Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Association between aortomesenteric angle and symptomatic spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection

The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the aortomesenteric angle (AMA) and the occurrence and image characteristics of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD). This is a single-centre retrospective case-control study. Between January 1 2013 and December 13 2022, consecutive patients with computed tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed symptomatic SISMAD were included. Controls were selected with 1:1 matches in patients with CTA of the superior mesenteric artery but without SISMAD using propensity score matching for age, sex, and body mass index. Patient demographics, symptoms, and dissection characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between AMA and SISMAD. The study also evaluated the association between AMA and SISMAD using restricted cubic splines (RCS). The associations between AMA and the characteristics of SISMAD were evaluated. One hundred and five SISMAD patients (mean age, 54.8 ± 8.9 years) were included, and most patients were male (87.6%). Univariable analysis revealed hypertension, hyperlipemia, and AMA (all p < .001) were associated with SISMAD. An increasing AMA (adjusted OR, 1.03 per 1 ° increase in angulation) and hypertension (adjusted OR, 3.52) were identified as risk factors for SISMAD. Compared with small AMA level (< 50°), intermediate (50-71°) (adjusted OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.23-5.58; p = .013) and large angle level (> 71°) (adjusted OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 2.07-9.82; p < .001) were significantly associated with SISMAD. No obvious associations between AMA and the SISMAD imaging characteristics were found. Greater AMA and hypertension were independent risk factors for SISMAD.

Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Arterial Dissection Treated with a Coronary Covered Stent: A Case Report

Spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery is rare with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms. The management of isolated dissections mainly depends on the clinical symptomatology and imaging presentation. This case report describes a 51-year-old male presenting with persistent abdominal pain. Computed tomography angiography revealed an isolated superior mesenteric arterial dissection associated with severe true lumen stenosis and thrombosed false lumen with an ulcer-like projection. Definitive treatment was performed with a coronary covered stent to reopen the true lumen and completely exclude the false lumen.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between medical or/and endovascular therapy in spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection patients without bowel ischemia

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the clinical results of endovascular intervention for spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) and its impact on superior mesenteric artery (SMA) remodeling in comparison to solely medical management.

METHODS

All patients with SISMAD between January 2015 and August 2023 were included. The primary endpoints were the absence of major adverse events (MAEs), including dissection-related mortality, recurrence of mesenteric ischemia symptoms, and the necessity for intervention. The secondary endpoints were stenosis or occlusion of the SMA and morphologic remodeling of the dissections.

RESULTS

A total of 217 SISMAD patients were included. In this study, 127 (58.5 %) patients received medical management alone (conservative group), and 90 (41.5 %) underwent endovascular therapy (EVT group). In the EVT group, the technical success rate was 94.4 % (85/90). During follow-up, 13 (6.0 %) patients experienced MAEs, and 1 patient in the conservative group death related to SISMAD. The patients in EVT group showed more complete remodeling than those in the conservative group (76 (84.4 %) vs 66 (52.0 %), P < .0001). Survival analysis showed that the estimated MAEs-free survival rates were97.8 %, 95.6 %, and 95.6 % in EVT group and 98.4 %, 94.5 %, 92.9 % in conservative group at one, two, and three years, respectively. No significant difference was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that both endovascular treatment and medical management alone yield comparable rates of MAE-free survival among patients with SISMAD. Additionally, endovascular therapy exhibits a higher rate of complete remodeling and greater freedom from stenosis or occlusion of the SMA.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in endograft therapy for spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection

