaciones después de una hemorroidectomía electiva.DISEÑO:Ensayo controlado aleatorio, prospectivo, unicentral, abierto.AJUSTES:2021-2022 Clínica de Cirugía Colorrectal y Mínimamente Invasiva Universidad Sechenov (Moscú, Rusia).PACIENTES:Pacientes después de hemorroidectomía, que se realizó para hemorroides de grado III-IV.INTERVENCIONES:Después de la hemorroidectomía, los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente al tratamiento estándar (antiinflamatorios no esteroides perorales y anestésicos locales, esteroides tópicos, psyllium, baños de asiento tibios, gel de nifedipina) - grupo de control, o al tratamiento estándar con flavonoide purificado micronizado. fracción (grupo de estudio) y seguido durante 60 días.RESULTADOS DE MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES:Trombosis o edema de puentes mucocutáneos e intensidad del dolor en una escala analógica visual entre el 1.º, 7.º, 14.º, 21.º y 30.º día postoperatorio; calidad de vida y efecto del tratamiento evaluado por el paciente el día 1, 3, 7, 21 y 30 del postoperatorio; Marcas cutáneas perianales en el día 60 del postoperatorio.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron los datos de 50 pacientes (25 en cada grupo). La escala analógica visual no demostró diferencias entre grupos en cada punto de seguimiento. En comparación con el grupo de control, los pacientes en el grupo de estudio tuvieron un efecto del tratamiento evaluado por el paciente significativamente mayor en los días 1, 3, 7, 21 y 30 después de la operación, una tasa significativamente menor de trombosis o edema de los puentes mucocutáneos en los días 1, 7 y 14.. Los pacientes del grupo de estudio tuvieron tasas significativamente más bajas de marcas en la piel perianal.LIMITACIONES:Diseño Unicenter de etiqueta abierta.CONCLUSIONES:La fracción de flavonoides purificada micronizada en el período posterior a la hemorroidectomía es un complemento eficaz del tratamiento estándar que ayuda a reducir la tasa de trombosis y edema de los puentes mucocutáneos, mejora el efecto del tratamiento evaluado por el paciente y previene la formación de marcas cutáneas perianales posoperatorias. La fracción de flavonoides purificados micronizados en el período posterior a la hemorroidectomía no se asocia con un alivio adicional del dolor en comparación con el tratamiento estándar con la fracción de flavonoides purificados no micronizados. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Comparison of ointment-based agents after excisional procedures for hemorrhoidal disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Efficient postoperative pain control is important after hemorrhoidal surgery. Although several locally applied medications have been used, current evidence regarding the optimal strategy is still conflicting. This network meta-analysis assessed analgesic efficacy and safety of the various topical medications in patients submitted to excisional procedures for hemorrhoids.

METHODS

The present study followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines. The last systematic literature screening was performed at 15 June 2023. Comparisons were based on a random effects multivariate network meta-analysis under a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 RCTs and 2132 patients were included. Regarding postoperative pain, EMLA cream (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) 80.3%) had the highest ranking at 12-h endpoint, while aloe vera cream (SUCRA 82.36%) scored first at 24 h. Metronidazole ointments had the highest scores at 7 and 14 days postoperatively. Aloe vera had the best analgesic profile (24-h SUCRA 84.8% and 48-h SUCRA 80.6%) during defecation. Lidocaine (SUCRA 87.9%) displayed the best performance regarding overall morbidity rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the inconclusive results and several study limitations, further RCTs are required.

Topical Lidocaine or Lidocaine/Diltiazem Ointment Following Rubber Band Ligation of Hemorrhoids: A Prospective 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids causes less pain than excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but many patients still experience significant postprocedure discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether topical lidocaine, with or without diltiazem, is more effective than placebo for analgesia after hemorrhoid banding.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 2% lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with 2% diltiazem, or a placebo ointment.

SETTINGS

This study was performed at 2 university public teaching hospitals and 2 private hospitals in Australia.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years undergoing hemorrhoid banding were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Topical ointments were applied postprocedure 3× daily for 5 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog pain score, opiate analgesia usage, and patient satisfaction were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of 159 eligible patients, 99 were randomly assigned (33 in each group). Pain scores were reduced at 1 hour for the lidocaine (OR 4.15 [1.12-15.41]; p = 0.03) and lidocaine/diltiazem groups (OR 3.85 [1.05-14.11]; p = 0.04) compared with placebo. Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group had improved satisfaction (OR 3.82 [1.28-11.44]; p = 0.02) and were more likely to recommend the procedure to others (OR 9.33 [1.07-81.72]; p = 0.04). Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group required approximately 45% less total and in-hospital analgesia compared with the placebo. There was no difference in complications between any of the groups.

