A Conceptual Classification of Resectability for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, from the early to the advanced stage: a Japanese perspective

Systemic therapy has now become mainstream for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is also changing from molecular-targeted therapy, such as with sorafenib and lenvatinib, to immunotherapy, such as with the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination regimens. Molecular-targeted therapy is selected as the first-line treatment when immunotherapy is not indicated or as second- or later-line treatment when immunotherapy is ineffective. It is necessary to select the appropriate treatment taking into consideration the expected treatment efficacy and adverse events, as well as the hepatic reserve. Currently, newer agents and combination regimens as first-line/second-line treatment for advanced-stage HCC, combined therapy with transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate-stage HCC, and perioperative adjuvant therapy for curative treatment for early-stage HCC are being developed. Therefore, systemic therapy is now indicated for any stage of the disease. While local therapies were previously used as the main treatment strategy for HCC, systemic therapy in combination with local therapies is being actively attempted at present. Systemic therapy is currently the main focus of development of novel treatments for HCC.

Precision surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma arises in the setting of cirrhosis in most cases, requiring multidisciplinary input to define resectability. In this regard, more precise surgical management considers patient factors and anatomical states, including resection margins, tumour biology, and perioperative therapy. Together with advances in surgical techniques, this integrated approach has resulted in considerable improvements in patient morbidity and oncological outcomes. Despite this, recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma remain high. As the systemic treatment landscape in hepatocellular carcinoma continues to evolve and locoregional options are increasingly used, we review current and future opportunities to individualise the surgical management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Consensus of Chinese Experts on Neoadjuvant and Conversion Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Update

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy in China, with high recurrence rate and low resection rate among patients first diagnosed. Preoperative treatments including neoadjuvant and conversion therapy have the potential to overcome these challenges. In December 2021, Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma was published. With the emersion of new evidence regarding the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for HCC, the cooperative group brought together multidisciplinary researchers and scholars with experience in related fields to update the new edition (2023 Edition) for reference in China, including principle of the treatment strategies, the potential populations selection, treatment methods, multidisciplinary team, and future research for preoperative treatments. The new consensus aims to provide guidance for clinical application. Through the use of neoadjuvant therapy and conversion therapy, we can enhance the resection rate and reduce the recurrence of intermediate-to-advanced HCC patients, thereby improving survival outcomes.

Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Globally, the incidence and associated mortality of primary liver cancer have been steadily increasing. Currently, 80% of cases are found in Asia. Curative resection is applicable in only 20% of patients; therefore, various nonsurgical treatment modalities have been developed. Image-guided percutaneous liver tumor ablation is regarded as the best option for treating early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, skills and knowledge in ablation can vary among operators. Furthermore, Asia has the highest number of ablation procedures for HCC and the largest number of doctors performing ablation worldwide. Thus, the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation has developed guidelines for HCC. These guidelines will discuss indications, pre-ablative diagnosis and planning, techniques, peri-ablative management, evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness, complications, post-ablative follow-up, prevention of recurrence, and treatment of recurrence for HCC.

Aggressive Multidisciplinary Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Achievement of a Pathologic Complete Response and Long-Term Survival

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus is generally considered to be borderline resectable because of its poor prognosis.1-5 This report describes a patient who underwent multidisciplinary treatment for HCC with massive IVC tumor thrombus.

METHODS

The 56-year-old woman in this study had diffuse HCC of the medial and anterior segments. She received an explanation of the procedure and provided informed consent. A tumor thrombus was observed in the right atrium through the middle and left hepatic veins and in the anterior branch of the portal vein. The HCC was considered unresectable, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy was initiated. However, the tumor thrombus progressed to the right atrium after two courses. The treatment was changed to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the tumor thrombus in the right atrium, followed by systemic lenvatinib.

