Comparison of Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Transarterial Ethanol Ablation for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≥ 10 cm) in Tumour Response and Long-Term Survival Outcome

Outcomes of Transarterial Hepatic Embolization versus Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Treatment of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma >7 cm

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of transarterial hepatic embolization (TAE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >7 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with HCC >7 cm who were treated with TAE or TARE between January 2013 and December 2023 were reviewed in this retrospective study. Nearest neighbor 2:1 propensity score matching was utilized for direct comparison. Radiological treatment response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Log-rank tests were performed to compare survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients with HCC >7 cm were treated with TAE (n = 103) or TARE (n = 22). After propensity score matching, 44 patients who underwent TAE and 22 patients who were treated with TARE were compared. The mean tumor sizes were 10.4 cm (SD ± 2.6) in the TAE group and 10.7 cm (SD ± 2.7) in the TARE group (P > .695). TAE and TARE exhibited comparable adverse event (AE) rates (Grade 1 AE in 22 [50%] of 44 in TAE and 6 [27%] of 22 in TARE, P = .999; 1 Grade 2 AE [4.5%] in TAE). Median OS durations were 15.2 and 23.6 months in the TAE and TARE groups, respectively (P = .252). Median local PFS (4.7 vs 21.6 months, P < .001) and PFS (3.6 vs 10.0 months, P = .002) were significantly longer after TARE. TAE and TARE had similar objective response rates (TAE, 88.6% vs TARE, 77.3%; P = .364). Systemic therapy after TAE or TARE was a significant positive prognostic factor associated with disease progression and survival (PFS hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [P = .047]; OS HR, 0.33 [P < .001]).

CONCLUSIONS

TAE and TARE are both safe transarterial therapies for patients with HCC >7 cm. TARE is associated with a longer time to progression and longer OS.

TACE vs. TARE for HCC ≥ 8 cm: A propensity score analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as first-line treatments for unresectable HCC > 8 cm.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 129 HCC patients with tumor diameters greater than 8 cm from January 2010 to December 2021, including 40 patients who received TARE, and 89 patients treated with TACE as primary treatment. Following Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 40 patients from each group were harmonized for baseline characteristics. Tumor responses were evaluated using mRECIST criteria, and survival outcomes were compared between treatment groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-rank test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) at 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups; ORR and DCR were 72.6%, 83.1% in TACE group vs. 72.5%. 87.5% in TARE group for best tumor response (p-values: 0.625 and 0.981, respectively). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups were comparable pre- and post-PSM. After PSM, the OS was 33.2 months (20.0-58.6) in TACE group and 38.1 months (13.8-98.1) in TARE group (p = 0.53), while PFS was 11.5 months (7.7-18.4) and 9.1 months (5.2-23.8) respectively. After PSM, post-embolization syndrome developed more in TACE group (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.002). Major adverse events were 72% in TACE group vs. 5% in TARE group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TARE and TACE offer comparable efficacy in managing large HCC, with TARE providing a safer profile, suggesting its consideration as a preferable initial therapeutic approach for unresectable HCC patients with tumors larger than 8 cm.

Transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Currently, inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is treated by both transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, their relative efficacy and outcomes remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare TARE and TACE to evaluate their safety and efficacy in treating inoperable HCC patients.

Methods

Relevant studies were identified by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, and Wanfang databases. Pooled analyses were used to compare treatment response rates, complications, and overall survival (OS) outcomes between the TARE and TACE groups.

Results

This analysis selected 8 studies comprising 1026 and 358 patients that respectively underwent TACE and TARE treatment. The results revealed that the TARE group had significantly higher pooled total response, disease control, and 1-year OS rates compared to the TACE group (P = 0.04, 0.003, and 0.02, respectively), with a corresponding increase in OS (P = 0.0002). Furthermore, rates of complications including fever and abdominal pain were also reduced in the TARE group (P = 0.006 and 0.02, respectively). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the pooled analyses of complete response rates, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, 3-year OS, or 5-year OS between these groups (P = 0.24, 0.69, 0.15, 0.73, and 0.38, respectively). Significant heterogeneity was detected for endpoints including fatigue, nausea/vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, OS duration, and 3-year OS (I2 = 89%, 82%, 72%, 90%, 96%, and 66%, respectively). All endpoints exhibited no significant risk of publication bias.

