The Adhesive Perinephric Fat Score is Correlated with Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Benign Diseases

Impact of Obesity on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic/Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy for Benign or Malignant Adrenal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) is one of two laparoscopic procedures used to treat benign and malignant adrenal diseases. Obesity in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenal surgery is a frequently discussed topic. Our meta-analysis aimed to provide updated evidence by comparing intraoperative and perioperative outcomes on non-obese (NOb) and obese (Ob) patients who underwent RLA due to benign or malignant disease. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index), and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)) databases were used to identify articles of interest. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan [Computer program] Version 5.4. Results: The four included comparative studies (809 patients: 552 NOb versus 257 Ob) covered an approximately 15-year-study period (2007-2022). All the included studies were observational in nature. By comparing the Ob and NOb groups, shorter operative time and lower overall postoperative complication rates in the NOb population were recorded through the meta-analysis. Considering the subgroup analysis (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), just the operative time maintained statistical significance. Conclusions: Obesity did not appear to impact RLA safety and effectiveness. Due to important biases (small overall sample size and few analyzed events), the interpretation of our results must be a careful one. Later randomized and multi-center trials may help the confirmation of our results.

Association of Mayo Adhesive Probability Score With Perioperative Outcomes and Histological Characteristics of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the difficulty of laparoscopic adrenalectomy by investigating the usefulness of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score for assessing adherent perinephric fat and its correlation with histological reality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 103 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomies. Based on preoperative computed tomography images, the patients were categorized into two groups: high (3-5 points) and low MAP (0-2 points). Clinical characteristics and perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Additionally, we analyzed the pathological tissue of the tumor and surrounding fat using hematoxylin-eosin-saffron staining.

RESULTS

Compared with the low MAP group, the high MAP group had younger patients (59 vs. 62 years, p=0.097), more male patients (93.3% vs. 44.3%, p<0.001), and higher body mass indices (26.4 vs. 23.8, kg/m2, p=0.029). The MAP group experienced a significantly higher estimated blood loss compared to the low MAP group (10 vs. 52.3, ml, p=0.047). Tumor and adhering perirenal fat tissues of pheochromocytoma, adrenal carcinoma, and metastatic adrenal tumors exhibited significantly higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and cluster of differentiation 204 compared to the low MAP group (p<0.001). Additionally, both proteins were highly expressed in the adhering perirenal fat in the high MAP group (p=0.020, p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a preoperative MAP score ≥3, pheochromocytoma, or malignant tumor had a high risk of increased intraoperative blood loss. Strict perioperative management should be performed in such cases.

Is the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Predictive in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

Introduction: Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score was developed as a means to predict the presence of adherent perinephric fat. Our aim was to determine the predictive value of the MAP score on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing standard adult percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 130 renal units that underwent PCNL between January 2022 and 2023. MAP scores 0-2 were classified as low, whereas MAP scores 3-5 were classified as high. The impact of the MAP score on perioperative and postoperative outcomes was studied. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24.0 for Windows. Results: The median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 48 (21) years, with a female-to-male ratio of 1:1.82. The median MAP score was 2 (2), with 43.8% of patients falling into the high MAP score group. Advanced age, hypertension history, low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels, and low renal parenchymal thickness were significantly higher in the high MAP score group (P = .010, P = .004, P = .001, and P = .005, respectively). Female patients had a significantly higher MAP score of 0 (P = .021). Operation time, postoperative hematocrit decrease, blood transfusion rate, postoperative fever rate, hospitalization, and stone-free rates were comparable between the low and high MAP score groups (P = .535, P = .209, P = .313, P = .289, P = .281, and P = .264, respectively). Gender and eGFR levels were shown to be significant predictors of a MAP ≥3 (P = .004 and P = .003, respectively). Conclusion: The present study showed that the MAP score groups had similar perioperative and postoperative results. Low eGFR levels and the male gender were associated with MAP score ≥3. To determine the predictive MAP score value for PCNL outcomes, more prospective studies are needed.

Can the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Predict Perioperative Outcomes in Laparoscopic Total and Partial Adrenalectomy?

