Preemptive plerixafor injection added to pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients mobilizing poorly

A novel PEGylated form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, mecapegfilgrastim, for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

The Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) has longer half-life and is given once only, which is more comfortable for patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies and to explore the potential factors related to HSC mobilization.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent HSC mobilization in the hematology department of Mianyang Central Hospital from April 2016 to November 2022. The number of CD34 + cells collected was compared between the patients receiving mecapegfilgrastim (PEG group) and those receiving recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF group), and the possible factors for mobilization failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

The success rates of collecting CD34 + cells in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 80.6% and 67.7%, respectively (χ = 1.444, P = 0.229). The median CD34 + cell counts were 3.62 × 10^6/kg and 2.92 × 10^6/kg (P = 0.178), respectively. After combination with plerixafor for mobilization, the median number of CD34 + cells collected in the PEG group and rhG-CSF group were 3.64 × 10^6/kg and 3.92 × 10^6/kg, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.754). There was no significant difference in hematopoietic cell recovery or infection between the groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy (OR = 15.897, 95% CI: 1.766-143.127, P = 0.014), a precollection WBC count < 32 × 10^9/L (OR = 14.441, 95% CI: 2.180-95.657, P = 0.006) and a precollection to premobilization lymphocyte ratio < 1.7 (OR = 11.388, 95% CI: 2.129-60.915, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for HSC mobilization failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The HSC mobilization efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim in patients with hematologic malignancies was comparable to that of rhG-CSF, and combination with plerixafor for mobilization was feasible and effective. Patients with more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy before HSC mobilization, a precollection WBC count lower than 32 × 10^9/L, and a precollection lymphocyte count less than 1.7 times the premobilization lymphocyte count have a high probability of HSC mobilization failure.

High D-index during mobilization predicts poor mobilization of CD34+ cells after anti-lymphoma salvage chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Performing stem cell collection after mobilization chemotherapy was a well-balanced strategy between anti-tumor effect and efficient collection of CD34+ cells, but deep and prolonged nadir exposed patients to risk of febrile neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia was known to be associated with lower yields of CD34+ cells, but quantitative data referring to association between yields of CD34+ cells and severity of neutropenia was lacking. We hypothesized that D-index, which was developed for quantitative evaluation of severity of neutropenia especially in the field of hematologic malignancies, could predict yields of CD34+ cells.

METHODS

We performed a single center, retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma who were mobilized with ESHAP or modified ESHAP. We evaluated the association between yields of CD34+ cells at first apheresis and D-index.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included, and we demonstrated that yields of CD34+ cells from patients with higher D-index were significantly lower than those from patients with lower D-index. Multivariate linear regression analysis and logistic regression analysis also demonstrated the significant predictive power of D-index. Further, D-index was significantly correlated to platelet count before starting mobilization chemotherapy. Platelet count was known to predict yields of CD34+ cells, and combination of platelet count and D-index could identify patients with lowest CD34+ yields.

CONCLUSION

D-index could predict yields of CD34+ cells and it seemed that its predictive power was not less than that of platelet count. Prospective studies including more heterogeneous patients were needed to validate our study.

Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization in the Setting of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantations: An Update

Mobilization failure is an important issue in stem cell transplantations. Stem cells are yielded from the peripheral blood via apheresis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the most commonly used mobilization agent among patients and donors. G-CSF is administered subcutaneously for multiple days. However, patients with mobilization failure cannot receive autologous stem cell transplantation and, therefore, cannot be treated adequately. The incidence rate of mobilization failure among patients is about 6–23%. Plerixafor is a molecule that inhibits the binding of chemokine receptor-4 with stromal-cell-derived factor-1, thereby resulting in the release of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood. Currently, plerixafor is used in patients with mobilization failure with G-CSF and is administered subcutaneously. Several studies conducted on different clinical settings have shown that plerixafor is effective and well tolerated by patients. However, more studies should be conducted to explore the optimal approach for plerixafor in patients with mobilization failure. The incidence of mobilization failure among donors is lower. However, plerixafor is not approved among donors with mobilization failure. Moreover, several clinical studies in donors have shown a beneficial effect of plerixafor. In addition, the adverse events of plerixafor are mild and transient, which can overcome the adverse events due to G-CSF. This review assessed the current role and effects of plerixafor in stem cell mobilization for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantations.

Mobilization characteristics, blood graft composition, and outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation: Results from the prospective multicenter GOA study

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective noninterventional study aimed to evaluate the impact of mobilization characteristics and graft cellular content on hematologic recovery and outcome after auto-SCT among 68 patients with DLBCL.

RESULTS

Better mobilization capacity as manifested by blood CD34⁺ cell count >32 × 10⁶ /L and CD34⁺ cell yield of the first apheresis >2.75 × 10⁶ /kg correlated with faster neutrophil (P = .005 and P = .017) and platelet (P = .002 and P < .001) recovery. A higher number of infused CD34⁺ cells (> 2.65 × 10⁶ /kg) was associated with better 5-year overall survival (OS; 95% vs 67%, P = .012). The graft CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CD38^- cell count >0.07 × 10⁶ /kg was predictive of better 5-year OS (87% vs 63%; P = .008) and higher graft CD3⁺ cell count (>23.1 × 10⁶ /kg) correlated also with better 5-year OS (80% vs 40%, P = .008). In multivariate analysis only disease status of CR I at auto-SCT was associated with better progression-free survival (P = .014) and OS (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

The mobilization capacity of CD34⁺ cells impacted on early hematologic recovery in patients with DLBCL after auto-SCT. Higher graft CD34⁺ cell count and both CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CD38^- and CD3⁺ cells were also associated with better OS. The effect of optimal graft cellular composition on outcome in DLBCL should be evaluated in a randomized study.

Stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXC chemokine receptor 4 axis in injury repair and renal transplantation

Stem cell therapy has shown promise in treating a variety of pathologies, such as myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and organ transplantation. The stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) axis plays a key role in stem cell mobilization. This review describes the important role of SDF-1 in tissue injury and how it works in tissue revascularization and regeneration via CXCR4. Furthermore, factors influencing the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis and its clinical potential in ischaemia reperfusion injury, such as renal transplantation, are discussed. Exploring signalling pathways of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis will contribute to the development of stem cell therapy so that more clinical problems can be solved. Controlling directional homing of stem cells through the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis is key to improving the efficacy of stem cell therapy for tissue injury. CXCR4 antagonists may also be effective in increasing circulating levels of adult stem cells, thereby exerting beneficial effects on damaged or inflamed tissues in diseases that are currently not treated by standard approaches.

Efficacy and safety of plerixafor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Plerixafor in combination granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this study was to systematically search the published literature and analyze evidence on the efficacy of additional plerixafor for successful HSC mobilization in patients with NHL and MM, and to evaluate the safety of the drug. The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Google scholar databases were searched electronically for studies published in the English language up to March, 2019. Five studies (3 on NHL and 2 on MM) were included in this review article. The meta-analysis of data of 364 patients in the treatment group and 368 patients in the control group, indicated that the mobilization of ≥5/6×10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg in 4 or less apheresis days was superior with plerixafor + G-CSF than with G-CSF alone (RR=2.59, 95% CI: 1.40 to 4.81; P<0.0001). Similarly, a greater proportion of patients in the treatment group exhibited the mobilization of ≥2×10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg in 4 or less apheresis days (RR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.12; P=0.04). The addition of plerixafor significantly increased the total collection of CD34⁺ cells (random: MD=4.21; 95% CI: 2.85 to 5.57; P<0.00001). Meta-analysis indicated no significant increase in adverse events with the addition of plerixafor for HSC mobilization (RR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.06; P=0.16). On the whole, the findings of this study indicate that the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF leads to an increased HSC collection in a shorter period of time with no concomitant increase in adverse events. Further randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size evaluating short term efficacy, as well as long term survival would help to further strengthen the evidence on this subject.

Comparison of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and lipegfilgrastim added to chemotherapy for mobilization of CD34+ cells in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

Data are limited on the long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) pegfilgrastim (PEG) and lipegfilgrastim (LIPEG) compared with filgrastim (FIL) regarding the mobilization efficiency of CD34⁺ cells, graft cellular composition, and engraftment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this prospective nonrandomized study, 36 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma received FIL, 67 received PEG, and 16 patients received LIPEG as a cytokine after chemotherapy. We analyzed the mobilization and collection of CD34⁺ cells, cellular composition of blood grafts, and hematologic recovery after auto-SCT according to the type of G-CSF used.

RESULTS

Patients in the LIPEG group had fewer apheresis sessions (1 vs. 2, p = 0.021 for FIL and p = 0.111 for PEG) as well as higher median blood CD34⁺ cell counts at the start of the first apheresis (LIPEG 74 × 10⁶ /L vs. FIL 31 × 10⁶ /L, p = 0.084 or PEG 27 × 10⁶ /L, p = 0.021) and CD34⁺ yields of the first apheresis (FIL 5.1 × 10⁶ /kg vs. FIL 2.3 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.105 or PEG 1.8 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.012). Also, the costs associated with G-CSF mobilization and apheresis were lower in the LIPEG group. The graft composition was comparable except for the higher infused CD34⁺ cell counts in the LIPEG group. The engraftment kinetics were significantly slower in the FIL group.

CONCLUSION

LIPEG appears to be more efficient compared with PEG after chemotherapy to mobilize CD34⁺ cells for auto-SCT demonstrated as fewer sessions of aphereses needed as well as 2.8-fold CD34⁺ cell yields on the first apheresis day. Early hematologic recovery was more rapid in the LIPEG group. Thus further studies on LIPEG in the mobilization setting are warranted.

Poor mobilizer and its countermeasures

Mobilization failure is a major concern in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation, especially in an autologous setting, as almost all donor harvests can be accomplished with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. Poor mobilizers, defined as those with a peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell count ≤20 cells/μl after mobilization preceding apheresis is a significant risk factor for mobilization failure. We recommend preemptive plerixafor plus G-CSF (filgrastim, 10 μg/kg daily) as a first mobilization strategy, which yields sufficient peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in almost all patients and avoids otherwise unnecessary remobilization. Preemptive plerixafor is administered in patients with a day-4 peripheral blood CD34⁺ count <15, depending on the disease and the target PBPC amount. Cyclophosphamide is reserved for patients who fail the first PBPC collection. We recommend second mobilization for patients who could not achieve a sufficient PBPC amount with the first mobilization. In these patients, a second attempt with plerixafor plus G-CSF or mobilization with plerixafor in combination with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF is recommended. Increased dose and/or twice daily administration of G-CSF can be considered.