Determining the Optimal Number of Core Needle Biopsy Passes for Molecular Diagnostics

Risk factors of non-diagnostic percutaneous liver tumor biopsy: a single-center retrospective analysis of 938 biopsies based on cause of error

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk factors of non-diagnostic results based on cause of error in liver tumor biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-institution, retrospective study included 843 patients [445 men, 398 women; median age, 67 years] who underwent a total of 938 liver tumor biopsies between April 2018 and September 2022. An 18-G cutting biopsy needle with a 17-G introducer needle was used. Ultrasound was used as the first choice for image guidance, and computed tomography was alternatively or complementarily used only for tumors with poor ultrasound visibility. Non-diagnostic biopsies were divided into two groups depending on the cause of error, either technical or targeting error. Biopsies in which the biopsy needle did not hit the target tumor were classified as technical error. Biopsies in which insufficient tissue was obtained due to necrosis or degeneration despite the biopsy needle hitting the target tumor were classified as targeting error. This classification was based on pre-procedural enhanced-imaging, intro-procedural imaging, and pathological findings. Statistical analysis was performed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

The non-diagnostic rate was 4.6%. Twenty-six and seventeen biopsies were classified as technical and targeting errors, respectively. In the technical error group, tumor size ≤ 17 mm and computed tomography-assisted biopsy due to poor ultrasound visibility were identified as risk factors (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively), and the tumors with both factors had a significantly high risk of technical error compared to those without both factors (non-diagnostic rate: 17.2 vs 1.1%, p < 0.001). In the targeting error group, tumor size ≥ 42 mm was identified as a risk factor (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size ≤ 17 mm and computed tomography-assisted biopsy due to poor ultrasound visibility were risk factors for technical error, and tumor size ≥ 42 mm was a risk factor for targeting error in liver tumor biopsies.

Percutaneous Core Biopsy Devices: A Detailed Review and Comparison of Different Needle Designs

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous core-needle biopsy (PCNB) plays a growing and essential role in many medical specialties. Proper and effective use of various PCNB devices requires basic understanding of how they function. Current literature lacks a detailed overview and illustration of needle function and design differences, a potentially valuable reference for users ranging from early trainees to experts who are less familiar with certain devices. This pictorial aims to provide such an overview, using diagrams and magnified photographs to illustrate the intricate components of these devices. Following a brief historical review of biopsy needle technology for context, we emphasize distinctions in design between 2 major classes of PCNB devices (side- and end-cutting devices), focusing on practical implications for how each device is most effectively used. We believe a nuanced understanding of biopsy device function sheds light on certain lingering ambiguities in biopsy practice, such as the optimal needle gauge in organ biopsy, the benefits and risks associated with coaxial technique, the impact of needle selection and technique on bleeding, and the risk of unsuccessful sampling. In a subsequent pictorial, we will draw on the concepts presented here to illustrate examples of biopsy needle failure and how unrecognized needle failure can be an important and often preventable cause of increased biopsy risk and lower tissue yield.

The Pathologic Diagnosis of Pediatric Soft Tissue Tumors in the Era of Molecular Medicine: The Sarcoma Pediatric Pathology Research Interest Group Perspective

CONTEXT.—

Pediatric soft tissue tumors are one of the areas of pediatric pathology that frequently generate consult requests. Evolving classification systems, ancillary testing methods, new treatment options, research enrollment opportunities, and tissue archival processes create additional complexity in handling these unique specimens. Pathologists are at the heart of this critical decision-making, balancing responsibilities to consider expediency, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of ancillary testing during pathologic examination and reporting.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a practical approach to handling pediatric soft tissue tumor specimens, including volume considerations, immunohistochemical staining panel recommendations, genetic and molecular testing approaches, and other processes that impact the quality and efficiency of tumor tissue triage.

DATA SOURCES.—

The World Health Organization Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors, 5th edition, other recent literature investigating tissue handling, and the collective clinical experience of the group are used in this manuscript.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Pediatric soft tissue tumors can be difficult to diagnose, and evaluation can be improved by adopting a thoughtful, algorithmic approach to maximize available tissue and minimize time to diagnosis.

Ultrasound-guided biopsy of challenging abdominopelvic targets

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsies have become the standard of practice for tissue diagnosis in the abdomen and pelvis for many sites including liver, kidney, abdominal wall, and peripheral nodal stations. Additional targets may appear difficult or impossible to safely biopsy by ultrasound due to interposed bowel loops/vasculature, deep positioning, association with the bowel, or concern for poor visibility; however, by optimizing technique, it is often possible to safely and efficiently use real-time ultrasound guidance for sampling targets that normally would be considered only appropriate for CT guided or surgical/endoscopic biopsy.

