Clinicopathologic analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in duodenum and small intestine

The impact of gender on survival outcomes in patients with small intestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis using the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Small intestinal stromal tumors (SISTs) are a rare type of mesenchymal tumor. Gender is known to influence the incidence and prognosis of various tumors, but its role on the survival of SISTs at the population level remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to explore the relationship between gender and the prognosis of SISTs using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

Data on SISTs patients from 2000 to 2019 were derived from the SEER database. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were applied to evaluate the impact of demographic and clinical characteristics on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 3513 patients with SISTs were analyzed, including 1921 males and 1592 females. Kaplan-Meier analysis coupled with log-rank testing demonstrated a significantly higher mortality rate among male patients compared to females (P < 0.001). Notably, female patients exhibited superior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.808, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.724-0.902, P < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.801, 95% CI 0.692-0.927, P = 0.003) compared to male patients. While the mean 1-year CSS rates were comparable between genders (95.3% for males vs. 96.0% for females, P = 0.332), male patients consistently showed lower mean survival rates at 3-, 5-, and 10-year intervals. Surgical intervention significantly boosted 5-year OS and CSS rates in both male and female patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, sex, grade, TNM stage, surgery, and mitotic rate as independent risk factors for OS and CSS in patients with SISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that male patients with SISTs have a higher risk of mortality compared to female patients, indicating that gender may serve as a predictive indicator for survival in this patient population.

NTRK2 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a special emphasis on the clinicopathological and prognostic impacts

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are typically characterized by activating mutations of the KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Recently, the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion was reported in a small subset of wild-type GIST. We examined trk IHC and NTRK gene expressions in GIST. Pan-trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) was positive in 25 (all 16 duodenal and 9 out of 16 small intestinal GISTs) of 139 cases, and all pan-trk positive cases showed diffuse and strong expression of c-kit. Interestingly, all of these cases showed only trkB but not trkA/trkC expression. Cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) analysis identified increased number of genes whose promoters were activated in pan-trk/trkB positive GISTs. Imbalanced expression of NTRK2, which suggests the presence of NTRK2 fusion, was not observed in any of trkB positive GISTs, despite higher mRNA expression. TrkB expression was found in duodenal GISTs and more than half of small intestinal GISTs, and this subset of cases showed poor prognosis. However, there was not clear difference in clinical outcomes according to the trkB expression status in small intestinal GISTs. These findings may provide a possible hypothesis for trkB overexpression contributing to the tumorigenesis and aggressive clinical outcome in GISTs of duodenal origin.

Survival outcome of local versus radical resection for jejunoileal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matched population-based analysis

PURPOSE

Survival after local resection (LR) versus radical resection (RR) has been revealed comparable for patients with rectal and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but is unknown for jejunoileal (JI) GISTs. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival between patients with JI GISTs who underwent LR and RR, and to find out the prognostic factors for JI GISTs.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with JI GISTs in 1975-2019 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and grouped according to surgical modality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the LR and RR groups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared in the full and matched cohorts using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Subgroup sensitivity analyses were also performed. Risk factors associated with DSS were analyzed in multivariate Cox analysis following model selection.

RESULTS

1107 patients diagnosed with JI GISTs were included in the study cohort. After PSM, OS and DSS were comparable in LR and RR groups. Consistently, the two groups had similar DSS in all subgroup analyses. Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis identified lymphadenectomy, older age, larger tumor size, distant metastasis, high and unknown mitotic rate, but not LR, as independent prognostic risk factors for JI GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

We conducted the first population-based comparison between the effect of different surgical modes on survival for patients with JI GISTs. LR can be carried out safely without compromising oncological outcome, and should be considered as a treatment option in selected patients with JI GISTs.

Outcome after Surgical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Second Part of Duodenum: Is Localized Resection Appropriate?

