Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair of the Ascending Aorta: Assessment of a Specific Novel Stent-Graft Design in Phantom, Cadaveric, and Clinical Application

Comparison between the outcomes of transfemoral access and transfemoral access with adjunct upper extremity access in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis

Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different access sites, such as transfemoral access (TFA) and upper extremity access (UEA). An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, access-site complications, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, among others. Forest plots were constructed for the pooled analysis of data using the random-effects model in Review Manager, version 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Our findings in 9403 study participants (6228 in the TFA group and 3175 in the UEA group) indicate that TFA is associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA [RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002], MI [RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69; p < 0.0001], spinal cord ischemia [RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.00001], and shortens fluoroscopy time [SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.24; p = 0.001]. Moreover, TFA required less contrast agent [SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.06; p = 0.02], contributing to its appeal. However, no significant differences emerged in technical success [p = 0.23], 30-day mortality [p = 0.48], ICU stay duration [p = 0.09], or overall hospital stay length [p = 0.22]. Patients with TFA had a lower risk of stroke, MI, and spinal cord ischemia, shorter fluoroscopy time, and lower use of contrast agents. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm and strengthen these findings.

Feasibility of Total Endovascular Repair of the Aorta in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Morphological Analysis of 119 Patients

(1) Background: This study aimed to morphologically analyze acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) patients for potential endovascular treatment candidates. The objective was to specify requirements for aTAAD endovascular devices. (2) Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis included aTAAD patients who underwent open surgical repair between November 2005 and December 2020. Preoperative CTA scans were used for morphological analysis, assessing endovascular repair eligibility. Statistical tests were performed. (3) Results: A total of 129 patients with aTAAD were studied, with 119 included. Entry tear (ET) locations were identified, mainly in the aortic root, 20 mm above the sinotubular junction (STJ) and within the ascending aorta (20 mm above STJ to -20 mm before the brachiocephalic trunk). Endovascular treatment was deemed feasible for 36 patients, with suggested solutions for the aortic arch and descending aorta. Significant differences were observed between eligible and noneligible groups for aortic diameter, false lumen diameter, distance between STJ and entry tear, and more. Dissection extension showed no significant difference. (4) Conclusions: Morphological analysis identified potential aTAAD candidates for endovascular treatment, highlighting differences between eligible and noneligible morphologies. This study offers insights for implementing endovascular approaches in aTAAD treatment and emphasizes the need for research and standardized protocols.

Avant-Garde Endovascular Stent Graft Insertion in Dissected Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Current guidelines and regulatory parameters for cardiothoracic surgery in the United States establish that open surgery is the first front line for treating ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA). Despite advances in performing endovascular procedures in thoracic aortic aneurysms, there are no approved state-of-the-art techniques that allow endovascular procedures to be performed in ATAA. Thus, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the ascending aorta, as we will demonstrate, is a useful and effective technical opportunity for treating high-risk patients with type A dissections, intramural hematomas, and pseudoaneurysms. In this case, an 88-year-old female patient was consulted due to a preliminary diagnosed descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. As a result of uncertainty regarding the initial diagnosis, abdominal-pelvic and chest computed tomography scan tests contradicted the original conclusion and surprisingly yielded a different scenario; in fact, the patient had a dissected ATAA. Using the TEVAR procedure, the patient's ATAA was treated with a thoracic GORE TAG endograft stent (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA). Four weeks later, the aneurysm was completely thrombosed, and the stent-graft was properly in place.

Endovascular Intervention for Aortic Dissection Is "Ascending"

Ascending aorta diseases represent an important cause of mortality worldwide. Notably, acute and chronic thoracic aorta pathologies have increased during the last years, but medical therapy does not seem to influence their natural history. Currently, although open surgery is the first choice of treatment, many patients are still rejected or have poor outcomes. In this scenario, endovascular treatment is raised as a valuable option. In this review we describe the limitations of conventional surgery and the state-of-art of endovascular ascending aorta repair.

Endovascular Repair for Ascending Aortic Graft Side Branch Pseudoaneurysm: A Report of Two Cases

Introduction

A pseudoaneurysm arising from the side branch of the prosthesis, following ascending aortic replacement, is extremely rare. Re-intervention usually involves open surgery, replacement of the ascending aorta, or ligation of the side branch. Redo surgery with an additional sternotomy carries the risk of cardiac and vascular injuries, and endovascular treatment can reduce such adverse events.

Report

This study describes the successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of two cases of pseudoaneurysms arising from the side branch after ascending aortic replacement. Case 1 involved a 79 year old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement and omentopexy for a ruptured tuberculous aortic aneurysm 13 years ago. The pseudoaneurysm was mushroom shaped with a 30 mm protrusion. Case 2 involved an 83 year old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection 11 years ago. The pseudoaneurysm was rod shaped with a 27 mm protrusion. In both cases, the pseudoaneurysm arising from the side branch was not noted on computed tomography (CT) until one year earlier and was first identified at a routine follow up examination. The pseudoaneurysms required surgical repair because of the risk of rupture; however, TEVAR was selected considering the risks of redo surgery and the patients' ages. It was performed via a femoral artery approach without adverse events using a commercially available thoracic aortic device. Post-operative CT scan showed complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm.

Discussion

Although TEVAR is usually not indicated for ascending aortic pathologies, if there is an anatomical indication and a compatible stent graft, TEVAR for the ascending aorta should be the first choice in patients who are inoperable, at high risk and undergoing redo surgery.

Use of a Steerable Sheath for Completely Femoral Access in Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair Compared to Upper Extremity Access

PURPOSE

To compare bridging stent graft (BSG) implantation in downward oriented branches in branched endovascular aortic repair (bEVAR), using a commercially available steerable sheath from an exclusively femoral access (TFA) with traditional upper extremity access (UEA).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, 7 patients with 19 branches in the TFA cohort received BSG insertion using the Medtronic Heli FX steerable sheath from a femoral access, and 10 patients with 32 branches in the UEA cohort from a brachial approach. Technical success, total intervention time, fluoroscopy time, branch cannulation time, and complication rate were recorded.

RESULTS

Technical success was 19/19 branches in the TFA and 31/32 in the UEA cohort. The mean branch cannulation time was considerably shorter in the TFA group (17 vs. 29 min, p = 0.003), and total intervention time tended to be shorter (169 vs. 217 min, p = 0.176).

CONCLUSION

Using a commercially available steerable sheath allowed successful cannulation of all branches in this cohort and was associated with significantly shorter branch cannulation times. Potentially, this technique can lower the stroke and brachial puncture site complication risk as well as reduce total intervention time and radiation dose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b, retrospective cohort study.