LIMITATIONS

A cost/benefit analysis was not performed. Analgesic efficacy appeared to be short term and the procedures were performed only in the hospital/nonambulatory setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical lidocaine reduced short-term analgesia use, whereas combination lidocaine/diltiazem was associated with both improved analgesia and patient satisfaction after hemorrhoid banding.

LIDOCANA TPICA O UNGENTO DE LIDOCANA/DILTIAZEM DESPUS DE LA LIGADURA HEMORROIDAL CON BANDA ELSTICA UN ENSAYO PROSPECTIVO CONTROLADO Y ALEATORIZADO DE TRES BRAZOS

ANTECEDENTES:La ligadura de hemorroides con banda elástica causa menos dolor que la hemorroidectomía escisional, pero muchos pacientes siguen experimentando molestias significativas tras el procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar si la lidocaína tópica, con o sin diltiazem, es más eficaz que el placebo para la analgesia tras la ligadura hemorroidal.DISEÑO:Este es un ensayo prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir lidocaína al 2 %, lidocaína al 2 % con diltiazem al 2 % o ungüento de placebo.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en dos hospitales públicos con docencia universitaria y dos hospitales privados en Australia.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes consecutivos de ≥18 años sometidos a ligadura para hemorroides.INTERVENCIONES:Se aplicaron ungüentos tópicos tras el procedimiento tres veces al día durante 5 días.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La puntuación analógica visual del dolor, el uso de analgésicos opiáceos y la satisfacción del paciente fueron las principales medidas de resultado.RESULTADOS:De 159 pacientes elegibles, 99 fueron aleatorizados (33 en cada grupo). Las puntuaciones de dolor se redujeron a la hora para los grupos de lidocaína (OR 4,15 (1,12-15,41); p = 0,03) y lidocaína/diltiazem (OR 3,85 (1,05-14,11), p = 0,04) en comparación con el placebo.Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem mejoraron su satisfacción (OR 3,82 (1,28-11,44), p = 0,02) y eran más propensos de recomendar el procedimiento a otros (OR 9,33 (1,07-81,72), p = 0,04). Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem requirieron aproximadamente un 45 % menos de analgesia total e intrahospitalaria en comparación con el grupo de placebo. No hubo diferencia en las complicaciones entre ninguno de los grupos.LIMITACIONES:No se realizó un análisis de costo/beneficio. La eficacia analgésica pareció ser a corto plazo y los procedimientos solo se realizaron en el hospital/entorno no ambulatorio.CONCLUSIÓN:La lidocaína tópica mejora la analgesia a corto plazo, mientras que la combinación de lidocaína/diltiazem se asocia tanto con una mejor analgesia como con la satisfacción del paciente tras la colocación de bandas para hemorroides. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Can Targeting Sphincter Spasm Reduce Post-Haemorrhoidectomy Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidectomy is often complicated by significant post-operative pain, to which spasm of the internal anal sphincter is thought to be a contributing factor. This study appraises the evidence behind interventions aimed at lowering sphincter spasm to relieve post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses compliant systematic review was conducted. Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched. All RCTs which compared interventions targeting the internal anal sphincter to relieve pain post excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. The primary outcome measure was pain on the visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Of the initial 10,221 search results, 39 articles were included in a qualitative synthesis, and 33 studies were included in a meta-analysis. Topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) reduced pain on day 7 (7 studies, 485 participants), with a mean difference and 95% confidence interval (MD, 95% CI) of -1.34 (-2.31; -0.37), I² = 91%. Diltiazem reduced pain on day 3 on the VAS, and the MD was -2.75 (-398; -1.51) shown in five studies (n = 227). Botulinum toxin reduced pain on day 7, in four studies with 178 participants, MD -1.43 (-2.50; -0.35) I² = 62%. The addition of Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy to haemorrhoidectomy reduced pain on day 2 in three studies with 275 participants, MD of -2.13 (-3.49; -0.77) I² = 92%. The results were limited by high heterogeneity and risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that lateral sphincterotomy, administration of botulinum toxin and the application of topical diltiazem or GTN can reduce post-operative pain after haemorrhoidectomy. Lateral sphincterotomy should not be routinely used due to the risk of incontinence.