Virtual liver needle biopsy from reconstructed three-dimensional histopathological images: Quantification of sampling error

INTRODUCTION

Prevalently considered as the "gold-standard" for diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis, the clinical liver needle biopsy is known to be subject to inadequate sampling and a high mis-sampling rate. However, quantifying such sampling bias has been difficult as generating a large number of needle biopsies from the same living patient is practically infeasible. We construct a three-dimension (3D) virtual liver tissue volume by spatially registered high resolution Whole Slide Images (WSIs) of serial liver tissue sections with a novel dynamic registration method. We further develop a Virtual Needle Biopsy Sampling (VNBS) method that mimics the needle biopsy sampling process. We apply the VNBS method to the reconstructed digital liver volume at different tissue locations and angles. Additionally, we quantify Collagen Proportionate Area (CPA) in all resulting virtual needle biopsies in 2D and 3D.

RESULTS

The staging score of the center 2D longitudinal image plane from each 3D biopsy is used as the biopsy staging score, and the highest staging score of all sampled needle biopsies is the diagnostic staging score. The Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) in reference to the Scheuer and Ishak diagnostic staging scores are 0.22 and 1.00, respectively. The absolute Scheuer staging score difference in 22.22% of sampled biopsies is 1. By the Ishak staging method, 55.56% and 22.22% of sampled biopsies present score difference 1 and 2, respectively. There are 4 (Scheuer) and 6 (Ishak) out of 18 3D virtual needle biopsies with intra-needle variations. Additionally, we find a positive correlation between CPA and fibrosis stages by Scheuer but not Ishak method. Overall, CPA measures suffer large intra- and inter- needle variations.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed virtual liver needle biopsy sampling pipeline provides a computational avenue for investigating needle biopsy sampling bias with 3D virtual tissue volumes. This method can be applied to other tissue-based disease diagnoses where the needle biopsy sampling bias substantially affects the diagnostic results.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy for a Comprehensive Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Primary Lung Cancer: Safety, Efficacy, and Predictors of Outcome

Introduction

To evaluate factors associated with successful comprehensive genomic sequencing of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsies in patients with lung cancer using a broad hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing assay (CHCA).

Methods

We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of image-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsies from January 2018 to December 2019. Samples with confirmed diagnosis of primary lung cancer and for which CHCA had been attempted were identified. Pathologic, clinical data and results of the CHCA were reviewed. Covariates associated with CHCA success were tested for using Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon ranked sum test. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with likelihood of CHCA success.

Results

CHCA was requested for 479 samples and was successful for 433 (91%), with a median coverage depth of 659X. Factors independently associated with lower likelihood of CHCA success included small tumor size (OR = 0.26 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.62, p = 0.002]), intraoperative inadequacy on cytologic assessment (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.06-0.63, p = 0.005]), small caliber needles (≥20-gauge) (OR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.10-0.45, p < 0.001]), and presence of lung parenchymal abnormalities (OR = 0.12 [95% CI: 0.05-0.25, p < 0.001]). Pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion occurred in 6% of the procedures. No grade IV complications or procedure-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Percutaneous image-guided transthoracic needle biopsy is safe and has 91% success rate for CHCA in primary lung cancer. Intraoperative inadequacy, small caliber needle, presence of parenchymal abnormalities, and small tumor size (≤1 cm) are independently associated with likelihood of failure.

Image-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of the Liver

Percutaneous Biopsy of the Liver (PBL) is a cornerstone in the diagnosis of parenchymal liver disease and focal hepatic lesions. The indications for PBL can broadly be divided into those used to garner information regarding diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment. While the diagnosis of many common liver diseases can usually be made with imaging and serologic testing alone, PBL may be indicated in situations where the diagnosis is in question. Furthermore, liver biopsies are a foundational element for personalized treatment approaches for cancer patients; increasing emphasis is being placed on acquiring sufficient tissue for molecular profiling. While a variety of image guidance and procedural techniques have been applied to PBL, following conventional principles can ensure technical success and minimize complication risks. In this technique article, we review the practical periprocedural considerations of PBL with emphasis on recent advancements and societal recommendations.