The role of endovascular stent therapy (EST) in the treatment of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) has gained momentum in recent years but remains controversial. We gathered research examining the advantages and disadvantages of EST for SISMAD patients. Primary outcomes involved both immediate and long-term results. Random or fixed effect models were used for effect size (ES) calculation with 95% confidence interval (CI) based on 50% heterogeneity threshold. Our analysis incorporated data from 21 studies including 611 SISMAD cases treated by EST. Our findings show a complication rate of approximately 1% following EST (95%CI 0.01-0.02, I2 = 0%, P = 0.97), with a bare minimum mortality rate of < 1% (95%CI 0.00-0.01, I2 = 0%, P > 0.05) and a reintervention rate of < 1% (95%CI 0.00-0.01, I2 = 0%, P = 0.89). We also found technique success and symptom resolution approaching 94% and 99%, respectively, in the immediate postoperative phase. In the long run, we observed a recurrence of symptoms at 3% (95%CI 0.00-0.06, I2 = 58.6%, P < 0.01), creation of new dissections at 1% (95%CI 0.00-0.02, I2 = 0%, P = 0.73), aneurysm progression at 2% (95%CI 0.00-0.03, I2 = 42.7%, P = 0.12), reintervention due to complications at 3% (95%CI 0.00-0.05, I2 = 0%, P = 0.43) and stenotic stents at 12% (95%CI 0.04-0.23, I2 = 77.5%, P < 0.01). Nevertheless, high levels of stent patency 98% (95% CI 0.97-1.00, I2 = 0%, P = 0.51) and complete remodeling 88% (95% CI 0.82-0.94, I2 = 65.5%, P < 0.05) were observed postoperatively. Overall, EST presents minimal complications and promising long-term outcomes for SISMAD, although the prevalence of stent stenosis requires further attention.

Midterm Results of the Conservative, Bare Stent, and Bare Stent-Assisted Coiling Treatments for Symptomatic Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection

BACKGROUND

We compared the early and midterm (31, 3-63 months) outcomes of conservative treatment, bare stent treatment (BST), and bare stent-assisted coiling treatment (BSACT) to determine the most effective treatment for patients with symptomatic isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with SISMAD admitted to the study hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Their demographic data, clinical findings, treatment options, early outcomes, and follow-up results were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were included in the study (23 with conservative treatment, 42 with BST, and 56 with BSACT). Symptoms were relieved in 91.3% of conservative patients, whereas all patients (100%) with BST or BSACT had symptom relief (P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the 2 endovascular treatments (P = 0.9051), but hospital stay was significantly shorter compared to conservative treatment (P < 0.0001). The cumulative rate of complete remodeling was 100% for BSACT versus 46.3% for BST (P < 0.0001) versus 42.9% for conservative patients (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the last 2 groups (P = 0.3925). The prevalence of adverse events for abdominal pain recurrence and aneurysm formation was also significantly lower in the BSACT group at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

BSACT for SISMAD has a preferable early outcome. The cumulative complete remodeling rate and the event-free survival rate are satisfactory at midterm follow-up. BSACT is an effective approach for SISMAD.

Endovascular treatment of systematic isolated mesenteric artery dissection with a patent false lumen: Bare stents alone versus stent-assisted coiling

OBJECTIVES

Bare stent treatment and bare stent-assisted coiling treatment have not been directly compared in symptomatic isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection with a patent false lumen. Thus, we compared the early and mid-term outcomes of bare stent treatment and bare stent-assisted coiling treatment to determine the most effective remedy for patients with this condition.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with systematic isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection with a patent false lumen admitted to the study hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Their demographic data, clinical findings, treatment options, early outcomes, and follow-up results were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients (83 men) were included. 34.1% (n = 29) adopted bare stent treatment and 65.9% (n = 56) underwent bare stent-assisted coiling treatment. The symptoms were relieved in all patients (100%) with bare stent treatment and bare stent-assisted coiling treatment. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two endovascular treatments (p = 0.354). The cumulative complete remodeling rate was 100% in bare stent-assisted coiling treatment vs. 70.4% in bare stent treatment (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of adverse events for abdominal pain recurrence (none in BST or bare stent-assisted coiling treatment), and formation of the aneurysm (two in bare stent treatment, and none in bare stent-assisted coiling treatment) showed no significant difference at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Both bare stent treatment and bare stent-assisted coiling treatment for symptomatic isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection with a patent false lumen have the same satisfying early outcome. In the midterm follow-up, bare stent-assisted coiling treatment has the higher cumulative complete remodeling rate which could be prioritized to treat this condition.

Volumetric Analysis of Progressive Remodeling of Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection Treated by Conservative Therapy

PURPOSE

To characterize remodeling of conservatively treated isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) using 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with Type I/II (classification of Yun) treated by conservative therapy between January 2018 and January 2020 were prospectively included. Semiautomatic morphological analysis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) included volumetric measurements of the true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL), and overall lumen (OL) and 3D aortomesenteric angles from computed tomography angiography data at admission (T0), 1 month (T1), and 12 months (T12). The SMA morphology of patients with IMAD (n = 15, mean age 53 years ± 7; 87% men) was also compared with that of control individuals (n = 51, mean age 56 years ± 4; 94% men).

