1
|
Kethidi N, Barsoum K, Shukla PA, Kumar A. Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:500-508. [PMID: 36960630 PMCID: PMC10679615 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2022.22908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the safety of complex inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval techniques through a systematic review of published literature. Using PubMed, a systematic review was conducted in line with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify articles published through April 2020 that reported on complex IVC filter retrieval techniques in >5 patients. Case reports, review papers, and studies that did not report on primary outcomes or variables of interest were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. Pooled success and complication rates were calculated for the overall number of complex retrieval attempts as well as for each filter type and each complex retrieval method. Sixteen fair-quality and three good-quality studies met the inclusion criteria, with 758 patients (428 female) who had undergone 770 advanced retrieval attempts. The mean age of the patients was 46.5 ± 7.1 years (range: 14.1-90), and the mean dwell time was 602.5 ± 388.6 days (range: 5-7336). Regarding filters, 92.6% (702/758) were retrievable and 7.4% (56/758) were permanent. Indications for complex retrieval included the failure of standard retrieval (89.2%; 676/758) and tilting or embedding in the caval wall (53.8%; 408/758); 92.6% (713/770) of the advanced retrieval attempts were successful. The pooled success rate was 92.0% (602/654) for retrievable filters and 96.4% (53/55) for permanent filters (P = 0.422). Only 2.8% (21/758) of patients experienced major complications, and the major complication rate was not significantly associated with filter type (P = 0.183). Advanced techniques for IVC filter retrieval appear safe for the retrieval of retrievable filters and certain permanent filters, with a low short-term major complication rate. Further studies on complex retrieval techniques used to remove permanent filters should be conducted to clarify their safety with respect to filter type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhit Kethidi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Kyrollos Barsoum
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Pratik A. Shukla
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu Q, Tran P, Iyer D, Gutti S, Li D, Li X, Navuluri R, Van Ha T, Ahmed O. Rigid forceps and excimer laser use for complex inferior cava filter retrieval: a preliminary quantitative analysis of available evidence. CVIR Endovasc 2022; 5:33. [PMID: 35802261 PMCID: PMC9270549 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-022-00311-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The present study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of advanced inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval using laser assistance compared with forceps via systematic review and quantitative aggregation of available data. Methods Pubmed and Embase were queried from establishment to September 2021. Original studies with a sample size ≥ 5 that reported at least one primary outcome of patients who underwent laser- or forceps-assisted IVCF retrieval were included. Primary outcomes included technical success and complication rates. Baseline characteristics were extracted: age, sex, presence of filter thrombus, strut penetration, previous retrieval attempt, filter dwell time, fluoroscopy time, and filter type. Complications were categorized by type and severity. Categorical data was pooled and evaluated with chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Results From the 16 included studies, a total of 673 and 368 patients underwent laser- and forceps-assisted IVCF retrieval, respectively. Successful retrieval was achieved in 98.1 and 93.7% patients from the laser and forceps groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Major complication rates (1.6 vs 2.1%, p = 0.629) and risk of injury to cava or adjacent organs (1.0 vs 1.4%, p = 0.534) were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of filters from the laser arm were closed-cell design (75.4 vs 68.1%, p = 0.020). Conclusion Based on limited available evidence, forceps- and laser-assisted complex IVCF retrievals were equally safe. The use of laser sheath is associated with a higher retrieval rate than forceps alone, though the baseline characteristics of two cohorts were not controlled. Future large-scale case-controlled comparative studies with longer clinical follow-up are warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-022-00311-4.
