Preoperative factors predicting clinical outcome following laparoscopic fundoplication

Application of machine learning models to identify predictors of good outcome after laparoscopic fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic fundoplication remains the gold standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, 10% to 20% of patients experience new, persistent, or recurrent symptoms warranting further treatment. Potential predictors for the best outcome after laparoscopic fundoplication were tested using a mature prospectively maintained database.

METHODS

Data from 894 consecutive patients who underwent primary laparoscopic fundoplication from 1998 to 2015 were examined using regression and machine learning (ML) models. Preoperative factors were assessed for influence on postoperative outcomes: heartburn, dysphagia, and satisfaction scores at a median follow-up of 5 years.

RESULTS

The accuracy in predicting heartburn score (range, 0-10) assessed using the root mean squared error (RMSE) was similar to a negative binomial regression model (RMSE = 2.39) and the least absolute shrinkage support operator ML model (RMSE = 2.34). The multivariate analysis using only patients with complete data (n = 221) generated a lower error than using mean imputation for patients with missing values. The most predictive variables were male sex for heartburn (β = -1.48 [95% CI, -2.37 to -0.6; P =.001) and dysphagia (β = -4.70 [95% CI, -8.02 to -1.39; P =.006) and percentage of esophageal peristalsis for satisfaction (β = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.16-1.10]; P =.009) and dysphagia (β = -1.85 [95% CI, -3.43 to -0.27]; P =.02).

CONCLUSION

Although male sex and degree of intact peristalsis are significant predictors for outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication, prediction of individual patient outcome was relatively poor, and ML prediction models provided only marginal improvement in accuracy. Clinical acumen and a discussion with patients to set realistic postoperative expectations cannot be replaced by regression models or standard ML prediction algorithms at the present time.

Does Patient Sex Influence the Symptom Pattern for Patients With Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease and the Response of Symptoms to Fundoplication?

BACKGROUND

Several studies show that female patients experience lower satisfaction after anti-reflux surgery. We hypothesised that there is a pattern of symptoms common to female patients presenting with GORD and that it is these symptoms in particular that lead to inferior outcomes. We also hypothesised that these symptoms would respond differently to the different types of fundoplication.

METHODS

Pre-operative and post-operative questionnaires for all patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication were analysed. Pre-operative symptoms, improvement of symptoms, patient demographics and type of fundoplication were assessed.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 328 patients, 156 females and 172 males. Eighty-seven females (55.8%) and 135 males (78.5%) underwent a Nissen Fundoplication (p < 0.001) with the rest undergoing a posterior 270° (partial) fundoplication. Females reported most symptoms more frequently than males, and a predominantly female pattern of symptoms was identified. Bloating (p ≤ 0.001), asthma (p = 0.045), constipation (p = 0.010) and diarrhoea (p = 0.023) were significantly more associated with being female. At 18 months post-surgery, outcomes for patients presenting with 'female-pattern' symptoms were not improved by undertaking partial fundoplication when compared to Nissen fundoplication. The only symptom that was affected by the type of fundoplication was dysphagia, with a significant number of patients experiencing worsening of dysphagia after a Nissen fundoplication (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There are certain symptoms that affect female patients who present with GORD more commonly than male patients, and this may contribute to lower satisfaction outcomes. Partial fundoplication does not appear to offer a significant advantage in improving these symptoms.

Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m2) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed.

RESULTS

The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.

European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) recommendations for the use of high-resolution manometry of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Several patients in gastroenterology practice present with esophageal symptoms, and in case of normal endoscopy with biopsies, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is often the next step. Our aim was to develop a European consensus on the clinical application of esophageal HRM, to offer the clinician guidance in selecting patients for HRM and using its results to optimize clinical outcome.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus was initiated with 38 multidisciplinary experts from 16 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 71 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 33 statements.

RESULTS

The process generated guidance on when to consider esophageal HRM, how to perform it, and how to generate the report. The Delphi process also identified several areas of uncertainty, such as the choice of catheters, the duration of fasting and the position in which HRM is performed, but recommended to perform at least 10 5-ml swallows in supine position for each study. Postprandial combined HRM impedance is considered useful for diagnosing rumination. There is a large lack of consensus on treatment implications of HRM findings, which is probably the single area requiring future targeted research.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

A multinational and multidisciplinary group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on technical aspects, indications, performance, analysis, diagnosis, and therapeutic implications of esophageal HRM.

ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF POST-FUNDOPLICATION ANATOMY AND CORRELATION WITH SYMPTOMATOLOGY

Background:

Upper digestive endoscopy is important for the evaluation of patients submitted to fundoplication, especially to elucidate postoperative symptoms. However, endoscopic assessment of fundoplication anatomy and its complications is poorly standardized among endoscopists, which leads to inadequate agreement.