Infiltration of Bupivacaine and Triamcinolone in Surgical Wounds of Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy for Postoperative Pain Control: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Pain management after hemorrhoidectomy continues to be challenging.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of bupivacaine hydrochloride and triamcinolone acetonide in surgical wounds of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for postoperative pain relief.

DESIGN

A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between May 2015 and June 2019.

SETTINGS

This study was carried out in a secondary referral hospital center in Spain.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent an elective Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for grade III-IV hemorrhoids were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients allocated in the intervention group received a single infiltration of bupivacaine and triamcinolone and patients allocated in the control group did not receive any intervention.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The primary end point was the median of maximum pain by visual analog scale during the 48 hours of hospital stay. Secondary end points were pain at follow-up, pain during defecation, analgesic requirements, wound healing rate, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were randomly assigned (64 in each group). The median of maximum pain score at 48 hours was 3 points in the intervention group and 6 points in the control group, which was significantly different ( p < 0.05). No differences were observed regarding pain during defecation. Morphine requirements were significant lower in the intervention group (6.3% vs 21.9% patients; p = 0.01; 5 vs 23 cumulative doses; p = 0.01). Wound healing and complication rates were similar in both groups.

LIMITATIONS

Use of placebo was not considered in the control group ("intervention group" vs "control group" clinical trial). Data regarding pain or other complications at 48 hours postoperatively were pooled and expressed as median of values.

CONCLUSIONS

Infiltration of surgical wounds with bupivacaine and triamcinolone decreases postoperative pain and reduces morphine requirements in Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomies. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B867 .Clinical trial registration: European Registry of Clinical Trials. EUDRACT 2014- 003043-35.

INFILTRACIN DE BUPIVACANA Y TRIAMCINOLONA EN HERIDAS QUIRRGICAS DE HEMORROIDECTOMA DE MILLIGANMORGAN PARA EL CONTROL DEL DOLOR POSOPERATORIO ENSAYO CLNICO DOBLE CIEGO, ALEATORIZADO Y CONTROLADO

ANTECEDENTES:El manejo del dolor posterior a una hemorroidectomía sigue siendo un desafío.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad de la infiltración de bupivacaína y triamcinolona en heridas quirúrgicas de hemorroidectomía de Milligan-Morgan para el alivio del dolor posoperatorio.DISEÑO:Se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado, aleatorizado, doble ciego entre mayo del 2015 y junio del 2019.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro hospitalario de referencia secundaria en España.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a una hemorroidectomía de Milligan-Morgan electiva por hemorroides de grado III-IV.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes asignados al grupo de intervención recibieron una única infiltración de bupivacaína y triamcinolona y los pacientes asignados al grupo de control no recibieron ninguna intervención.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS RESULTADOS:El factor de valoración principal fue la mediana del dolor máximo según la escala análoga visual durante las 48 horas de estancia hospitalaria. Las variables secundarias fueron dolor durante el seguimiento, dolor durante la defecación, requerimientos de analgésicos, tasa de cicatrización de heridas y complicaciones.RESULTADOS:Se asignó aleatoriamente a un total de 128 pacientes (64 en cada grupo). La mediana de puntuación máxima de dolor a las 48 horas fue de 3 puntos en el grupo de intervención y de 6 puntos en el grupo de control con diferencias significativas (p < 0,05). No se observaron diferencias en cuanto al dolor durante la defecación. Las necesidades de morfina fueron significativamente menores en el grupo de intervención (6,3% versus 21,9% de los pacientes; p = 0,01; 5 versus 23 dosis acumuladas; p = 0,01). Las tasas de curación de heridas y complicaciones fueron similares en ambos grupos.LIMITACIONES:No se consideró el uso de placebo en el grupo de control (ensayo clínico: "grupo de intervención" versus "grupo control"). Los datos con respecto al dolor u otras complicaciones después de 48 horas postoperatorias se agruparon y expresaron como mediana de los valores.CONCLUSIONES:La infiltración de heridas quirúrgicas con bupivacaína y triamcinolona disminuye el dolor posoperatorio y reduce los requerimientos de morfina en la hemorroidectomía de Milligan-Morgan. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B867 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).Registro de ensayos clínicos: Registro europeo de ensayos clínicos. EUDRACT 2014- 003043-35.