RESULTS

A significant reduction in OL volume was observed (P <.001), whereas TL volume remained stable (P =.23). The TL/OL volume ratio significantly increased over time (P =.001) from 53% at T1 to 78% at T12. Aortomesenteric 3D angles at 2, 4, and 6 cm from the ostium showed a progressive decrease toward values observed in the control group (P =.013, P =.002, and P =.027, respectively). At T12, 5 patients (33%) had complete remodeling, and aneurysmal change was observed in 2 patients (<20 mm). Smoking and SMA angle at a distance of 6 cm from the ostium (T0) were the only factors affecting remodeling negatively at T12.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year remodeling in IMAD followed an overall decrease in OL volume related to a decrease in FL volume. Smokers and patients with larger SMA angles at baseline showed poorer remodeling. Spontaneous arterial remodeling in IMAD might favor conservative therapy.

Acute Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection: Four Year Experience From a French Intestinal Stroke Centre

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report outcomes of patients with symptomatic acute isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) treated within a French intestinal stroke centre (ISC).

METHODS

All patients with symptomatic IMAD referred to the ISC from January 2016 to January 2020 were included prospectively. Patients with aortic dissection and asymptomatic IMAD were not included. The standardised medical protocol included anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, gastrointestinal resting, and oral antibiotics. Operations were considered for acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI).

RESULTS

Among the 453 patients admitted to an ISC during the study period, 34 (median age, 53 years [41 - 67]; 82% men) with acute symptomatic IMAD were included. According to the classification of Yun et al., IMADs were reported as follows: type I (n = 7, 20%), type IIa (n = 6, 18%), type IIb (n = 15, 44%), and type III (i.e., complete superior mesenteric artery [SMA] occlusion; n = 6, 18%). Overall, nine (26%) patients had AMI (type I/II, n = 3; type III, n = 6). On initial computerised tomography angiogram, nine (26%) patients had an associated visceral arterial dissection or pseudoaneurysm. All patients with types I/II (n = 28, 82%) followed a favourable clinical course with conservative therapy, with no need for any operation. All patients with type III (n = 6, 18%) underwent urgent laparotomy with SMA revascularisation (open, n = 4; stenting, n = 1) and or bowel resection (early, n = 3; late, n = 1). Rates of intestinal resection and short bowel syndrome were 12% and 8.8%, respectively. After a median follow up of 26 months [18 - 42], recurrence of symptoms occurred in four (12%) patients and aneurysmal change in 14 (41%), with no re-intervention.

CONCLUSION

Although IMAD was associated with a high frequency of AMI, a standardised protocol produced a low rate of intestinal resection. Conservative therapy seems appropriate in types I/II patients, whereas urgent SMA revascularisation should aim to avoid intestinal resection or death in type III patients.

Long-term outcome of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection in different angiographic types

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the follow-up and outcomes of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) in different angiographic types and to determine the optimal therapeutic options for SISMAD patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 61 SISMAD patients between December 2010 and January 2019 in a single center. Data analysis consisted of demographics, clinical data, radiology review, treatment, follow-up, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 61 SISMAD patients were reviewed in this study. Median age was 53 (quartile, 47.5-63.0), 90.2% were males with hypertension (50.8%), dyslipidaemia (54.1%), and smoking history (60.7%). Among all, 43 patients underwent periodic follow-up of computed tomography (CT) angiography for follow-up analysis. 11 (25.6%) patients showed "No Change" during follow-up, including 6 type I patients. 23 patients (53.5%) were "Partially Remodelled" and 18 of them were type II patients. 7 "Completely Remodelled" patients (16.3%) were all in type II group. Two type III patients (4.6%) died after the emergent surgical intervention within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Different SISMAD angiographic types present with variant progression. Type I SISMAD may be inclined to remain "unchanged." Type II SISMAD shows a clear trend to remodeling, especially type IIb patients. The progression of type III SISMAD varies in the extent of collateral bypasses.

Results Obtained with the Protege EverFlex Self-expanding Bare Stent in Interventional Treatment of Spontaneous Isolated Visceral Artery Dissection

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the early and midterm results of the endovascular approach with a certain type of bare stent to treat spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection (SIVAD).