Aim:

To assess the frequency of postoperative abnormalities of fundoplication anatomy using a modified endoscopic classification and to correlate endoscopic findings with clinical symptoms.

Method:

This is a prospective observational study, conducted at a single center. Patients were submitted to a questionnaire for data collection. Endoscopic assessment of fundoplication was performed according to the classification in study, which considered four anatomical parameters including the gastroesophageal junction position in frontal view (above or at the level of the pressure zone); valve position at retroflex view (intra-abdominal or migrated); valve conformation (total, partial, disrupted or twisted) and paraesophageal hernia (present or absent).

Results:

One hundred patients submitted to fundoplication were evaluated, 51% male (mean age: 55.6 years). Forty-three percent reported postoperative symptoms. Endoscopic abnormalities of fundoplication anatomy were reported in 46% of patients. Gastroesophageal junction above the pressure zone (slipped fundoplication), and migrated fundoplication, were significantly correlated with the occurrence of postoperative symptoms. There was no correlation between symptoms and conformation of the fundoplication (total, partial or twisted).

Conclusion:

This modified endoscopic classification proposal of fundoplication anatomy is reproducible and seems to correlate with symptomatology. The most frequent abnormalities observed were slipped and migrated fundoplication, and both correlated with the presence of symptoms.

New treatment method for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): C-BLART (clip band ligation anti-reflux therapy)-a short-term study

OBJECTIVES

C-BLART (clip band ligation anti-reflux therapy) has been reported as a new alternative endoscopic treatment for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study evaluated the short-term efficacy of C-BLART for controlling GERD symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, esophagitis, and quality of life.

METHODS

Patients with refractory GERD were recruited for a nonrandomized concurrent comparison, with 60 patients in the C-BLART with tailored PPI use group and 43 patients in the BID proton pump inhibitor (PPI) group. The primary outcomes were esophageal acid exposure and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. The GERD-Q score, esophagitis grade, and adherence degree were also recorded. Crossover from the BID PPI group to the C-BLART with tailored PPI use group was allowed after 6 months.

RESULTS

The LES pressure and GERD-Q score improved more in the C-BLART with tailored PPI use group (P < 0.001) after 6 months, with no significant difference in the decrease in esophagitis compared with the baseline endoscopic results (P = 0.268). Treatment with PPIs had been halted in 43% of the patients at 6 months after C-BLART. At 12 months after C-BLART, the DeMeester score showed a significant improvement compared with the baseline measurements (P = 0.025). The GERD-Q score and LES pressure did not significantly improve compared with the baseline values (P = 0.102, P = 0.184) in C-BLART with tailored PPI use group. At 6 to 12 months, n = 6 (10%) patients had undergone laparoscopic fundoplication to control their symptoms in all the patients after C-BLART.

CONCLUSION

C-BLART is a novel treatment for controlling refractory GERD symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, and LES pressure according to this short-term analysis, safely performed endoscopically to create an anti-reflux barrier with ligated bands. Despite improvements in DeMeester score, LES pressure, and GERD-Q scores in the C-BLART with tailored PPI use group, many patients continue to demonstrate objective evidence of GERD.

Trends in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: a Korea nationwide study

BACKGROUND

In 2014, the results derived from the nationwide data of the Korean Anti-reflux Surgery Study (KARS) demonstrated short-term feasibility and safety of anti-reflux surgery. This study aimed to update the longer-term safety and feasibility of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery up to 1-year follow-up with the KARS nationwide cohort.

METHODS

The data of 310 patients with GERD who received anti-reflux surgery up to 2018 were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics, postoperative symptom resolution, and postoperative complications were evaluated at postoperative 3 months and 1 year using the questionnaire designed by KARS. We divided the patients into two groups according to the operation period (up to and after 2014) to identify changes in the trends of the characteristics of surgical patients and operative qualities.

RESULTS

The typical preoperative symptoms were present in 275 patients (91.7%), and atypical symptoms were present in 208 patients (71.0%). Ninety-seven (35.5%) and 124 patients (46.1%) had inadequate PPI responses and hiatal hernia, respectively. At postoperative 1 year, typical and atypical symptoms were either completely or partially controlled in 90.3% and 73.5.0% of patients, respectively. Moderate-to-severe dysphagia, inability to belch, gas bloating, and flatulence at postoperative 1 year were identified in 23.5%, 29.4%, 23.2%, and 22.0% of patients, respectively. The number of surgical patients continuously increased from 2011 to 2018 in Korea. The proportion of patients with hiatal hernia and comorbidities increased (p < 0.01, p = 0.053), and the operation time decreased significantly (p < 0.01) in the late period (2015-2018) as compared with the early period (2011-2014). Symptom control and complication rate were equivalent between the two periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-reflux surgery was effective with > 90% of typical symptom resolution and posed a comparable postoperative complication rate with those in Western studies with mid-term to long-term follow-up. This result supports the feasibility and safety of anti-reflux surgery as a treatment for GERD in the Korean population.