Evaluation of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3 loaded hydrogel for the treatment of perianal ulcer in a rat model

Background

As a kind of common complication of the surgery of perianal diseases, perianal ulcer is known as a nuisance. This study aims to develop a kind of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3 (Rg3)-loaded hydrogel to treat perianal ulcers in a rat model.

Methods

The copolymers PLGA₁₆₀₀-PEG₁₀₀₀-PLGA₁₆₀₀ were synthesized by ring-opening polymerization process and Rg3-loaded hydrogel was then developed. The perianal ulcer rat model was established to analyze the treatment efficacy of Rg3-loaded hydrogel for ulceration healing for 15 days. The animals were divided into control group, hydrogel group, free Rg3 group, Rg3-loaded hydrogel group, and Lidocaine Gel® group. The residual wound area rate was calculated and the blood concentrations of interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were recorded. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Masson's Trichrome (MT) staining, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), Ki-67, CD31, ERK1/2, and NF-κB immunohistochemical staining were performed.

Results

The biodegradable and biocompatible hydrogel carries a homogenous interactive porous structure with 10 μm pore size and five weeks in vivo degradation time. The loaded Rg3 can be released sustainably. The in vitro cytotoxicity study showed that the hydrogel had no effect on survival rate of murine skin fibroblasts L929. The Rg3-loaded hydrogel can facilitate perianal ulcer healing by inhibiting local and systematic inflammatory responses, swelling the proliferation of nuclear cells, collagen deposition, and vascularization, and activating ERK signal pathway.

Conclusion

The Rg3-loaded hydrogel shows the best treatment efficacy of perianal ulcer and may be a candidate for perianal ulcer treatment.

Comparison of the Effects of Diltiazem Gel with Lidocaine Gel on Reducing Pain and Discomfort in Patients Undergoing Rectosigmoidoscopy: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial

Background:

Flexible rectosigmoidoscopy is an easy and accessible exam to diagnose distal colon diseases, although many patients refuse to undergo it due to pain and discomfort during the procedure. Studies show that the application of local lidocaine, as an analgesic has no effect on pain relief in patients undergoing rectosigmoidoscopy. The current study aims at comparing the effects of diltiazem gel, an antispasmoic drug with local pain-reducing effects, with lidocaine gel in patients undergoing flexible rectosigmoidoscopy.

Materials and Methods:

The current double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial was performed to compare the effect of two topical drugs, lidocaine and diltiazem, on pain relief in patients undergoing rectosigmoidoscopy. A total of 80 patients who were potential candidates for rectosigmoidoscopy were enrolled in the study after obtaining the informed consent and then randomly assigned to one of the lidocaine gel (2 mL) or diltiazem gel (2 mL) group, 10 minutes prior to rectosigmoidoscopy. The level of pain in the patients during the procedure was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the results were recorded. The data were analyzed using paired samples ttest and independent t-test as well as analysis of covariance (ANOVA) with SPSS version 18. P-value <0.05 was considered the level of significance.

Results:

Of 80 patients, 35 (43.75%) were male and 45 (56.25%) female. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of the patients were 51.45 ± 15.21 years and 25.95 ± 7.47 kg/m2, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups. The most frequent indications for rectosigmoidoscopy were abdominal pain (46.3%) and rectorrhagia (31.3%). The mean VAS score for pain reported by the patients in the lidocaine and diltiazem groups was 3.97 ± 2.89 and 2.60 ± 2.36, respectively. The VAS score for pain in the diltiazem group was significantly lower than lidocaine group (P = 0.023).

Conclusion:

The application of local diltiazem gel around the anus, in spite of no side effects, can effectively reduce the pain and discomfort in patients during rectosigmoidoscopy. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Reg. No 31055).

Haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To evaluate comparative outcomes of local anaesthesia (LA) and spinal anaesthesia (SA) in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

A systematic online search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Database, The Virtual Health Library, Clinical trials.gov , and Science Direct. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing excisional haemorrhoidectomy under LA and SA were included. Post-operative pain score, need for rescue analgesia, urinary retention, headache, rectal bleeding, and operative time were the evaluated outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs reporting a total number of 440 patients of whom 222 patients underwent haemorrhoidectomy under LA and 218 patients had the procedure under SA were included. LA was associated with significantly lower post-operative pain at 6 h (mean difference (MD) - 2.25, P = 0.0001) and at 24 h (MD - 0.87, P = 0.0002), need for a rescue analgesia (risk ratio (RR) 0.18, P = 0.002), urinary retention (RR 0.17, P = 0.0001), and headache (RR 0.09, P = 0.0003) compared with SA. However, there was no significant difference in rectal bleeding (RR 0.89, P = 0.70) and operative time (MD 1.15, P = 0.19) between LA and SA.

