1
|
Al-Ameri AAM, Zheng S. Survival outcomes after caudate lobectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:335-341. [PMID: 38193603 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caudate lobectomy (CLB) remains the most effective treatment for caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma (CL-HCC). However, there is controversy regarding the survival after CLB. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the survival outcomes following CLB for the treatment of CL-HCC. METHODS In line with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a search for all eligible studies was performed. The pooled estimates of survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. RESULTS Sixteen studies comprising 864 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 62.3% and 42.9% respectively and the pooled estimate of 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 39.3% and 24.4% respectively. CL-HCC showed inferior OS (HR:1.39, 95% CI: 0.91-1.88, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR:1.33, 95% CI: 1.10-1.56, P < 0.001) than other sites HCC. Isolated CLB showed better OS (HR:0.9, 95% CI:0.39-1.41, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR:0.76, 95% CI: 0.03-1.5, P = 0.04) than combined CLB. CONCLUSIONS The survival outcomes for CL-HCC after CLB are lower compared to other sites HCC. Isolated CLB offers better survival outcomes compared to combined CLB. However, choosing isolated or combined approaches should be prioritized according to patient and tumour characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulahad Abdulrab Moahmmed Al-Ameri
- Department of Hepatobiliaryand Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment For Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliaryand Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment For Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xie W, Tan J, Li B, Chen S, Liu B, Shen J, Fu S, Kuang M, Sun K, Zeng X. Comparison of Hepatic Resection with Percutaneous Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Caudate Lobe Within Milan Criteria. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:323-332. [PMID: 34494218 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05111-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to compare the efficacy of hepatic resection and percutaneous ablation for resectable caudate HCC within Milan criteria and to investigate the prognostic factors. METHODS Between August 2006 and August 2020, a total of 67 eligible patients with resectable caudate HCC within Milan criteria in three centers were retrospectively analyzed and divided into hepatic resection group (n = 46) and percutaneous ablation group (n = 21). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between groups of hepatic resection and percutaneous ablation for these resectable caudate HCC patients with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors of RFS and OS. RESULTS The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 97.6%, 83.6%, and 71.5% for the hepatic resection group, and 89.4%, 58.5%, and 48.8% for the percutaneous ablation group (P = 0.032). The corresponding RFS rates were 77.6%, 47.9%, and 42.6% for the hepatic resection group, and 40.5%, 23.2%, and 15.4% for the percutaneous ablation group (P = 0.010). According to the univariable and multivariable analyses, tumor type (first recurrence) (HR = 3.54; 95%CI, 1.49-8.37; P = 0.004) was a significant independent prognostic factor of RFS for caudate HCC patients after resection or ablation, while total bilirubin (HR = 1.02; 95%CI, 1.01-1.04; P = 0.006) and treatment strategy (HR = 5.97; 95%CI, 1.48-24.12; P = 0.012) were significant independent prognostic factors of OS. CONCLUSIONS Hepatic resection appears to outperform percutaneous ablation for caudate HCC patients within Milan criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxuan Xie
- Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiehui Tan
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Li
- Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuling Chen
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baoxian Liu
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingxian Shen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shunjun Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery II, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kaiyu Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58, Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xuezhen Zeng
- Institute of Precision Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58, Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58, Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu ZG, Zhang FH, Sun DW, Zheng QT, Ji GW, Wang K. Surgical Strategy for Resecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Caudate Lobe: Isolated or Combined Lobectomy? A Single-Center Study and Meta-Analysis. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2022; 9:13-25. [PMID: 35118017 PMCID: PMC8802904 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s349335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) originating in the caudate lobe remains challenging, while the optimal extent of resection is debated. We aimed to evaluate the relative benefits of combined caudate lobectomy (CCL) versus isolated caudate lobectomy (ICL) for caudate HCC. Methods Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for caudate HCC between January 2010 and December 2018 were identified from a single-center database. Surgical outcomes of the two strategy groups were analyzed before and after propensity score matching. A systematic review with meta-analysis was also performed to compare outcomes of CCL versus ICL for caudate HCC. Results A total of 28 patients were included: 11 in the CCL and 17 in the ICL group. Compared with ICL, the CCL group contained patients with larger tumors and a higher incidence of vascular invasion. After propensity score matching, 6 pairs of patients were selected. In the well-matched cohort, CCL demonstrated significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.047) compared with ICL; no significant differences were noted for overall survival (OS), operation time, blood loss and morbidity rate. A total of 227 patients from nine eligible studies and ours were involved in the systematic review. Meta-analysis revealed that CCL provided better RFS (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.31–0.92) than ICL; no significant differences were observed in OS, operation time, blood loss and morbidity rate. Conclusion CCL confers superior RFS over ICL without compromise of perioperative outcomes and should be prioritized for patients with caudate HCC when feasible, especially for those with large-sized tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng-Gang Xu