Rethinking gastroesophageal reflux disorder

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common clinical condition for which our understanding has evolved over the past decades. It is now considered a cluster of phenotypes with numerous anatomical and physiological abnormalities contributing to its pathophysiology. As such, it is important to first understand the underlying mechanism of the disease process for each patient before embarking on therapeutic interventions. The aim of our paper is to highlight the mechanisms contributing to GERD and review investigations and interpretation of these results. Finally, the paper reviews the available treatment modalities for this condition, ranging from medical intervention, endoscopic options through to surgery and its various techniques.

Surgical results of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease with special reference to recurrence

BACKGROUND

Surgical results of GERD have mainly been reported from the Western countries, with a few reports found in Japan. We examined the surgical results of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication and clarify the characteristics of recurrent cases.

METHODS

The subjects included 375 patients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication from June 1997 to December 2016 as the initial surgery. Patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and surgical results were examined. In addition, we compared the patient characteristics and pathophysiology of recurrent cases in comparison with non-recurrent cases.

RESULTS

Age 59 (43-70) and male 211 (56.3%). The operation time was 141 min (113-180) and intraoperative complications were found to have onset in 13 subjects (3.5%). Dysphagia after surgery was found in 18 cases (4.8%). The A factor (the degree of hiatal hernia), P factor (the degree of esophagitis), and pH < 4 holding time significantly improved after surgery compared with prior to surgery (p < 0.001 for all), while the LES lengths and abdominal LES lengths were extended (p < 0.001 for each). Recurrence was found in 48 patients (15.1%) among the 318 patients for whom we could confirm the presence or absence of recurrence. The A factor, P factor, and pH < 4 holding time prior to surgery were, respectively, higher in the recurrence group (p = 0.031, p < 0.001, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for GERD could be performed safely, with a response rate as good as 85%. Compared with non-recurrent cases, preoperative clinical conditions such as esophageal hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and acid reflux time were all advanced in recurrent cases.

A Novel, Dynamic Statistical Model for Predicting Patient Satisfaction with Fundoplication Based on Pre-Operative Symptom Patterns

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication provides excellent control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), but there remain a number of unsatisfied patients who have proven difficult to identify pre-operatively. We hypothesised that pre-operative symptom patterns can predict of the risk of post-operative dissatisfaction.

METHODS

Pre-operative symptoms and post-operative satisfaction were measured using standardised questionnaires along with routine investigations. These data were used to calculate our novel pre-operative risk of dissatisfaction (PROD) score. Potential pre-operative prognostic markers were tested against the post-operative satisfaction data, including the objective investigations and the PROD score. The prognostic utility of the PROD score and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guideline was tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

An association was found between our PROD score and each of the satisfaction measures (n = 225, p < 0.001) which is likely to be of prognostic utility (AUC = 0.67-0.79). No such association was found between the routine investigations and post-operative satisfaction. The PROD score was found to be of greater prognostic utility than the SAGES guideline (n = 166, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PROD score is a novel, easy-to-use test that can predict individual patient satisfaction with fundoplication.

Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) commonly starts with an empiric trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and complementary lifestyle measures, for patients without alarm symptoms. Optimization of therapy (improving compliance and timing of PPI doses), or increasing PPI dosage to twice daily in select circumstances, can reduce persistent symptoms. Patients with continued symptoms can be evaluated with endoscopy and tests of esophageal physiology, to better determine their disease phenotype and optimize treatment. Laparoscopic fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and endoscopic therapies can benefit patients with well-characterized GERD. Patients with functional diseases that overlap with or mimic GERD can also be treated with neuromodulators (primarily antidepressants), or psychological interventions (psychotherapy, hypnotherapy, cognitive and behavioral therapy). Future approaches to treatment of GERD include potassium-competitive acid blockers, reflux-reducing agents, bile acid binders, injection of inert substances into the esophagogastric junction, and electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Factors predicting outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: experience at a single institution in Korea

Purpose

Laparoscopic fundoplication is considered the standard surgical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western countries. However, some patients experience poor surgical outcomes with this procedure. The study aimed to identify the predictive factors of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of Korean GERD patients.

Methods

Sixty-one patients with GERD were treated using laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between November 2012 and February 2015. Symptom control rates were compared according to clinical and surgical factors to identify predictive factors of successful surgical outcomes.