Conclusions

This study revealed that relative to TACE, TARE performed using 90Y can yield significantly higher treatment response rates and prolong HCC patient survival with fewer treatment-related side effects.The PRISMA guidelines were used to guide the execution and publication of this meta-analysis. The study is registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY202380017).

Systematic review registration

INPLASY.COM, identifier INPLASY202380017.

Drug-eluting beads chemoembolization combined with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor and lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has achieved promising results. However, there are few studies comparing whether drug-eluting beads TACE (D-TACE) can bring more survival benefits to patients with large HCC compared to conventional TACE (C-TACE) in this triplet therapy.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of triple therapy comprising D-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (D-TACE-P-L) and C-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (C-TACE-P-L) in patients with large HCC (maximum diameter ≥ 5 cm), and analyze the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Following a comprehensive review of our hospital's medical records, this retrospective study included 104 patients: 50 received D-TACE-P-L, and 54 received C-TACE-P-L. We employed Kaplan-Meier estimation to assess the median progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups, utilized Cox multivariate regression analysis to identify prognostic factors, and applied the χ 2 test to evaluate AEs.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) and median PFS were significantly higher in the D-TACE-P-L group compared to the C-TACE-P-L group (ORR: 66.0% vs 44.4%, P = 0.027; median PFS: 6.8 months vs 5.0 months, P = 0.041). Cox regression analysis identified treatment option, portal vein tumor thrombus, and hepatic vein invasion as protective factors for PFS. AEs were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

D-TACE-P-L may have significantly better PFS and ORR for large HCC, while exhibiting similar AEs to C-TACE-P-L.

Superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization for recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma: a 6-month outcome analysis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization (SACE) for the treatment of patients with recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 22 patients (19 men; median age, 63 years [range, 38-86]) with Child-Pugh class of A/ B/C (16/3/3) that underwent SACE between January and June 2023 for recurrent single HCCs measuring ≤5 cm in diameter using a mixture of 99% ethanol and ethiodized oil/doxorubicin emulsion. The primary endpoint was the 6-month tumor response, and the secondary endpoints were the 1-month tumor response and treatment-related safety. This study was approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

RESULTS

SACE was successfully performed in 22 patients (95.2%). The complete response rates at 1-month and 6-month after treatment were 100.0% and 83.3%, respectively. At 6-month, local tumor progression occurred in one patient and intrahepatic distant metastasis was found in six patients (30.0%). No 6-month mortalities were reported. No adverse events greater than grade 2 or laboratory deteriorations were observed. Biliary complications or liver abscesses were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

SACE for a single rHCC was highly effective in achieving a favorable 6-month tumor response and showed acceptable adverse events. However, further prospective studies are required to verify these findings.

Multimodal treatment confers best overall survival results in patients with huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Huge (>10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma is burdened by elevated mortality due to its peculiar characteristics and delayed diagnosis. Liver resection is considered the gold standard although survival is poor. Recently, some different strategies have been evaluated to improve results in tumor recurrence and survival. The aim of this research is to identify which strategy offers the best results in terms of overall survival for resectable huge hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 13 studies was conducted from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases including research comparing two or more treatments to manage huge hepatocellular carcinoma. Results were synthesized through forest plots and risk of bias assessed with the CINeMA framework as recommended.

RESULTS

The association of liver resection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization confers a significant improvement in survival compared to liver resection alone (HR: 0.55) while transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ethanol ablation alone were associated to decreased overall survival. Within-study bias, indirectness and incoherence were the domains mainly affected by concerns in risk of bias analysis.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal treatment including liver resection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization increases survival in patients with resectable huge hepatocellular carcinoma.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres® microsphere-transarterial chemoembolization in large hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The prognosis of large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unfavorable due to limited and challenging treatment. CalliSpheres® microsphere-transarterial chemoembolization (CSM-TACE) is an effective therapy for general HCC but not frequently applied for large HCC. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CSM-TACE in large HCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study analyzed 100 large HCC (tumor size >5 cm) patients receiving CSM-TACE. Treatment response, survival, change in liver function indexes, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULT

The best complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 2.0%, 31.3%, 65.7%, and 1.0%, respectively, leading to the best objective response rate (ORR) of 33.3% and disease control rate of 99.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that intrahepatic metastasis was independently related to poor ORR (odd ratio = 0.366, P = 0.023). The 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 88.9% and 80.6%, with a mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] PFS of 21.6 (20.4-22.9) months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 99.0% and 99.0%, with a mean (95% CI) OS of 23.8 (23.3-24.2) months. Total bilirubin (P < 0.001), alanine transaminase (P < 0.001), aspartate transaminase (P < 0.001), and α-fetoprotein (P = 0.045) were abnormal in a short-term period then stably recovered from 1 month ± 15 days after drug-eluting bead-TACE to 24 months ± 15 days. During hospitalization and postdischarge, tolerable abdominal pain and decreased appetite were common adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

CSM-TACE shows favorable treatment response and survival with acceptable tolerance among large HCC patients, indicating that it may promote the management of these patients.

Non-Thermal Liver Ablation: Existing and New Technology

Cancer has and continues to be a complex health crisis plaguing millions around the world. Alcohol ablation was one of the initial methods used for the treatment of liver lesions. It was surpassed by thermal ablation which has played a big role in the therapeutic arsenal for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, thermal ablation has several shortcomings and limitations that prompted the development of alternative technologies including electroporation and histotripsy. Percutaneous alcohol injection in the liver lesion leads to dehydration and coagulative necrosis. This technology is limited to the lesion with relative sparing of the surrounding tissue, making it safe to use adjacent to sensitive structures. Electroporation utilizes short high-voltage pulses to permeabilize the cell membrane and can result in cell death dependent on the threshold reached. It can effectively target the tumor margins and has lower damage rates to surrounding structures due to the short pulse duration. Histotripsy is a novel technology, and although the first human trial was just completed, its results are encouraging, given the sharp demarcation of the targeted tissue, lack of thermal damage, and potential for immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment. Herein, we discuss these techniques, their uses, and overall clinical benefit.

A simple preoperative model to predict overall survival of patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma ≥10 cm

BACKGROUND

Studies have rarely reported on preoperative predictors of prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection (LR) for HCC ≥10 cm. We developed a simple model to predict overall survival (OS) of these patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 305 patients with HCC ≥10 cm undergoing LR. Cirrhosis and imaging-defined AJCC stage were used to develop a preoperative model. Patients were divided into three groups based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Group 1 included patients with AJCC stage 1 and no cirrhosis (n = 86), group 2 those with AJCC stage 1 and cirrhosis plus those with AJCC stage 2 or 3 and no cirrhosis (n = 166), and group 3 those with AJCC stage 2 or 3 and cirrhosis (n = 51). The five-year OS of group 1, 2, and 3 was 55%, 32%, and 25%, respectively (p < 0.001). With group 1 as the reference, multivariate analysis of OS showed that group 2 (HR = 2.043; 95% CI = 1.332-3.134; p = 0.001) and group 3 (HR = 2.740; 95% CI = 1.645-4.564; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

We developed a simple model to predict OS of patients undergoing LR for HCC ≥10 cm.

Transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis: analysis of factors prognostic of clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TACE and factors predicting survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 236 treatment-naïve patients who underwent TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC without MVI or EHS between January 2007 and December 2021.

RESULTS

Following TACE, the median overall survival (OS) was 24 months. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that tumor number ≥4 (risk point: 3), maximal tumor size >10 cm (risk point: 2), Child-Pugh class B (risk point: 2), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration ≥400 ng/mL (risk point: 2), and presence of HCC rupture (risk point: 2) were risk factors significantly associated with OS. The expected median OS among patients with <2, 2-4, and 5-9 risk points were 72, 29, and 12 months respectively. The major complication rates were significantly lower in patients with maximal tumor size ≤10 cm than in those with maximal tumor size >10 cm (4% [5/138] vs 21% [21/98], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TACE may be safe and effective in selected patients with advanced HCC without MVI or EHS, with a median OS of 24 months. Patients with limited tumor burden, compensated liver function, absence of HCC rupture, and favorable biologic markers may benefit the most from TACE. TACE is not recommended for patients with huge HCCs (>10 cm) because of its high rate of major complications (21%).

Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ethanol-Lipiodol Mixture and Drug-Eluting Bead TACE for Large HCC

Purpose

To evaluate treatment response, survival and safety of a novel TACE using combination of ethanol-Lipiodol mixture and drug-eluting beads in patients with large unresectable HCC, single tumor >8 cm or multiple tumors with the largest tumor diameter >5 cm and total tumor diameter >10 cm.

