Rituximab maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation prolongs response duration in non-naive rituximab follicular lymphoma patients: a single institution experience

Modern approaches in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: literature review and own experience

An advance of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) diagnostic and treatment protocols promoted between fatal and high-curative disease. Modern treatment programs can reach many-year survival rate in 8097% even in patients with advanced (IIIIV) HL stages and unfavorable prognostic factors pre- sence. Nevertheless, relapses and refractory (r/r) HL appears in 830% patients and depend on treatment scheme, prognostic factors and comorbi- dity. Second-line therapy (ViGePP and ICE) is a common platform for r/r HL treatment in pediatric patients, but results of 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) not to exceed 7075%. For increase RFS rate in patients with r/r HL as combinatorial partners to schemes ViGePP and ICE add monoclonal antibodies (brentuximab vedotine) and immune chekpoint inhibitors (nivolumab), cell (auto-/allogenic stem cell transplantation) and genetically engineered (CAR-T) products. In the current issue literature and own experience in r/r HL treatment presented. It is showed, that inclusion a brentuximab vedotine in ViGePP scheme increased 3-year RFS up to 8311.2%.

Durable benefit of rituximab maintenance post-autograft in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma: 12-year follow-up of the EBMT lymphoma working party Lym1 trial

We report the 12-year follow-up of the prospective randomized EBMT LYM1 trial to determine whether the benefit of brief duration rituximab maintenance (RM) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) receiving an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is sustained. One hundred and thirty-eight patients received RM with or without purging. The median follow-up after random assignment is 12 years (range 10-13) for the whole series. The 10-year PFS after ASCT is 47% (95% CI 40-54) with only 4 patients relapsing after 7.5 years. RM continues to significantly improve 10-year PFS after ASCT in comparison with NM [P = 0.002; HR 0.548 (95% CI 0.38-0.80)]. Ten-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was not significantly different between treatment groups (7% overall). 10-year overall survival (OS) after ASCT was 75% (69-81) for the whole series, with no significant differences according to treatment sub-groups. 10-year OS for patients who progressed within 24 months (POD24T) was 60%, in comparison with 85% for patients without progression. Thus the benefit of rituximab maintenance after ASCT on relapse prevention is sustained at 12 years, suggesting that RM adds to ASCT-mediated disease eradication and may enhance the curative potential of ASCT.

Improving outcomes after autologous transplantation in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a European expert perspective

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established approach to treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) recommended by both the European Society for Medical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network based on the results from randomized controlled studies. However, a considerable number of patients who receive ASCT will progress/relapse and display suboptimal post-transplant outcomes. Over recent years, a number of different strategies have been assessed to improve post-ASCT outcomes and augment HL cure rates. These include use of pre- and post-ASCT salvage therapies and post-ASCT consolidative therapy, with the greatest benefits demonstrated by targeted therapies, such as brentuximab vedotin. However, adoption of these new approaches has been inconsistent across different centers and regions. In this article, we provide a European perspective on the available treatment options and likely future developments in the salvage and consolidation settings, with the aim to improve management of patients with HL who have a high risk of post-ASCT failure. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that early intervention with post-ASCT consolidation improves outcomes in patients with R/R HL who require ASCT. Future approvals of targeted agents are expected to further improve outcomes and provide additional treatment options in the coming age of personalized medicine.

Antibody Therapy Maintenance in Follicular Lymphoma

Because patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) usually experience repeated disease recurrences, maintenance treatment is an attractive option to prolong remission after induction therapy. Rituximab maintenance therapy has been shown in multiple randomized studies to significantly improve progression-free survival in FL with both low and high tumor burden after induction therapy, independently of patient and disease characteristics. Several questions regarding the use of antibody directed against CD20 (anti-CD20) maintenance remain open, including the optimal antibody administration schedule and duration, the risk/benefit ratio of maintenance in the context of previous bendamustine administration, and its cost-effectiveness.

