Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Single-Centre Retrospective Study Comparing Microspheres Versus n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate

Transcatheter arterial and venous embolisation with α-hexyl cyanoacrylate MagicGlue®: short-term safety and efficacy outcomes

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to assess the feasibility and the short-term safety and efficacy outcomes of a wide range of transcatheter arterial and venous embolisation procedures done using α-hexyl-cyanoacrylate (AHCA)-MagicGlue® in patients with bleeding and non-bleeding disorders.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent emergent or planned AHCA-MagicGlue® transcatheter embolisation between February 2019 and September 2023. Technical success, clinical success, 30-day mortality, and complication rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

We included 101 patients with a mean age of 49.9 ± 20.5 years who underwent arterial (n = 43, 42.6%) or venous (n = 58, 57.4%) embolisation for bleeding (n = 16, 15.8%) or other reasons (n = 85, 84.2%). The technical success rate was 100%. After a mean follow-up of 2.2 months, the clinical success rate was 94% in patients with bleeding and 95% in other patients; 1 patient died of multi-organ failure unrelated to the procedure. In the 22 patients with prostatic artery embolisation, statistically significant improvements were recorded at 3 months versus baseline for the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (10.0 ± 5.8 vs. 20.8 ± 7.3, p = 0.001), IPSS quality-of-life score (2.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.0 ± 1.0; p = 0.001), and prostate volume (67.8 ± 38.0 mL vs. 96.7 ± 47.4 mL, p = 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 11 (10.9%) patients and were major in 4 and minor in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MagicGlue® transcatheter arterial and venous embolisation is feasible, effective, and safe for bleeding and non-bleeding conditions across a broad range of anatomic sites.

Early Outcomes of Prostatic Artery Embolization using n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Liquid Embolic Agent: A Safety and Feasibility Study

This retrospective study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and short-term effectiveness of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA) glue embolization in 244 patients from June 2022 through May 2024. Technical success, defined as bilateral glue embolization, was achieved in 95% of cases. The median fluoroscopy time was 22.2 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 17.1-30.0 minutes), and the median air kerma was 753 mGy (IQR, 417-1,559 mGy). Compared with baseline, statistically significant improvements were observed at 7.1 weeks for the International Prostate Symptom Score (9.5 [SD ± 6.0] vs 20.5 [SD ± 6.7]; P < .01), quality of life (1.8 [SD ± 1.5] vs 4.0 [SD ± 1.1]; P < .01), Qmax (10.4 mL/s [SD ± 6.3] vs 6.1 mL/s [SD ± 2.5]; P < .01), and prostate grand volume at 6 months (113.3 mL [SD ± 69.3] vs 156.6 mL [SD ± 104.6]; P < .01). These results demonstrate the use of nBCA for PAE as a technically feasible and safe option with excellent short-term outcomes.

Prostate Artery Embolization with 4D-CT

Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is a technically challenging angiographic therapy that has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms. Although clinical outcomes have been well documented, several questions remain regarding various technical details of the procedure. This article is a brief review of indications and technical parameters of PAE as well as commonly debated topics throughout the literature. Finally, the article serves to report tips and tricks from a high-volume center.

Repeat Prostatic Artery Embolization with the Addition of a Liquid Embolic Agent: Short-term Results

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The long-term effectiveness of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) can be hampered by the recanalization of the previously embolized prostatic arteries (PA). The use of a liquid embolic agent (LEA) could limit this risk. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of repeat PAE (rePAE) using a LEA (Squid Peri) coupled with microspheres in patients experiencing recurring symptoms after initial embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent rePAE using Squid Peri coupled with microspheres. Angiographic patterns of prostatic revascularization were identified. Outcomes were assessed at the 3-month follow-up using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Quality of Life (QoL) score. The primary endpoint was clinical success defined as an IPSS < 18 with > 25% decrease and a QoL score ≤ 3 with ≥ 1 point decrease. Safety was assessed by using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

30 consecutive men (mean age: 67.1 ± 9.5 years) were included. Recanalization of the previously embolized PA was found in 83.3% of patients. Technical success was 93.3%. Median follow-up was 4.9 months [IQR: 3.9 - 9.8]. Clinical success rate was 76.7%, with a mean decrease in IPSS of -9.3 ± 7.3 (p < 0.001) and a median decrease in QoL of -2 [IQR: - 4 - - 1] (p < 0.001). One patient presented with an acute urinary retention requiring readmission (grade IIIa complication).

CONCLUSION

Repeat PAE using Squid Peri coupled with microspheres is safe and effective for patients with recurring symptoms after initial embolization.

Prostate artery embolization using n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: A six-month outcome analysis in 103 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and 6-month outcomes of prostate artery embolization (PAE) using N-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue as the only embolic agent in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms who were treated by PAE using methacryloxysulfolane-NBCA mixed with ethiodized oil (1:8 ratio) between September 2018 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Vascular mapping was made using cone-beam computed tomography angiography. PAEs were performed as an outpatient procedure, under local anaesthesia. Outcomes were assessed at six months using the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and associated quality-of-life score (IPSS-QoL), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, and International Index of Erectile Function form 5 (IIEF5).

