The Endovascular Management of Iliac Artery Aneurysms

Percutaneous approach options for embolization of endoleak after iliac artery aneurysm repair: stick the sac or stick the gluteal artery

Internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs), isolated or associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms, are at rupture risk with growth. Treatment is recommended when symptomatic or greater than 3 cm. Surgical or endovascular therapy should exclude the arterial origin and outflow branches. If all outflow branches are not completely embolized, an endoleak can develop, pressurizing the sac leading to growth and rupture. Accessing the arteries involved can be technically challenging and understanding potential targets is critical. We describe two percutaneous approaches for treatment: percutaneously accessing the sac from an anterior trans-iliopsoas approach and percutaneously accessing the gluteal artery from a posterior approach.

A systematic review on endovascular repair of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms and suggestions regarding diameter thresholds for intervention

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to systematically review results of endovascular aneurysm repair for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA) regarding outcomes and to determine if changes should be made to current diameter threshold recommendations for intervention.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were searched.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were deemed eligible and provided data for 879 patients and 981 isolated CIAA treated with endovascular repair. The majority of the patients (90.8%) were males. The weighted mean age of the patients was 71.7 years (range, 37-91 years). The weighted mean diameter for the CIAA was 41. mm 1 (range, 15-110 mm) and for ruptured aneurysms 58.4 mm. The overall technical success rate was 97.6%. The perioperative mortality rate was 0.7%. Secondary patency rates were reported in only four studies and varied between 96.7% and 100%. The overall morbidity rate was 14%, ranging from 0% to 25%. Most of the studies did not report long-term or adequate follow-up data. Rupture of an isolated CIAA at <4 cm diameter was extremely low.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of isolated CIAA is feasible and safe with a low mortality and excellent technical success rates. Consideration of increasing the diameter threshold for intervention of CIAA to 4 cm should be considered. Studies with longer follow-up and reliable long-term results are needed.

Successful endovascular repair of a ruptured isolated iliac artery aneurysm: A case report

While isolated iliac artery aneurysm is rare, its rupture can lead to complete circulatory collapse and possibly death. Herein, we report a case of rupture of a large isolated aneurysm of the right common iliac artery that led to circulatory collapse and rapid endovascular repair saved the patient's life.

Customized endovascular repair of common iliac artery aneurysms

Open technique for elective repair of iliac artery aneurysms can be safely performed with good outcomes but not inconsequential morbidity. An endovascular approach has been shown to have both periprocedural and postoperative advantages with equivalent outcomes. Endovascular repair of common iliac arteries (CIAs) without sacrificing the hypogastric artery using an iliac branch device is a complex endovascular technique requiring a proximal seal zone that may be absent in larger CIA aneurysms. We present two cases in which CIA aneurysms were repaired with a customized endovascular technique using the benefit of the aortic bifurcation for stability in addition to providing a long proximal seal zone with the AFX device (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) paired with the iliac branch device (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) for internal iliac artery preservation.

Primary Endovascular Elective Repair and Repair of Ruptured Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms Is Durable-Results of 72 Consecutive Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcome of endovascular elective repair and repair of ruptured isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs) as a primary treatment strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with an IIAA undergoing endovascular treatment were included. Aneurysms were classified according to an anatomic classification and treated with coiling of the internal iliac artery, stent graft placement in the common to external iliac artery, or placement of a bifurcated aortoiliac stent graft. Between November 1996 and November 2015, 72 patients with 85 IIAAs underwent endovascular repair. Mean age was 73.9 years ± 9.2. Common iliac artery was involved in 63 patients (74.1%), internal iliac artery was involved in 21 patients (24.7%), and external iliac artery was involved in 1 patient (1.2%). Mean diameter was 5 cm (range, 2.5-11 cm). Emergency repair was performed in 19 patients owing to rupture (26.4%).

RESULTS

Overall primary technical success rate was 95.8% with conversion rate to open surgery of 4.2% (all in the emergency group) and in-hospital mortality rate of 1.4%. During mean follow-up of 4.3 years ± 3.3 (median 3.8 y; range, 0-14.2 y), 17 endoleaks were observed (6 type I, 10 type II, 1 type IIIa). Overall reintervention rate was 16.7%. Primary patency rate was 98.6%. During the follow-up period, 22 deaths occurred (30.6%), including 2 aneurysm-related deaths (2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary endovascular repair of IIAAs shows excellent results and should be considered as first-line therapy. Surgical backup should be available in emergency cases.

Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Bilateral Common Iliac Artery Aneurysms Using Iliac Branched Stent Graft

Endovascular treatment of isolated bilateral common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA) requires salvage of at least one internal iliac artery to prevent complications such as ischemic buttock claudication. We treated a case of bilateral CIAAs using an internal iliac branched stent graft. We report a case of a 58-year-old man who presented with bilateral CIAAs. The left internal iliac artery was occluded with coil embolization. The right internal iliac artery was saved by using a branched stent graft. The aneurysms were excluded with conventional endovascular aneurysm repair. Completion angiography showed technical success. Follow up computed tomography angiogram at three months showed complete exclusion of bilateral CIAAs, no endoleaks, and patent right internal iliac artery. There was no pelvic ischemic complication. We treated successfully a case of isolated bilateral CIAAs using an iliac branched stent graft.

The effect of endovascular treatment on isolated iliac artery aneurysm treatment and mortality

OBJECTIVE

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms are rare, but potentially fatal. The effect of recent trends in the use of endovascular iliac aneurysm repair (EVIR) on isolated iliac artery aneurysm-associated mortality is unknown.

METHODS

We identified all patients with a primary diagnosis of iliac artery aneurysm in the National Inpatient Sample from 1988 to 2011. We examined trends in management (open vs EVIR, elective and urgent) and overall isolated iliac artery aneurysm-related deaths (with or without repair). We compared in-hospital mortality and complications for the subgroup of patients undergoing elective open and EVIR from 2000 to 2011.

RESULTS

We identified 33,161 patients undergoing isolated iliac artery aneurysm repair from 1988 to 2011, of which there were 9016 EVIR and 4933 open elective repairs from 2000 to 2011. Total repairs increased after the introduction of EVIR, from 28 to 71 per 10 million United States (U.S.) population (P < .001). EVIR surpassed open repair in 2003. Total isolated iliac artery aneurysm-related deaths, due to rupture or elective repair, decreased after the introduction of EVIR from 4.4 to 2.3 per 10 million U.S. population (P < .001). However, urgent admissions did not decrease during this time period (15 to 15 procedures per 10 million U.S. population; P = .30). Among elective repairs after 2000, EVIR patients were older (72.4 vs 69.4 years; P = .002) and were more likely to have a history of prior myocardial infarction (14.0% vs 11.3%; P < .001) and renal failure (7.2% vs 3.6%; P < .001). Open repair had significantly higher rate of in-hospital mortality (1.8% vs 0.5%; P < .001) and complications (17.9% vs 6.7%; P < .001) and a longer length of stay (6.7 vs 2.3 days; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms has increased since the introduction of EVIR and is associated with lower perioperative mortality, despite a higher burden of comorbid illness. Decreasing iliac artery aneurysm-attributable in-hospital deaths are likely related primarily to lower elective mortality with EVIR rather than rupture prevention.

Endovascular treatment of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms using bifurcated-unibody stent grafts

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA) is a promising alternative to open surgical repair. However, endovascular treatment is challenging when the CIAAs have short proximal necks and internal iliac artery needs to be preserved.

METHODS/RESULTS

We report a case of a 62-year-old man who presented with bilateral CIAA with short proximal necks, with the right-side aneurysm extended into the internal iliac artery. The aneurysms were successfully excluded by using a bifurcated-unibody stent graft on the left with preservation of its internal iliac artery; a conventional tubular covered stent was used on the right with occlusion of its internal iliac artery. In addition, an aorta-bi-iliac artery stent was used to provide extended proximal landing zones for the iliac stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair using an iliac bifurcated-unibody stent graft can be a useful approach for the treatment of CIAAs. An aorta-bi-iliac endograft may also be needed to provide a reliable landing zone when the proximal neck of the iliac aneurysm is short.

The upside down Endurant iliac limb stent graft for treatment of a common iliac artery aneurysm

Endovascular repair of the coverage from the common iliac artery to the external iliac artery after the internal iliac artery embolization has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment in isolated iliac artery aneurysms. But in cases in which the diameter of the proximal sealing zone is larger than that of the distal sealing zone, a reverse-tapered device is needed. We described the off-label use of the Endurant iliac limb stent graft in an upside down configuration to accommodate this diameter mismatch.

The midterm experience of tapered stent grafts in the endovascular management of iliac artery aneurysms with unfavorable anatomy

We report our experience and the midterm results of a modern technique for endovascular management of isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) with unfavorable neck anatomy, which involves the inversion of an iliac leg of a Zenith stent graft. Patients who underwent endovascular IAA repair from 2002 to 2010 were reviewed. A total of 12 patients, with a mean age of 77.6 years, underwent endovascular repair of 13 IAAs. Mean size of the aneurysms was 54.6 mm (range 34-133 mm). Mean proximal neck diameter was 18 mm (range 15-22 mm). In 7 patients, the length of the proximal neck was <15 mm (10-14 mm). Only 1 patient developed thrombosis of the stent graft immediately after the operation. Patients were followed up for a mean of 31.5 months (range 18-72 months). Our midterm results demonstrate the durability of this technique in the management of iliac aneurysms with unfavorable anatomy.