RESULTS

The patient's tumor marker levels decreased significantly, and the tumor thrombus regressed into the IVC. Left hepatic trisegmentectomy and IVC tumor thrombectomy were performed.6-8 Although Clavien-Dindo IIIa postoperative biliary leakage was observed, the patient was discharged on postoperative day 56. Pathologic findings showed no viable residual tumor cells in either the main tumor or the tumor thrombus, and the patient had a pathologic complete response. At this writing, the patient has been recurrence-free for 19 months since the initial treatment without any adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

This report presents a case of unresectable HCC treated with multimodality therapy followed by salvage surgery. The patient achieved a long-term cancer-free and drug-free status through aggressive treatment. This patient's experience offers hope for aggressive treatment of advanced HCC.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expanding Cornerstone of Care in the Era of Immunotherapy

Liver transplantation (LT) has been accepted as a cornerstone of care in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for almost three decades. In recent years, its role has been evolving to include patients with disease burden beyond the widely used Milan criteria. The integration of dynamic biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein together with downstaging approaches and tumor evolution after enlistment has allowed the selection of patients most likely to benefit, resulting in 5-year survival rates greater that 70%. With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across all stages of disease, alone or in combination with locoregional therapies, there is now the potential to further expand the patient population with HCC who may benefit from LT. This brings challenges, given the global shortage of organs and the need to better understand the optimal use of ICIs before transplantation. Furthermore, the field of transplant oncology awaits additional biomarkers that can predict those likely to benefit from ICIs. More than ever, a multidisciplinary approach for liver cancer management is critical to ensure all patients are considered for LT where appropriate, and do not miss the opportunity for long-term survival.

Advances in systemic therapy leading to conversion surgery for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Recently, a systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been developed. The regimen for unresectable HCC varies and includes single or multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or their combinations. Treatment with these agents begins with sorafenib as the first-line drug for unresectable HCC. Subsequently, several systemic therapies, including lenvatinib, ramucirumab, cabozantinib, and regorafenib have been investigated and established. With advances in systemic therapy for unresectable HCC, the prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC has improved significantly than previously. Conversion surgery, consisting of systemic therapy and surgery, showed the possibility of improving the prognosis than systemic therapy alone. Although a combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is mostly used for initially unresectable HCC to conduct conversion surgery because of the high response rate and fewer adverse events compared to others, many trials are being conducted to assess their efficacy for initially unresectable HCC. However, the appropriate timing of surgery and interval between systemic therapy and surgery remain controversial. To address these issues, a multidisciplinary team can play a vital role in determining the strategies for treating unresectable HCC. This review describes previous and current trends in the treatment of HCC, with a particular focus on conversion surgery for initially unresectable HCC.

Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a SEER population-based propensity score matching study

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in terms of their therapeutic effect on small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC). The SEER database was employed to integrate SHCC patients who had received treatment with either LH (n = 1132) or RFA (n = 797). The LH group (n = 623) and the RFA group (n = 623) were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) in order to reduce the possibility of selection bias. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression method were employed to ascertain the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Both before and after PSM, the 1, 3 and 5-years OS and DSS were significantly higher in the LH groups compared to the RFA group. Besides, for SHCC with tumor size ≤ 2cm (n = 418), even P values not reaching statistical significance, the survival curves were compatible with a superiority of LH over RFA for OS and DSS in overall (P = 0.054 and P = 0.077), primary SHCC (P = 0.110 and P = 0.058) and recurrent SHCC (P = 0.068 and P = 1.000) cohorts. In contrast, for SHCC with tumor size between 2 and 3 cm (n = 828), LH group always had a better OS and DSS in the all cohorts (all P < 0.05). In addition, higher AFP level, poor differentiation grade, recurrent tumor and treatment type were independent prognostic factors for OS, while poor differentiation grade, larger tumor size and treatment type were the independent prognostic factors for DSS (all P < 0.05). LH was associated with better OS and DSS than RFA in SHCC patients. Even in tumor size ≤ 2 cm, LH still should be the first choice as its long-term survival benefits.

Oncological Resectability Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies: The Japan Liver Cancer Association and Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement 2023

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to debates about the feasibility of combination therapies, such as systemic therapy combined with surgery or transarterial chemoembolization, for patients with advanced HCC. However, a lack of consensus on the oncological resectability criteria has hindered discussions of "conversion therapy" and the optimal management in patients with HCC. To address this issue, the Japan Liver Cancer Association (JLCA) and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) established a working group and discussed the concept of borderline resectable HCC. Herein, we present a consensus statement from this expert panel on the resectability criteria for HCC from the oncological standpoint under the assumption of technically and liver-functionally resectable situations. The criteria for oncological resectability in HCC are classified into three grades: resectable, representing an oncological status for which surgery alone may be expected to offer clearly better survival outcomes as compared with other treatments; borderline resectable 1, representing an oncological status for which surgical intervention as a part of multidisciplinary treatment may be expected to offer survival benefit; and borderline resectable 2, representing an oncological status for which the efficacy of surgery is uncertain and the indication for surgery should be determined carefully under the standard multidisciplinary treatment. These criteria aim to provide a common language for discussing and analyzing the treatment strategies for advanced HCC. It is also expected that these criteria will be optimized, modified, and updated based on further advancements in systemic therapies and future validation studies.