RESULTS

A total of 103 men with a mean age of 68.4 ± 6 (standard deviation [SD]) years were included. Technical success rate was 100%. The mean fluoroscopy time was 26.4 ± 12.5 (SD) min and the median radiation dose was 23 980 mGy·cm (Q1, Q3: 16 770, 38 450). Compared to baseline, statistically significant improvements were observed at six months for the IPSS (8.9 ± 6.2 [SD] vs. 20.2 ± 6.5 [SD]; P = 0.01), IPSS-QoL (2.1 ± 1.4 [SD] vs. 5.1 ± 0.9 [SD]; P = 0.01), PSA level (3.6 ± 3.2 [SD] ng/mL vs. 4.8 ± 4.2 [SD] ng/mL; P = 0.0001), and prostate volume (78.6 ± 43.5 [SD] mL vs. 119.1 ± 65.7 [SD] mL; P = 0.01). Minor adverse events developed in 19/103 (18.4%) patients. No major complications occurred. Compared to baseline, the IIEF5 did not change significantly at six months (15.3 ± 6.8 [SD] vs. 15.8 ± 6.8 [SD]; P = 0.078).

CONCLUSION

PAE with NBCA is a feasible and safe method that provides good outcomes at six months in patients with BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms. This method deserves further evaluation in randomized trials with longer follow-up.

Non-target embolic events during prostatic embolization with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated nontarget embolization (NTE) during prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH).

RESULTS

Ten consecutive patients treated by PAE with EVOH for the presence of disabling benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) between June 22 and January 2023 were included in this prospective study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: LUTS attributed to BPH, LUTS duration ≥ 6 months, failure to respond to standard pharmacotherapy, IPSS > 18 or QoL score > 2, and prostate volume > 40 mL. Embolization was performed under general anaesthesia. According to established techniques, a microcatheter was positioned bilaterally within the feeding arteries, and EVOH was injected slowly under X-ray control. Unenhanced pelvic computed tomography scans were carried out before and after embolization to assess the NTE. The safety of the prostatic embolization procedure with EVOH was assessed by collecting adverse effects over 3 months of evaluation that included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) score.-up evaluations, occurring at 3, 6, and 12months, included International Prostate Symptom Score. Bilateral PAE was technically successful in 9 patients, and unilateral injection was performed in one patient. The postoperative scanner showed a distribution of the embolization material in the two lobes of the prostate in all patients. The procedure time varied from 120 to 150 (mean: 132) minutes. Eight out of 10 patients developed pollakiuria within 24 h; none of the patients had postoperative pain. Two patients required catheterization for postoperative urinary retention. Catheters were removed successfully at the end of the first day for one of these patients and on the tenth day for the other. At the 3-month follow-up, patients showed significant improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score (n = 10; mean = -11,5; P < 0.01) and quality of life score (n = 10; mean = -3,40; P < 0.01). Only one patient presented one asymptomatic muscular NTE.

CONCLUSIONS

PAE with EVOH is safe, effective, and associated with few NTEs and no postoperative pain. Prospective comparative studies with longer follow-ups are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IDRCB, 2021-AO29-56-35. Registered 27 May 2022, http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05395299?cond=embolization&term&rank=1 .

Prostate Artery Embolization: Challenges, Tips, Tricks, and Perspectives

Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) consists of blocking the arteries supplying the prostate to treat benign prostate hypertrophia (BPH). Its effectiveness on both urinary symptoms and flowmetric parameters has now been amply demonstrated by around a hundred studies, including several randomized trials. The main advantage of this procedure is the very low rate of urinary and sexual sequelae, including ejaculatory, with an excellent tolerance profile. The arterial anatomy is a key element for the realization of PAE. Its knowledge makes it possible to anticipate obstacles and prevent potential complications related to nontarget embolization. Nontarget embolization can occur with a small intraprostatic shunt or reflux and has no consequences except some local inflammation symptoms that resolve in a couple of days. Nevertheless, some situations with large arterial shunts arising from the prostatic artery must be recognized (accessory rectal, bladder, or pudendal branches), and must imperatively be protected before embolization, at the risk of exposing oneself to otherwise ischemic complications that are more severe, such as bladder necrosis and skin or mucosal necrosis. This article offers a step-by-step review of the various anatomical and technical key points to ensure technical and clinical success, while avoiding the occurrence of adverse events.

Controversies in Prostate Artery Embolization: Future Best Practice

Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia is correlated with age. Men seeking treatment options with a low side effect profile often turn to prostate artery embolization (PAE). PAE continues to be refined with advanced tools and optimized techniques. Nonetheless, there exist controversies in terms of best practices for the management of lower urinary track symptoms (LUTS) with PAE. These controversies are essential for medical progress. Herein we suggest best practices moving forward based on currently available data. Given extensive safety data, we recommend PAE be considered alongside medical management and as a precursor to surgery. Given demonstrated efficacy across gland sizes, PAE can be performed in a single session, ideally in a hybrid angio-CT suite, without preoperative cross-sectional imaging. PAE should be initially performed with 300- to 500-μm size particles, and instead consider exploring other particles and sizes for repeat PAE. Finally, PAE can also be considered as first-line option for recurrent disease given the efficacy and excellent safety profile. This article is not meant to purport a dogma, but rather to serve as a guide to the experienced practitioner in challenging his or her own biases when performing PAE.