Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Juxta-Cardiac Hepatic Tumours

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Adjacent versus Nonadjacent to the Diaphragm

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) adjacent versus nonadjacent to the diaphragm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively created MWA database, from 2 prospective clinical trials for patients with CLM treated in a single tertiary center from 2012 to 2023. CLM adjacent to the diaphragm was defined as a tumor located <1 cm from the diaphragm. Minimal ablation margin (MM) was calculated with 3-dimensional software using postablation contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 classification for 6 months.

RESULTS

Two hundred nine CLMs underwent 191 MWA sessions in 143 patients. Mean tumor diameter was 1.52 cm (SD ± 0.53). Eighty-three of 209 (39.7%) CLMs were adjacent to the diaphragm. There was no difference in local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) between CLMs adjacent and nonadjacent to the diaphragm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-1.16; P = .15). MMs of 5-10 mm and >10 mm were documented in 49.3% versus 46.8% (P = .83) and 21.6% versus 12.6% (P = .16) for CLMs adjacent versus nonadjacent to the diaphragm, respectively. Twelve-month LTPFS was similar between groups (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-1.16; P = .15) without local tumor progression for MM of >10 mm. There were 3 Grade IV adverse events: 1 diaphragmatic perforation, 1 liver abscess, and 1 biloma. Pneumothorax was associated with location adjacent to the diaphragm (P < .001) and transpulmonary approach (P < .001). Median length of hospital stay was 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-3 days) for patients who needed thoracostomy (n = 20, 9.6%) compared with 1 day (IQR, 1-8 days) for those who did not, without long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

MWA of CLM adjacent to the diaphragm is effective and safe, without difference in success and 12-month LTPFS. Pneumothorax was associated with location adjacent to the diaphragm and thoracostomy that resulted in longer hospitalization without long-term sequelae.

Safety of CT-Guided Microwave Ablation of Subcardiac Liver Tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of subcardiac hepatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 19 patients (11 males and 8 females, age: 64.0 years (IQR: 58.3, 71.0) who underwent CT-guided MWA of 22 subcardiac tumors from January 2016 through December 2020. The subcardiac tumors consisted of 6 hepatocellular carcinomas and 16 metastases. Hydrodissection or other thermal protection technique was not used during the ablation. Subcardiac ablation was defined as the ablation zone extended ≤ 0.5 cm from myocardium or coronary artery. The safety of MWA of subcardiac tumors was evaluated based on procedural and post-procedural complications and intra-procedural ECG changes. Local tumor progression (LTP) was also analyzed and correlated with tumor and ablation zone sizes.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy rate was 100%. The median follow-up was 20.5 months (IQR: 6.0, 29.8). There was no 30-day mortality. One grade 3 complication occurred (severe shoulder and chest pain), and there were 19 events of grade 1 or 2 complications. No instances of cardiac complications or significant procedural ECG changes were observed. There were 22 events of grade 1 and 2 laboratory toxicity and 1 event of grade 3 elevated bilirubin. The LTP was 13.6% at 1 year and 22.7% at 2 years. There was no significant correlation between LTP and tumor or ablation zone sizes.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided MWA of subcardiac hepatic tumors is safe, and MWA should be considered as an option for managing subcardiac tumors. LTP rates for MWA of subcardiac tumors may be inferior to ablation of tumors in common location.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Cohort Study.

Advanced Techniques in the Percutaneous Ablation of Liver Tumours

Percutaneous ablation is an accepted treatment modality for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases. The goal of curative ablation is to cause the necrosis of all tumour cells with an adequate margin, akin to surgical resection, while minimising local damage to non-target tissue. Aside from the ablative modality, the proceduralist must decide the most appropriate imaging modality for visualising the tumour and monitoring the ablation zone. The proceduralist may also employ protective measures to minimise injury to non-target organs. This review article discusses the important considerations an interventionalist needs to consider when performing the percutaneous ablation of liver tumours. It covers the different ablative modalities, image guidance, and protective techniques, with an emphasis on new and advanced ablative modalities and adjunctive techniques to optimise results and achieve satisfactory ablation margins.