CONCLUSION

Compared with SA, LA may be associated with significantly lower post-operative pain, need for rescue analgesia, urinary retention, and headache making it an attractive choice of anaesthesia in day-case surgery for those who are not either fit for GA or refuse such anaesthetic modality.

Is There a Relationship Between Stool Consistency and Pain at First Defecation After Limited Half Hemorrhoidectomy? A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

While the first defecation pain is a problem following hemorrhoidectomy, it is unknown whether the stool consistency has an influence on pain. This pilot study aimed to investigate whether the intensity of defecation pain varied according to stool consistency.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy in combination with injection sclerotherapy for grade III or IV hemorrhoids. The pain intensity and stool form during the first postoperative defecation were self-recorded by the patients using a visual analogue scale (score of 0-10) and Bristol Stool Form Scale, respectively. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to stool consistency, and the intensity of defecation pain was compared among the groups using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients were eligible for this study and were classified into the hard stool (n=15), normal stool (n=21), and soft stool groups (n=25). No significant intergroup differences were identified in the intensity of pain at defecation (P=0.29).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated that there were no clear differences in pain intensity during the first defecation after surgery among the 3 groups with different levels of stool consistency.

Effect of Topical Baclofen 5% on Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain: Randomized Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Baclofen is an agonist for a subtype of gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA-B) receptors and traditionally been used for the systemic treatment of spasticity. Topical application of baclofen has been shown to reduce pain in patients with localized neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigate the efficacy of baclofen cream (5%) in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirement after open hemorrhoidectomy.

DESIGN

The patients were randomly assigned to either baclofen (5%) cream or placebo immediately after surgery and then every 12 h for 14 days.

PATIENTS

A total of 66 patients with third- and fourth-degree hemorrhoids undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy were randomly assigned to this trial.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single educational hospital.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were intensity of pain, measured with a visual analog scale, and the analgesic requirement, measured by the amount of the acetaminophen consumption.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Postoperative pain score of the baclofen group was significantly lower on week 1 (P = 0.01) and week 2 (P = 0.02) than the placebo group. Similarly, patients in the baclofen group consumed significantly less analgesic medication on week 1 (P = 0.025) and week 2 (P = 0.024) than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Topical application of baclofen effectively relieves pain after hemorrhoidectomy with minimal side effects.

Topical analgesia following excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PURPOSE

Post-operative pain following excisional haemorrhoidectomy poses a particular challenge for patient recovery, as well as a burden on hospital resources. There appears to be an increasing role for topical agents to improve this pain, but their efficacy and safety have not been fully assessed. This systematic review aims to assess all topical agents used for pain following excisional haemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors independently assessed MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases to 27 June 2019. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in English that investigated topical agents following excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, version 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 3639 records were identified. A final 32 RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis. Meta-analysis was performed on 9 RCTs that investigated glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (5 for diltiazem, 2 for metronidazole and 2 for sucralfate). There were mixed significant changes in pain for GTN compared with placebo. Diltiazem resulted in significant reduction of pain on post-operative days 1, 2, 3 and 7 (p < 0.00001). Metronidazole resulted in significant reduction of pain on days 1 (p = 0.009), 7 (p = 0.002) and 14 (p < 0.00001). Sucralfate resulted in signification reduction of pain on days 7 and 14 (both p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Topical diltiazem, metronidazole and sucralfate appear to significantly reduce pain at various timepoints following excisional haemorrhoidectomy. GTN had mixed evidence. Several single trials identified other promising topical analgesics.

Evidence-based review of methods used to reduce pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy

Background Excisional hemorrhoidectomy is one of the most commonly performed anorectal procedures. Despite the satisfactory outcomes of excisional hemorrhoidectomy, the pain perceived by the patients following the procedure can be a distressing sequel. This review aimed to search the current literature for the existing evidence on how to avoid or minimize the severity of post-hemorrhoidectomy pain.

