Orthopaedic Surgeon Density in South Africa

Challenges to fracture service availability and readiness provided by allopathic and traditional health providers: national surveys across The Gambia and Zimbabwe

Background

Populations in Africa are ageing, hence the number of age-related fragility fractures, including hip fractures, is rising. Hip fractures are an indicator condition for older adult health provision, as they require a multifaceted pathway of care. To enable health service planning, detailed national-level understanding of current fracture service provision is needed.

Methods

The WHO Service Availability & Readiness Assessment survey was modified to evaluate fracture service availability, and readiness. All health care facilities to which a patient with a hip fracture could present in The Gambia and Zimbabwe were invited to participate between October 2021 and January 2023. A further traditional bone-setter (TBS)-specific survey assessed TBS care in The Gambia. Availability of services per 100 000 adults ≥ 18 years, and general, fracture-specific, and hip fracture-specific care readiness were determined.

Results

All invited facilities in Zimbabwe (n = 186), 98% in The Gambia (n = 150), and 35 of 42 (83%) TBS participated in the survey. General availability of hospital facilities was low in both Zimbabwe and The Gambia and many facilities lacked regular electricity, reliable oxygen supplies, and sharp/infectious waste disposal. In The Gambia, 78.6% public hospitals and 53.8% other facility types (e.g. NGO/mission) had no doctors. Fracture care readiness: < 1 orthopaedic surgeon was available for 100 000 adults in both countries. Orthopaedic trained nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists were few. Only 10 (6.7%) facilities in The Gambia and 56 (30.1%) in Zimbabwe had functioning X-ray facilities. Equipment for fracture immobilisation was widely unavailable. No public facility had a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanner; antiresorptive treatment access was limited to < 5% facilities. Hip fracture readiness: only four facilities in The Gambia and 17 in Zimbabwe could offer surgery. Inpatient delays for surgery were long, especially in Zimbabwe. Non-operative management was common in Zimbabwe and in those visiting TBS in The Gambia. Over half TBS (51.4%) reported being able to set a hip fracture, management included traditional medicines (57.1%), splinting (20.0%), manipulation (14.3%) and traction (5.7%). Only 14.3% TBS referred hip fractures to hospital.

Conclusions

Findings highlight multiple important modifiable gaps in care which warrant urgent focus, with recommendations made, given expected increases in fragility fractures and need for universal health coverage.

Women in leadership in orthopaedic sports medicine societies throughout the world

OBJECTIVES

The proportion of women in orthopaedic surgery is low compared to other specialties, despite equal numbers of male and female students entering the medical profession. This gender disparity persists across various aspects of orthopaedic sports medicine, such as academic leadership, medical education, and on the sidelines. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive and updated global analysis of female representation in leadership positions within orthopaedic sports medicine and arthroscopy societies throughout the world.

METHODS

Publicly available websites for orthopaedic sports medicine societies throughout the world were evaluated. For societies that met inclusion criteria, the following data were collected: types of leadership positions available and breakdown of male and female orthopaedic surgeons in those positions.

RESULTS

There were a total of 55 societies analyzed from North America (5, 9.1%), South America (8, 14.5%), Europe (18, 32.7%), Asia (13, 23.6%), Africa (2, 3.6%), the Middle East (3, 5.5%) and Australia (3, 5.5%), as well as 3 international societies (5.5%). North America had the highest percentage of women in leadership positions with 19 of 97 positions (19.6%), followed by international societies with 11 of 92 (12.0%) positions filled by women. The Middle East and Australia had the fewest number of women, with all-male leadership. Globally, female orthopaedic surgeons served in 11 of 181 (6.1%) board of directors positions, 16 of 192 (8.3%) executive committees positions, 17 of 143 (11.9%) committee chair positions, 2 of 18 (11.1%) officer positions, 1 of 12 (8.3%) council positions, and 2 of 7 (28.6%) spokesperson positions.

