Percutaneous placement of peritoneal port-catheter in patients with malignant ascites

Contemporary Management of Malignant Ascites

INTRODUCTION

Malignant ascites (MA) develops when malignant disease of the peritoneum causes excess fluid to accumulate in the abdominal cavity. It portends a poor prognosis and is associated with debilitating symptoms. While several palliative therapies exist, none have proven curative or free from side effects and complications. This review article describes experimental therapies on the horizon and the contemporary management of MA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, in which studies of emerging or experimental therapies under investigation for the management of MA were reviewed. Current therapies were also reviewed to provide important context. Data, including study design, sample size, primary and secondary outcomes, and side effects were recorded and described. Studies were then categorized into distinct sections and subsections, with tables corresponding to each section.

RESULTS

Five current therapies, including paracentesis, diuretics, peritoneovenous shunting, permanent catheters, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, are described. Their limitations in effectively managing MA are highlighted. The "Experimental therapies" section is subsectioned into several categories, with the major studies corresponding to each section thoroughly described regarding methods, results, and validity. A final section describes treatments for mucinous ascites, which has distinct characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

While each of the experimental therapies described offers unique benefits and has demonstrated some promise in managing MA, they all have limitations that have thus far prevented any one of them from being routinely used in practice. MA remains a challenging condition to treat, warranting further research into novel therapies.

Safety and Prognostic Factor for Survival in Patients with PleurX Drain for Malignant Ascites: AscitX Study

Background: Malignant ascites (MA) represents 10% of all causes of ascites and is associated with a poor prognosis. The PleurX tunneled peritoneal catheter is a device that allows the management of MA at home in a palliative care context (renamed AscitX catheter for this work). The objective of this study was to analyze real-world data of AscitX use for cancer patients with MA, to describe complications associated with the insertion of this device, and to identify factors influencing patient outcomes. Methods: Fifty-six patients with AscitX catheter insertion between October 2018 and October 2022 in our comprehensive cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed by two radiologists to determine the presence of liver and peritoneal metastases and to identify portal hypertension. Results: The majority of patients were followed for pancreatic cancer (39%), followed by ovarian cancer (18%). We identified four cases of severe infections post-insertion and two moderate infections. The median survival time after AscitX insertion was 18 days. A Kaplan-Meier analysis did not identify differences in survival time between patients with peritoneal metastases and those with liver metastases. In contrast, CT-diagnosed portal hypertension and the absence of diuretic treatment were independently associated with a better prognosis. Regarding post-catheter end-of-life management, 41% of the patients died at home. Conclusions: AscitX catheter safety appears to be acceptable and most of the palliative care patients included in our study died at home. We identified CT-diagnosed portal hypertension as associated with better prognosis, as well as the absence of diuretic treatment.

Management of drainage for malignant ascites in gynaecological cancer

BACKGROUND

Ascites is the accumulation of fluid within the abdominal cavity. Most women with advanced ovarian cancer and some women with advanced endometrial cancer need repeated drainage for ascites. Guidelines to advise those involved in the drainage of ascites are usually produced locally and are generally not evidence-based. Managing drains that improve the efficacy and quality of the procedure is key in making recommendations that could improve the quality of life (QoL) for women at this critical period of their lives.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of different interventions for the management of malignant ascites drainage in the palliative care of women with gynaecological cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase to 4 November 2019. We checked clinical trial registries, grey literature, reports of conferences, citation lists of included studies, and key textbooks for potentially relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with malignant ascites with gynaecological cancer. If studies also included women with non-gynaecological cancer, we planned to extract data specifically for women with gynaecological cancers or request the data from trial authors. If this was not possible, we planned to include the study only if at least 50% of participants were diagnosed with gynaecological cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, evaluated the quality of the included studies, compared results, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