METHODS

28 patients with symptomatic SIVAD were selected from two hospitals from July 2014 to September 2020. All patients had symptoms of acute persistent abdominal pain accompanied by varying degrees of nausea and vomiting. The diagnosis of SIVAD was made according to the multidetector CT angiography (CTA) findings. We retrospectively analyzed the patients' medical records. According to our previous clinical experience, the Protege EverFlex self-expanding bare stent was used in these patients, and we subsequently followed up the patients to record and analyze their outcomes after surgery. The imaging results before and after the operations were compared.

RESULTS

All 28 patients were successfully implanted with Protege EverFlex stents. The true lumen blood flow of the SIVAD recovered during the operation. The residual stenosis rate was less than 30%, and the technical success rate was 100%. There were no complications, such as bleeding, intestinal necrosis, digestive tract perforation, liver failure or spleen infarction. The abdominal pain was relieved or eliminated in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The Protege EverFlex self-expanding bare stent and the endovascular approach could be a minimally invasive, safe and effective treatment method for SIVAD with a high success rate and a relatively low price.

Management of Spontaneous Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review

Background and Aims:

There are increasing reports on case series on spontaneous isolated mesenteric artery dissection, that is, dissections of the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery, mainly due to improved diagnostic capacity of high-resolution computed tomography angiography performed around the clock. A few case–control studies are now available, while randomized controlled trials are awaited.

Material and Methods:

The present systematic review based on 97 original studies offers a comprehensive overview on risk factors, management, conservative therapy, morphological modeling of dissection, and prognosis.

Results and Conclusions:

Male gender, hypertension, and smoking are risk factors for isolated mesenteric artery dissection, while the frequency of diabetes mellitus is reported to be low. Large aortomesenteric angle has also been considered to be a factor for superior mesenteric artery dissection. The overwhelming majority of patients can be conservatively treated without the need of endovascular or open operations. Conservative therapy consists of blood pressure lowering therapy, analgesics, and initial bowel rest, whereas there is no support for antithrombotic agents. Complete remodeling of the dissection after conservative therapy was found in 43% at mid-term follow-up. One absolute indication for surgery and endovascular stenting of the superior mesenteric artery is development of peritonitis due to bowel infarction, which occurs in 2.1% of superior mesenteric artery dissections and none in celiac artery dissections. The most documented end-organ infarction in celiac artery dissections is splenic infarctions, which occurs in 11.2%, and is a condition that should be treated conservatively. The frequency of ruptured pseudoaneurysm in the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery dissection is very rare, 0.4%, and none of these patients were in shock at presentation. Endovascular therapy with covered stents should be considered in these patients.

Uncovered stent insertion for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to describe our clinical outcomes in isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SMAD) patients that underwent uncovered stent insertion.Between January 2016 and August 2019, consecutive isolated SMAD patients at our center were treated via uncovered stent insertion. Both short- and long-term outcomes in these patients were analyzed.Over the course of the study period, 11 total isolated SMAD patients meeting the criteria for stent insertion at our hospital were treated via uncovered stent insertion. Stent placement across the SMAD site was successful in all patients, with 1 stent being used per patient. There were no instances of procedure-related complications, and the median operative duration was 60 minutes. Patency of the distal superior mesenteric artery and branches thereof was achieved in all cases. Patients experienced progressive SMAD-related symptom relief and were followed for 6 to 49 months (median: 22 months). Over this follow-up period, the obliteration of the dissection was observed within 3 months in all patients. We did not detect any instances of stent occlusion, bowel ischemia, or anti-platelet-related bleeding during the follow-up period.Uncovered stent insertion can achieve favorable short- and long-term outcomes in isolated SMAD patients.

Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection

Introduction

Isolated dissection of visceral artery organs is very infrequently reported and when it occurs it mostly affects the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with abdominal pain as the commonest presenting symptom. However, the best therapeutic strategy in symptomatic patients has not yet been established.

Aim

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD).

Material and methods

We reviewed patients who had SISMAD and received conservative, bare stent and coil assisting bare stent as a primary treatment between 2014 and 2018. Patient demographics, symptoms, angiographic findings and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 62 patients was found to have SISMAD among whom 83.9% (n = 52) were male and 16% (n = 10) were female with the mean age of 52.55 ±7.22 years, range 33–77. 22.6% (n = 14) received conservative, 62.9% (n = 39) endovascular bare stent and 14. Four percent (n = 9) endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatment. The success rate in primary treatment was conservative 78.5% (n = 11), bare stent 97.4% (n = 38), coil assisting bare stent 100% (n = 9). The mean follow-up duration (months) was 28.76 ±12.87.