Results

Thirty-five men and 26 women were enrolled. Preoperatively, typical symptoms were present in 60 patients (98%), while atypical symptoms were present in 40 patients (66%). Postoperatively, typical symptoms were controlled in 51 of 60 patients (85.0%), while atypical symptoms were controlled in 33 of 40 patients (82.5%). Overall, at 6 months postsurgery, 54 (88.5%) reported some resolution of GERD symptoms, with 48 (78.7%) achieving complete control. Patients who exhibited a good response to proton pump inhibitor therapy had a significantly greater rate of complete symptom control (P = 0.035).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic fundoplication is effective for controlling GERD symptoms. Response to preoperative proton pump inhibitor was a predictor of successful outcome.

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) assesses EGJ barrier function on esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM). We assessed EGJ-CI values in achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to determine if postoperative EGJ-CI changes reflected surgical intervention.

METHODS

Twenty-one achalasia patients (42.8 ± 3.2 years, 62% F) with HRM before and after Heller myotomy (HM) and 68 GERD patients (53.9 ± 1.8 years, 66% F) undergoing antireflux surgery (ARS) were compared to 21 healthy controls (27.6 ± 0.6 years, 52% F). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (mmHg.cm) was calculated using the distal contractile integral measurement across the EGJ, measured above the gastric baseline and corrected for respiration. Pre and postsurgical EGJ-CI and conventional lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) metrics were compared within and between these groups using non-parametric tests. Correlation between EGJ-CI and conventional LESP metrics was assessed.

KEY RESULTS

Baseline EGJ-CI was higher in achalasia compared to GERD (p < 0.001) or controls (p = 0.03). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral declined by 59.2% after HM in achalasia (p = 0.001), and increased by 26.3% after ARS in GERD (p = 0.005). End-expiratory and basal LESP decreased by 74.5% and 64.5% with HM, but increased by only 17.8% and 4.3% with ARS. Differences were noted between Dor vs Toupet fundoplication in achalasia (p = 0.007), and partial vs complete ARS in GERD (p = 0.03). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral correlated modestly with both end-expiratory and basal LESP (Pearson's r of 0.8 for all), but was less robust in GERD (0.7).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral has clinical utility in assessing EGJ barrier function at baseline and after surgical intervention to the EGJ, and could complement conventional EGJ metrics.

Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic anterior and Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence exists to which operation gives best long-term outcomes for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. This study aimed to assess long-term symptomatic outcome and satisfaction following laparoscopic anterior (LA) or Nissen fundoplication in a specialist upper gastrointestinal unit.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary LA or Nissen (LN) fundoplication between May 1994 and June 2010 were identified from a prospectively collected database. DeMeester, modified DeMeester, 'Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale' scores and patient satisfaction were assessed by questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 387 patients underwent surgery and 246 patients (65%) completed questionnaires, with 181 LA patients and 65 LN patients. Median follow-up was 83 months for LA and 179 months for LN (P < 0.001). A total of 218/245 (89%) reported major improvement in symptoms and 27 (11%) reported poor outcomes. There was no differences between LA and LN for symptom scores at short (<5 years) or long-term follow-up (>5 years). Women reported significantly higher DeMeester scores and lower satisfaction (P = 0.012). One hundred and eighteen (48%) patients were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) at follow-up despite high satisfaction rates.

CONCLUSION

LA and LN have similar long-term results with patients reporting high satisfaction levels. Women reported more symptoms and less satisfaction than men. Despite high satisfaction rates a high percentage of patients take PPIs.

Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in non-responders to proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common public health problem. Medical treatment remains the first line of treatment of GERD. Failure of medical treatment may occur in up to 45% of GERD patients. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) as a means of antireflux surgery in patients with poor response to anti-reflux medication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study of patients who underwent LNF in the period between January 2000 and December 2010 in the Gastrointestinal Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Egypt. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively, after 1 year, by clinical examination, esophagogastroscope, barium esophagography, esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. Patient satisfaction after surgery was also graded through a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study population was 370 patients. 296 patients were good responders to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) while 74 patients were PPI non-responders. Preoperatively, atypical reflux symptoms were significantly more in PPI non-responders (P = 0.006). On follow-up, PPI responders significantly reported relief of heartburn (P = 0.01) and regurgitation (P = 0.04). Patient satisfaction was more in PPI responders (P = 0.04). Both groups were comparable regarding anatomical and functional assessment. Integrity of the wrap was higher in PPI responders (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

PPI non-responders should not be precluded from LNF. Thorough assessment is mandatory to confirm GERD diagnosis. A substantial proportion of PPI failures show good response to LNF but significantly than clinical response in PPI responders. Increased likelihood of poor outcome after surgery should be discussed with the patient.