Refractory Chylous Ascites Leading to Chylothorax Following Extended Right Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Chylous ascites, a rare but severe complication of abdominal surgery, often results from lymphatic vessel damage during procedures, such as extended resection and lymphadenectomy. Although conservative management through dietary modifications and medications is the primary approach, refractory cases may lead to severe complications including nutritional deficiencies and even death. Herein, we report a case of refractory chylous ascites that progressed to chylothorax after extended right hepatectomy with lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A 73-year-old woman developed chylous ascites one month postoperatively, which subsequently perforated the diaphragm and led to a massive chylothorax. Despite conservative management including fasting and drainage, surgical intervention was required to resolve the condition. This case highlights the importance of timely recognition and treatment of refractory chylous ascites after extensive liver resection.

Prognosis of Neoadjuvant HAIC and Lenvatinib Followed by Surgery versus Direct Resection for Resectable or Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

Purpose

This research aims to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Lenvatinib (Len) to direct liver resection (LR) in patients with resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This retrospective study included 154 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated at the a large-scale hepatocellular carcinoma Research Center between March 2019 and June 2023. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: 63 received neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Lenvatinib followed by liver resection (HAIC+Len→LR), while 91 received direct liver resection (LR). The primary outcomes assessed were median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median duration of response (mDOR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Patients in the HAIC+Len→LR group demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) (40.1 months vs 35.9 months, P=0.001) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) (32.8 months vs 23.8 months, P=0.0023) compared to the LR group. Preoperative complete response (CR) to HAIC was associated with better median duration of response (mDOR) and mOS compared to partial response (PR) (not reached vs 28.9 months, P=0.006; 40.0 vs 29.1 months, P=0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in OS or PFS between the HAIC+Len→LR and LR groups in early Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. However, in late BCLC stages, the HAIC+Len→LR group exhibited significantly improved OS and PFS (HR 0.471, P=0.016; HR 0.551, P=0.022). Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

For patients with resectable or marginally resectable HCC in the intermediate to advanced stages of BCLC, surgery after neoadjuvant HAIC+Len may offer improved long-term prognosis.

Proposal for Prognosis-Oriented Definition of Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Owing to advances in the multidisciplinary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a conceptualization and definition for borderline resectable (BR) HCC, which carries a high risk of recurrence, is warranted. In this study, we aimed to define BR-HCC using a prognosis-oriented approach.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included an original cohort of 221 patients and an independent validation cohort of 181 patients who had undergone primary hepatic resection for HCC. To define biological BR-HCC, we evaluated the risk factors for early recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 1 year after hepatic resection using multivariable logistic regression models. Subsequently, we developed high-risk scores using the identified risk factors and defined BR-HCC. The utility of high-risk score was validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

In the original cohort (hepatitis B virus:hepatitis C virus = 20%:29%), recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 1 year was observed in 28 patients (13%), with a 5-year survival rate of 25%. Multivariable analysis identified risk factors for recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 1 year, including serum alpha-fetoprotein levels of 12 ng/mL or more (p = 0.02), tumor diameters less than 5 cm (p = 0.02), tumor number 3 or more (p = 0.001), and macrovascular invasion (p = 0.04). BR-HCC was defined as a tumor with 2 or more identified risk factors, and 42 patients (19%) were diagnosed with BR-HCC, with a 5-year survival rate of 51%. In the validation cohort, 45 (25%) patients had BR-HCC, with a 5-year survival rate of 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis-oriented definition of BR-HCC enabled us to identify patients who are susceptible to early unresectable recurrence and have poor survival after hepatic resection for HCC. For patients with BR-HCC, preoperative systemic therapy may be a viable option to improve postresection outcomes.