Conclusions

Endovascular bare stent placement is a safe, effective, and successful treatment in the management of symptomatic SISMAD. The diagnostic imaging result is a key point for planning appropriate treatment especially in patients with tapered vessels, longer dissection lesion, and dissection aneurysm where coil assisting bare stent shows good results. Conservative treatment should be given priority for the asymptomatic patient, but close monitoring is highly recommended.

Management of Symptomatic Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Single Centre Experience with Mid Term Follow Up

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report a single centre management experience and mid term outcomes for symptomatic spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. Between 1 August 2012, and 30 June 2018, consecutive patients with symptomatic SISMAD were included. Patient demographics, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, risk factors, and dissection characteristics were obtained. The treatment regimens and clinical and follow up outcomes were reviewed and analysed. A chi square test, Fisher's exact test, or one way analysis of variance was used to compare variables between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to determine predictive factors for failed conservative treatment. The cumulative rate of complete dissection remodelling was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (mean age, 56.0 ± 9.3 years) were included. Patients at risk of intestinal ischaemia or dissecting aneurysm rupture were considered to be high risk patients (Group 1, n = 16) and received primary endovascular treatment. The remaining patients were considered low risk (Group 2, n = 46) and received primary conservative treatment. Symptom relief was observed in 82.6% of patients in Group 2. Finally, failed conservative treatment was observed in 50% of the low risk patients. Dissection length ≥50 mm was an independent risk factor for failed conservative treatment (p = .019; OR 4.68, 95% CI 1.29-16.98). During a median follow up of 30.5 months (interquartile range, 17.5, 58.3), patients with stents had a higher complete dissection remodelling rate than those without stents.

CONCLUSION

This study found that conservative treatment showed satisfactory symptom resolution for low risk SISMAD patients. Endovascular stenting was associated with a high technical success and dissection remodelling rate. This treatment modality might be reserved for patients with high risk SISMAD or failed conservative treatment. In addition, a dissection length ≥50 mm was a risk factor for failed conservative treatment.

The impact of endovascular treatment on clinical outcomes of stable symptomatic patients with spontaneous superior mesenteric artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for superior mesenteric artery dissection (SMAD) and its effect on superior mesenteric artery (SMA) remodeling compared with medical management alone after successful initial medical management.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, all patients with spontaneous SMAD at a single institution were identified from March 2007 to August 2019. The primary outcomes were freedom from major adverse events (MAEs, a composite of dissection-related death, the recurrence of mesenteric ischemia symptoms, and a requirement for intervention). The secondary outcomes were morphologic remodeling of the dissections and stenosis or occlusion of the SMA.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients with SMAD who underwent successful initial medical management (91 males; mean age, 50.4 ± 6.3 years) were enrolled in the study. Fifty-seven (60.6%) received medical management alone, and 37 (39.4%) underwent endovascular repair after initial medical management. In the endovascular group, the technical success rate was 86.5% (32 of 37). During a mean follow-up period of 33.6 ± 26.2 months (range, 1-120 months), nine (9.6%) patients experienced a recurrence of abdominal pain, and six had additional interventions for SMAD. The patients in the endovascular group showed more complete or partial remodeling (22 [81.1%] vs 24 [44.4%]; P < .0001) or unchanged dissections (5 [13.5%] vs 23 [42.6%]; P = .0001) than those in the conservative group. Survival analysis showed that the estimated MAE-free survival rates were 95.6%, 88.9%, and 85.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There was a higher freedom from SMA stenosis or occlusion in the endovascular group (log rank P = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment and medical management alone result in similar MAE-free survival for patients with SMAD after successful initial medical management. Moreover, endovascular therapy is associated with a higher complete remodeling rate and greater freedom from SMA stenosis or occlusion.

Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: CTA features and clinical relevance

PURPOSE

To determine the detailed computed tomography angiography (CTA) features of isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD), aiming to improve the current understanding of ISMAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 57 patients with confirmed diagnoses of ISMAD with CTA from June 2011 to June 2018 in our hospital. The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) angle, entry site of dissection, and features of both false and true lumen were analyzed individually.