In the original 2010 review, we identified no relevant studies. This updated review included one RCT involving 245 participants that compared abdominal paracentesis and intraperitoneal infusion of catumaxomab versus abdominal paracentesis alone. The study was at high risk of bias in almost all domains. The data were not suitable for analysis. The median time to the first deterioration of QoL ranged from 19 to 26 days in participants receiving paracentesis alone compared to 47 to 49 days among participants receiving paracentesis with catumaxomab infusion (very low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were only reported among participants receiving catumaxomab infusion. The most common severe adverse events were abdominal pain and lymphopenia (157 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on the improvement of symptoms, satisfaction of participants and caregivers, and cost-effectiveness.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the most appropriate management of drainage for malignant ascites among women with gynaecological cancer, as there was only very low-certainty evidence from one small RCT at overall high risk of bias.

Permanent peritoneal ports for the management of recurrent malignant ascites: a retrospective review of safety and efficacy

Large volume paracentesis is effective in relieving the symptoms of malignant ascites, but frequent procedures are often required. Permanent peritoneal ports are an alternative to repeated procedures. We describe our experience with the use of peritoneal ports in patients at Middlemore Hospital (Auckland, New Zealand) who had a port inserted for the drainage of malignant ascites. Twenty-eight ports were inserted in 26 patients and accessed a total of 257 times with acceptably low rates of complications including cellulitis, peritonitis and wound dehiscence.

Drainage of malignant ascites: patient selection and perspectives

Malignant ascites (MA) is a sign of advanced cancer and poor prognosis. MA can result in impairment in quality of life (QOL) and significant symptoms. As a supportive treatment, ascites can be drained by paracentesis (PC), percutaneously implanted catheters (tunneled, untunneled, central venous catheters), or peritoneal ports, or peritoneovenous shunts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of different drainage methods for the management of MA. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and 32 original articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients selected for permanent drain insertion demonstrated symptoms related to MA and had undergone repeated PC. The primary focus of the reviewed articles was procedural safety issues. The rate of technical success of drainage device installation was 100%. Most patients experienced improvements in symptom control after ascites drainage. When analyzed together, 19.7% (255/1297) of patients experienced any complication and 6.2% (81/1297) experienced serious adverse events during MA drainage. Complications were reported for every drainage method; however, the least occurred after PC or central venous catheter, while the most serious occurred after peritoneovenous shunts. Adverse events were as follows: catheter obstruction: 4.4%, infection: 4.1%, leakage: 3.5%, catheter dislodgment: 2.3%, hypotension: 0.6%, injuries during device insertion: 0.6%, renal impairment: 0.5%, electrolyte imbalance: 0.2%, other: 3.6%. PRO and QOL endpoints were available for 12 studies. When PRO were measured using an interview, a significant improvement in symptom control and QOL was reported in almost all patients. Once standardized questionnaires were used, improvements in symptomatic scores and role functioning were observed. Deterioration was observed in cognitive and emotional subscales. MA drainage is a safe and effective method to control symptoms associated with ascites, and should be perceived as a supportive care, that can be applied for those who need it at any time of their cancer trajectory. Patient selection should be performed using a thorough assessment of symptoms and QOL, and should not be delayed.

Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneously Inserted Peritoneal Ports Compared to Surgically Inserted Ports in a Retrospective Study of 87 Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma over a 10-Year Period

PURPOSE

Placement of peritoneal ports has become a favorable technique for direct chemotherapy infusion in treating peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer. We aim to outline an approach to the percutaneous insertion of peritoneal ports and to characterize success and complication rates compared to surgically inserted ports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was collected from 87 patients who had peritoneal port insertion (28 inserted surgically and 59 percutaneously) for treatment of peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer from July 2004 to July 2014. Complications were classified according to the SIR Clinical Practice Guidelines as major or minor.