Ultrasound-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique: pleural contact length affects the occurrence of pneumothorax after first puncture

PURPOSE

To assess prebiopsy characteristics influencing the occurrence of pneumothorax after first puncture of ultrasound (US)-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2007 to September 2018, 180 peripheral lung lesions in 174 patients who underwent B-mode US-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique at single institution were included in this study. Technical success was defined as the ability to make a diagnosis using the acquired sample with/without an adverse event of pneumothorax. Statistical analyses of prebiopsy characteristics were performed to identify the most important cutpoint and to evaluate the effect on diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Of the 180 lesions (mean size, 37 mm ± 26.2; mean pleural contact length, 38.2 mm ± 34.4), technical success rate was 97.2% (175/180 lesions) and diagnostic accuracy rate was 91.6% (165/180 lesions). Pneumothorax occurred immediately after first puncture for seven of 180 lesions. Classification and regression tree analysis and Fisher's exact test showed the proportion of the pneumothorax immediately after first puncture was higher in lesions with pleural contact length less than 9.78 mm (p = 0.002). No significant difference was shown between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax after first puncture in technical success and final diagnosis success rate.

CONCLUSION

Pleural contact length affects the occurrence of pneumothorax after first puncture of US-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique.

Pathology Quality Control for Multiplex Immunofluorescence and Image Analysis Assessment in Longitudinal Studies

Immune profiling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) staining and image analysis methodology allows for the study of several biomarkers on a single slide. The pathology quality control (PQC) for tumor tissue immune profiling using digital image analysis of core needle biopsies is an important step in any laboratory to avoid wasting time and materials. Although there are currently no established inclusion and exclusion criteria for samples used in this type of assay, a PQC is necessary to achieve accurate and reproducible data. We retrospectively reviewed PQC data from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides and from mIF image analysis samples obtained during 2019. We reviewed a total of 931 reports from core needle biopsy samples; 123 (13.21%) were excluded during the mIF PQC. The most common causes of exclusion were the absence of malignant cells or fewer than 100 malignant cells in the entire section (n = 42, 34.15%), tissue size smaller than 4 × 1 mm (n = 16, 13.01%), fibrotic tissue without inflammatory cells (n = 12, 9.76%), and necrotic tissue (n = 11, 8.94%). Baseline excluded samples had more fibrosis (90 vs 10%) and less necrosis (5 vs 90%) compared with post-treatment excluded samples. The most common excluded organ site of the biopsy was the liver (n = 19, 15.45%), followed by soft tissue (n = 17, 13.82%) and the abdominal region (n = 15, 12.20%). We showed that the PQC is an important step for image analysis and that the absence of malignant cells is the most limiting sample characteristic for mIF image analysis. We also discuss other challenges that pathologists need to consider to report reliable and reproducible image analysis data.

Image-guided biopsy in the age of personalised medicine: strategies for success and safety

Oncology has progressed into an era of personalised medicine, whereby the therapeutic regimen is tailored to the molecular profile of the patient's cancer. Determining personalised therapeutic options is achieved by using tumour genomics and proteomics to identify the specific molecular targets against which candidate drugs can interact. Several dozen targeted drugs, many for multiple cancer types are already widely in clinical use. Molecular profiling of tumours is contingent on high-quality biopsy specimens and the most common method of tissue sampling is image-guided biopsy. Thus, for radiologists performing these biopsies, the paradigm has now shifted away from obtaining specimens simply for histopathological diagnosis to acquiring larger amounts of viable tumour cells for DNA, RNA, or protein analysis. These developments have highlighted the central role now played by radiologists in the delivery of personalised cancer care. This review describes the principles of molecular profiling assays and biopsy techniques for optimising yield, and describes a scoring system to assist in patient selection for percutaneous biopsy.

Bevel angle study of flexible hollow needle insertion into biological mimetic soft-gel: Simulation and experimental validation

BACKGROUND

A thorough understanding of cutting-edge geometry and cutting forces of hollow biopsy needles are required to optimise needle tip design to improve fine needle aspiration procedures.

OBJECTIVES

To incorporate the dynamics of needle motion in a model for flexible hollow bevel tipped needle insertion into a biological mimetic soft-gel using parameters obtained from experimental work. Additionally, the models will be verified against corresponding needle insertion experiments.

METHODS

To verify simulation results, needle deflection and insertion forces were compared with corresponding experimental results acquired with an in-house developed needle insertion mechanical system. Additionally, contact stress distribution on needles from agar gel for various time scales were also studied.

RESULTS

For the 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° bevel angle needles, and 90° blunt needle, the percentage error in needle deflection of each needle compared to experiments, were 7.3%, 9.9%, 8.6%, 7.8%, and 9.7% respectively. Varying the bevel angle at the needle tip demonstrates that the needle with a lower bevel angle produces the largest deflection, although the insertion force does not vary too much among the tested bevel angles.

CONCLUSION

This experimentally verified computer-based simulation model could be used as an alternative tool for better understanding the needle-tissue interaction to optimise needle tip design towards improved biopsy efficiency.

