Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Cross-Sectional Study to Compare Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery

The 2024 revised clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery

The Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery published the first edition of the "Clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors" in 2010 and the revised edition in 2018. The guideline presented herein is the English translation of the revised third edition, issued in 2024. The aim is to enhance health outcomes for patients suffering from thyroid tumors by facilitating evidence-based shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients, as well as standardizing the management of thyroid tumors. The focus is on adult patients with thyroid tumors, addressing clinically significant issues categorized into areas such as an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules, treatment strategies by histological type, radioactive iodine therapy, treatment of advanced differentiated carcinoma, pharmacotherapy, and complications and safety management associated with thyroid surgery. Thirty-two clinical questions were established in these areas. Following a comprehensive search of the literature and systematic review to evaluate the overall evidence, we aimed to present optimal recommendations by considering the balance of benefits and harms from the patient's perspective. We integrated evidence and clinical experience to determine the "Certainty of evidence" and "Strength of recommendations". Based on these, we illustrated overall flows of care as "Clinical algorithms". Necessary background knowledge of diseases and established clinical procedures for understanding the recommendations are presented in "Notes", while information that may be clinically useful but for which evidence remains insufficient is included in "Columns", based on the current state of evidence. Finally, future challenges for the next revision are presented as "Future research questions".

Outcomes and effectiveness of active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and effectiveness of active surveillance (AS) in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and compare them to those of immediate surgery (IS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis, including 14 comparative studies and 7 noncomparative studies, was conducted, encompassing a total of 9,397 patients.

RESULTS

AS was associated with lower rates of familial history of thyroid cancer, multiplicity, and overall mortality compared to IS. The disease progression rate during AS was 14.53% (95% CI, 9.59-21.43%), and the delayed surgery rate was 14.91% (95% CI, 8.35-25.21%). No thyroid cancer-related mortality was observed in either the AS and IS groups. Clinicopathological characteristics showed no significant differences between delayed surgery and IS, except for higher rates of extrathyroidal extension and multiplicity in the delayed surgery group. Overall complication and recurrence rates were higher in the delayed surgery group than in the IS group. Quality of life and anxiety levels were similar between AS and IS, except for interest in sex, where AS was more beneficial.

CONCLUSION

AS is a feasible and reliable option for managing low-risk PTC, with a relatively low rate of disease progression and no thyroid cancer-related mortality. However, AS should be undertaken with caution, given the higher rates of overall complications and recurrence in the delayed surgery group compared to the IS group. Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to clarify the role and effectiveness of AS.

Anxiety disorders in patients with thyroid nodules vs. thyroid cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Thyroid nodules, often discovered incidentally, typically require long-term monitoring and may contribute to psychological distress. Despite their prevalence, the psychological impact of thyroid nodules remains underexplored.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used data from the TrinetX platform (2010-2023), encompassing 118 million patients. Patients diagnosed with thyroid nodules were matched to those with thyroid cancer using propensity score matching for age, sex, race, socioeconomic status and comorbidities. The primary outcome was anxiety disorder risk, with secondary outcomes including depression, mood disorder, and insomnia.

Results

After matching, 138,803 pairs were analyzed, with a mean age of 52 years, 70% female, and 66% White. Comorbidities were well-balanced. Patients with thyroid nodules had a significantly higher risk of developing anxiety disorder compared to those with thyroid cancer (HR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.08). Conversely, thyroid nodule patients had lower risks of depression (HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.96), mood disorders (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.98), and insomnia (HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). Psychotic disorders showed no significant difference (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.90-1.17).

Conclusions

This study identifies a significant association between thyroid nodules and increased anxiety risk, while risks for depression, mood disorders, and insomnia were lower compared to thyroid cancer patients. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis compared thyroid nodule patients to the general population and revealed elevated anxiety risk in patients with nodules, reinforcing that this increased risk is not solely attributable to cancer-related factors. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and explore mechanisms underlying the psychological impact of thyroid nodules.