RESULTS

Technical success rates for surgically and percutaneously inserted ports were 100 and 96.7 %, respectively (p = 0.44), with the two percutaneous failures successful at a later date. There were no major complications in either group. Minor complication rates for surgically versus percutaneously inserted ports were 46.4 versus 22.0 %, respectively (p = 0.02). The infection rate for surgically inserted versus percutaneously inserted ports was 14.3 and 0 %, respectively (p = 0.002). The relative risk of developing a complication from percutaneous peritoneal port insertion without ascites was 3.4 (p = 0.04). For percutaneously inserted ports, the mean in-room procedure time was 81 ± 1.3 min and mean fluoroscopy time was 5.0 ± 4.5 min.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneously inserted peritoneal ports are a safe alternative to surgically inserted ports, demonstrating similar technical success and lower complication rates.

Permanent catheters for recurrent ascites-a critical and systematic review of study methodology

PURPOSE

Management of refractory ascites traditionally includes medical treatment with diuretics or intermittent paracentesis. Patients with recurrent ascites may benefit from the use of permanent intra-abdominal catheters with more frequent drainage without hospitalization. The objective was to systematically asses the methodology of factors and endpoints reported in studies investigating permanent catheters for recurrent ascites treatment.

METHODS

Using a systematic search strategy, we critically assessed the methodology when treating refractory ascites using a permanent catheter. Studies critically assessed included both retro- and prospective studies.

RESULTS

A total of 715 unique articles were found via PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Embase. Twenty-nine studies (tunnelled catheter = 12, peritoneal ports = 6 and peritoneovenous shunts = 11) with three distinct types of permanent catheters fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only three studies reported technical success less than 100 %. Data on complications and treatment were not available in all papers; peritonitis (48 %), cellulitis (41 %), prophylactic antibiotics (48 %) and complications to catheter insertion were difficult to distinguish from advanced co-morbidity of patients. Thirteen studies (45 %) reported some type of evaluating patient experience or functional outcome, but only three studies used validated reproducible scales when assessing outcomes. Fifteen of the 29 studies included 30 patients or less.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge is limited because complications and outcomes are poorly defined. The expected increase in catheter treatment of refractory ascites necessitates comparative studies, using validated patient-related outcomes, and the reporting of unambiguous complications. A proposal of variables to include in future studies is presented.

Tenckhoff tunneled peritoneal catheter placement in the palliative treatment of malignant ascites: technical results and overall clinical outcome

Background

To assess the technical and clinical outcome of percutaneous insertion of tunneled peritoneal catheters in the palliative treatment of refractory malignant ascites and to determine the safety and feasibility of intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs through the tunneled catheter.

Materials and methods

Consecutive patients palliatively treated with a tunneled peritoneal catheter to drain the malignant ascites were identified. Patients’ medical history, procedural and clinical follow-up data, including complications and estimated survival, were reviewed. Additionally, a sub analysis of the patients with widespread ovarian cancer and refractory ascites treated with or without intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs was made.

Results

In all 94 patients it was technically feasible to insert the peritoneal drainage catheter and to drain a median of 3260 cc (range 100 cc – 8500 cc) of malignant ascitic fluid. Post procedural complications included catheter infection (n = 2; 2%), fluid leakage around the entry site (n = 4; 4%), catheter occlusion (n = 2; 2%), sleeve formation around the catheter tip (n = 1; 1%) and accidental loss of the catheter (n = 1; 1%). There was no increase in catheter infection rate in patients treated with or without intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs. Median overall survival after catheter insertion is 1.7 months.

Conclusions

Percutaneous insertion of a tunneled Tenckhoff catheter for the palliative drainage of malignant ascites and intraperitoneal infusion of cytotoxic drugs is feasible and associated with a very low complication rate, including catheter infection. These tunneled peritoneal lines are beneficial for symptomatic palliative treatment of refractory ascites and allow safe intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Interventional radiology in paediatric palliative care

Paediatric palliative care is a distinct subspecialty that offers treatment to children with many types of illness, including oncological, neurological and respiratory problems. Paediatric interventional radiologists can make a useful contribution to symptom management as part of a multidisciplinary team. Interventions for pain management include local ablation or other treatment of painful lesions, image-guided nerve blocks and the insertion of devices for the delivery of analgesic drugs. Various techniques are also available for the management of ascites, pleural effusions and other symptomatic complications of the underlying disease process.