Case report. A novel approach to the management of a ruptured Type II endoleak following endovascular repair of an internal iliac artery aneurysm

Endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms is an established safe and effective management option. Type II endoleak is a potential complication, but rarely results in significant morbidity or mortality. We report a case of a patient who presented with a ruptured internal iliac artery aneurysm secondary to a Type II endoleak. To our knowledge this and the following method of managing this have not been previously reported. Established methods of managing endoleaks, such as intravascular transfemoral embolisation and open or laparoscopic ligation, were not possible. Therefore, we resorted to a novel approach to this type of aneurysm and successfully performed a transcutaneous direct puncture and embolisation of the superior gluteal artery.

Percutaneous balloon-expandable stent graft repair of a ruptured iliac aneurysm

Elective stent graft repair of iliac aneurysm is successful and safe. There are, however, few published data on stent grafting unstable patients with acute iliac aneurysm rupture. Iliac diameter mismatch can also present a challenge to emergency endovascular treatment. We report the treatment of an unstable patient with iliac aneurysm rupture and diameter mismatch using a percutaneous balloon-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) stent graft. Outcomes were satisfactory up to 12-month follow-up. Treatment of iliac aneurysm rupture using a balloon-expandable stent graft can be successful in selected patients. A percutaneous approach and targeted stent graft postdilatation enable prompt repair in the presence of diameter mismatch, facilitating emergency therapy.

Endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate a 12-year experience with endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IAA).

METHODS

From August 1997 through July 2009, 91 patients (81 men; mean age 71 years, range 31-90) underwent endovascular treatment for isolated IAA at our department. Of these, 77 patients received stent-grafts either alone or in combination with coils or an Amplatzer vascular plug (n = 2); 1 patient received a Smart stent combined with coils, and 13 patients were treated with coil embolization only. The aneurysms were classified according to location: type I = common iliac artery (CIA), type II = internal iliac artery (IIA), type III = CIA and IIA, and type IV = external iliac artery with/without CIA and/or IIA involvement.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was 90.1% for all aneurysm types and 93.6%, 80%, 88.8%, and 93.3% for types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Secondary technical success was 96.7% for all types and 97.8%, 95%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, for each type. Clinical success was 93.4% for all types and 97.8%, 85%, 100%, and 86.7%, respectively, by type. Complications in 18 (19.8%) patients included 7 type I endoleaks, 3 type II endoleaks, 2 enlarged aneurysm sacs (incomplete embolization), 5 cases of buttock claudication, and 2 stent-graft thromboses. Two patients were converted to open surgery; 10 underwent secondary interventions. Mortality rates were 1.1% (n = 1) at 30 death days and 23.1% (n = 21) over a mean follow-up of 45.9 months (no aneurysm-related death). Cumulative overall survival was 97.7% at 1 year and 47.6% at 10 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related complications was 88.6% at 1 year and 83.5% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular repair of isolated IAA is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgery. However, it may be associated with several complications and must, therefore, be carefully planned.

Endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms with willis covered stents: technical case report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms with Willis covered stents (Micro-Port, Shanghai, China).

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The endovascular treatment of two cases of giant intracranial aneurysm was successfully accomplished by the placement of Willis covered stents specially designed for intracranial use. Both patients presented with symptoms of cavernous mass effect that resulted from a giant aneurysm in the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery.

INTERVENTION

Three Willis covered stents were successfully placed in two patients. Immediate postprocedure angiograms demonstrated some endoleak of the aneurysms. In one patient, the endoleak was eliminated and complete exclusion of the aneurysms was confirmed with follow-up angiography. However, the other patient required the placement of a new Willis covered stent.

CONCLUSION

The use of covered stents in intracranial vascular structures is a feasible method to treat selected cases of intracranial giant aneurysms. It is suggested that patients who present with compressive mass effect caused by large or giant aneurysms are the best candidates for covered stent placement, but potential complications should be considered carefully before the stenting procedure.

Endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms with willis covered stents: technical case report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms with Willis covered stents (Micro-Port, Shanghai, China).

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The endovascular treatment of two cases of giant intracranial aneurysm was successfully accomplished by the placement of Willis covered stents specially designed for intracranial use. Both patients presented with symptoms of cavernous mass effect that resulted from a giant aneurysm in the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery.

INTERVENTION

Three Willis covered stents were successfully placed in two patients. Immediate postprocedure angiograms demonstrated some endoleak of the aneurysms. In one patient, the endoleak was eliminated and complete exclusion of the aneurysms was confirmed with follow-up angiography. However, the other patient required the placement of a new Willis covered stent.

CONCLUSION

The use of covered stents in intracranial vascular structures is a feasible method to treat selected cases of intracranial giant aneurysms. It is suggested that patients who present with compressive mass effect caused by large or giant aneurysms are the best candidates for covered stent placement, but potential complications should be considered carefully before the stenting procedure.