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Jiang P, Tian X, Jia W, Huang NL, Zhan H, Chen W. Clinical outcomes of retrievable inferior vena cava filters for venous thromboembolic diseases. J Comp Eff Res 2022; 11:437-449. [PMID: 35199584 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To identify literature evidence assessing retrievable inferior vena cava filter (rIVCF) for venous thromboembolic diseases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant references from the mainstay English and Chinese bibliographic databases (search period: January 2003 to October 2019). Results: 80 original studies with 11,413 patients were included in this review. The success rates of deploying the six types of rIVCFs ranged from 98.4 to 100.0%. Denali had the highest retrieval success rate (95.4-97.6%). The incidence rates of fracture and perforation associated with retrieving the six rIVCFs were less than 2%. Conclusion: The approved rIVCF had comparable clinical profiles, except that Denali was easier to be retrieved than other rIVCF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peng Jiang
- Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuan Tian
- Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Jia
- Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Huan Zhan
- Changsha Normin Health Technology Ltd, Changsha, China
| | - Wendong Chen
- Changsha Normin Health Technology Ltd, Changsha, China.,Normin Health Consulting Ltd, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
White P, Jahangiri Y, Farsad K, Kaufman J, Al-Hakim R. Lateral tilt during IVC filter placement does not predict the need for advanced filter retrieval techniques. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (ANKARA, TURKEY) 2021; 27:644-648. [PMID: 34559049 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2021.19411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to determine if lateral inferior vena cava (IVC) filter tilt at placement predicts the need for subsequent advanced retrieval techniques. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed of all Gunther Tulip IVC filter placements with subsequent retrievals between February 2015 and October 2017. Chart and imaging review was performed for patient, filter placement, and filter retrieval demographics/characteristics. Degree of agreement between two measurement sets was evaluated with the intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Kendall rank correlation was used to measure correlation between categorical variables. RESULTS There was poor agreement between filter tilt angle at the time of placement and retrieval (ICC coefficient, 0.54). Mean difference ± standard deviation between tilt angle at the time of placement and retrieval was 4.6°±4.3° (p = 0.35). Among patient- or procedure-related factors, a common femoral vein access on placement (regression coefficient, -2.90; p = 0.039) was associated with a lower difference between placement and retrieval filter tilt angles compared to internal jugular vein access. Higher filter tilt angle measured at the time of retrieval (OR: 1.19, p = 0.025), hook embedment (OR: 77.3, p < 0.001), and a longer dwell time (OR: 1.25, p = 0.002) were associated with the need for advanced retrieval techniques. However, in univariate and multivariate analysis filter tilt angle at the time of placement was not associated with the subsequent need for advanced retrieval technique (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION Lateral tilt at the time of placement is poorly associated with lateral tilt at the time of retrieval and does not correlate with the need for advanced retrieval technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter White
- Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Younes Jahangiri
- Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Khashayar Farsad
- Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - John Kaufman
- Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ramsey Al-Hakim
- Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rajan A, S Makary M, D Martyn T, D Dowell J. Computational evaluation of inferior vena cava filters through computational fluid dynamics methods. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 27:116-121. [PMID: 33252333 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2020.19435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Numerical simulation is growing in its importance toward the design, testing and evaluation of medical devices. Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis allow improved calculation of stress, heat transfer, and flow to better understand the medical device environment. Current research focuses not only on improving medical devices, but also on improving the computational tools themselves. As methods and computer technology allow for faster simulation times, iterations and trials can be performed faster to collect more data. Given the adverse events associated with long-term inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, IVC filter design and device evaluation are of paramount importance. This work reviews computational methods used to develop, test, and improve IVC filters to ultimately serve the needs of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Rajan
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mina S Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Dowell
- Northwest Radiology and St. Vincent Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laidlaw GL, Chick JFB, Ingraham CR, Monroe EJ, Johnson GE, Valji K, Shin DS. Inferior vena cava filter tilting between placement and retrieval is associated with caval diameter and need for complex retrieval techniques. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:243-248. [PMID: 34365155 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter tilt may lead to apex embedment and need for advanced retrieval techniques. This study assesses factors associated with filter tilt change over time and need for complex retrieval procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS 252 consecutive patients underwent retrievable IVC filter placement and removal at a single academic institution over 58 months. 182 (72.2%) patients met inclusion criteria. IVC filters included 168 (92.3%) Gunther Tulip and 14 (7.7%) Option filters. The primary outcome was medial-to-lateral IVC filter tilt change between placement and retrieval. Secondary outcomes included advanced retrieval technique use and multiple retrieval attempts. Independent variables included demographics, IVC diameter, filter hook position relative to the renal veins, and dwell time. Associations were determined using student's t-tests, ANOVA, and linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS Mean IVC diameter at placement was 19.2 ± 3.3 mm. Mean filter tilts at placement and retrieval were 6.1 ± 4.9° and 5.2 ± 5.0°, respectively. Mean tilt change was 5.0 ± 5.0°. Larger IVC diameter was associated with greater filter tilt change (p = 0.0004). While IVC diameter did not independently predict retrieval difficulty, greater tilt change and prolonged dwell time were associated with increased advanced retrieval technique use (p = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Results were unchanged in a subgroup analysis of patients treated with Gunther Tulip filters. CONCLUSION Larger IVC diameter predicts increased filter tilt change, which in turn is associated with challenging retrievals. Attention to IVC diameter during filter placement may anticipate tilt-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Laidlaw