Methods An organized literature search was performed using electronic databases including PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar service for the articles that evaluated different methods for pain relief after excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Then, the studies were summarized in a narrative way illustrating the hypothesis and the outcomes of each study. The methods devised to reduce pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy were classified into three main categories: technical tips; systemic and topical agents; and surgical methods. The efficacy of each method was highlighted along the level of evidence supporting it.

Results Stronger evidence (level Ia) supported LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment to be associated with significant pain relief after excisional hemorrhoidectomy whereas the remaining methods were supported by lower level of evidence (level Ib).

Conclusion The use of LigaSure in performing excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the application of topical glyceryl trinitrate ointment contributed to remarkable relief of postoperative pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy according to the highest level of evidence. Perhaps a multimodality strategy that combines systemic and topical agents can be the optimal method for control of pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy, yet further prospective trials are required to draw such conclusion.

Enhancement of Wound Healing by the Traditional Chinese Medicine Herbal Mixture Sophora flavescens in a Rat Model of Perianal Ulceration

BACKGROUND/AIM

Hemorrhoidectomy is often associated with significant postoperative complications that may result in slow wound healing. The traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compound Sophora flavescens (CSF) has shown efficacy on many inflammatory disorders. The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of CSF on wound healing in a rat model of perianal ulceration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A rat model of perianal ulceration was induced by subcutaneous injection of 75% glacial acetic acid. The animals with induced perianal ulcer received topical treatment of low, medium, and high doses of CFS twice daily. Potassium permanganate (PP); 0.02%) was given to the animals for comparison. Macroscopic and histological assessments of the ulcerated area were performed after treatment. The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) was detected by immunohistochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Topical administration of medium- and high-dose CSF significantly enhanced perianal ulcer healing as compared to the untreated control (p<0.05). The macroscopic ulceration score was significantly reduced only in the high-dose CSF-treated group as compared to the control (p<0.01). All doses of CSF and PP ameliorated histological damages in the rats with induced perianal ulceration. High-dose CSF or PP significantly reduced the expression of PGE₂ and IL-8 as compared to the control (p<0.01). No treatment-related toxicity was found in either the CSF- or the PP-treated mice.

CONCLUSION

CSF enhances wound healing in a rat model of perianal ulceration. The inhibitory effect of CSF on pro-inflammatory cytokines PGE₂ and IL-8 may be involved in the mechanism of enhanced wound-healing.

Efficacy of Mesoglycan in Pain Control after Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Pilot Comparative Prospective Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Various pain management strategies for patients undergoing open excisional hemorrhoidectomy have been proposed, yet postoperative pain remains a frequent complaint.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether mesoglycan (30 mg two vials i.m. once/day for the first 5 days postoperative, followed by 50 mg 1 oral tablet twice/day for 30 days) would reduce the edema of the mucocutaneous bridges and thus improve postoperative pain symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this prospective observational multicenter study, 101 patients undergoing excisional diathermy hemorrhoidectomy for III-IV degree hemorrhoidal disease were enrolled at 5 colorectal referral centers. Patients were assigned to receive either mesoglycan (study group SG) or a recommended oral dose of ketorolac tromethamine of 10 mg every 4-6 hours, not exceeding 40 mg per day and not exceeding 5 postoperative days according to the indications for short-term management of moderate/severe acute postoperative pain, plus stool softeners (control group CG).

RESULTS

Postoperative thrombosis (SG 1/48 versus CG 5/45) (p < 0.001) and pain after rectal examination (p < 0.001) were significantly reduced at 7-10 days after surgery in the mesoglycan-treated group, permitting a faster return to work (p < 0.001); however, in the same group, the incidence of postoperative bleeding, considered relevant when needing a readmission or an unexpected outpatient visit, was higher, possibly owing to the drug's antithrombotic properties.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of mesoglycan after an open diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy can reduce postoperative thrombosis and pain at 7-10 days after surgery, permitting a faster return to normal activities.

