The Effect of Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass on Patients with Severe Obesity in Three Consecutive Years

Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Efficiency and safety of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in the treatment of obesity and associated comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass is a new bariatric surgery corresponding to an adaptation of the Santoro approach, consisting of a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) followed by loop gastroileostomy. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess all the current literature on SASI bypass in terms of safety, weight loss, improvement in associated comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). We performed a meta-analysis of risk ratios and mean differences to compare surgical approaches for excessive weight loss, improvement/remission in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia (DL), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and complications. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and four in the quantitative analysis, comparing SASI bypass with SG and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). A comparison between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and SASI bypass could not be performed. Compared to SG, the SASI bypass was associated with improved weight loss (MD = 11.32; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) [7.89;14.76]; p < 0.0001), and improvement or remission in T2DM (RR = 1.35; 95%CI [1.07;1.69]; p = 0.011), DL (RR = 1.41; 95%CI [1.00;1.99]; p = 0.048) and OSA (RR = 1.50; 95%CI [1.01;2.22]; p = 0.042). No statistically significant differences in any of the assessed outcomes were observed when compared with OAGB. When compared to both SG and OAGB, the complication rate of SASI was similar.

CONCLUSION

Although studies with longer follow-up periods are needed, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that SASI bypass has a significant effect on weight loss and metabolic variables. Variations in outcomes between studies reinforce the need for standardization.

Laparoscopic single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass in the surgical management of morbid obesity: A single‐centre experience

Background

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a recently developed two‐step bariatric operation that involves a sleeve gastrectomy followed by a side‐to‐side sleeve‐ileal anastomosis. While the primary outcomes are promising, more evidence is required before SASI can be considered a standard bariatric procedure.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate short‐term outcomes of SASI bypass regarding safety, efficacy and complications.

Methods

This retrospective study involved the analysis of 75 patients who underwent SASI between January 2019 and January 2022. The study examined patients’ characteristics, comorbidities, surgical technique, operative details, post‐operative weight loss and complications.

Results

Of the 88 patients who underwent SASI, 13 were excluded, leaving 75 participants for analysis. The mean age was 36.9 ± 8.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 49.23 ± 5.5 kg/m2. Among the participants, 19 patients (25.3%) had diabetes and 8 patients (10.6%) had hypertension. The mean operative time was 78.42 ± 13.18 min. The mean excess weight loss percentage was 25.53 ± 3.63, 43.33 ± 8.78, 63.51 ± 10.85, 82.11 ± 11.42 and 88.95 ± 8.69 at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. The diabetic remission rate was 100%, and the hypertension remission rate was 75%. Post‐operative complications were observed in 12 patients (16%), with most being minor. Notably, two patients underwent SASI reversal to sleeve gastrectomy due to excessive weight loss, and one patient experienced weight regain in the second post‐operative year.

Conclusion

SASI bypass emerges as a straightforward and highly effective bariatric procedure, with an acceptable complication rate. It is easy to perform and revise, offering not only excellent and sustained weight loss outcomes during short‐term follow‐up but also the resolution or improvement of obesity‐associated comorbidities.

One Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (OATB): Rational and Mid-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The "One-anastomosis transit bipartition" (OATB) is a promising emerging technique in the metabolic syndrome treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the results achieved with OATB in the first 5 years after surgery.

METHOD

Cross-sectional, retrospective study, with individuals undergoing primary OATB. Individuals included in the study were: ≥ 18 years, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2; and excluded smoking habits, drug dependence, inflammatory bowel diseases. The data analyzed demographic, anthropometric, surgical, clinical, and nutritional.

RESULTS

Sixty eight participants, 75% women, average age 45.5 years and BMI 41 kg/m2. Associated diseases: osteoarthritis (52.9%), hypertension (48.5%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus-T2DM (39.7%). All underwent laparoscopy, without conversions. Average operative time is 122.6 ± 31.7 min, and hospital stay is 2.2 ± 0.8 days. The common channel length 27 and 41 patients with 250 cm and 300 cm respectively. We registered no intraoperative complications, 2 (2.9%) early complications, and 14 (20.6%) late complications. In the first 6 months, 94.7% (250 cm) and 88.9% (300 cm) of the patients no longer used medication for T2DM, with no statistical difference between the two groups. The incidence of nutritional disorders at any time during follow-up: hypovitaminosis D (14.7%), folate hypovitaminosis (14.7%), elevated PTH (7.4%), hypoproteinemia (5.9%) and anemia (5.9%). We found no statistically significant difference between 250 and 300 cm common channel groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that OATB is a safe and effective technique, demonstrating good control of T2DM and metabolic syndrome. There is a requirement to treat previous nutritional deficits. We need more long-term evidence and comparison to other surgical techniques.