CONCLUSION

While some countries have higher representation than others, the number of women in leadership positions in orthopaedic sports medicine societies throughout the world is significantly less than their male counterparts. While this is a preliminary analysis, future studies should aim to evaluate these trends over time. Providing equitable opportunities for women to rise into high-ranking positions in orthopaedic sports medicine may contribute to the interest of women and other minorities in the field of sports medicine and help improve diversity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Overcoming the Barriers to Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Global Perspective

BACKGROUND

Diversity in orthopaedics continues to lag behind that in other surgical specialties. This pattern exists globally and is not unique to gender or race. This review offers a global perspective on overcoming the barriers to diversity in orthopaedics.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE and Embase was conducted and a narrative review was undertaken. Publications that discussed any aspect of diversity or solutions to diversity within orthopaedics or academic orthopaedics were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 62 studies were included. Studies showed that diversity in orthopaedic training is limited by structural barriers such as long hours, requirements to relocate during training, training inflexibility, and a lack of exposure to orthopaedics. Implicit bias during the selection process for training, discrimination, and a lack of role models are additional barriers that are experienced by both minority and female surgeons. The global lack of diversity suggests that there are also inherent "cultural barriers" that are unique to orthopaedics; however, these barriers are not uniformly experienced. Perceptions of orthopaedics as promoting an unhealthy work-life balance and the existence of a "boys' club" must be addressed. Strong, committed leaders can embed cultural norms, support trainees, and act as visible role models. Targeted efforts to increase diverse recruitment and to reduce bias in selection processes for medical school and specialty training will increase diversity in the "training pipeline."

CONCLUSIONS

Diversity in orthopaedics continues to lag behind that in other specialties. Increasing diversity is important for providing a more inclusive training environment, improving patient care, and reducing health disparities. Structural and cultural barriers need to be addressed to improve diversity in orthopaedics. Promoting a culture supportive of all surgeons is essential to reframing perceptions that may prevent individuals from even considering a career as an orthopaedic surgeon. Changing attitudes require focused efforts from committed leadership in a "top-down" approach that prioritizes diversity. The efforts from national bodies seeking to tackle the lack of diversity, as well as the establishment of organizations committed to diversity, such as the International Orthopaedic Diversity Alliance, provide reasons to be optimistic for the future.

Orthopaedic trauma residency programs: Perspectives from different countries across the world

The ability to manage the myriad of musculoskeletal conditions successfully requires multiple years of training. Access to and completion of orthopaedic surgical training entails an often grueling, highly regulated path to certification to practice. Although the world is more connected than ever, the question is whether the local certification criteria for medical specialists leads to a generic residency program and a similar training in all countries. This report from eight nations on five continents details the distinctive features of that training, including the number of positions available, the examinations required, the gender distribution of residents, and available possibilities once the residence period is complete. This analysis shows a wide variation in the orthopaedic trauma training program worldwide, with emphasis on different skills per country.

The impact of a decentralised orthopaedic service on tertiary referrals in Cape Town, South Africa

BACKGROUND

In South Africa (SA), district hospitals (DHs) have limited capacity to manage the high burden of traumatic injuries. Scaling up decentralised orthopaedic care could strengthen trauma systems and improve timely access to essential and emergency surgical care (EESC). Khayelitsha township in Cape Town, SA, has the highest trauma burden in the Cape Metro East health district.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to describe the impact of Khayelitsha District Hospital (KDH) on acute orthopaedic services in the health district, with a focus on the volume and type of orthopaedic services provided without tertiary referral.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis described acute orthopaedic cases from Khayelitsha and their management between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Orthopaedic resources and the proportion of cases referred to the tertiary hospital by all DHs in the Cape Metro East health district are described.

RESULTS

In 2018 - 2019, KDH performed 2 040 orthopaedic operations, of which 91.3% were urgent or emergencies. KDH had the most orthopaedic resources and the lowest referral ratio (0.18) compared with other DHs (0.92 - 1.35). In Khayelitsha, 2 402 acute orthopaedic cases presented to community health clinics. Trauma (86.1%) was the most common mechanism of injury for acute orthopaedic referrals. Of clinic cases, 2 229 (92.8%) were referred to KDH and 173 (7.2%) directly to the tertiary hospital. The most common reason for direct tertiary referral was condition related (n=157; 90.8%).

