Chimerism status after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation with fludarabine-melphalan conditioning is affected by the melphalan dose and is predictive of relapse

Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/busulfan versus fludarabine/low-dose melphalan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are commonly used in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, the optimal regimen remains unknown. In this study, the outcomes of adult patients with NHL who received fludarabine plus reduced-dose busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; Flu/Bu2) (n = 286) and fludarabine plus low-dose melphalan (80 or 100 mg/m2; Flu/Mel80-100) (n = 283) between January 2009 and December 2020 were compared using Japanese registry data. The primary end-point was the 5-year overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 53.8% (95% CI, 47.6-59.6) and 42.4% (95% CI, 35.6-49.0) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Mel80-100 groups respectively (p = 0.030). After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the adjusted HR of Flu/Bu2 compared with Flu/Mel80-100 group for 5-year OS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99, p = 0.046), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.78-1.21, p = 0.798) for 5-year progression-free survival, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94, p = 0.022) for 5-year cumulative risk of non-relapse mortality and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.95-1.64, p = 0.115) for 5-year cumulative risk of relapse. In this study, patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 were associated with better OS and lower non-relapse mortality than those who received Flu/Mel80-100.

Impact of Different Fludarabine Doses in the Fludarabine-Based Conditioning Regimen for Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation

The purine analog fludarabine (Flu) plays a central role in reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens because of limited nonhematologic toxicities. Few reports assess the impact of different dose of Flu on the clinical outcomes and the Flu doses vary across reports. To compare the effect of Flu dose, the clinical outcomes of patients who received Flu and busulfan (FB; n = 1647) or melphalan (Flu with melphalan (FM); n = 1162) conditioning for unrelated bone marrow transplantation were retrospectively analyzed using Japanese nationwide registry data. In the FB group, high-dose Flu (180 mg/m2; HFB) and low-dose Flu (150/125 mg/m2; LFB) were given to 1334 and 313 patients, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher in the HFB group than in the LFB group (49.5% versus 39.2%, P < .001). In the HFB and LFB groups, the cumulative incidences were 30.4% and 36.6% (P = .058) for 3-year relapse and 25.1% and 28.1% (P = .24) for 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), respectively. In the multivariate analysis for OS and relapse, Flu dose was identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 0.83, P = .03; hazard ratio: 0.80, P = .043). In the FM group, high-dose Flu (180 mg/m2; HFM) and low-dose Flu (150/125 mg/m2; LFM) were given to 118 and 1044 patients, respectively. The OS, relapse, and NRM after 3 years did not differ significantly between the HFM and LFM groups (48.3% versus 48.8%, P = .92; 23.7% versus 27.2%, P = .55; 31.9% versus 30.8%, P = .67). These findings suggest that high-dose Flu was associated with favorable outcomes in the FB group but not in the FM group.

Comparison of Melphalan Dose in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation with Reduced-Intensity Conditioning

The present study compared lower-dose melphalan (80 mg/m2, FM80) and higher-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2, FM140) when administering reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively analyzed nationwide registry data (2006 to 2019) and compared transplant outcomes between the 2 groups. Ninety-two patients (median age, 61 [interquartile range, 56 to 65] years) were assigned to the FM80 and FM140 groups by propensity score matching. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate in the FM140 group (63.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9% to 73.0%) was significantly higher than that in the FM80 group (54.2%; 95% CI, 37.1% to 52.1%) (P = .038). The FM140 group had a nonsignificantly (P = .095) lower 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (15.5%; 95% CI, 8.9% to 23.8% versus 26.0%; 95% CI, 17.3% to 35.5%). The 3-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality were 22.3% (95% CI, 14.1% to 31.8%) and 23.7% (95% CI, 15.4% to 33.2%) in the FM80 and FM140 groups, respectively (P = .49). The beneficial effect of FM140 was more evident in patients with a poor cytogenetic risk. Our findings suggest the superiority of FM140 in patients with MDS undergoing allo-HSCT, especially in high-risk patients.

Retrospective comparison of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/low-dose melphalan plus 4 Gy TBI versus fludarabine/ busulfan plus 4 Gy TBI

Fludarabine with intravenous busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; FB2) and fludarabine with intermediate-dose melphalan (140 mg/m²; FM140) are the most widely used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. FM140 generally has a lower relapse rate and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM), resulting in overall survival (OS) comparable to that seen with FB2. To evaluate the effect of reducing the melphalan dose, we retrospectively compared transplant outcomes in 156 patients who received FB2 (n = 103) or FM80 (n = 53) at our center (median age: 63 years; range 27-72 years). All patients received 4-Gy total body irradiation. Three-year OS, the cumulative incidence of relapse, and NRM were comparable between groups (FB2 vs. FM80, 58% vs. 47%, p = 0.24; 30% vs. 36%, p = 0.57; 17% vs. 21%, p = 0.44, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100, chronic GVHD at 3 years, or the 3-year GVHD-free/relapse-free survival rate. In the high-risk disease group, patients receiving FM80 tended to have lower 3-year OS (FB2 vs. FM80, 48% vs. 17%, p = 0.06). In summary, transplant outcomes following FB2 or FM80 were comparable except in patients with high-risk disease.