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Christopher R Ingraham
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Eric J Monroe
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, 1675 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, United States of America
| | - Guy E Johnson
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Karim Valji
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - David S Shin
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han K, Kim MD, Kim GM, Kwon JH, Lee J, Won JY, Moon S, An H. Comparison of Retrievability and Indwelling Complications of Celect and Denali Infrarenal Vena Cava Filters: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44:1536-1542. [PMID: 34312689 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02928-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the Celect and Denali filters in terms of complex filter retrieval and indwelling complications after a 2-month indwelling time. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective, randomized trial, 153 subjects were assessed for eligibility between May 2016 and July 2018. A total of 136 participants were randomly assigned to receive either Celect (n = 68) or Denali (n = 68) filter placement in the infrarenal inferior vena cava. Tilt angles at placement and retrieval and rates of overall filter retrieval, indwelling complication, and complex retrieval were compared. RESULTS Of 136 participants (mean age, 62 ± 12.8 years, 55 male), 24 (17.6%) were lost to follow-up. The mean indwelling time of filter was 60.4 ± 7 days and there was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Filter retrieval was successful in all participants (112/112, 100%). Significantly higher rates of filter tilt > 15° (n = 8) and strut penetration (n = 14) were found with the Celect filter than with the Denali filter (1 significant tilt and 1 penetration) (P = 0.033 and 0.001, respectively). No filter fractures were observed and there was no significant difference in tip embedment, filter fracture, filter migration, or mean fluoroscopy times. There were 3 cases of complex retrieval (1 for Denali vs. 2 for Celect, P = 0.500), for which the loop-snare technique was used. CONCLUSION Denali filters demonstrated significantly lower rates of tilt angle > 15° and strut penetration. However, there was no significant difference in the complex filter retrieval rate between the Celect and Denali filters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kichang Han
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Man-Deuk Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
| | - Gyoung Min Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Joon Ho Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Junhyung Lee
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Jong Yun Won
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Sungmo Moon
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Hyeongsu An
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Role of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation Therapy. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11936-020-00891-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurpose of reviewDescribe the role of inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval in patients on chronic anticoagulation given the overlap of these treatment options in the management of patients with venous thromboembolic disease.Recent findingsDespite the increase in IVCF retrievals since the Food and Drug Administration safety communications in 2010 and 2014, retrieval rates remain low. Previous studies have shown that longer filter dwell times are associated with greater risk for filter complications and more difficulty with filter retrievals. Recent findings suggest that complications are more frequent in the first 30 days after placement.SummaryThe decision to retrieve an optional IVCF is individualized and requires diligent follow-up with consistent re-evaluation of the need for the indwelling IVCF, particularly in those on long-term anticoagulation therapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ivanics T, Williams P, Nasser H, Leonard-Murali S, Schwartz S, Lin JC. Contemporary management of chronic indwelling inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 9:163-169. [PMID: 32721588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite increasing retrieval rates of the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, less than one-third are removed within the recommended timeline. Prolonged filter dwell times may increase the technical difficulty of retrieval and filter-related complications. We sought to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of patients with chronic indwelling IVC filters at a tertiary care center. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed from August 2015 through August 2019 of all patients who were referred for removal of a prolonged IVC filter with a dwell time >1 year. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes, which were reviewed through electronic medical records. Data were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) or number and percentage, as appropriate. RESULTS A total of 47 patients were identified with a median filter dwell time of 10.0 years (IQR, 6-13 years); 34 patients underwent IVC filter removal, and 13 patients refused retrieval. The median age of patients was 54.9 years (IQR, 42.5-64.0 years); the majority were female (57%) and white (53%). The most common indication for filter placement was high risk despite anticoagulation (49%), followed by venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (21%). The majority of patients were symptomatic (72%). If symptomatic, the most common reason for retrieval was IVC penetration (94%), and the chief complaint was pain (56%). Retrieval success was 97%, with a median length of stay of 0 days. The majority of retrievals were performed through an endovascular approach (97%). There was one postprocedural complication (3%). CONCLUSIONS Despite prolonged dwell times, IVC filter retrieval can be performed safely and effectively in carefully selected patients at a tertiary referral center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.