CONCLUSION

This study outlines a successful example of a decentralised orthopaedic surgical service that increased EESC accessibility and alleviated the high burden of tertiary referrals compared with other DHs with fewer resources. Further research on the barriers to scaling up orthopaedic DH capacity in SA is needed to improve equitable access to surgical care.

Mortality Rates in Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Arthroplasty in South Africa

Objectives

To investigate the mortality rate for neck of femur fractures treated with arthroplasty at a tertiary level unit in South Africa and to evaluate the effect of known risk factors for mortality in neck of femur fractures treated with arthroplasty in the South African context.

Design

Retrospective cohort study. The main outcome was to determine mortality rates during in hospital stay, at 3 months, 6 months 1 year post surgery. The secondary outcome was to determine factors influencing mortality at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery.

Results

Mortality rate was 3.3% in hospital, 5.6% at 30 days and 26.7% at 1 year. Age >79, ASA score >3, and cementing of the femur had statistically increased mortality risk (P < .001). Average length of hospital stay was 12.3 ± 5.1 days (range 3.0-41.0 days) with 73% of patients discharged back to pre-hospital home.

Conclusion

Mortality rates after femur neck fracture arthroplasty in South Africa are slightly higher at 1 year compared to international data. However, the rates are comparably low during hospital stay, 30 day and at 6 months post-surgical intervals.

Access to care for low trauma hip fractures in South Africa

RATIONALE

Early surgery is recommended for hip fractures.

MAIN RESULT

In this study only one-third of subjects with hip fractures were admitted within 24 h of the fracture, and surgery was delayed beyond 48 h in the majority.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings highlight the need to improve access to care for hip fracture subjects.

PURPOSE

There is limited data on the timing of admission and surgery following a low trauma hip fracture (HF) in South Africa (SA).

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted at public and private hospitals in three provinces, Gauteng (GP), KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) and the Western Cape (WC), in SA to determine time from fracture to admission and from admission to surgery in patients presenting with low trauma HF. Associations with delayed admission and surgery were explored using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The median age of the 1996 subjects was 73 years (IQR 63-81 years), the majority were women (1346, 67%) and 1347 (67%) were admitted to the public hospitals. In one-third of subjects (661, 33%), admission was delayed to beyond 24 h after the fracture. There was a significantly longer time to admission in public compared to private hospitals (21 h [IQR 10.0-48.5] versus 6 h [IQR 3.3-14.1], p < 0.001), in subjects < 65 years, the WC and when admission occurred on a weekday. Surgery was delayed beyond 48 h in the majority (1272, 69%) of subjects and was significantly longer in public compared to private hospitals (130 h [IQR 62.6-212.4] versus 45.4 h [IQR 24.0-75.5], p < 0.001), in KZN, and when admission occurred after hours.

CONCLUSION

The burden of HFs is higher at public hospitals in SA, where there is a significant delay in admission after a fracture and surgery after admission. This highlights the need for a review of HF care pathways, resources and policies.

Estimating the Specialist Surgical Workforce Density in South Africa

Background

South Africa is an upper middle-income country with inequitable access to healthcare. There is a maldistribution of doctors between the private and public sectors, the latter which serves 86% of the population but has less than half of the human resources.

Objective

The objective of this study was to estimate the specialist surgical workforce density in South Africa.

Methods

This was a retrospective record-based review of the specialist surgical workforce in South Africa as defined by registration with the Health Professionals Council of South Africa for three cadres: 1) surgeons, and 2) anaesthesiologists, and 3) obstetrician/gynaecologists (OBGYN).

Findings

The specialist surgical workforce in South Africa doubled from 2004 (N = 2956) to 2019 (N = 6144). As of December 2019, there were 3096 surgeons (50.4%), 1268 (20.6%) OBGYN, and 1780 (29.0%) anaesthesiologists. The specialist surgical workforce density in 2019 was 10.5 per 100,000 population which ranged from 1.8 in Limpopo and 22.8 per 100,000 in Western Cape province. The proportion of females and those classified other than white increased between 2004-2019.