Patients and Methods

Between June 2016 and February 2020, a total of 27 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment response was assessed at first month after the treatment; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The prognostic factors associated with patient survival were statistically analyzed by the Cox regression model. Adverse events were recorded.

Results

The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 5 cm to 17 cm (mean 10.48 cm). The objective response and disease control rates were 56% and 78%, respectively, at 1-month follow-up. The median survival time was 15.9 months (95% CI, 9.03-34.76 months). The OS rates were 76.9% at six months, 65.2% at one year and 44.8% at two years. AFP >400 ng/mL (p = 0.0306), maximum tumor size >10cm (p = 0.0240) were potential risk factors for OS. Regarding safety, major complications occurred in one patient (1/27, 3.7%), presenting with transient hepatic encephalopathy.

Conclusion

Combined DEB-TACE appeared to have favorable objective tumor response. It can be an effective treatment option for large unresectable HCC.

The Role of 18F-FLT PET/CT in Assessing Early Response to Transarterial Radioembolization and Chemoembolization in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors

Objectives

Metastases and primary malignancies are common in the liver. Local ablative applications such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) provide minimally invasive and safe treatment in unresectable liver tumors. Early detection of response to treatment prevents unnecessary toxicity and cost in non-responder patients and provides an earlier use of other options that may be effective. This study aimed to identify the role of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the assessment of early response to TACE and TARE treatments in patients with unresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Methods

This single-center study included 63 patients who underwent ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT for response evaluation after TACE and TARE. After excluding 20 patients whose data were missing 43 TARE-receiving patients were analyzed. The compatibility of change in semi-quantitative values obtained from the ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT images with the treatment responses detected in ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, CT, and MR images and survival was evaluated.

Results

There was no correlation between early metabolic, morphological response, and ¹⁸F-FLT uptake pattern, and change in standardized uptake values (SUV) which were ΔSUV_max, ΔSUV_mean, ΔSUV_peak., ΔSUV_mean, Δ SUV_peak values. There was no significant correlation between ¹⁸F-FLT uptake pattern, ΔSUV_max, ΔSUV_mean, ΔSUV_peak, and overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) for the target lobe PFS for the whole-body. The survival distributions for the patients with >30% change in Δ SUV_max and ΔSUV_peak values were statistically significantly longer than the patients with <30% change (p<0.009 and p<0.024, respectively).

Conclusion

There was significant longer PFS for target liver lobe in patients with more than 30% decrease in ¹⁸F-FLT SUV_max and SUV_peak of the liver lesion in primary and metastatic unresectable liver tumors undergoing TARE.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) plus apatinib versus DEB-TACE alone in treating huge hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Background

Apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits angiogenesis under the tumor hypoxic environment induced by drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), which is hypothesized to have synergic effect with DEB-TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE plus apatinib in treating huge HCC patients.

Methods

Totally, 73 huge HCC patients (tumor size > 10 cm) were screened and divided into DEB-TACE plus apatinib group (N = 34) or DEB-TACE group (N = 39) based on the treatment they received. Their clinical response and adverse events were retrieved. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

Results

DEB-TACE plus apatinib achieved a trend of higher objective response rate (64.7% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.071), but similar disease control rate (88.2% vs. 79.5%, P = 0.314) than DEB-TACE alone. Moreover, DEB-TACE plus apatinib reached an improved PFS (median (95%CI): 19.0 months (15.5–22.5) vs. 10.9 months (8.0–13.8), P = 0.025) and OS (median (95%CI): 25.1 months (20.3–29.9) vs. 13.7 months (9.8–17.6), P = 0.042) than DEB-TACE alone. After adjustment by multivariate Cox’s regression analyses, DEB-TACE plus apatinib (vs. DEB-TACE alone) was independently correlated with better PFS (HR: 0.420, P = 0.004) and OS (HR: 0.477, P = 0.022). Regarding safety, adverse events were mostly mild and manageable; also, they were of no difference between DEB-TACE plus apatinib and DEB-TACE alone (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

DEB-TACE plus apatinib achieves prolonged PFS and OS, while similar adverse events occurrence compared to DEB-TACE alone in huge HCC treatment.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11845-021-02884-w.