1
|
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA to Diagnose Graft Rejection Post-Transplant: Past, Present and Future. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2030034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a non-invasive biomarker that is more sensitive and specific towards diagnosing any graft injury or rejection. Due to its applicability over all transplanted organs irrespective of age, sex, race, ethnicity, and the non-requirement of a donor sample, it emerges as a new gold standard for graft health and rejection monitoring. Published research articles describing the role and efficiency of dd-cfDNA were identified and scrutinized to acquire a brief understanding of the history, evolution, emergence, role, efficiency, and applicability of dd-cfDNA in the field of transplantation. The dd-cfDNA can be quantified using quantitative PCR, next-generation sequencing, and droplet digital PCR, and there is a commendatory outcome in terms of diagnosing graft injury and monitoring graft health. The increased levels of dd-cfDNA can diagnose the rejection prior to any other presently used biochemistry or immunological assay methods. Biopsies are performed when these tests show any signs of injury and/or rejection. Therefore, by the time these tests predict and show any unusual or improper activity of the graft, the graft is already damaged by almost 50%. This review elucidates the evolution, physiology, techniques, limitations, and prospects of dd-cfDNA as a biomarker for post-transplant graft damage and rejection.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ilić D, Kunac N, Borčić T, Dinjar Kujundžić P, Mišetić Dolić Z, Sobočan N, Lalovac M, Mijić M, Međimurec G, Kocman B, Mikolašević I, Filipec Kanižaj T. Liver transplantation in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a case series and literature review. Croat Med J 2021; 62:44-51. [PMID: 33660960 PMCID: PMC7976884 DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms with variable biological behavior. They frequently metastasize to the liver, requiring active, multimodality treatment. Surgical resection, possible in only a minority of cases, was until recently the only potentially curative option. For unresectable NET with liver metastases, liver transplantation (LT) emerged as a potential curative treatment due to relatively slow growth and indolent behavior of the metastases. In this case series with literature review, we retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 12 highly selected patients with metastatic NET disease as an indication for LT treated in our center. We also summarized the proposed prognostic factors, and evaluated and compared the existing selection criteria. The main poor prognostic factors in our patients were high grade NET and primary tumor in the pancreas. Inconsistent liver transplantation outcome parameters make it difficult to standardize patient selection criteria. There is a need for further studies that would fully elucidate the curative potential of LT in patients diagnosed with NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Ilić
- Diana Ilić, UH Merkur, Zajčeva 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu KKW, Wong KHC, Chok KSH. Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors. Gut Liver 2021; 15:19-30. [PMID: 32102130 PMCID: PMC7817931 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
During the past few decades, liver transplant has developed from a high-mortality procedure to an almost routine procedure with good survival outcomes. The development of living donor liver transplant has increased the availability of liver grafts, and the scope of indications for liver transplant has been expanding ever since. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of such an expansion of scope. Various criteria have been proposed to expand the eligibility of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan criteria for liver transplant. Furthermore, liver transplant is increasingly performed as a treatment modality for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastasis and colorectal liver metastasis. The number of elderly patients receiving liver transplant is on the rise. Combined organ transplantation has also been adopted to treat patients with multiple organ failure. Going forward, further development of preoperative noninvasive predictors in tumor, patient and even donor factors is needed to identify patients at risk of poor outcomes and hence optimize patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ka-Wan Chu
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Kenneth Siu-Ho Chok
- Department of Surgery and State Key Laboratory for Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effect of Institutional Case Volume on In-Hospital Mortality After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3644-3649. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
5
|
Wadström J, Ericzon BG, Halloran PF, Bechstein WO, Opelz G, Serón D, Grinyó J, Loupy A, Kuypers D, Mariat C, Clancy M, Jardine AG, Guirado L, Fellström B, O'Grady J, Pirenne J, O'Leary JG, Aluvihare V, Trunečka P, Baccarani U, Neuberger J, Soto-Gutierrez A, Geissler EK, Metzger M, Gray M. Advancing Transplantation: New Questions, New Possibilities in Kidney and Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2017; 101 Suppl 2S:S1-S41. [PMID: 28125449 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Wadström
- 1 Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 2 Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3 Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Canada. 4 Frankfurt University Hospital and Clinics, Frankfurt, Germany. 5 University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 6 Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain. 7 Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 8 Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Spain. 9 Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France. 10 University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 11 University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Jean Monnet University, France. 12 Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 13 Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain. 14 University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. 15 King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 16 Baylor University Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX. 17 Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic. 18 Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy. 19 Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 20 Directorate of Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom. 21 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 22 Experimental Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 23 Ahead of Time GmbH, Starnberg, Germany. 24 Better Value Healthcare, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grąt M, Wronka KM, Patkowski W, Stypułkowski J, Grąt K, Krasnodębski M, Masior Ł, Lewandowski Z, Krawczyk M. Effects of Donor Age and Cold Ischemia on Liver Transplantation Outcomes According to the Severity of Recipient Status. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61:626-635. [PMID: 26499986 PMCID: PMC4729807 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3910-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED BackgroundProlonged cold ischemic time (CIT) and increased donor age are well-known factors negatively influencing outcomes after liver transplantation (LT). AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the magnitude of their negative effects is related to recipient model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. METHODS This retrospective study was based on a cohort of 1402 LTs, divided into those performed in low-MELD (<10), moderate-MELD (10–20), and high-MELD (>20) recipients. RESULTS While neither donor age (p = 0.775) nor CIT (p = 0.561) was a significant risk factor for worse 5-year graft survival in low-MELD recipients, both were found to yield independent effects (p = 0.003 and p = 0.012, respectively) in moderate-MELD recipients, and only CIT (p = 0.004) in high-MELD recipients. However, increased donor age only triggered the negative effect of CIT in moderate-MELD recipients, which was limited to grafts recovered from donors aged ≥46 years (p = 0.019). Notably, utilization of grafts from donors aged ≥46 years with CIT ≥9 h in moderate-MELD recipients (p = 0.003) and those with CIT ≥9 h irrespective of donor age in high-MELD recipients (p = 0.031) was associated with particularly compromised outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the negative effects of prolonged CIT seem to be limited to patients with moderate MELD receiving organs procured from older donors and to high-MELD recipients, irrespective of donor age. Varying effects of donor age and CIT according to recipient MELD score should be considered during the allocation process in order to avoid high-risk matches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Grąt
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karolina M. Wronka
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Waldemar Patkowski
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jan Stypułkowski
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karolina Grąt
- />Second Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Krasnodębski
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Masior
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Lewandowski
- />Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marek Krawczyk
- />Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Durand F. Is it worth discussing the feasibility of deceased donor liver transplantation in centers with a strong experience in living donor liver transplantation? World J Surg 2014; 38:1529-30. [PMID: 24549998 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2479-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- François Durand
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hepatology & Liver Intensive Care, Hospital Beaujon, University Paris VII, 100 Boulevard du General Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France,
| |
Collapse
|