Conclusion

South Africa falls short of the minimum specialist workforce density of 20 per 100,000 to provide adequate essential and emergency surgical care. In order to address the current and future burden of disease treatable by surgical care, South Africa needs a robust surgical healthcare system with adequate human resources, to translate healthcare services into improved health outcomes.

The management of acute knee dislocations: A global survey of orthopaedic surgeons' strategies

Purpose: Great variety and controversies surround the management strategies of acute multiligament knee injuries (aMKLIs) and no established guidelines exist for resource-limited practices. The aim of this study was to compare the management approach of acute knee dislocations (AKDs) by orthopedic surgeons from nations with different economic status. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional scenario-based survey compares different management strategies for aMLKIs of surgeons in developed economic nations (DEN) and emerging markets and developing nations (EMDN). The main areas of focus were operative versus non-operative management, timing and staging of surgery, graft choice and vascular assessment strategies. The members of the Societe Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopedique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) were approached to participate and information was collected regarding their demographics, experience, hospital setting and management strategies of aMLKIs. These were analyzed after categorizing participants into DEN and EMDN based on the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Results: One-hundred and thirty-eight orthopedic surgeons from 47 countries participated in this study, 67 from DEN and 71 (51.4%) from EMDN. DEN surgeons had more years of experience and were older (p < 0.05). Surgeons from EMDN mostly worked in public sector hospitals, were general orthopedic surgeons and treated patients from a low-income background. They preferred conservative management and delayed reconstruction with autograft (p < 0.05) if surgery was necessary. Surgeons from DEN favored early, single stage arthroscopic ligament reconstruction. Selective Computerized Tomography Angiography (CTA) was the most preferred choice of arterial examination for both groups. Significantly more EMDN surgeons preferred clinical examination (p < 0.05) and duplex doppler scanning (p < 0.05) compared to DEN surgeons. More surgeons from EMDN did not have access to a physiotherapist for their patients. Conclusions: Treatment of aMLKIs vary significantly based on the economic status of the country. Surgeons from DEN prefer early, single stage arthroscopic ligament reconstruction, while conservative management is favored in EMDN. Ligament surgery in EMDN is often delayed and staged. EMDN respondents utilize duplex doppler scanning and clinical examination more readily in their vascular assessment of aMLKIs. These findings highlight very distinct approaches to MLKIs in low-resource settings which are often neglected when guidelines are generated.

Prioritised challenges in the management of acute knee dislocations are stiffness, obesity, treatment delays and associated limb-threatening injuries: a global consensus study

OBJECTIVES

Heterogeneous patient factors and injury mechanisms result in a great variety of injury patterns encountered in knee dislocations (KD). Attempts to improve outcome can focus on a wide range of challenges. The aim of this study was to establish and prioritise a list of challenges encountered when treating patients with acute KD.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with international knee specialists who generated a prioritised list of challenges. Selected priorities were limited to half of the possible items. Agreement of more than 70% was defined as consensus on each of these items a priori.

RESULTS

Ninety-one international surgeons participated in the first round. The majority worked in public hospitals and treated patients from low-income and middle-income households. Their propositions were prioritised by 27 knee surgeons from Europe, Africa, Asia, as well as North and South America, with a mean of 15.3 years of experience in knee surgery (SD 17.8). Consensus was reached for postoperative stiffness, obesity, delay to presentation and associated common peroneal nerve injuries. Challenges such as vascular injuries, ipsilateral fractures, open injuries as well as residual laxity were also rated high. Most of these topics with high priority are key during the initial management of a patient with KD, at presentation. Topics with lower priority were postsurgical challenges, such as patient insight, expectations and compliance, rehabilitation programme, and pain management.