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score could predict perioperative outcomes in transperitoneal laparoscopic total adrenalectomy (LTA) and laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy (LPA). Materials and Methods: The clinical data of 139 patients who underwent transperitoneal LTA (n = 116) or LPA (n = 23) between March 2013 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the images obtained from preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, the patients were divided into two groups: the low MAP score group (0-1 points) and the high MAP score group (2-5 points). General clinical features and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: In patients with a high MAP score, the mean body mass index (BMI) (p: 0.005), tumor size (p: 0.005), operative time (p: 0.002), estimated blood loss (EBL) (p: 0.001), and complication rate (p: 0.013) were significantly higher compared with those with a low MAP score. The comparison of the patients between the LTA and LPA subgroups revealed that operative time and EBL were significantly higher in both subgroups among the patients with a high MAP score. Moreover, the complication rate in the LTA subgroup was significantly higher in the high MAP score group compared with the other group. The Multivariate analyses revealed that a high MAP score was a risk factor for prolonged operative time (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.081, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.284-7.398, p: 0.012), increased EBL (OR: 2.495, 95% CI: 1.114-5.588, p: 0.026), and complications (OR: 6.085, 95% CI: 1.532-24.171, p: 0.01) Conclusions: Patients with a high MAP score had a prolonged operative time, increased EBL, and a higher complication rate compared with those with a low MAP score. In addition, we found that a high MAP score was an independent risk factor for perioperative parameters and complications in patients who underwent LTA and LPA.

Perirenal fat thickness is a powerful predictor for surgical outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has been the gold standard surgical procedure. However, the adaptation criteria for malignant tumors and predictors of perioperative outcomes are not well defined. Therefore, this study tried to identify valid predictors for perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy and consider the adaptation criteria.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative and perioperative data of 216 patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our hospital. Preoperative factors associated with perioperative outcomes were analyzed using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 216 patients, 165 (76.4%), 26 (12.0%), and 25 (11.6%) were suspected of having benign tumors, pheochromocytoma, and malignant tumors, respectively. Median tumor size was 25.0 mm (interquartile range 18.0-35.0); median perirenal fat thickness was 9.2 mm (interquartile range 4.9-15.6) on preoperative computed tomography scans. The median operative time was 145.5 min (interquartile range 117.5-184.0) and the median estimated blood loss was 0.0 mL (interquartile range 0.0-27.3). Perirenal fat thickness (p < 0.001), tumor size (p < 0.001), and malignant tumors (p = 0.020) were associated with operative time, and perirenal fat thickness (p = 0.038) and malignant tumors (p = 0.002) were associated with estimated blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Perirenal fat thickness, tumor size, and malignant tumors are valid predictors of the surgical outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. As only perirenal fat thickness is associated with both surgical outcomes except for malignant tumors, it is a powerful predictor. Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large malignant adrenal tumors with thick perirenal fat should be performed with caution.

Clinical predictors and significance of adherent periadrenal fat in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Adrenalectomy requires the anatomic preparation of the adrenal gland in the fat-rich retroperitoneal space. In the literature, it was shown that the retroperitoneal fat area affects surgical outcomes in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). Besides the quantity of retroperitoneal fat, its qualitative properties play hypothetically a significant role in the safety profile and perioperative parameters of LA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with adherent periadrenal fat.

METHODS

The prospectively obtained demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of 44 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our clinic were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as adherent periadrenal fat (APAF) and non-APAF group. Periadrenal fat tissue was defined as adherent or non-adherent by the attending surgeon according to the difficulty in dissection of the adrenal gland from the surrounding fat tissue during the operation.

RESULTS

The rate of female gender and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was higher in the APAF group (respectively, p = 0.038 and p = 0.001). A ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off point was - 97 HU for APAF. On multivariable analysis using a stepwise regression model, we identified the presence of DM (OR = 5.073; 95% Cl = 2.192-12.387; p = 0.006) and ARFD > -97 HU (OR = 3.727; 95% Cl = 1.898-11.454; p = 0.008) as an independent predictor of APAF.

CONCLUSION

APAF seems to affect the perioperative outcomes of LA in terms of operation duration but not perioperative complications.