Active Surveillance in Early Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: There remain several challenges to the acceptance and standardization of active surveillance (AS) in patients with early thyroid cancer. The purpose of this study was to update the evidence of tumor progression outcomes in AS to support resolution of clinical concerns and to examine the effect of follow-up duration, period context such as diagnostic techniques, and tumor size at baseline on outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were used to search for original articles in English until January 2024. The main outcomes were the pooled proportion of patients who showed tumor growth ≥ 3 mm, metastasis to cervical lymph nodes, and conversion to delayed thyroid surgery. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results: Fourteen studies with 7291 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that 5.6% (95% CI: 4.2-7.4) of patients increased tumor diameter by more than 3 mm, 1.1% (95% CI: 0.9-1.4) developed cervical lymph node metastases by clinical diagnosis and 3.6% (95% CI: 3.1-4.2) by pathology, 12.7% (95% CI: 9.9-16.1) of patients converted to delayed surgery, with 31.6% (95% CI: 25.3-38.7) of those conversions being due to tumor progression. Subgroup analysis showed a small difference in the proportion of outcomes by baseline tumor size but no increase in the proportion of tumor progression or conversion to surgery due to other factors. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests long-term stability in the proportion of tumor progression in AS and less susceptibility to external influences.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Active Surveillance and Immediate Lobectomy in Patients with Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Initial Findings from the KoMPASS Cohort

Background: Patients diagnosed with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) face the decision between thyroid lobectomy and active surveillance (AS). This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing treatment decisions in low-risk PTMC and to compare the quality of life (QoL) according to the treatment plan. Methods: The multicenter prospective cohort study comparing AS and thyroid lobectomy was conducted. Clinical characteristics were compared between the AS and Lobectomy groups. QoL questionnaires were administered every 6 months in the initial year and annually thereafter. Results: A total of 927 patients (453 in the AS group and 474 in the Lobectomy group) with low-risk PTMC were included in this study. The mean age was 47.4 ± 12.2 years, and 72.2% of the patients were women. Older age (odd ratio [OR] 1.04, confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.05, p < 0.001), smaller tumor size (OR 0.78, CI 0.69-0.87, p < 0.001), family history of thyroid cancer (OR 1.48, CI 1.03-2.12, p = 0.035), prior awareness of AS (OR 1.53, CI 1.16-2.02, p = 0.003), and higher income (OR 1.79, CI 1.13-2.83, p = 0.013) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of choosing AS. The median follow-up was 27.3 months (23.9-43.9) in the AS group and 28.7 months (20.4-44.5) in the Lobectomy group. During the follow-up period, the AS group showed significantly better QoL scores compared with the Lobectomy group (β 0.17, CI 0.02-0.33, p = 0.029). Although baseline QoL scores favored the AS group significantly (7.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.7 ± 1.2, p < 0.001), no significant difference was observed after 12 months (7.2 ± 1.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2, p = 0.592). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that age, tumor size, family history of thyroid cancer, awareness of AS, and income were associated with patients' treatment choices. Although the overall QoL scores were significantly higher in the AS group, the QoL became similar between the two groups after 12 months. Clinical Trial Registration: KCT0004935.

Decision Regret Following the Choice of Surgery or Active Surveillance for Small, Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: It is important to understand cancer survivors' perceptions about their treatment decisions and quality of life. Methods: We performed a prospective observational cohort study of Canadian patients with small (<2 cm) low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) who were offered the choice of active surveillance (AS) or surgery (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03271892). Participants completed a questionnaire one year after their treatment decision. The primary intention-to-treat analysis compared the mean decision regret scale total score between patients who chose AS or surgery. A secondary analysis examined one-year decision regret score according to treatment status. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, mood, fear of disease progression, and body image perception. We adjusted for age, sex, and follow-up duration in linear regression analyses. Results: The overall questionnaire response rate was 95.5% (191/200). The initial treatment choices of respondents were AS 79.1% (151/191) and surgery 20.9% (40/191). The mean age was 53 years (standard deviation [SD] 15 years) and 77% (147/191) were females. In the AS group, 7.3% (11/151) of patients crossed over to definitive treatment (two for disease progression) before the time of questionnaire completion. The mean level of decision regret did not differ significantly between patients who chose AS (mean 22.4, SD 13.9) or surgery (mean 20.9, SD 12.2) in crude (p = 0.730) or adjusted (p = 0.29) analyses. However, the adjusted level of decision regret was significantly higher in patients who initially chose AS and crossed over to surgery (beta coefficient 10.1 [confidence interval; CI 1.3-18.9], p = 0.02), compared with those remaining under AS. In secondary adjusted analyses, respondents who chose surgery reported that symptoms related to their cancer or its treatment interfered with life to a greater extent than those who chose AS (p = 0.02), but there were no significant group differences in the levels of depression, anxiety, fear of disease progression, or overall body image perception. Conclusions: In this study of patients with small, low-risk PTC, the mean level of decision regret pertaining to the initial disease management choice was relatively low after one year and it did not differ significantly for respondents who chose AS or surgery.