BACKGROUND

The second part of the duodenum is the most common part to be involved with duodenal gastrointestinal tumors (D2-GISTs). Localized resection (LR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are two viable options for curative resection. The aim of this study is to compare the middle-term outcomes in patients with D2-GIST after either LR or PD in a single institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 53 patients with non-metastatic D2-GIST were analyzed. Either LR or PD was executed depending on the involvement of the ampulla of Vater. The tumors were stratified in accordance with the Miettinen classification for tumor behavior. The patients were followed up for 3 years for recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of the patients were females (60%) and 21 males (40%), with a mean age of 55 ± 8 years. Bleeding was the most common presentation in 19 patients (36%). LR was performed in 41 patients (77%), whereas PD was performed in 12 patients (23%). Three-year survival and recurrence were comparable between the two groups. The disease-free survival at 3 years was 85% and 92% in LR and PD group, respectively. The PD group had a significantly longer operative time and a higher incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was calculated. A significantly shorter survival was calculated in those with a mitotic index of >5 and also for tumors classified as high grade in accordance with the Miettinen classification. 71% of those with recurrence had high mitotic index > 5/hpf.

CONCLUSIONS

LR for D2-GIST is an acceptable alternative to PD with satisfactory middle-term outcomes. For tumors involving the ampulla of Vater, PD is still indicated. Furthermore, tumor biology predicts the likelihood of survival and recurrence.

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study based on a 13 years experience of a single center in China

AIM

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) constitute a small rare subset. This study aims to analyze the prognostic differences between duodenal and jejunoileal GISTs and evaluate the clinical treatment and prognostic characteristics of patients with duodenal GISTs.

METHODS

Data of patients with primary duodenal or jejunoileal GISTs were collected. Patients were matched through propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with duodenal GISTs were compared based on surgical approach.

RESULTS

Altogether, 101 duodenal and 219 jejunoileal GISTs were identified. In patients with duodenal GISTs, 79 (78%) underwent local resection (LR) and 22 (22%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Patients undergoing PD had a longer postoperation stay (18.5 vs 13 days, P = 0.001) and more complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II complications for PD vs LR, 31.8 vs 15.2%; Clavien-Dindo III-V complications for PD vs LR, 22.7 vs. 2.5%; P < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.8) or overall survival (OS) (P = 0.9) when comparing patients who underwent LR versus PD. Multivariable analysis showed that tumor size >5 cm was the only independent predictor of shorter RFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.012). After matching, there was no significant difference in RFS and OS between patients with duodenal versus jejunoileal GISTs (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of duodenal and jejunoileal GISTs are similar. Recurrence and OS of duodenal GISTs primarily depend on tumor size. For duodenal GISTs, LR is associated with comparable long-term survival when compared to PD, but with superior short-term outcomes.

Characteristics and prognosis of jejunoileal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) in the era of imatinib: a comparative study with gastric GISTs

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) located in the jejunum or ileum (JI-GIST) are considered worse prognosis compared to those of gastric (G-GIST) location. It has been suggested that this dogma should be revised. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of jejunoileal GISTs and its prognosis and to compare them with G-GISTs in the era of imatinib.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical histories of all the patients diagnosed with GISTs between January 2000 and November 2016: Clinical and pathological data, as recurrence, metastatic state, disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS) rates of patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

JI-GIST patients comprise 29 cases (37.7%). Compared to G-GIST, JI-GIST patients had undergone emergency surgery more frequently (37.9% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.007). According to the NIH-Fletcher classification, the low or very-low risk group represents 17.2% of JI-GISTs as opposed to 37.6% of G-GISTs (p < 0.005). When the AFIP-Miettinen system was used the low or very-low group represented 17.2% of JI-GISTs vs. 58.4% in the G-GISTs group (p < 0.001). Both local recurrence (24.1% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.05) and metastatic rate (34.5% vs. 22.9%, p < 0.05) were higher in the JI-GIST group than in G-GIST. 5- and 10-year DFS and 10-year OS rate were lower for JI-GIST (54.5% and 39.6% vs. 77.2% and 60.8%, and 57.9% vs. 65%, respectively, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed differences between both groups in DFS and OS rates at long term could be attributed to the effect of imatinib.