Comparison of a coaxial versus non-coaxial liver biopsy technique in an oncological setting: diagnostic yield, complications and seeding risk

Objectives

Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) poses specific challenges in oncological patients such as bleeding and tumour seeding. This study’s aim was to compare a coaxial (C-PLB) and non-coaxial (NC-PLB) biopsy technique in terms of diagnostic yield, safety and seeding risk of image-guided PLB techniques in an oncological setting.

Methods

Local research committee approval was obtained for this single-site retrospective study. Patients who underwent a PLB between November 2011 and December 2017 were consecutively included. Medical records were reviewed to determine diagnostic yield and complications. Follow-up imaging was re-reviewed for seeding, defined as visible tumour deposits along the PLB track. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were performed to investigate differences between biopsy techniques in sample number, complications and seeding rate.

Results

In total, 741 patients (62 ± 13 years, 378 women) underwent 932 PLB (C-PLB 72.9% (679/932); NC-PLB 27.1% (253/932)). More tissue cores (p < 0.001) were obtained with C-PLB (median 4 cores; range 1–12) compared with NC-PLB (2 cores; range 1–4) and diagnostic yield was similar for both techniques (C-PLB 92.6% (629/679); NC-PLB 92.5% (234/253); p = 0.940). Complication rate (9.3%; 87/932) using C-PLB (8.2% (56/679)) was lower compared with NC-PLB (12.3% (31/253); p = 0.024). Major complications were uncommon (C-PLB 2.7% (18/679); NC-PLB 2.8% (7/253)); bleeding developed in 1.2% (11/932; C-PLB 1.2% (8/679); NC-PLB 1.2% (3/253)). Seeding was a rare event, occurring significantly less in C-PLB cases (C-PLB 1.3% (7/544); NC-PLB 3.1% (6/197); p = 0.021).

Conclusions

C-PLB allows for high diagnostic tissue yield with a lower complication and seeding rate than a NC-PLB and should be the preferred method in an oncological setting.

Key Points

• A coaxial percutaneous liver biopsy achieves a significant higher number of cores and fewer complications than a non-coaxial biopsy technique.

• The risk of tumour seeding is very low and is significantly lower using the coaxial biopsy technique.

• In this study, a larger number of cores (median = 4) could be safely acquired using the coaxial technique, providing sufficient material for advanced molecular analysis.

Lung and Abdominal Biopsies in the Age of Precision Medicine

Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsies (PNBs) are one of the most common procedures performed in radiology departments today. Rapid developments in precision medicine, which identifies molecular and genomic biomarkers in cancers, have ushered a new paradigm of oncologic workup and treatment. PNB has conventionally been used to establish a benign or malignant nature of a lesion during initial diagnosis or in suspected metastatic or recurrent disease. However, increasing amounts of tissue are being required to meet the demands of molecular pathologic analysis, which are now being sought at multiple time points during the course of the disease to guide targeted therapy. As primary providers of biopsy, radiologists must be proactive in these developments to improve diagnostic yield and tissue acquisition in PNB. Herein, we discuss the important and expanding role of PNB in the age of precision medicine and review the technical considerations of percutaneous lung and intra-abdominal biopsy. Finally, we examine promising state-of-the-art techniques in PNB that may safely increase tissue acquisition for optimal molecular pathologic analysis.

Needle Biopsy Adequacy in the Era of Precision Medicine and Value-Based Health Care

CONTEXT.—

Needle biopsy of diseased tissue is an essential diagnostic tool that is becoming even more important as precision medicine develops. However, the capability of this modality to efficiently provide samples adequate for diagnostic and prognostic analysis remains quite limited relative to current diagnostic needs. For physicians and patients, inadequate biopsy frequently leads to diagnostic delay, procedure duplication, or insufficient information about tumor biology leading to delay in treatment; for health systems, this results in substantial incremental costs and inefficient use of scarce specialized diagnostic resources.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review current needle biopsy technology, devices, and practice with a perspective to identify current limitations and opportunities for improvement in the context of advancing precision medicine.

DATA SOURCES.—

PubMed searches of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy devices and similar technologies were made generally, by tissue site, and by adequacy as well as by health economics of these technologies.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Needle biopsy adequacy can be improved by recognizing the importance of this diagnostic tool by promoting common criteria for needle biopsy adequacy; by optimizing needle biopsy procedural technique, technologies, clinical practice, professional education, and quality assurance; and by bundling biopsy procedure costs with downstream diagnostic modalities to provide better accountability and incentives to improve the diagnostic process.