CUP Syndrome in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Analysis of Risk Factors and Impact of Surgical Intervention

Diagnostic Approaches for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Unknown Primary (NEN-UPs) and Their Prognostic Relevance-A Retrospective, Long-Term Single-Center Experience

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a rare and heterogenous group of tumors with predominantly gastroenteropancreatic or pulmonary origin. Despite numerous diagnostic efforts, the primary tumor site remains unknown in up to 20% of the patients diagnosed with NEN. In this subgroup of NEN patients, a standard diagnostic algorithm has not yet been integrated into clinical routine. Of note, an undetermined primary tumor site in NENs is associated with an impaired clinical outcome by at least "formally" limiting treatment options exclusively approved for NENs of a certain histological origin. In this retrospective study, a patient cohort of 113 patients initially diagnosed with NEN of unknown primary (NEN-UP) was analyzed. In 13 patients (11.5%) a primary tumor site could be identified subsequently, amongst others, by performing somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET-based imaging, which was irrespective of the initial clinical or demographic features. Diagnostic work-up and therapeutic regimens did not differ significantly between patients with an identified or unidentified primary tumor site; only a detailed immunohistochemical assessment providing additional information on the tumor origin proved to be significantly associated with the detection of a primary tumor site. Our study revealed that a profound diagnostic work-up, particularly including SSTR-PET-based imaging, leads to additional treatment options, finally resulting in significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with NEN-UPs.

Molecular deciphering of primary liver neuroendocrine neoplasms confirms its distinct existence with foregut-like profile

Isolated hepatic localizations of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are generally considered as metastatic NETs of unknown primary but could correspond to primary hepatic NETs (PHNETs), a poorly explored entity. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of PHNETs and compare them with other primary NETs. We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients managed for hepatic localization of NET without extra-hepatic primary tumor after exhaustive clinical, imaging and immunohistochemical characterization. We performed whole-exome sequencing with mutational and copy number analysis. Transcriptomic profiles were compared to pancreatic (n=31), small-bowel (n=22) and lung (n=15) NETs using principal component analysis, unsupervised clustering and gene-set enrichment analysis. Among 27 screened patients, 16 had PHNET (solitary tumor in 63%, median size 11 cm, G2 NETs in 81%) following clinical and pathological review. DNA analyses showed "foregut-like" genomic profiles with frequent alterations in pathways of Fanconi DNA repair (75%), histone modifiers (58%), adherens junctions (58%) and cell cycle control (50%). The most frequently involved genes were KMT2A (58%), ATM (42%), CDH1, CDKN2C, FANCF and MEN1 (33% each). Transcriptomic analyses showed that PHNETs clustered closer to foregut (pancreatic, lung) NETs than to midgut (small-bowel) NETs, while remaining a distinct entity with specific profile. Assessment of potentially predictive biomarkers suggested efficacy of treatments usually active in foregut NETs. In conclusion, PHNETs display a foregut-like molecular profile distinct from other types of NETs, with recurrent molecular alterations. Upon exhaustive work-up to exclude unrecognized primary tumor, PHNETs should not be considered metastatic NETs from an unknown primary. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

An abdominal wall neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin: A case report and review of the literature

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms that arise from cells of the endocrine and nervous system. NETs, often found in the gastrointestinal tract, can be found anywhere in the body, and have metastatic potential. NETs occasionally present with metastatic disease without an identifiable primary tumor.

Case

A 79‐year‐old female patient presented with an abdominal wall mass. Percutaneous biopsy was consistent with a NET. Preoperative endoscopy and PillCam were unremarkable. PET Dotatate demonstrated uptake in the abdominal wall as well as vague uptake in the pelvis. Intraoperatively, we identified a suspicious nodule on the sigmoid colon, which was consistent with a drop metastasis on final pathology.

Conclusion

In this case report we present a patient with a NET metastasis to the abdominal wall without a known primary site. This case highlights the limitations of endoscopy and imaging in the workup of metastatic NETs. Additionally, this is a novel case report of a metastatic NET to the abdominal wall without an identifiable primary site.

Curative and palliative surgery in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) increases with age. Lately, the diagnosis of NET was mainly caused by early detection of small NET (<1 cm) in the rectum and stomach, which are depicted by chance during routine and prophylactic endoscopy. Also in patients with large and metastatic pancreatic and intestinal tumors thorough pathologic investigation with use of different immunohistologic markers discovers more neuroendocrine tumors with low differentiation grade (G2-G3) and more neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), nowadays, than in former times. While gastric and rectal NET are discovered as small (<1 cm in diameter) and mainly highly differentiated tumors, demonstrating lymph node metastases in less than 10% of the patients, the majority of pancreatic and small bowel NET have already metastasized at the time of diagnosis. This is of clinical importance, since tumor stage and differentiation grade not only influence prognosis but also surgical procedure and may define whether a combination of surgery with systemic biologic therapy, chemotherapy or local cytoreductive procedures may be used. The indication for surgery and the preferred surgical procedure will have to consider personal risk factors of each patient (i.e. general health, additional illnesses, etc.) and tumor specific factors (i.e. tumor stage, grade of differentiation, functional activity, mass and variety of loco regional as well as distant metastases etc.). Together they define, whether radical curative or only palliative surgery can be applied. Altogether surgery is the only cure for locally advanced NET and helps to increase quality of life and overall survival in many patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. The question of cure versus palliative therapy sometimes only can be answered with time, however. Many different aspects and various questions concerning the indication and extent of surgery and the best therapeutic procedure are still unanswered. Therefore, a close multidisciplinary cooperation of colleagues involved in biochemical and localization diagnostics and those active in various treatment areas is warranted to search for the optimal strategy in each individual patient. How far genetic screening impacts survival remains to be seen. Since surgeons do have a central role in the treatment of NET patients, they have to understand the need for integration into such an interdisciplinary team.