Effects of Topical Atorvastatin (2 %) on Posthemorrhoidectomy Pain and Wound Healing: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor widely used in treatment of hypercholesterolemia and prevention of coronary heart disease and has various pleiotropic effects. In this study, the efficacy of atorvastatin emulgel (2 %) in reducing postoperative pain at rest, pain during defecation and analgesic requirement after open hemorrhoidectomy was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients with third- and fourth-degree hemorrhoids undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy were included in this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomly assigned to either atorvastatin emulgel or placebo immediately after surgery and then every 12 h for 14 days. The primary outcomes were intensity of pain at rest and during defecation, measured with a visual analog scale, and the analgesic requirement, measured by amount of pethidine and acetaminophen consumption, and percent of wound healing.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the average postoperative pain scores in the first 48 h (P _12h = 1, P _24h = 0.128 and P _48h = 0.079) after the surgery between the two groups, but at the week 1 the pain scores during defecation were considerably lower in the atorvastatin group than in placebo group (P = 0.004), which also was the same at the week 2 (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the average pethidine and acetaminophen (mg) administration at 12 h and 24 h between the two groups after surgery. Regarding the data about wound healing, at the week two the healing was much better in the treatment group than it was in control group and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, atorvastatin emulgel reduced postoperative pain at rest and on defecation and could improve the healing process after open hemorrhoidectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT201404013014N8.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of metronidazole in post-haemorrhoidectomy pain relief

AIM

Conventional haemorrhoidectomy is still considered the reference standard for the management of severe or recurrent haemorrhoids. Pain is reported by patients to be the most common postoperative complication. Although the literature lacks a consensus on its effectiveness, metronidazole is often used to reduce postoperative pain. We have performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of metronidazole for pain relief after haemorrhoidectomy.

METHOD

A systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the PRISMA protocol using the MESH headings 'haemorrhoidectomy', 'hemorhoidectomy', 'hemorrhoidectomy', 'haemorrhoid', 'metronidazole', 'Flagyl^® ' 'antibiotic' and 'pain'. The search returned 421 articles of which eight were RCTs suitable for inclusion in the review with a total population of 437 patients. The outcomes of interest were postoperative pain intensity on days 1, 2 and 7 and on first defaecation as measured using a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative pain for patients treated with metronidazole with a reduced mean difference for the metronidazole group on day 1 of -1.42 (95% CI: -2.14 to -0.69, P = 0.0001), on day 2 of -1.43 (95% CI: -2.45 to -0.40, P = 0.006) and on day 7 of -2.40 (95% CI: -3.10 to -1.71, P < 0.00001). Pain on first defaecation was likewise reduced with a mean difference of -1.38 (95% CI: -2.15 to -0.60, P = 0.0005). Limitations of this study include variation in the grade of haemorrhoids treated and variability in the quality of included studies.

CONCLUSION

Metronidazole is a cheap, safe and effective intervention for reducing postoperative pain following conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Topical diltiazem ointment in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain relief: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidectomy is commonly associated with postoperative pain. Calcium channel blockers are known to cause relaxation of gastrointestinal smooth muscle and oral diltiazem has also been shown to reduce the resting anal pressure.

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to analyze efficacy and side effects of topical diltiazem oint. in post-operative pain control.

METHODS

This is a meta-analysis of patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy using topical diltiazem oint. versus placebo (Vaseline) for pain control. Patients with third or fourth degree hemorrhoids undergoing traditional hemorrhoidectomy were included. Procedures took place in the colorectal division of a hospital in 5 countries. Five randomized control trials (RCTs) published between 2005 and 2016 including 227 patients were included our meta-analysis (Diltiazem (calcium channel block) group = 137; Placebo (Vaseline) group = 90). Pain assessment was performed using a standardized Visual Analogue Scale. Any side effects of surgery or medication use, which were noted by the patient or the surgeon, also were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that Diltiazem ointment was statistically significant in reducing pain within 48 h, at 72 h, and more than 96 h after operation compared to the placebo group. Regarding overall complications (including headache), there was no statistical significance between diltiazem and placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical application of diltiazem effectively relieves pain after hemorrhoidectomy with minimal side effects. Further large studies are needed to substantiate its value in clinical practice.