Outcomes of permanent peritoneal ports for the management of recurrent malignant ascites

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ascites complicates many advanced malignancies, resulting in abdominal pain, discomfort, anorexia, nausea, and dyspnea. Percutaneous drainage relieves symptoms in the vast majority of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the course and outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with recurrent ascites managed with permanent peritoneal ports.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal descriptive study from 2006 to 2011, involving patients treated at the Sydney Cancer Center (New South Wales, Australia).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 155 drainages were performed in 24 patients; 26% of drainages (n=40) in the patient's home and the remainder in the ambulatory care clinic. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occured in less than 25% of all draining procedures. An improvement in symptoms was demonstrated in almost half of all individual drainage procedures. Our findings suggest that peritoneal ports are efficacious, safe, and are associated with symptomatic relief in most patients.

Multivariate comparison of B-ultrasound guided and laparoscopic continuous circulatory hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for malignant ascites

OBJECTIVE

Clinical efficacy of B-ultrasound-guided and laparoscopy-assisted continuous hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHIPC) for treatment of malignant ascites was investigated.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with malignant ascites induced by ovarian or gastrointestinal cancers were randomly treated with B-ultrasound-guided CHIPC (therapeutic group) or laparoscopy-assisted CHIPC (control group) performed at the same center. Hospitalization costs and surgical duration were evaluated. Follow-up was conducted for 21 months with B-ultrasound or computed tomography at least once per month for assessment of ascites amount and tumor progression. Clinical efficacy was assessed by modified World Health Organization criteria. Survival time, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of quality of life (QOL), and complications were recorded for all patients.

RESULTS

Overall condition, primary disease type, and ascites amounts were comparable between groups. Significantly shorter mean duration of perfusion catheter placement (35 vs. 85 min) and mean hospitalization cost (36,000 vs. 55,000 ¥/patient) were observed in the therapeutic group than the control group (P < 0.01). Significantly different KPS scores were not observed before or after CHIPC (23.13 vs. 22.64 %) in both groups (P > 0.05). No significant differences in objective remission rates of malignant ascites (93.75 vs. 93.34 %), median survival times (9 vs. 8 months), or stamp hole metastasis rates (18.75 vs. 18.15 %) were observed between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

B-ultrasound-guided and laparoscopy-assisted CHIPC have similar clinical efficacy for improving QOL and prolonging patient survival. B-ultrasound-guided CHIPC may, however, shorten operation times and reduce hospitalization costs, making the treatment available to a broader patient population, although port hole metastasis remains an issue.

B ultrasound-guided hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant ascites

To minimize invasive surgery, we employed B ultrasound to guide the placement of the catheters used in continuous circulatory hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHIPC) in malignant ascites treatment. Thirty-two patients with malignant ascites were treated with CHIPC guided by B-mode ultrasound. Ascites were originally from ovarian cancer (11 cases), gastric cancer (10 cases), colorectal cancer (9 cases) and pancreatic cancer (2 cases). The CHIPC was carried out at 43˚C for 90 min with 0.9% saline solution as a carrier containing cisplatin and doxorubicin or mitomycin-C as therapeutic reagents depending on the type of the primary tumor. The therapeutic efficacy, postoperative complications and survival period of these patients were assessed with follow-up examinations. Among all participates to be assessed with ascites, 26 and 4 patients showed complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) respectively, with an objective remission rate (ORR) of 93.75%. The KPS scores were elevated by 23.1±9.0 after 3 sessions of ultrasound guided CHIPC and the quality of life (QOF) of patients was significantly improved (p<0.01). The median survival time was 9 months and 18 patients survived between 3 and 30 months after CHIPC treatment. Additionally, patients with different types of cancers significantly differed in the survival time (p<0.01). A novel approach of using B ultrasound guided CHIPC for the treatment of malignant ascites demonstrated satisfactory outcomes. The approach shows benefit in minimizing invasive surgery, improving the patient QOF and prolonging survival time.