CONCLUSION

This consensus study has a wide geographical footprint of experts around the world practising in various settings. These participants prioritised stiffness, obesity, treatment delays and associated limb-threatening injuries as the most important challenges when managing a patient with acute KD. This list calls for applicable and feasible solutions for these challenges in a global setting. It should be used to prioritise research efforts and discuss treatment guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Hip fracture care and national systems in Israel and South Africa

Despite the same latitude on earth, Israel and South Africa have a wide variety of healthcare systems and approaches. Israel is a developed country with life expectancy within the first decile of the modern world. South Africa is a developing country where available resources and health care varies greatly across the country. Israeli policy makers have realized in 1999 the importance of early surgery for hip fractures as the single most important factor contributing to decreased mortality. After an introduction of a newer reimbursement system in 2004, and public advertising of early hip fracture treatment as a quality tag for hospitals, in more than 85% of the cases patients are operated on early (within 8 hours) with a significant decrease in mortality. However, other issues such as patient preparation, rehabilitation, and prevention are still at their beginning. South Africa deals with significant challenges with high energy hip fractures in a younger population, although osteoporosis is on the rise in certain parts of the country. Due to limited resources and distances, time to surgery differs among hospital systems in the country. In public hospitals, a delay up to a week may be common, whereas in private hospitals most patients are operated early within 48 to 72 hours. Due to decreased life expectancy, arthroplasty is more aggressively used in displaced femoral neck fractures. Rehabilitation is mostly done within the families. Prevention and orthogeriatric teamwork are not being commonly practiced. Generally speaking, more attention to hip fractures is needed from healthcare funders.

Topics, Skills, and Cases for an Undergraduate Musculoskeletal Curriculum in Southern Africa: A Consensus from Local and International Experts

BACKGROUND

Most patients with orthopaedic pathology in low to middle-income countries are treated by nonspecialists. A curriculum to prepare undergraduate medical students for this duty should reflect the local pathology and skills that are required to manage patients in a resource-restricted environment. The aim of this study was to establish and prioritize a list of core orthopaedic-related knowledge topics, clinical cases, and skills that are relevant to medical students in southern Africa and areas with a similar clinical context.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with 3 interactive iterative rounds of communication and prioritization of items by experts from Africa, Europe, and North America. Preferred priorities were selected but were limited to 50% of all of the possible items. Percent agreement of ≥75% was defined as consensus on each of these items.

RESULTS

Most of the 43 experts who participated were orthopaedic surgeons from 7 different countries in southern Africa, but 28% were general practitioners or doctors working in primary or secondary-level facilities. Experts prioritized cases such as patients with multiple injuries, a limping child, and orthopaedic emergencies. Prioritized skills were manipulation and immobilization of dislocations and fractures. The most important knowledge topics included orthopaedic infections, the treatment of common fractures and dislocations, any red flags alerting to specialist referral, and back pain. Surgical skills for the treatment of urgent care conditions were included by some experts who saw a specific need in their clinical practice, but these were ranked lower.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide geographic, academic, and expertise-specific footprint of experts informed this international consensus through their various clinical and academic circumstances. Knowledge topics, skills, and cases concerning orthopaedic trauma and infection were prioritized by the highest percent agreement. Acute primary care for fractures and dislocations ranked high. Furthermore, the diagnosis and the treatment of conditions not requiring specialist referral were prioritized. This study can inform national curricula in southern Africa and assist in the allocation of student clinical rotations.

Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery: International Perspectives: AOA Critical Issues

Orthopaedic surgery in the United States is one of the few medical specialties that has consistently lacked diversity in its training programs and workforce for decades, despite increasing awareness of this issue. Is this the case in other English-language speaking countries? Are there inherent national differences, or does orthopaedics as a profession dictate the diversity landscape around the globe?The Carousel group includes the presidents of the major English-language-speaking orthopaedic organizations around the globe-Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Established in 1952, members of this group attend each other's annual scientific meetings during the year of their presidency, learning about our profession in each country and building international relationships. In this article, 13 Carousel presidents from different countries explore diversity in orthopaedics in their training programs and the workforce, with an assessment of the current state and ideas for improvement.