| | - Paul Williams
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| | - Hassan Nasser
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| | | | - Scott Schwartz
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| | - Judith C Lin
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ahmed O, Kim YJ, Patel MV, Tullius TG, Navuluri R, Funaki B, Van Ha T. A Single-Institutional Comparative Analysis of Advanced Versus Standard Snare Removal of Inferior Vena Cava Filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 31:53-60.e1. [PMID: 31734075 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate differences in procedure time, radiation exposure, and periprocedural complications associated with advanced inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval compared with standard snare retrieval. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 378 patients underwent standard or advanced IVC filter retrieval over a 5-year period. Technical success, retrieval techniques, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and complications were analyzed. All retrieval procedures with techniques other than a "snare-and-sheath" method were categorized as advanced, including failed standard attempts requiring intraprocedural conversion to advanced techniques. RESULTS A total of 462 filter retrieval attempts were made in 378 patients (57% female). Success rates for standard and advanced retrieval attempts were 86.8% (317 of 365) and 91.8% (89 of 97), respectively. The rate of periprocedural complications was significantly higher in the advanced retrieval group (P = .006). Complication rates for standard and advanced retrievals were 0.6% (2 of 318; all minor) and 5.2% (5 of 97; 3 minor [3.1%] and 2 major [2.1%]), respectively. The 2 major complications during advanced retrievals included filter fracture and embolization. Average fluoroscopy time for advanced retrievals was significantly higher than for standard retrievals (23.1 min vs 4.3 min; P < .001). Average radiation dose for advanced retrievals was also significantly higher than for standard retrievals (557.2 mGy vs 156.9 mGy; P < .001). Use of general anesthesia was also significantly more common in advanced retrievals compared with standard retrievals (6.2% vs 0.9%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Advanced filter retrieval results in a similarly high rate of technical success compared with standard snare retrieval but is associated with greater fluoroscopy time, anesthesia requirements, and radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ye Joon Kim
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL 60064.