A Long-Term Study Comparing the Quality of Life and Psychological Status of Patients with Highly Suspicious Thyroid Nodules ≤1 cm Undergoing Active Surveillance with Those Undergoing Immediate Surgery

Background: Limited information is available on the long-term impact of active surveillance (AS) and immediate surgery (IS) on the quality of life (QoL) and psychological status of patients with highly suspicious subcentimeter thyroid nodules. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 752 patients showing highly suspicious subcentimeter thyroid nodules, among whom 584 chose AS and 168 chose IS. All patients underwent at least two assessments regarding their QoL and psychological status, using three questionnaires: Thyroid Cancer-Specific Quality of Life (THYCA-QoL), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Propensity-score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 3:1 was utilized on patients in the AS and IS groups to mitigate selection bias (504 patients in the AS group and 168 in the IS group). Subsequently, the mixed linear model was used to analyze the QoL data. Results: The median time from the initial evaluation to the last follow-up in the AS and IS groups was 24.0 and 14.2 months, respectively. The AS group showed superior QoL outcomes compared to the IS group, mainly manifested in voice (p < 0.001), sympathetic (p = 0.008), throat/mouth (p < 0.001), and problems with scar (p < 0.001) domains, as per the THYCA-QoL questionnaire. Further, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire highlighted better outcomes in physical function (p = 0.029), role function (p < 0.001), social function (p < 0.001), global health status (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.012), pain (p = 0.028), appetite loss (p = 0.017), and financial difficulties (p < 0.001). Compared to the initial assessment (1 week after surgery), the IS group showed progressive improvements in QoL, especially in voice (p = 0.024), throat/mouth (p < 0.001), physical function (p = 0.004), social function (p = 0.014), nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001), pain (p = 0.006), and appetite loss (p = 0.048) domains as per both questionnaires. Conclusion: Patients with highly suspicious subcentimeter thyroid nodules who choose IS tend to experience a poorer long-term QoL compared to those who choose AS. Although the situation may improve over time, certain issues might persist, making AS a favorable option for these patients.

Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma as an Acceptable Management Option with Additional Benefits: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

BACKGRUOUND

Active surveillance (AS) has been introduced as a management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) due to its typically indolent nature. Despite this, the widespread adoption of AS has encountered several challenges. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety of AS related to disease progression and its benefits compared with immediate surgery (IS).

METHODS

Studies related to AS in patients with low-risk PTC were searched through the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases. Studies on disease progression, surgical complication, quality of life (QoL), and cost-effectiveness were separately analyzed and narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of disease progression, the proportions of cases with tumor growth ≥3 mm and a volume increase >50% were 2.2%-10.8% and 16.0%-25.5%, respectively. Newly detected lymph node metastasis was identified in 0.0%-1.4% of patients. No significant difference was found between IS and delayed surgery in surgical complications, including vocal cord paralysis and postoperative hypoparathyroidism. AS was associated with better QoL than IS. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of AS reported inconsistent data, but AS was more cost-effective when quality-adjusted life years were considered.

CONCLUSION

AS is an acceptable management option for patients with low-risk PTC based on the low rate of disease progression and the absence of an increased mortality risk. AS has additional benefits, including improved QoL and greater QoL-based cost-effectiveness.