Predictors of increased melphalan exposure correlate with overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and toxicities in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine and melphalan

The reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, fludarabine and melphalan 140 mg/m² (FM140), is widely adopted in practice. Pharmacokinetic studies report 10-fold interpatient variability in melphalan exposure. We identified low hemoglobin (Hb) and/or creatinine clearance (CrCl), determinants of melphalan pharmacokinetic, as strong predictors of outcomes after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplant. We hypothesized that these variables could predict for outcomes after FM140. Overall survival was shorter in patients with a lower Hb (113 vs. 2536 days; p = 0.004), due to an increased rate of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (p = 0.0005). Overall survival was also worse in patients with lower CrCl (75 vs. 317 days; p = 0.003), with a significantly worse nonrelapse mortality (p = 0.0023). In a multivariate analysis, a higher Hb and CrCl predicted for better overall survival (p = 0.017). In patients with a lower Hb, the median duration of hospitalization (p = 0.02) and the mean duration of diarrhea (p = 0.008) were longer. In patients with a lower CrCl, the median duration of hospitalization (p = 0.06) and the mean duration of diarrhea (p = 0.0009) longer, and the rate of infection was higher (p = 0.02). We show for the first time that Hb and CrCl represent important determinants of outcomes after FM140, suggesting that pharmacokinetic-directed dosing may be beneficial in achieving optimal outcomes.

The effect of melphalan dose and total body irradiation as reduced-intensity conditioning for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

To evaluate the prognostic impact of melphalan dose and total body irradiation (TBI) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation, we retrospectively compared the outcomes between higher-dose melphalan (120-140 mg/m²) with (HDM/TBI+, n = 118) or without 2-4 Gy TBI (HDM/TBI-, n = 152) and lower-dose melphalan (80-110 mg/m²) with TBI (LDM/TBI+, n = 237). At 3 years, the overall survival was 49.6% in the HDM/TBI+, 51.7% in the HDM/TBI-, and 47.3% in the LDM/TBI + groups (p = .67). The relapse rate and non-relapse mortality were comparable among the three groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that conditioning regimen was not associated with overall survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality; however, central nervous system complication was less frequent with LDM/TBI + than with HDM/TBI+. Our findings suggest reduced-intensity conditioning with LDM/TBI + might be a reasonable option, especially in vulnerable ALL patients, with similar transplant outcomes to HDM with or without TBI.

Prognostic impact of melphalan dose and total body irradiation use in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning

To evaluate the prognostic impact of melphalan dose and total body irradiation (TBI) use in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation, we retrospectively compared outcomes of patients receiving a higher-dose (120-140 mg/m², n = 379) or lower-dose melphalan (80-110 mg/m², n = 128) with or without TBI of ≤4 Gy. At 3 years, overall survival was 48.9% in the higher-dose group versus 40.3% in the lower-dose group (p = .013). This survival benefit was attributed to lower tumor-related mortality (23.9% vs. 31.7%; p = .049). Non-relapse mortality did not differ (24.8% vs. 23.5%, p = .59). The beneficial effect of a higher-dose melphalan was more evident when combined with TBI in younger patients, those not in complete remission, and those with good performance status. Our findings support the use of a higher-dose melphalan in combination with TBI for reduced-intensity conditioning in physically fit patients.

Phase II study of intrabone single unit cord blood transplantation for hematological malignancies

The outcomes of cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated reduced‐intensity conditioning for hematological malignancies need to be improved because of graft failure and delayed engraftment. Intrabone infusion of cord blood cells has the potential to resolve the problems. In this phase II study, 21 adult patients with hematological malignancy received intrabone transplantation of serological HLA‐A, B, and DR ≥4/6 matched single cord blood with a median number of cryopreserved total nucleated cells of 2.7 × 10⁷/kg (range, 2.0–4.9 × 10⁷/kg) following non‐irradiated fludarabine‐based reduced‐intensity conditioning. Short‐term methotrexate and tacrolimus were given as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis, and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor was given after transplantation. No severe adverse events related to intrabone injection were observed. The cumulative incidences of neutrophils ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L, reticulocytes ≥1%, and platelets ≥20 × 10⁹/L recoveries were 76.2%, 71.4%, and 76.2%, respectively, with median time to recoveries of 17, 28, and 32 days after transplantation, respectively. The probability of survival with neutrophil engraftment on day 60 was 71.4%, and overall survival at 1 year after transplantation was 52.4%. The incidences of grade II–IV and III–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease were 44% and 19%, respectively, with no cases of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease. The present study showed the safety of direct intrabone infusion of cord blood. Further analysis is required to confirm the efficacy of intrabone single cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated reduced‐intensity conditioning for adult patients with hematological malignancy. This study was registered with UMIN‐CTR, number 000000865.

Early phase mixed chimerism in bone marrow does not affect long-term outcomes of myeloablative single-unit cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematological malignancies

Coexisting hematopoiesis from donor and recipient origin, called a mixed chimerism status, can occur in patients after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, its impact on the outcomes of cord blood transplantation (CBT) has yet to be clarified. We retrospectively analyzed 150 adult patients who received myeloablative single-unit CBT for hematological malignancies in our institute. At the median time of first bone marrow analysis of 41 days after CBT, mixed chimerism was observed in 16 of the 150 patients. Among patients with mixed chimerism, 4 patients relapsed. The remaining 12 patients were alive and in remission at a median follow-up of 50 months. Bone marrow-mixed chimerism did not have a significant impact on the incidences of disease-free survival, relapse, or transplant-related mortality after CBT. These data show that early phase mixed chimerism did not have a significant impact on long-term outcomes after myeloablative single-unit CBT for hematological malignancies.