RESULTS

In general, middle-aged men with atherosclerosis (42.1%), hypertension (35.3%), or long-term smoking (33.3%) were the main populations. 80.7% of patients can be discharged successfully after conservative treatment. 87% of patients had a right (or almost right) SMA angle, and the entry site of dissection in 90% of patients occurred in the curved segment of the SMA. As a polymorphic disease, we can use the coded CTA features to delineate individual cases, including cases beyond the presenting classification systems. The diameter of the true lumen is the only different CTA feature between the conservative treatment group and the interventional treatment group (p = 0.000). The re-entry site (p = 0.501), thrombosis in the false lumen (p = 0.135), the distance between the entry site of dissection and SMA root (p = 0.133), and SMA branch involvement (p = 0.322) had no difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on CTA analysis, the bending area, especially in the SMA with right or nearly right SMA angle, is the most vulnerable anatomical region for the occurrence of ISMAD. The diameter of true lumen is the determined CTA feature for the decision of treatment. CTA should be recommended as a standardized diagnostic and classification tool for ISMAD.

Endovascular Management of Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissecting Aneurysm by Retrograde Catheterization Via Collaterals from the Celiac Artery

Isolated superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissecting aneurysm is frequently symptomatic and potentially catastrophic; thus, it usually requires endovascular treatment. The endovascular management can be challenging in certain cases as catheterization of the collapsed true lumen is often very difficult. This case report is to describe a new approach for catheterization of the true lumen of the SMA in a case of isolated SMA dissecting aneurysm. A 63-year-old male with an SMA dissecting aneurysm underwent stent-graft placement for treatment. Catheterization of the true lumen via the anterograde approach was unsuccessful because of angulation and collapse of the SMA true lumen as a result of the dissecting aneurysm. A guidewire was passed through the collaterals from the celiac artery and retrogradely passed across the collapsed SMA true lumen into the aorta. We then used a snare that had been delivered through the contralateral femoral access to capture and retrieve the guidewire. A delivery system was advanced into the SMA, and a stent graft was successfully deployed to occlude the dissecting aneurysm. This report introduces a new feasible retrograde approach that provides access to the SMA true lumen via celiac collaterals in cases of difficult antegrade catheterization of an SMA dissecting aneurysm.

Long-term outcomes of conservative treatment and endovascular treatment in patients with symptomatic spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) is a rare vascular disorder, and the treatment strategies remain controversial. This study aimed to compare outcomes of conservative and endovascular treatments in symptomatic patients with SISMAD.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive SISMAD patients who were admitted to a single center between October 2009 and May 2018 were enrolled in this study. Based on their symptoms, 15 had conservative treatment, and 27 had endovascular treatment. The baseline characteristics, treatments, and follow-up results of the conservative group and endovascular group were analysed.

RESULTS

The rates of symptom relief were 93.3% in the conservative group and 96.3% in the endovascular group. The procedure-related complications in the endovascular group included one case of pseudoaneurysm formation in the left brachial artery. During the follow-up period (median 28.5 months), a higher proportion of patients in the conservative group had symptom recurrence (42.9% in the conservative group versus 4.8% in the endovascular group, p < 0.001). Four patients in the conservative group and one patient in the endovascular group had additional endovascular intervention during follow-up. Compared with the conservative group, patients in the endovascular group had statistically significantly longer symptom-free survival (p = 0.014) and a higher rate of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) remodeling (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For symptomatic SISMAD, endovascularly treated patients had a lower rate of symptom recurrence and a higher rate of SMA remodeling in the long term. Prospective, multi-center studies are needed to confirm the long-term outcomes of both treatments.

Accurate diagnosis and treatment of isolated mesenteric artery dissections

Objectives

Diagnosis and treatment of isolated mesenteric artery dissections (IMAD) are overlooked. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical feature, possible diagnostic errors and treatment methods.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2017, 99 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with IMAD on computed tomography angiography were enrolled retrospectively. Thirty-nine misdiagnosed patients, false negative, and 60 accurate diagnosis patients with revealed IMAD were compared. In addition, therapeutic schemes were evaluated.

Results

Ninety-nine patients participated in this study; 39 patients (34 men, 5 women; median age, 51.41 years, range 38–64 years) were included in group A who were misdiagnosed initial visit; the remaining 60 patients (52 men, 8 women; median age, 52.07 years, range 38–68 years) with IMAD who were diagnosed accurately initial visit were included in group B. Significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to dissection length (55.26 ± 3.88 mm vs. 43.37 ± 2.75 mm; p = 0.01), and branch involvement (14 and 9, respectively; p = 0.04). Ultimately, 33 patients (group A 14 patients and group B 19 patients) underwent invasive interventional therapy, and 66 patients with conservative treatment with antithrombotic agents (group A 25 patients and group B 41 patients). A total of 86 (86.87%) had follow-up computed tomography angiography with a median duration of 24.51 months (range 2–71 months). Three patients died during follow-up. The remaining patients recovered smoothly.