| | - Mikin V Patel
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Thomas G Tullius
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rakesh Navuluri
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian Funaki
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brahmandam A, Skrip L, Mojibian H, Aruny J, Sumpio B, Dardik A, Sarac T, Ochoa Chaar CI. Costs and complications of endovascular inferior vena cava filter retrieval. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019; 7:653-659.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
12
|
An analysis of factors associated with increased fluoroscopy time or the need for complex techniques at IVC filter retrieval. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:1931-1938. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5766-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
13
|
Predicting inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrievability using positional parameters: A comparative study of various filter types. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018; 99:615-624. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
14
|
Makary MS, Kapke J, Yildiz V, Pan X, Dowell JD. Outcomes and Direct Costs of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval within the IR and Surgical Settings. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:170-175. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/09/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
15
|
Dowell JD, Semaan D, Makary MS, Ryu J, Khayat M, Pan X. Retrieval characteristics of the Bard Denali and Argon Option inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; 5:800-804. [PMID: 29037348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the retrieval characteristics of the Option Elite (Argon Medical, Plano, Tex) and Denali (Bard, Tempe, Ariz) retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs), two filters that share a similar conical design. METHODS A single-center, retrospective study reviewed all Option and Denali IVCF removals during a 36-month period. Attempted retrievals were classified as advanced if the routine "snare and sheath" technique was initially unsuccessful despite multiple attempts or an alternative endovascular maneuver or access site was used. Patient and filter characteristics were documented. RESULTS In our study, 63 Option and 45 Denali IVCFs were retrieved, with an average dwell time of 128.73 and 99.3 days, respectively. Significantly higher median fluoroscopy times were experienced in retrieving the Option filter compared with the Denali filter (12.18 vs 6.85 minutes; P = .046). Use of adjunctive techniques was also higher in comparing the Option filter with the Denali filter (19.0% vs 8.7%; P = .079). No significant difference was noted between these groups in regard to gender, age, or history of malignant disease. CONCLUSIONS Option IVCF retrieval procedures required significantly longer retrieval fluoroscopy time compared with Denali IVCFs. Although procedure time was not analyzed in this study, as a surrogate, the increased fluoroscopy time may also have an impact on procedural direct costs and throughput.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Dowell
- Northwest Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Dominic Semaan
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mina S Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - John Ryu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mamdouh Khayat
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Xueliang Pan
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Computational predictions of the embolus-trapping performance of an IVC filter in patient-specific and idealized IVC geometries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2017; 16:1957-1969. [DOI: 10.1007/s10237-017-0931-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
17
|
Makary MS, Shah SH, Warhadpande S, Vargas IG, Sarbinoff J, Dowell JD. Design-of-Experiments Approach to Improving Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:72-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Revised: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
18
|
Dowell JD, Castle JC, Spinner J, Black S. Role of inferior vena cava filters in transplant patients. Clin Transplant 2016; 31. [PMID: 27801505 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates the selection, use, and risks of permanent and retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in patients who have undergone organ transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Single-center retrospective review of 35 patients who had an IVCF placed following organ transplantation. Patient demographics, IVCF indication, and eligibility for retrieval were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) studies showing the filter (n=22) were evaluated independently for IVCF adverse effects. RESULTS Thirty-two (91%) of 35 patients had retrievable IVCFs placed while three (9%) patients received permanent IVCFs. Filter retrieval was indicated in three of the 32 patients receiving retrievable filters and was performed in two cases. Patients were ineligible for retrieval due to short life expectancy, complications/contraindications to anticoagulation, extended filter dwell time, lost to follow-up, and undetermined therapeutic value of anticoagulation. CONCLUSION Current practices of filter placement usually dictate placing a retrievable IVCF in transplant patients. However, transplant patients are unlikely to be eligible for filter retrieval especially in situations of advanced age and comorbidities. Given the low incidence of eligibility for retrieval in this patient population, these results suggest preferential placement of permanent filters may reduce the potential morbidity due to filter-related complications, such as strut perforation, in transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Dowell
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Northwest Radiology, St. Vincent Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jordan C Castle
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jesse Spinner
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sylvester Black
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ryan E, Kok HK, Lee MJ. Retrievable IVC filters - Friend or foe. Surgeon 2016; 15:104-108. [PMID: 27520332 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism is a common condition with widely varied outcomes. Pulmonary embolism is associated with a case-fatality rate of up to 8%, increasing up to 18-fold in massive PE. Pharmacological treatment of VTE with anticoagulant medication (AC) is the first line therapy of choice. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are indicated as a short-term replacement for AC in certain circumstances. Most of the evidence concerning IVCF pertains to permanent filters and older filter models. Limited evidence for retrievable IVCF results in poor consensus regarding indications, follow-up and retrieval. Complications increase with dwell-time and retrieval success rates decline. Professional bodies advocate strict guideline adherence and robust strategies for filter monitoring to maximise retrieval rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ryan
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Surgeons and Beaumont Hospital, Ireland
| | - H K Kok
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Surgeons and Beaumont Hospital, Ireland
| | - M J Lee
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Royal College of Surgeons and Beaumont Hospital, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|