Efficacy of metronidazole versus placebo in pain control after hemorrhoidectomy. Results of a controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhoidal disease occurs in 50% of people aged > 40 years and is the most common reason for anorectal surgery. Pain is the main complication. Multiple topical and systemic drugs have been investigated for pain control, but there is no ideal treatment. Metronidazole has been shown to decrease postoperative pain but is not used widely.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of oral metronidazole versus placebo and to assess postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Controlled clinical trial in adult patients who underwent elective hemorrhoidectomy for grade III/IV hemorrhoids. Patients were assigned to receive metronidazole (500 mg q8 h orally; study group, SG) or placebo (control group, CG) for 7 days after surgery. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale after surgery. Analgesic administration (time and use of analgesics) and resumption of daily life activities were also assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included, 22 in each group. Postoperative pain differed significantly between the SG and CG at 6 h (3.86 ± 0.56, 6.64 ± 1.49), 12 h (5.59 ± 1.33, 8.82 ± 0.79), 24 h (6.86 ± 1.49, 9.73 ± 0.45), day 4 (5.32 ± 2.10, 9.50 ± 0.59), day 7 (3.14 ± 1.03, 7.36 ± 1.39), and day 14 (2.14 ± 0.46, 5.45 ± 1.29). The first analgesia dose was required at 21.27 ± 5.47 h in the CG and 7.09 ± 2.36 h in the SG (p < 0.05), the time of analgesic use was 6.86 ± 1.61 days in the CG and 13.09 ± 2.48 days in the SG (p < 0.05), and resumption of daily activities occurred at 7.59 ± 1.56 days in the CG and 14.73 ± 3.76 days in the SG (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of metronidazole is effective in pain management after hemorrhoidectomy.

Is the severe pain after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy still currently remaining a major postoperative problem despite being one of the oldest surgical techniques described? A case series of 117 consecutive patients

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the only curative method of hemorrhoidal disease. Currently the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is still considered the "gold standard", since it is the best performing technique. However, postoperative pain remains a major problem. We analize the postoperative analgesic requirements for this procedure in 117 patients.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

Between 2012 and 2013, 117 consecutive patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorroidectomy, with an analysis of sex, age, total vascular anal cushions removed, hospital stay, complications, and relation with postoperative analgesic requirements. Patients with documented allergy to NSAIDs or pyrazolones were excluded. Additionally 23 patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy associated to internal lateral sphincterotomy were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 51.7 years. The 50.8% were women and 49.2% men. In 33.3% of cases, one vascular anal cushion was removed, 2 in 39.3%, and 3 in 27.4%. The average stay for the 3 groups was 2.0days. An analgesic dose average of 4.1 by day was given, with opioid requirements in 22.2% of cases. It was statistically significant that as more anal cushions were eliminated was higher the opioids need. No significant difference of opioids use was found regarding patients undergoing sphincterotomy as additional procedure.

DISCUSSION

Postoperative pain after a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy currently remains a problem for colorectal surgery teams. This involves the use of opioids comparable to other major surgeries, finally causing not negligible days of admission charge. A protocolized analgesic treatment, as we actually do in our center, should be implemented after a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for improving the postoperative period pain management.

[Complication management following hemorrhoid operations]

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoid operations are performed frequently in Germany. After the operation severe complications can occur that require appropriate management.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of current complications and suitable therapeutic options.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data including operative procedures and complications that have been collected in an electronic online-based survey of all resident, affiliated and private practice German surgeons during the period from 1 December 2009 to 31 January 2010 are presented. A review of the current literature in a PubMed search is given.

RESULTS

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has several benefits during the early postoperative phase in comparison to conventional hemorrhoidectomy; however, patients should be informed about the possibility of postoperative defecation disorders, elevated recurrence and reoperation rates and rare life-threatening complications.

CONCLUSION

The aim should be to keep risks at a low level by means of prevention, patient selection, careful analysis of indications and relevant expertise. In cases of complications early recognition and direct initiation of adequate treatment are crucial.

Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review

Surgical therapy guaranties satisfactory results, which are significantly better than those obtained with conservative therapies, especially for Grade III and IV hemorrhoids. In this review, we present and discuss the results of the most diffuse surgical techniques for hemorrhoids. Traditional surgery for hemorrhoids aims to remove the hemorrhoids, with closure (Fergusson's technique) or without closure (Milligan-Morgan procedure) of the ensuing defect. This traditional approach is effective, but causes a significant postoperative pain because of wide external wounds in the innervated perianal skin. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy, proposed by Longo, has gained a vast acceptance because of less postoperative pain and faster return to normal activities. In the recent literature, a significant incidence of recurrence after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was reported, when compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Double stapler hemorrhoidopexy may be an alternative to simple stapled hemorrhoidopexy to reduce the recurrence in advanced hemorrhoidal prolapse. Transanal hemorrhoidal deartertialization was showed to be as effective as stapled hemorrhoidopexy in terms of treatment success, complications, and incidence recurrence. However, further high-quality trials are recommended to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.