Mid-term outcomes after single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

According to several short-term studies, single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass offers similar weight loss to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with fewer complication and better comorbidity reduction/resolution. Long-term data on this operation is lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of SASI bypass up to 4 years.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of 366 patients with morbid obesity who underwent primary SASI bypass from January 2018 to February 2022.

RESULTS

The mean age and preoperative body mass index (BMI) were 41 years (range 22-71 years) and 43.9 ± 6.5 kg/m², respectively. Follow-up was available for 229 patients at 1-year (89%), 112 patients at 2-year (75%), 61 patients at 3-year (75%), and 35 patients at 4-year (71%). The intraoperative, short-term, and long-term complication rates were 0%, 2.5%, 4.6%, respectively. After 4 years, mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was 93.3% and total weight loss (%TWL) was 41.2%. Remission of comorbidities was 93% for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 73% for hypertension, 83% for hyperlipidemia, 79% for sleep apnea, and 25% for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Biliary gastritis and ulcers are seldom. Eight patients developed de novo GERD symptoms requiring proton pump inhibitor treatment. None of the patients in our study had hypoalbuminemia or malabsorption that did not respond to increased protein intake and vitamin or mineral supplementation.

CONCLUSION

SASI bypass appears to be safe, and one of the most effective bariatric procedures regarding weight loss and obesity related comorbidities. The double-outlet created in this procedure seemingly minimizes nutritional complications.

From Our One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Experience to Establishing Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass Procedure: A Single-Center Report

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective treatment for obesity with or without metabolic syndrome. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a well-established bariatric procedure developed over the past 20 years with excellent outcomes. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is introduced as a novel bariatric and metabolic procedure. There is some similarity between these two operations. This study aimed to present our SASI procedure based on the past experience of the OAGB in our center.

METHOD

Thirty patients with obesity underwent SASI surgery from March 2021 to June 2022. Herein, we demonstrated our techniques step by step and key points of techniques learned from our experience with OAGB (shown in the video) with satisfying surgical outcomes. The clinical characteristics, peri-operative variables, and short-term outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

There was no case of conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and hospital stay were 135.2 ± 39.2 min, 16.5 ± 6.2 mL, and 3.6 ± 0.8 days, respectively. There is no postoperative leakage, bleeding, or mortality. The percentage of total weight loss and excess weight loss at 6 months were 31.2 ± 6.5 and 75.3 ± 14.9, respectively. Improvement in type 2 diabetes (11/11, 100%), hypertension (14/26, 53.8%), dyslipidemia (16/21, 76.2%), and obstructive sleep apnea (9/11, 81.8%) were observed at 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed that our proposed SASI technique is feasible and may help surgeons perform this promising bariatric procedure without encountering many obstacles.

Assessment of Exocrine Pancreatic Function Following Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) can be seen after bariatric/metabolic surgery. Fecal elastase level is a simple test in diagnosing and grading EPI. Quality of life changes in patients with bariatric/metabolic surgery related to gastrointestinal complaints is debated.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate rates and grades of EPI via fecal elastase levels and association between EPI and quality of life in bariatric surgery patients.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed for patients with bariatric/metabolic surgery at their second-year follow-up. Fecal elastase levels were used to diagnose and grade EPI as severe or moderate. Patient's gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) was calculated. Patients were grouped as sleeve gastrectomy (SG), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI), and transit bipartition (TB). Rates of severe or moderate EPI were primary outcome. Secondary outcome was an association between fecal elastase and GIQLI.

RESULTS

There were 17, 29, 21, and 15 patients in OAGB, SG, TB, and SASI groups. There was no significant difference between groups in GIQLI scores and fecal elastase levels (p = 0.152 and p = 0.361). Rates of patients with moderate EPI in the groups OAGB, SG, TB, and SASI were 23.5%, 17.2%, 14.3%, and 20.0%. GIQLI scores were not significantly correlated with age, postoperative morphometric data, and fecal elastase values (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rates of patients with moderate EPI ranged from 14.3 to 23.5% at second-year follow-up. There was no patient with severe EPI. GIQLI scores were not significantly correlated with fecal elastase levels and different types of bariatric/metabolic surgery.