1
|
Hao X, Li Y, Liu L, Bai J, Liu J, Jiang C, Zheng L. Is duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon 2024; 10:e33156. [PMID: 39040391 PMCID: PMC11260976 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula is influenced by the effectiveness of the pancreaticojejunostomy, and the most suitable pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy remains uncertain. Since grade A postoperative pancreatic fistula is no longer considered a true fistula, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of duct-to-mucosa anastomosis and invagination anastomosis in reducing the incidence of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula. The meta-analysis was conducted using software Review Manager 5.3, and the fixed-effect model was employed for pooled statistic calculations. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was utilized for quality assessment. Ten randomized controlled trials from Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library (1990.01-2022.10) including 1471 patients, met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42023491673. The incidence of grade B/C fistula was significantly lower in the invagination group (7.7 %) compared to the duct-to-mucosa group (12.8 %, mostly Cattell manner)(RR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.14-2.39, P = 0.008; heterogeneity: P = 0.008, I2 = 68 %),heterogeneity among the results was addressed through sensitivity analysis. In patients with a soft pancreas, the incidence of grade B/C fistula was significantly lower in those who underwent invagination anastomosis (10 %) compared to those who underwent duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (41.9 %)(RR = 4.19, 95%CI: 1.33-13.25, P = 0.01).No significant differences were observed in terms of the occurrence of grade B/C fistula in firm pancreas, postoperative mortality, other major postoperative complications, anastomosis time, and postoperative bile leak. Therefore, we concluded that invagination anastomosis is significantly superior to duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in reducing the incidence of grade B/C fistula, especially in patients with a soft pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofei Hao
- Fourth Outpatient Department, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yi Li
- Section for Day Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu & The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Fourth Outpatient Department, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jian Bai
- Fourth Outpatient Department, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jia Liu
- Fourth Outpatient Department, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Cuinan Jiang
- Section for HepatoPancreatoBiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu & The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lu Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bellotti R, Cardini B, Strolz CJ, Stättner S, Oberhuber R, Braunwarth E, Resch T, Scheidl S, Margreiter C, Schneeberger S, Öfner D, Maglione M. Single Center, Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Different Reconstruction Techniques following Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3318. [PMID: 37176758 PMCID: PMC10179219 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy is still hampered by significant morbidity. So far, there is no universally accepted technique aimed at minimizing postoperative complications. Herein, we compare three different reconstruction techniques. METHODS This is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database including 283 patients operated between January 2010 and December 2020. Three reconstruction techniques were compared: (1) the Neuhaus-style telescope pancreatojejunostomy, (2) the pancreatogastrostomy, and (3) the modified Blumgart-style, duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy. The primary endpoint consisted in determining the rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF); the secondary endpoints included 90 days morbidity and mortality rates. A propensity score matching analysis was used. RESULTS Rates of CR-POPF did not differ significantly between the groups (Neuhaus-style pancreatojejunostomy 16%, pancreatogastrostomy 17%, modified Blumgart-style pancreatojejunostomy 15%), neither in the unmatched nor in the matched analysis (p = 0.993 and p = 0.901, respectively). Similarly, no significant differences could be observed with regard to major morbidity (unmatched p = 0.596, matched p = 0.188) and mortality rates (unmatched p = 0.371, matched p = 0.209) within the first 90 days following surgery. Propensity-score matching analyses revealed, however, a higher occurrence of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION Similar CR-POPF rates suggest no crucial role of the applied reconstruction technique. Increased incidence of intraluminal post-pancreatectomy hemorrhages following pancreatogastrostomy demands awareness for meticulous hemostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Bellotti
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Benno Cardini
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Carola J. Strolz
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergut Hospital, 4840 Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Rupert Oberhuber
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Thomas Resch
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Stefan Scheidl
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Christian Margreiter
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (R.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okubo S, Hashimoto M, Kojima K, Makuuchi M, Kobayashi Y, Shindoh J. Clinical impact of the new "twin U-stitch method" of pancreaticogastrostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1263-1269. [PMID: 34846600 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02384-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) method for reducing pancreatic fistula (PF) incidence remains unclear. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the "twin U-stitch method" and compared it with the conventional invagination method. METHODS Data of 183 consecutive patients who underwent PG after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between January 2015 and November 2020 were evaluated. PF incidence was compared between patients who experienced twin U-stitch PG (twin U-stitch group) and those who experienced conventional invagination PG (conventional PG group). RESULTS The twin U-stitch and conventional PG methods were performed in 97 and 86 patients, respectively. The time required for twin U-stitch PG was shorter than conventional PG (9.3 min vs 20.0 min, P < 0.001). The twin U-stitch group showed a lower incidence of PF than the conventional PG group (8% vs. 19%, P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis confirmed that twin U-stitch PG was significantly correlated with a decreased risk of PF (odds ratio, 0.23; P = 0.006), independent of the texture of the pancreas. Subgroup analysis of patients with soft-textured pancreas showed that the median drain amylase levels in the twin U-stitch group on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 were significantly lower than those in the conventional PG group (POD 1: 1,335 vs. 5,991 U/L, P < 0.001; POD 3: 212 vs. 518, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION The twin U-stitch method was simple and preferable to the conventional method for preventing PF in patients with PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Okubo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan
- Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaji Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan.
- Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kazutaka Kojima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan
| | - Mikio Makuuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sannoudai Hospital, 4-1-38 Higashiishioka, Ishioka-city, Ibaraki, 315-0037, Japan
| | - Yuta Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan
- Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Shindoh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan
- Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Z, Wang X, Ke N. A different suturing method of the duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy for the normal pancreatic duct in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17:412-414. [PMID: 33885032 PMCID: PMC8270029 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_298_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Although laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is safe and widely used in clinical practice, pancreaticojejunostomy is still one of the most challenging parts of LPD surgery. We introduce a simpler method of pancreaticoenterostomy which reduces the technical complexity and produces acceptable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyao Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nengwen Ke
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|