Predictors of reintervention after endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm

[Management of isolated iliac aneurysms: A Tunisian center experience]

Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are rare. The diagnoses of these aneurysms become easier with non-invasive radiologic investigations. The development of endovascular treatment is a recent alternative to surgical treatment. We report our experience in the management of 8 cases of isolated iliac aneurysms in the department of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery of the Habib Bourguiba Hospital of Sfax.

Clinical significance of type I endoleak on completion angiography

Purpose

Type I endoleak is known to be associated with sac enlargement and occasional rupture, therefore, the treatment of type I endoleak is recommended at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to identify the significance of early type I endoleak found on completion angiography.

Methods

Between January 2000 and December 2012, a total of 86 patients underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and 10 patients (11.6%) were diagnosed with type Ia endoleak on completion angiography. Clinical and radiologic data were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Of the 10 patients, two underwent EVAR with custom-made stent-grafts in the initial stage and both of them needed immediate treatment: one case involved open repair while the other involved insertion of an additional stent-graft. In 8 patients, the amount of leakage decreased after repeated balloon molding. They were managed conservatively and followed up with computed tomography angiography within 2 weeks after EVAR. In 7 of the 8 cases, type Ia endoleaks disappeared. In one patient with a persistent endoleak and a folded posterior wall of the stent-graft, coil embolization was performed 1 week after EVAR. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 1-61 months), no patients showed recurrence of type I endoleak or sac expansion.

Conclusion

Type I endoleaks diagnosed on completion angiography sealed spontaneously in 7 of 10 patients (70.0%). In cases of decreased amounts of leakage after balloon molding, simple observation may be an alternative to repetitive procedures. The long-term follow-up of patients with self-sealed type I endoleaks is mandatory.

Endovascular treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms with anaconda stent graft limb

Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are relatively rare conditions that traditionally have been treated by surgical reconstruction. We report our experience with endovascular treatment of iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) with Anaconda stent graft limb. Two male patients were found to have 4.5 and 3.6 cm isolated common IAAs, respectively. The endograft was successfully advanced and deployed precisely to the intended position in both cases. In one case the internal iliac artery was embolized. No type I or II endoleak was observed immediately after the procedure. In one patient postimplantation fever (>38°C) and gluteal claudication occurred. After 2 years followup both iliac endovascular stent grafts are patent and without endoleak. Endovascular treatment with Anaconda limb stent graft seems to be a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery.

Endovascular treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms using a custom-made stent graft with proximal barb fixation: early outcome

Current endovascular treatments for isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs) include the use of aortoiliac stent grafts with coverage of the distal aorta or stent grafts confined to the iliac artery without active proximal fixation. We report our experience in the use of custom-made Cook Zenith™ iliac limb stent grafts with proximal barb fixation. Patients treated from July 2009 to February 2011 were included. All imaging and patient records were assessed for perioperative and early outcomes. Nine IIAAs (seven patients) were treated. The mean patient age was 80 years (range 58-91 years). The mean aneurysm size was 48 mm (35-80 mm), and the mean length of the proximal landing zone (PLZ) was 29 mm (10-50 mm). The distal landing zone was in the external iliac artery after coil embolization of the internal iliac artery. The Mean diameter of the PLZ was 21 mm (20-24 mm). Technical success was achieved in eight cases. Perioperative complications included reoperation in one patient for groin bleeding and ischemia. On follow-up (mean 12 months, range 1-26), all aneurysms were successfully excluded from the circulation and there was no stent graft migration or thrombosis. Use of custom-made stent grafts with proximal barb fixation in treatment of IIAAs is a feasible option which may reduce the risk of migration when compared with stent grafts with lack of proximal fixation.

A comparative study of the bell-bottom technique vs hypogastric exclusion for the treatment of aneurysmal extension to the iliac bifurcation

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) have common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA). Aneurysmal involvement at the iliac bifurcation potentially undermines long-term durability.

METHODS

Patients with CIAA who underwent EVAR were identified in two teaching hospitals. Bell-bottom technique (BBT; iliac limb ≥20 mm) or internal iliac artery embolization and limb extension to the external iliac artery (IIE + EE) were used. Outcome between these two approaches was compared.

RESULTS

We identified 185 patients. Indication for EVAR included asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in 157, symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm in 19, and CIAA in nine. Mean AAA diameter was 59 mm. Among 260 large CIAAs that were treated, BBT was used to treat 166 CIAA limbs, and 94 limbs underwent IIE + EE. Total reintervention rates were 11% for BBT (n = 19) and 19.1% for IIE + EE (n = 18; P = .149). Rates of reintervention for type Ib or III endoleak were 4% for BBT (n = 7) and 4% for IIE + EE (n = 4; P > .99). The difference in limb patency rates was not significant. The 30-day mortality rate was 1%. Median follow-up was 22 months. Complications did not differ significantly between the two groups; however, the combined incidence of perioperative complications and reinterventions was higher in the IIE + EE group (49% vs 22%; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined incidence of perioperative complications and reinterventions is significantly higher with IIE + EE than with BBT; therefore, when feasible, BBT is desirable.