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fei-Hong Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dong-Wei Sun
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi-Tong Zheng
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gu-Wei Ji
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ke Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Ke Wang; Gu-Wei Ji, Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 18061675088; +86 15951758275, Fax +86 68136450, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan L, Ren Y, Qian K, Kan X, Zhang H, Chen L, Liang B, Zheng C. Superselective Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable or "Ablation Unsuitable" Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Caudate Lobe: A Real World, Single-Center Retrospective Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:678847. [PMID: 34778023 PMCID: PMC8581471 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.678847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the clinical outcomes of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for unresectable or "ablation unsuitable" hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe (CL) found at initial presentation in clinical practice. METHODS Fifty-eight patients with HCC-CL undergoing conventional TACE from January 2015 to January 2020 were enrolled in our medical center. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response rate and major complication rates were analyzed. Multivariate analyses for potential clinical and radiologic factors were performed by using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS The median OS was 23 months (95%CI: 18.1-27.9), and the median PFS was 11 months (95%CI: 7.4-14.6). The 1-, 3-, and 5-years OS rates were 66.5%, 31.9% and 15.7%, respectively. The 0.5, 1-, and 3-years PFS rates were 60.3%, 44.5% and 6.3%, respectively. Objective response rate was 53.4% and disease control rate was 79.3%. The most serious complication was bile duct injury, with an incidence of 3.4%. Multivariable analysis revealed that total bilirubin, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, nonselective chemoembolization and TACE session were four significant factors associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS Superselective TACE treatment might be associated with better survival benefits in unresectable or "ablation unsuitable" HCC in the CL without macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) and adequate liver function, compared with the non-selective TACE group, and should be considered as an important reliable therapy for surgeons and interventional radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangliang Yan
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanqiao Ren
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Kun Qian
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuefeng Kan
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongsen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Liang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Chuansheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yan L, Chen L, Qian K, Kan X, Zhang H, Liang B, Zheng C. Caudate Lobe Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sequential Transarterial Chemoembolization and Iodine 125 Seeds Implantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:3901-3912. [PMID: 34012296 PMCID: PMC8128345 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s309310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Resection of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe (CL) is challenging even for accomplished surgeons. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and iodine 125 seeds implantation (ISI) for unresectable or “ablation unsuitable” HCC-CL detected at the initial presentation in clinical practice. Patients and Methods A total of 20 HCC-CL patients undergoing sequential TACE and ISI from January 2014 to October 2018 were enrolled in this study. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response rate, and complication rates were analyzed and compared to non-caudate lobe (NCL) HCC patients. Multivariate analyses for potential clinical and radiological factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results The technical success rate was 100%, as all the patients received 28 ISI treatments. The median OS was 35 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 63.2%, and 11.1%, respectively. The median PFS was 16 months. The objective response rate was 60.0%. The puncture tract bleeding (2/20) and pneumothorax (1/20) were the most common complications in operation, but no operation-related deaths occurred. One year after the surgery, biliary tract injury occurred in 1 patient, necessitating percutaneous biliary intervention. No statistical difference was observed between the CL and NCL groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B and tumor size >3 cm were two significant factors associated with OS. Conclusion Sequential TACE and ISI were associated with the survival benefits in HCC-CL and should be considered as a reliable therapy for surgeons and interventional radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangliang Yan
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Qian
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuefeng Kan
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongsen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin Liang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuansheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|