Measuring the cellular memory B cell response after vaccination in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Vaccinations in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology: Biologic Basis, Clinical Applications, and Perspectives

Children with hemato-oncological diseases represent a heterogeneous population at heightened risk for vaccine-preventable diseases. Their immunosuppressed state reduces vaccine efficacy and raises safety concerns regarding live attenuated vaccines due to the risk of viral reactivation. The immunological and clinical implications of the single conditions are significantly different; therefore, specific vaccination strategies are needed. Despite the availability of vaccine guidelines for immunocompromised patients, clinical practice remains highly variable. It is generally recommended to avoid vaccinations during chemotherapy, with some exceptions for influenza, pneumococcal, and, in some countries, hepatitis B vaccines. The timing of immune recovery after chemotherapy depends on the specific treatment and most guidelines recommend administering vaccines 3-6 months after treatment cessation. Concerning HSCT, the timing of immune recovery is affected by several factors such as the HSCT platform, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and infections. Inactivated vaccines are typically administered 3-6 months post-HSCT, while live attenuated vaccines are delayed for at least two years. In children with asplenia or hyposplenism, recommendations focus on immunization against encapsulated bacteria, with tailored schedules based on the patient's age and underlying condition. This paper explores the biological factors influencing vaccination efficacy and safety in pediatric hematology and oncology patients. It also provides an updated overview of the available evidence and current vaccination guidelines. Finally, this paper highlights the main clinical and research areas for further improvement to provide tailored vaccination schedules for this vulnerable population.

Impact of DTaP-IPV and DTaP Vaccination Among Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Observational Study

Background/Objectives: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can potentially cure hematological malignancies; however, post-transplant patients have a high risk of infection owing to their immunocompromised status. Vaccination against pathogens, such as diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and polio, is essential post-transplantation, but neither the long-term efficacy of vaccines nor the optimal vaccination schedule has been fully established. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we assessed the short- and long-term immunogenicity of three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccines or DTaP vaccines in 29 adult allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) recipients, with antibody levels measured at baseline, 1-3 months post-vaccination, and 1-year after vaccine completion. Results: At baseline, a substantial proportion of patients lacked protective antibody levels for the targeted pathogens. However, within 1-3 months post-vaccination, seropositivity rates significantly increased, reaching 78-100% for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliovirus. Despite this, antibody levels significantly declined 1-year post-vaccination, especially for pertussis, with only 58-65% of patients maintaining protective levels. In contrast, 85-96% of patients retained protective levels for diphtheria, tetanus, and poliovirus, although antibody values also decreased. Compared to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched cases, HLA-matched cases showed significantly higher antibody levels for diphtheria, pertussis, and poliovirus types 1 and 3. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the short-term effectiveness of DTaP-IPV and DTaP vaccines in adult allo-HSCT patients but emphasizes the challenge of maintaining long-term immunity. Given the difficulties in sustaining long-term vaccine efficacy in allo-HSCT recipients, particularly in HLA-mismatched cases, re-evaluating the current vaccination schedule may be necessary to maintain protection.

Infectious Disease Considerations in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease and Transplantation Survivors

Chronic graft-versus-host disease is a frequent and serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and is associated with an increased risk of serious infections. Impaired humoral immunity increases the risk of recurrent or severe sinopulmonary infections, and functional asplenia predisposes to infections from encapsulated organisms. Herpesvirus infections and community-acquired respiratory viral infections are problematic as well. Pneumocystis pneumonia remains a risk, and mold infections occur in some patients. Understanding the epidemiology and pathophysiology of these infections is important for determining optimal monitoring and prophylaxis, and guiding patient counseling.

Adoptive transfer of donor B lymphocytes: a phase 1/2a study for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

ABSTRACT

Immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is slow and patients carry a high and prolonged risk of opportunistic infections. We hypothesized that the adoptive transfer of donor B cells can foster after HSCT immuno-reconstitution. Here, we report, to our knowledge, the results of a first-in-human phase 1/2a study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of adoptively transferred donor B cells and to test their activity upon recall vaccination. Good manufactoring practice (GMP) B-cell products were generated from donor apheresis products using 2-step magnetic cell separation. Fifteen patients who had undergone allo-HSCT were enrolled and treated after taper of immunosuppression (median, day +148; range, 130-160). Patients received 4 different doses of B cells (0.5 × 106 to 4.0 × 106 B cells per kg body weight). To test the activity of infused donor memory B cells in vivo, patients were vaccinated with a pentavalent vaccine 7 days after B-cell transfer. We observed the mobilization of plasmablasts and an increase in serum titers against vaccine antigens, with a stronger response in patients receiving higher B-cell numbers. Analysis of immunoglobulin VH-sequences by next-generation sequencing revealed that plasmablasts responding to vaccination originated from memory B-cell clones from the donor. Donor B-cell transfer was safe, as no Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation was observed, and only low-grade graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 4 out of 15 patients. This pilot trial may pave the way for further studies exploring the adoptive transfer of memory B cells to reduce the frequency of infections after allo-HSCT. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov as #NCT02007811.

