Advantages of ultrasound identification of the distal insertion of the calcaneofibular ligament during ligament reconstructions

Accuracy of Cutaneous Landmarks Compared to Ultrasound to Locate the Calcaneal Footprint of the CFL

The purpose was to determine the accuracy of the techniques of Lopes et al. and Michels et al., compared to ultrasound, to locate the center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL in healthy volunteers. The authors recruited 17 healthy adult volunteers at 1 center with no current ankle pathologies and no previous surgical antecedents on either ankle. The authors recorded the age, sex, height, BMI, and ankle side for each volunteer. Measurements were made on both ankles of the 17 volunteers to increase the sample size and ensure less dispersion of data, independently by 2 surgeons: 1 senior surgeon with 15 years' experience and 1 junior with 3 years' experience. The location of the center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL was determined by each surgeon using 3 methods: (1) the cutaneous technique of Lopes et al., (2) the cutaneous technique of Michels et al., and (3) ultrasound imaging. The 17 volunteers (34 feet) had a mean age of 26.3 ± 8.7 and a BMI of 21.7 ± 2.9. The Michels point was significantly closer (4.6 ± 3.7 mm) than the Lopes point (11.1 ± 5.4 mm) to the true center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL determined by ultrasound, notably in the vertical direction. The Michels point was located significantly closer to the true center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL and demonstrated less dispersion than the Lopes point, indicated by significantly lower absolute mean deviation from the true center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL, and that ultrasound is therefore preferred to locate the footprint the CFL.

The calcaneofibular ligament groove at the inferior fibula, an ultrasonographic anatomical landmark

PURPOSE

Calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) injuries are harder to diagnose than anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) ones. This study aimed to clarify the fibular attachment of the CFL and verify the bony landmark for evaluating the CFL on ultrasonography.

METHODS

Fifty-nine ankles were used in this anatomical study. To confirm the control function of the CFL, we performed passive movement manually using cadaveric ankles and observed the ankle positions where the CFLs were tense. Histological observation of CFL attachment of the fibula was performed using Masson's trichrome stain. The ATFL and CFL were removed, and the bone morphology of the CFL attachment and inferior fibular end was imaged using a stereomicroscope and a 3D scanner. Using ultrasonography, we evaluated the bone morphology of the fibular attachment of the CFL in short-axis images of 27 healthy adult ankles.

RESULTS

The CFL was tensed according to ankle motions: supination, maximum dorsi flexion, maximum plantar flexion, and mild plantar flexion-external rotation. Below the CFL attachment of the fibula was a slight groove between the inferior tip and the obscure tubercle of the fibula. This groove was observed in 81.5% of cases using short-axis ultrasonography.

CONCLUSION

The CFL was tensed in various ankle positions to control the movements of the talocrural and subtalar joints. There was a slight groove at the inferior end of the fibula where the CFL coursed downward. We called it the CFL groove and proposed that it could serve as a landmark for the short-axis image of ultrasonography.