Maintenance Strategies After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an essential component of potentially curative therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous (auto) stem cell rescue is used to overcome chemoresistance in multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Alternatively, poor-risk acute leukemias rely on the graft versus leukemia effect of allogeneic (allo) products. Long-term remissions are feasible with both auto- and allo-HCT; however, disease relapse is the leading cause of death after HCT for many patients. In recognition of this, novel therapies are being investigated in the upfront, relapsed/refractory, and post-HCT maintenance settings to deepen response and maintain disease control. To date, the most robust data to support this approach are in multiple myeloma, where post-transplant maintenance therapy has improved clinical outcomes. In Hodgkin lymphoma, patients with high-risk features may benefit from post-auto-HCT vedotin (BV) regardless of pre-HCT BV exposure. Apart from mantle cell lymphoma, where rituximab maintenance is generally accepted, post-auto-HCT maintenance in other forms of NHL is less established. In patients who undergo allo-HCT, the utilization of maintenance therapy is an important component of improving post-HCT outcomes, however, an individualized approach that considers patient factors such as residual toxicity from HCT, an immature graft with poor graft function, infection, and graft-versus-host disease create a complex environment for aggressive interventions. Initiation of directed agents in patients with identified mutations prior to allo-HCT, including FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome in acute lymphoid leukemia have generally improved post-HCT outcomes. Ongoing studies are exploring the safety and efficacy of additional maintenance strategies post-allo-HCT in an effort to further improve post-HCT outcomes.

Maintenance Therapies for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas After Autologous Transplantation: A Consensus Project of ASBMT, CIBMTR, and the Lymphoma Working Party of EBMT

Importance

Maintenance therapies are often considered as a therapeutic strategy in patients with lymphoma following autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) to mitigate the risk of disease relapse. With an evolving therapeutic landscape, where novel drugs are moving earlier in therapy lines, evidence relevant to contemporary practice is increasingly limited. The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) jointly convened an expert panel with diverse expertise and geographical representation to formulate consensus recommendations regarding the use of maintenance and/or consolidation therapies after auto-HCT in patients with lymphoma.

Observations

The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements where at least 75% vote in favor of a recommendation was considered as consensus. The process included 3 online surveys moderated by an independent methodological expert to ensure anonymity and an in-person meeting. The panel recommended restricting the histologic categories covered in this project to Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma. On completion of the voting process, the panel generated 22 consensus statements regarding post auto-HCT maintenance and/or consolidation therapies. The grade A recommendations included endorsement of: (1) brentuximab vedotin (BV) maintenance and/or consolidation in BV-naïve high-risk HL, (2) rituximab maintenance in MCL undergoing auto-HCT after first-line therapy, (3) rituximab maintenance in rituximab-naïve FL, and (4) No post auto-HCT maintenance was recommended in DLBCL. The panel also developed consensus statements for important real-world clinical scenarios, where randomized data are lacking to guide clinical practice.

Conclusions and Relevance

In the absence of contemporary evidence-based data, the panel found RAND-modified Delphi methodology effective in providing a rigorous framework for developing consensus recommendations for post auto-HCT maintenance and/or consolidation therapies in lymphoma.

The role of stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma

With the introduction of novel treatments paradigms to if or when to use transplantation strategies for patients with follicular lymphoma have changed substantially. Autologous transplantation has been intensively evaluated as consolidation after first induction treatment with positive effects, however the introduction of Rituximab led to comparable improvements and HDT has been moved to relapse treatment. In this indication HDT was frequently use already at first relapse, but now is dominantly used in patients with a highrisk profile, e.g. failure of response, early or multiply relapse and/or signs of transformation. The ideal place for allogeneic transplantation is even harder to define, as the curative potential might be outweighed by the substantial side effect profile and the indication must always be discussed in the light of available alternatives. In consequence, transplantation strategies remain an important therapeutic instrument for patients with FL, however timing within the treatment course has to be defined individually.

Maintenance Therapies in Indolent Lymphomas: should Recent Data Change the Standard of Care?

OPINION STATEMENT

The overall benefit of maintenance therapy for patients with an indolent lymphoma continues to go unanswered. A myriad of variables contribute to the lack of clear clinical guidance. First, the disease course is slow and treatment may not be required for years, requiring a long follow-up to prospectively study. Second, due to the long lag time from study initiation to conclusion, many of the induction therapies used at the onset of the study may not be favored at present, providing a conclusion that cannot be reconciled with current clinical practice. For example, bendamustine and rituximab are typically the favored initial treatment agents in follicular lymphoma, which was not true when many maintenance trials were initiated. Third, several studies' inclusion criteria allow for patient enrollment at both initial diagnosis as well as at disease recurrence. In some studies, patients who are asymptomatic are started on therapy, counter to the accepted watch and wait approach. This contributes to the difficulty of generalizing results. The question of the benefit of maintenance therapy has been studied enough, and there may not be a smoking gun in the foreseeable future. However, what does hold promise is focusing on the patients with minimum residual disease after conclusion of chemotherapy. This may be a population that could receive benefit from a prolonged treatment approach. In the meantime, maintenance therapy should not be used in all patients, and the rationale for use should be data-driven, as well as an assessment of a patient's potential intolerability of cytotoxic chemotherapy.