An Unexpected Finding of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy; How to Deal? How Much Safety Margin Needed?

Background: There is an increasing incidence of coincidental gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) during a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Resection with negative margin R0 is the safest and most proper treatment. Objectives: The incidence of GIST in patients undergoing LSG and resection with a 1- to 2-cm safety margin was validated and analyzed. The primary endpoint is that can simultaneous excision be oncologically adequate or not? How much GIST is supposed to be far from a staple line? Methods: The present prospective study included 338 patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35. All patients underwent LSG without known history or imaging reveal GIST. Resection was done with a safety margin of 1 to 2 cm away from the stapled margin and, then, sent for histopathology and immunohistochemically staining. Results: A total of 17 patients (5%) had coincidental GIST. The size was T1 in 88.2% of patients; 16 patients were staged as IA according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC TNM). Safety margin was ≤ 1 cm for 3 patients to avoid incorporation in staple line and 14 patients (82.3%) had 2 cm safety margin. Resection margin in biopsy revealed positive resection margin R1 for 2 patients, whose safety margin was only 1 cm or less. A total of 15 patients had a negative margin (R0), whose safety margin was 2 cm. Conclusions: Any incidental GIST can be removed safely during LSG as long as it is far from the staple line with at least a 2-cm safety margin and negative resection margins without changing the procedure. Margins less than 1 cm are associated with adverse prognostic factors.

Surgery for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local resection

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for survival of patients with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or local resection (LR). PubMed database was searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 software. Twenty-seven observational studies involving 1103 patients were included in the review. The overall morbidity and 30-day mortality was 27% and 0.5% respectively. The median (range) 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 87% (60-100%) and 71% (44-100%) respectively. In meta-analyses, factors associated with shorter DFS included male sex, mitotic index >5/50 high-power fields, high risk, tumor size >5 cm, and the PD procedure. Factors associated with shorter OS included mitotic index >5/50 high-power fields and tumor size >5 cm. Patients in PD group had a higher incidence of mitotic index >5/50 HPF, a higher incidence of high-risk classification, a higher incidence of tumors in the second portion of the duodenum, a larger tumor size, a longer duration of operation, more intraoperative blood loss, a greater blood transfusion requirement, a higher morbidity rate, a longer hospital stay, and an increased recurrence rate than those in LR group. In conclusion, the current literature review demonstrates that the postoperative prognosis of duodenal GIST is promising and mainly affected by tumor factors. The choice of the surgical approach should depend on the anatomical location and tumor size.

Small Bowel Stromal Tumors: Different Clinicopathologic and Computed Tomography Features in Various Anatomic Sites

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can present with different clinical and immunohistochemical characteristics according to different anatomic sites. The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathologic and computed tomography (CT) features of small bowel stromal tumors located in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. In total, 197 patients (109 male, 88 female) with small bowel GISTs were retrospectively reviewed. All tumors had definite anatomic sites in the small bowel tract with surgical confirmation. The clinicopathologic variables included age, sex, onset of symptoms, and tumor risk category. CT variables included tumor size, degree enhancement, enhancement pattern (region of necrosis), adjacent tissue involvement, lymphadenopathy, and distant metastasis. We assessed any possible differences according to different GIST site of origin. Based on tumor size and mitotic count, the risk categories in different anatomic sites did not differ significantly between duodenal and jejunal GISTs. However, high risk ileum GISTs accounted for 66.0% of ileal cases, which was higher than duodenum cases (36.8%, P = 0.002) and jejunum cases (43.9%, P = 0.004). The mean size of GISTs in the ileum was 9.77 cm, which was significantly larger than in the duodenum (7.41 cm, P = 0.043), and in the jejunum (8.14 cm, P = 0.027). On CT images, enhancement degree appeared to gradually increase from the duodenum to the ileum in the portal phase, and the enhancement pattern presented a tendency for heterogeneity. In Conclusions, the clinicopathologic and CT features of small bowel GISTs can differ according to different primary anatomic sites.