Noninvasive Visualization of Tumor Blood Vessels within Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Application of Superb Microvascular Imaging to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

The combination or sequential use of systemic therapies, such as lenvatinib and locoregional therapies, can improve the curability rate of hepatocellular carcinoma. This is based on the notion that lenvatinib remodels abnormal tumor vessels into normal vessels, potentially enhancing the efficacy of locoregional therapies. In this case report, we achieved noninvasive visualization of tumor blood vessels by applying superb microvascular imaging (SMI) to contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). A man in his 80s with a borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma received preoperative therapy using lenvatinib. The patient achieved a complete response after lenvatinib therapy, underwent hepatectomy, and maintained a cancer-free status. CEUS and SMI revealed a decrease in tumor blood vessels at 1 week after lenvatinib administration and a decrease in tumor perfusion at 2 weeks. Although CEUS alone is adequate for noninvasive real-time evaluation of tumor perfusion, it is not sufficient to achieve accurate assessments of tumor blood vessels. We performed a noninvasive time-course evaluation of vascular normalization after lenvatinib administration by applying SMI. The evaluation of vascular normalization with lenvatinib therapy using CEUS and SMI can support the decision to proceed to conversion therapies.

Neoadjuvant therapies in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Exploring strategies to improve prognosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a challenging malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention, notably liver resection. However, the high recurrence rate, reaching 70% within 5 years post-resection, significantly impacts patient outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapies aim to preoperatively address this challenge, reducing lesion size, improving surgical resection rates, deactivating potential micro-metastases, and ultimately lowering postoperative recurrence rates. This review concentrates on advances in research on and clinical use of neoadjuvant therapies for HCC, with particular attention to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4). Ongoing clinical studies exploring immunotherapy combined with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), interventional therapy, radiotherapy, and other modalities offer promising insights into overcoming resistance to monotherapies. In summary, neoadjuvant therapies hold significant promise in terms of improving the prognosis for patients with HCC and enhancing long-term survival, particularly through innovative combination strategies.

Predictors for early recurrence beyond up-to-7 or distant metastasis after hepatocellular carcinoma resection: proposal for borderline resectable HCC

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rate after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) reaches over 70% after 5 years and early recurrence (within 1 year) is now recognized as having a poor prognosis and has limited treatment options.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 184 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for HCC. Severe early recurrence was defined as multiple (beyond up-to-7) liver recurrence or distant metastasis after hepatic resection within 1 year. We divided the participants into two groups according to severe early recurrence and analyzed clinicopathological and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the patients with multiple or distant metastasis (n = 59), 49 patients (83%) had recurrence within 1 year. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly worse in the severe early recurrence group than in the others group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that severe early recurrence was significantly associated with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), tumor burden score (TBS) > 4.70, and ALBI grade 2. In patients with scores of 2 and 3 (the sum of the three factors), OS and RFS rates were significantly poorer than those of patients with scores of 0 or 1. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value for severe early recurrence was 68.4% and 84.2%, respectively. Furthermore, a validation study demonstrated that cases with these factors were at high risk of severe early recurrence and had poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, MVI, TBS, and ALBI could predict severe early recurrence after hepatic resection for HCC, and patients with these risk factors had a poor prognosis.

Trends in long-term outcomes of patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: A comparison before and after introduction of direct-acting antivirus therapy

Backgrounds

The success of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy provides a cure for patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV); however, outcomes after hepatectomy for HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before and after DAA introduction remain poorly studied.

Methods

Patients who underwent R0/R1 hepatectomy for HCV-associated HCC were retrospectively analyzed. Two time periods were defined: Pre-DAA (2007-2011, December 2013 was defined as the end of follow-up) and Post-DAA groups (2014-2018, December 2020 was defined as the end of follow-up). Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were performed to highlight the effect of DAA therapy.

Results

A total of 155 patients with HCV-associated HCC were included in this study (Pre-DAA group, n = 103 and post-DAA group, n = 52). In the Post-DAA group, DAA therapy was performed in 26 patients (50.0%), and all of these patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) (preoperative SVR, n = 7; postoperative SVR, n = 19). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding surgical settings and tumor pathology. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (61.1% and 64.8%, pre- and post-DAA group, respectively, p = 0.441); meanwhile, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate in the post-DAA group was better than the pre-DAA group (21.1% and 40.2%, p = 0.073) with a trend toward significance. After PSM except for the postoperative SVR status, there were no significant differences in OS (p = 0.586) and RFS (p = 0.888).

Conclusions

This study showed that survival outcomes were not changed in hepatectomized cases of HCV-associated HCC before and after the introduction of DAA therapy.

Neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

High rate of recurrence impaired the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

METHODS

41 HCC patients received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were respectively enrolled. The safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant therapy were assessed. The prognosis was evaluated and compared with that of 41 matched HCC patients who received surgery alone.

RESULTS

36 (87.8%) patients had adverse events (AEs) and only one patient had a grade 3/4 of ALT elevated. All patients performed surgery successfully and no severe postoperative complications occurred. The objective response rate (ORR) was 56.1% and 87.8% based on RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively. 15 (36.6%) patients had radiological complete tumor necrosis and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) was 13 (31.7%) and 18 (43.9%), respectively. The incidence of microvascular invasion (MVI) was 4.9% in neoadjuvant therapy patients, compared with 64.9% before propensity score matching (PSM) and 60.9% after PSM for surgery alone patients. Neoadjuvant therapy patients had a significant better prognosis than surgery alone patients (recurrence-free survival p = 0.041, overall survival p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results suggest the neoadjuvant D-TACE and tislelizumab therapy is safe and benefit to the pathological results and prognosis for patients with resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

Long-term outcomes and salvageability in patients undergoing liver resection for intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUNDS

The prognosis of intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection should be comprehensively analyzed due to the high incidence of tumor recurrence and the availability of salvage therapy. This study evaluated the long-term outcome and salvageability in these patients after liver resection.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent initial liver resection from 2000 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Analyses were performed in the setting of the initial liver resection and the recurrence(s). Active salvage therapy for recurrence was defined as the implementation of each therapy with curative intent-repeat surgery, ablative therapy, and liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Among the 1,013 liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma, a total of 270 patients were eligible for this study (intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 134; advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 136). The 5-year overall survival rates for intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma were 49.7% and 36.8%, respectively; meanwhile, the actual recurrence rates excluding patients who died without recurrence were 94.7% and 90.7%, respectively. Active salvage therapy was performed in 43 (39.8%) patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma and 25 (23.4%) patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall survival after initial liver resection, first active salvage therapy, and second/more active salvage therapy were comparable in both stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that although liver resection alone may not yield remission in most patients with intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, active salvage therapy can potentially prolong survival. Further study to identify approaches to decrease recurrence rates and increase salvageability for these patients would be warranted.

Recent updates in the use of pharmacological therapies for downstaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer, but only 20-30% of patients benefit from potentially curative treatments such as liver resection or transplantation. This article reviews conventional treatments and recent progress in pharmacotherapy for advanced HCC, with a focus on downstaging unresectable tumors to resectable status.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, conventional treatments and recent progress in pharmacotherapy for advanced HCC, aiming at downstaging from unresectable to resectable status, are reviewed. Future prospectives of combination therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors were also introduced by reviewing recent clinical trials, paying attention to the objective response rate as its potential of downstaging treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

The newly developed pharmacological therapies showed higher responses. Although various tumor statuses in advanced HCC hamper detailed analysis of successful conversion rate, the novel combined immunotherapies are expected to provide more opportunities for subsequent curative surgery for initially unresectable advanced HCC. The conversion treatment strategies for unresectable HCC should be separately discussed for 'technically resectable but oncologically unfavorable' HCC and metastatic or invasive HCC beyond curative surgical treatments. The optimal downstaging treatment strategy for advanced HCC is awaited. Elucidation of preoperatively available factors that predict successful downstaging will allow the tailoring of promising initial treatments leading to conversion surgery.

Impact of liver volumetric regeneration on survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after major hepatectomy

PURPOSE

Prognostic value of liver volumetric regeneration (LVR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo major hepatectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVR on long-term outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Data of 399 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent major hepatectomy between 2000 to 2018 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The LVR-index was defined as the relative increase in liver volume from 7 days to 3 months (RLV3m/RLV7d, where RLV3m and RLV7d is the remnant liver volume around 3 months and postoperative 7 days after surgery). The optimal cut-off value was determined using the median value of LVR-index.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were eligible in this study. The optimal cut off value of LVR-index was 1.194. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients in the high LVR-index group were significantly better compared to those in the low LVR-index group (95.5%, 84.8%, 75.4% and 49.1% vs. 95.4%, 70.2%, 56.4%, and 19.9%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference with regards to time to recurrence between the two groups (p = 0.607). Significance of LVR-index for OS was retained after adjusting for known prognostic factors (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In patients with HCC undergoing major hepatectomy, LVR-index may serve as a prognostic indicator for OS.