Survival and Tolerability of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Greater Versus less than 70 Years of Age Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis

A retrospective study of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib compared with TACE monotherapy for BCLC B2 stage hepatocellular carcinoma

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with lenvatinib (Len) plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and TACE alone in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B2 stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 66 patients with BCLC B2 stage HCC were retrospectively reviewed in the present study, of which 34 patients received Len + TACE, while 32 patients received TACE alone between May 2018 and May 2020. Survival outcome, tumor response and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two treatment groups. The 6-month, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher in the Len + TACE group (97.1, 85.3 and 76.3%, respectively) compared with those in the TACE group [(93.8, 81.1 and 45.4%, respectively); hazard ratio (HR), 0.395; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.180-0.867; P=0.023], but no significant difference in progression-free survival rate was observed between the two groups (HR, 0.815; 95% CI, 0.437-1.520; P=0.510). Patients receiving Len + TACE demonstrated a higher objective response rate compared with those receiving TACE alone (64.7 vs. 34.4%; P=0.014). Therefore, Len + TACE combination therapy was associated with increased OS and tumor response compared with that of TACE monotherapy in patients with BCLC B2 stage HCC. However, large-scale, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further confirm these results.

Safety and Effectiveness of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Aged Greater versus Less Than 80 Years

Background

Population aging has emerged as a pressing global concern and a significant medical challenge. The use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been extensively employed for managing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of TACE specifically in individuals aged 80 years and above.

Aim

To examine the safety and effectiveness of TACE in elderly patients (≥ 80 years) compared to younger patients (< 80 years) with HCC, and the potential risk factors that may impact the progression-free survival (PFS) for TACE were also identified.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a consecutive cohort of unresectable HCC patients who were initially treated with TACE. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the age at which they underwent TACE, and the efficacy and safety of the treatment were evaluated. The PFS was investigated, and the prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

A total of 198 patients were included in this study, with 44 patients aged 80 years or older and 154 patients younger than 80 years. The cumulative risk of PFS after TACE was similar between the two groups (P = 0.800). In the multivariate analysis, a lower ECOG score (P = 0.039) and an earlier BCLC stage (P = 0.004) were identified as independent predictors of better PFS. Patients in both groups tolerated the TACE treatment well.

Conclusion

The impact of aging on poor PFS is not significant. In patients with HCC, TACE therapy is both safe and effective for octogenarians, similar to younger patients. Furthermore, the better PFS is associated with a low ECOG score and an early BCLC stage.

Equal Efficacy and Safety Profile in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Palliative Treatment

Palliative treatment of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often challenging due to comorbidities or frailty, and data about the outcome and overall survival (OS) in these patients are limited. This was a retrospective single centre study. Patients were grouped according to their age as young (<60 years; YP), intermediate (60-70 years; IP) or elderly (>70 years; EP). Administration of chemotherapy or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was defined as palliative treatment. Therapy-related adverse events (AE) were assessed via CTCAE 5.0. Out of 656 patients analyzed, n = 359 received palliative treatment: YP: n = 90; IP: n = 127 and EP: n = 142. The median OS (months) in patients receiving TACE (n = 254) was 17 vs. 18 vs. 20 months for YP, IP, and EP, respectively (p = 0.44) and 15 vs. 16 vs. 17 months (p = 0.56), respectively, in patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 105). AEs differed non-significantly between the subgroups. Multivariate analysis revealed impaired liver function and advanced tumor stage as significant factors for impaired OS. In this study, the mOS and rate of AEs were equal between elderly and younger HCC patients receiving palliative treatment. Therefore, we propose regular palliative treatment stratification in spite of the high age of patients.