Adjunctive hydrodissection of the bare area of liver during percutaneous thermal ablation of sub-cardiac hepatic tumours

OBJECTIVE

To report the technique of hydrodissection of the sub-diaphragmatic bare area of the liver, in order to protect the diaphragm/heart during percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) of sub-cardiac hepatic tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2018, five patients (four female, one male; mean age 56.2 years) with five sub-cardiac liver tumours (two hepatocellular carcinoma, three metastases; mean size 39 mm) abutting the bare area (segments II/IVA) with expected ablation zones ≤ 5 mm from the myocardium were treated with PTA and adjunctive hydrodissection. Time to perform hydrodissection, distance between superior hepatic and diaphragmatic/pericardial surfaces before and after hydrodissection, ablation efficacy, complications, and local tumour progression (LTP) at last imaging follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

Technical feasibility was 100%, with mean hydrodissection-volume of 126 ml (range 80-200 ml) and median hydrodissection-time of 9 min (range 8-45 min). Liver-diaphragmatic and liver-pericardial distance increased, respectively, from 2.4 mm (range 0-8 mm) to 10.8 mm (range 6-19 mm) and from 4 mm (range 1-10 mm) to 12.6 mm (range 8-20 mm) post-hydrodissection. All procedures were performed at full-power with complete tumour ablation and without complications (including peri-procedural haemodynamic/electrocardiographic disturbances, pericardial effusion and diaphragmatic hernia) or evidence of LTP at mean 12.2-month (range 1-26 month) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Hydrodissection of the sub-diaphragmatic bare area of the liver is technically feasible and may potentially optimize safety PTA of sub-cardiac hepatic tumours.

Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Argon-Helium Cryoablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Abutting the Diaphragm

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous argon-helium cryoablation (CA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) abutting the diaphragm (<5 mm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 61 consecutive patients (50 men, 11 women; mean age, 56.3 ± 12.1 years old; range, 32-83 years) with 74 HCC tumors (mean size, 3.3 ± 1.7 cm; range, 0.8-7 cm) who were treated with percutaneous argon-helium CA were enrolled in this retrospective study. Adverse events were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Local tumor progression (LTP) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The risk factors associated with OS and LTP were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

No periprocedural (30-day) deaths occurred. A total of 29 intrathoracic adverse events occurred in 24 of the 61 patients. Major adverse events were reported in 5 patients (pleural effusion requiring catheter drainage in 4 patients and pneumothorax requiring catheter placement in 1 patient). Median follow-up was 18.7 months (range, 2.3-60.0 months). Median time to LTP after CA was 20.9 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.1-30.6 months). Median times of OS after CA and diagnosis were 27.3 months (IQR, 15.1-45.1 months) and 40.9 months (interquartile range, 24.8-68.6 months), respectively. Independent prognostic factors for OS included tumor location (left lobe vs right lobe; hazard ratio [HR], 2.031; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.062-3.885; P = .032) and number of intrahepatic tumors (solitary vs multifocal; HR, 2.684; 95% CI, 1.322-5.447; P = .006). Independent prognostic factors for LTP included age (HR, 0.931; 95% CI, 0.900-0.963; P  < .001), guidance modality (ultrasound vs computed tomography and US; HR, 6.156 95% CI, 1.862-20.348; P  =   .003) and origin of liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous argon-helium CA is safe for the treatment of HCC abutting the diaphragm, with acceptable LTP and OS.

Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) for the treatment of subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods: From 2003 to 2018, 79 consecutive patients underwent 104 multi-probe SRFA sessions for the treatment of 114 subcardiac HCC with a median size of 2.5 cm (0.5-9.5 cm). The results were compared with a randomly selected control group of 79 patients with 242 HCC with a median size of 2.0 cm (0.5-12 cm) following SRFA in other (non-subcardiac) locations with propensity score matching. Results: The 95.6% of the tumors were successfully treated by the first ablation session (primary technical efficacy rate) and 99.1% after the second session (secondary technical efficacy rate). Local tumor recurrence developed in 8 nodules (7.0%). Major complication and perioperative mortality rates were 7.7% (8/104) and 1% (1/104), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rates from the date of the first SRFA with single subcardiac HCCs were 92%, 77% and 65% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with a median OS of 90.6 months. The disease-free survival (DFS) after SRFA was 75, 34 and 34%, at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with a median DFS of 19.1 months. There was no statistically significant difference with the control group in terms of local tumor control, safety, OS and DFS. Conclusion: SRFA of subcardiac tumors is as safe and efficacious as when treating tumors remote from the heart.

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Cryoablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas Adjacent to the Heart

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of the left subdiaphragmatic small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) adjacent to the heart.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2013 and March 2018, 189 consecutive patients underwent cryoablation for small HCCs (≤3 cm); 70 patients (mean: 61.3 ± 10.6 years of age; range: 40-82 years) with left hepatic tumors (22 juxtacardiac and 48 nonjuxtacardiac tumors) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into juxtacardiac and nonjuxtacardiac tumor groups (tumor margins: ≤10 mm and >10 mm, respectively, from the heart border). The rates of technical success, complete ablation, complications, and local tumor recurrence (LTR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup differences were observed in the mean diameter of the tumor (17.9 ± 5.5 mm vs. 17.5 mm ± 5.2, respectively; P = 0.781) and of the ablation zone (41.3 ± 4.2 mm vs. 43.5 ± 5.8 mm, respectively; P = 0.115). Technical success was achieved in all patients. No procedure-related major complications occurred in either group. The median follow-up period was 15 months (range: 3.1-49.6 months). No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in the rates of complete ablation (90.9% vs. 93.8%, respectively; P = 0.646) and LTR (20% vs. 15.6%, respectively; P = 0.725).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoablation is a safe treatment modality for patients with juxtacardiac small HCCs, without an increased risk of cardiac complications compared to treatment of HCCs that are nonjuxtacardiac, and with comparable efficacy.

Eye Opener to EtOH Ablation for Juxta-Cardiac Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is notoriously refractory to systemic chemotherapy, mandating an interventional approach. Mortality may be avoided by neutralizing rapidly growing tumors that approach the heart and major vessels. When the risk/benefit ratio of surgery is unacceptable, percutaneous ablation can achieve remarkable results. High volumes of flowing blood adjacent to the treatment area may impact the ability to reliably achieve an adequate ablation margin for modalities that rely on extreme temperatures to destroy malignant cells. Ethanol ablation is safe, efficacious, and unaffected by this "thermal sink" effect. This report describes a juxta-cardiac (JC) HCC in segment 4a measuring 35 × 26 mm, which exhibited rapid growth until it was abutting the pericardium and 7.5 mm from the chamber of the right ventricle (RV).

Methods

One 21-gauge needle was inserted using direct CT fluoroscopy into the center of the hepatic mass. In order to confirm the position of the needle, 0.5 mL of diluted Visipaque was injected. Then, under CT fluoroscopy guidance, a mixture of 1 mL of Ethiodol and 10 mL of 98% dehydrated alcohol was slowly injected into the mass.

Results

Repeat CT scan 1 month post-ablation demonstrated decreased arterial enhancement and dense Ethiodol throughout the tumor consistent with ablation. Tumor size decreased to 30 × 23 mm with a distance of 12.4 mm from the chamber of the RV.

Conclusion

Pericardial involvement or large vessels near the treatment area may limit the use of thermal ablation techniques for JC HCC. Percutaneous, intratumoral ethanol injection provides safe and effective alternative that is not subject to the "thermal sink" effect.