Peritoneal and pleural ports for management of refractory ascites and pleural effusions: assessment of impact on patient quality of life and hospice/home nursing care

PURPOSE

Patients with end-stage malignancies often have refractory ascites or pleural effusions requiring repeated paracenteses or thoracenteses. Subcutaneous peritoneal and pleural port catheters are an alternative therapeutic option. We evaluate the clinical utility of this approach and the impact on quality of life (QOL) and home/hospice care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty ports were placed, 16 peritoneal and 14 pleural, in patients with a mean age of 62 years. Retrospective chart review and interviews were held with patients and nursing care providers. Mean follow-up was 59 days.

RESULTS

On a 10-point scale, QOL improvement, compared to that prior to port placement, was rated a mean of 9.5 by patients and 9.0 by the nursing staff. Both patients and nurses reported a high degree of convenience (rated at 9.7 and 9.6, respectively) and improvement of symptoms and comfort (9.6 and 9.3, respectively). Nursing staff reported a high degree of comfort (9.9) using the aspiration ports. Six of 14 pleural ports were removed following pleurodesis. One pleural port was removed due to patient discomfort and another due to pneumothorax. Two patients with pleural ports developed tumor seeding in the subcutaneous tissues. Of 14 peritoneal ports, 3 required removal for leaking and probable chemical cellulitis. Four became temporarily occluded with patency restored using tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal and pleural ports offer a convenient and relatively safe alternative to frequent paracenteses/thoracenteses in the management of refractory ascites and pleural effusions. This approach can improve the QOL for patients with end-stage disease.

Palliative treatment of malignant ascites: profile of catumaxomab

Malignant ascites is the abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity associated with several intrapelvic and intra-abdominal malignancies. The development of ascites leads to significant symptoms and poor quality of life for the cancer patient. Available therapies for palliation include treatment of the underlying disease, but when there are no treatment options, the use of diuretics, implantation of drainage catheters, and surgical shunting techniques are considered. None of these symptom palliation options affect the course of disease. The development of trifunctional antibodies, which attach to specific overexpressed surface markers on tumor cells, and trigger an immune response leading to cytoreductive effects, represents a new approach to the management of malignant ascites. The purpose of this review is to highlight current therapies for malignant ascites and review data as to the effectiveness of a new trifunctional antibody, catumaxomab.

Indwelling catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites: a systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review

The safety and efficacy of indwelling intraperitoneal (IP) catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites is unclear. A systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review of patients with malignant refractory ascites who underwent indwelling IP catheter placement was performed. Standardized literature abstraction and chart review templates were used to ensure that consistent information was collected. Fifteen publications met literature search criteria, representing 221 patients. Tenckhoff (Quinton Instrument Company, Seattle, WA, USA), Pleurex (Denver Biomedical Inc., Golden, CO, USA), and peritoneal catheters were used, along with IP ports. A median 5.9% of cases (range: 2.5%-34%) had documented peritonitis. In the literature, untunneled catheters were most commonly associated with infections. Our chart review added 19 cases from two academic institutions to this literature (median age: 60 years [range: 31-85]; females: 17 [89%]; gynecological malignancies: 14 [73%]). Palliative management before catheter placement included diuretics (n=4 [21%]) and multiple paracenteses (n=11 [58%] had two or more taps [range: 2-8]). Median time from diagnosis to catheter placement was 25 months (range: 1-77). Interventions were: French pigtail catheters (n=16 [84%]), Tenckhoff catheter (n=1 [5%]), and Port-A-Caths (Smith Medical MD, St. Paul, MN, USA) (n=2; 11%). Four (21%) catheters were tunneled. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in six cases (32%). Two cases (11%) had documented infections, seven catheters (37%) became occluded, and two leaked (11%). The median time from catheter until death was 36 days (range: 4-660). Nine patients (47%) were admitted to hospice. In these retrospective studies, indwelling IP catheters appear to be a safe and effective palliative strategy to manage refractory malignant ascites, without overwhelming infection rates.