Conclusion

Physicians should raise the awareness of IMAD and use the optimal treatment time frame. Diagnosis of IMAD depends on imaging examinations, especially computed tomography angiography. Additionally, conservative management is the most common initial treatment. For patients in whom conservative treatment fails, endovascular and/or surgery may be necessary.

Endovascular Bare Stenting for Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection

Purpose:

To investigate the clinical outcomes of endovascular bare stenting in patients with symptomatic isolated superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection (ISMAD).

Methods:

This study was a retrospective analysis which included a total of 9 patients with symptomatic ISMAD (7 males and 2 females, age range: 48-67 years) who were treated with endovascular bare stenting. Data regarding basic patient clinical characteristics, e-technical success of the operation, and long-term patient outcomes were assessed.

Results:

Endovascular bare stenting was found to be technically successful in all patients. A total of 9 stents were inserted in these 9 patients. Five patients presented with stable false lumen and 4 patients presented with shrinking of false lumen after stenting. Both the trunk and branches of the SMA remained patent in all patients after stent insertion. There was no incidence of procedure-related complications, with all patients experiencing progressive symptom relief and subsequent symptom abatement within 1 week of the operation. Over a median 24 month follow-up period (range: 12-36 months), abdominal computed tomographic angiography revealed that all patients had obliterated dissections. In addition, there were no instances of stent obstruction, intestinal necrosis, or antiplatelet related bleeding during the follow-up period.

Conclusions:

Endovascular bare stenting was found to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with ISMAD.

Endovascular stent placement for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection with intestinal ischaemia

BACKGROUND

Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) is rare, especially when associated with intestinal ischaemia. We report our clinical experience managing this condition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records from 22 patients with ISMAD and intestinal ischaemia were retrospectively analysed. Conservative treatment was given to all patients as first line therapy. Subsequently, 15 patients received endovascular stent placement and three patients received endovascular stent placement plus intestinal resection and anastomosis.

RESULTS

After conservative treatment, the symptoms of three patients were remarkably relieved; however, a repeat contrast CT showed that stenosis was aggravated. Hence, endovascular stent placement was performed in all 15 patients. Enteral nutrition was successfully restored in 12 patients. Three patients showed signs of chronic intestinal ischaemia, including peritonitis and ileus. These patients underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis. Enteral nutrition was restored at postoperative week two. No signs of intestinal ischaemia recurred during two-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend endovascular stent placement as a feasible, effective, and minimally invasive procedure in patients with ISMAD and symptoms of intestinal ischaemia.

Endovascular Treatment of Patients with Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection Aneurysm: Bare Stents Alone Versus Stent Assisted Coiling

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular treatment with bare stents alone versus stent assisted coiling in isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) aneurysms.

METHODS

Patients with an IMAD aneurysm who underwent endovascular stenting between February 2010 and February 2017 at one of three institutions were included in this study. Data regarding technical success, procedure time, symptom resolution, complications, changes in IMAD aneurysm, and stent patency were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (35 men) were included, 27 treated with bare stents alone and 11 treated with stent assisted coiling. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients treated with bare stents and in 81.8% of those treated with stent assisted coiling (p = 0.078). The mean procedure times were 62.6 ± 5.3 min for treatment with bare stents and 116.4 ± 8.4 min for stent assisted coiling (p < 0.001). A total of 23 patients had persistent symptoms before stenting; all symptoms were resolved within 3.0 ± 0.7 days. No procedure related major complications occurred. Over 30.2 ± 18.1 months of follow up, complete resolution of the IMAD aneurysm was achieved in all patients; good stent patency and in stent re-stenosis were achieved in 65.8% and 34.2% patients, respectively. There were no occlusions of the stented arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Bare stents alone and stent assisted coiling have high technical success rates and demonstrate good intermediate patency in patients with an IMAD aneurysm. Bare stents alone may serve as an alternative to stent assisted coiling for the management of IMAD aneurysm.