Long-Term Immunity Against Tetanus and Diphtheria after Vaccination of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

Revaccination against tetanus and diphtheria after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is usually effective, but the duration of the immunity is unknown. We conducted this study to evaluate humoral immunity to tetanus and diphtheria in long-term survivors and to provide knowledge regarding the need for boosters. The median time from HCT to blood sampling was 14 years (range, 8 to 40 years). All patients had received at least 3 doses of vaccines against both tetanus and diphtheria, either monovalent or combination vaccines containing a full dose of the diphtheria toxoid component. In addition, 1 or more booster doses were administered to 21 of the 146 patients (14%). On enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, levels <.1 IU/mL for diphtheria and <.01 IU/mL for tetanus were considered low or seronegative. Values between .01 and .5 IU/mL for tetanus and between .1 and 1.0 IU/mL for diphtheria were considered to represent partial protection, and levels >.5 and >1.0 IU/mL were considered high and protective, respectively. In all, 39% of patients were seronegative against diphtheria, 52% had some protection, and 9% had a high titer. In contrast, no patient had become seronegative to tetanus, 32% had "partial protection" against tetanus and 68% had a high titer. In multivariate analysis, active graft-versus-host-disease, sex, or time from sampling did not affect the probability of becoming seronegative or seropositive. Younger age was associated with lower antibody levels to tetanus toxoid, but age was not correlated with antibody levels against diphtheria toxoid. Tetanus immunity was maintained after vaccination in most long-term survivors, but immunity against diphtheria was poor, and boosters should be considered.

Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timing of this vaccination is important in order to be effective and obtain proper immune response. Postponement of vaccination would lead to better immune response but would also cause longer-lasting risk of infection. This review describes available data on the timing of vaccination and its vaccine responses. Optimal timing of vaccination might require an individualized approach per patient.

Abstract

Consensus on timing of post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vaccination is currently lacking and is therefore assessed in this review. PubMed was searched systematically for articles concerning vaccination post-HSCT and included a basis in predefined criteria. To enable comparison, data were extracted and tables were constructed per vaccine, displaying vaccine response as either seroprotection or seroconversion for allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) and autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) separately. A total of 33 studies were included with 1914 patients in total: 1654 alloHSCT recipients and 260 autoHSCT recipients. In alloHSCT recipients, influenza vaccine at 7–48 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 10–97%. After 12 months post-transplant, responses were >45%. Pneumococcal vaccination 3–25 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 43–99%, with the response increasing with time. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b at 6–17 months post-transplant: 26–100%. Meningococcal vaccination at 12 months post-transplant: 65%. Hepatitis B vaccine at 6–23 months post-transplant: 40–94%. Measles, mumps and rubella at 41–69 months post-transplant: 19–72%. In general, autoHSCT recipients obtained slightly higher responses compared with alloHSCT recipients. Conclusively, responses to childhood immunization vaccines post-HSCT are poor in comparison with healthy individuals. Therefore, evaluation of response might be indicated. Timing of revaccination is essential for optimal response. An individualized approach might be necessary for optimizing vaccine responses.

B-Cell Immunophenotyping to Predict Vaccination Outcome in the Immunocompromised - A Systematic Review

Vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent infections in the general population. Its efficiency strongly depends on the function and composition of the immune system. If the immune system lacks critical components, patients will not be fully protected despite a completed vaccination schedule. Antigen-specific serum immunoglobulin levels are broadly used correlates of protection. These are the products of terminally differentiated B cells - plasma cells. Here we reviewed the literature on how aberrancies in B-cell composition and function influence immune responses to vaccinations. In a search through five major literature databases, 6,537 unique articles published from 2000 and onwards were identified. 75 articles were included along three major research lines: extremities of life, immunodeficiency and immunosuppression. Details of the protocol can be found in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021226683)]. The majority of articles investigated immune responses in adults, in which vaccinations against pneumococci and influenza were strongly represented. Lack of baseline information was the most common reason of exclusion. Irrespective of study group, three parameters measured at baseline seemed to have a predictive value in assessing vaccine efficacy: (1) distribution of B-cell subsets (mostly a reduction in memory B cells), (2) presence of exhausted/activated B cells, or B cells with an aberrant phenotype, and (3) pre-existing immunological memory. In this review we showed how pre-immunization (baseline) knowledge of circulating B cells can be used to predict vaccination efficacy. We hope that this overview will contribute to optimizing vaccination strategies, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Immune control of cytomegalovirus reactivation in stem cell transplantation

The reactivation of viruses from latency after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) continues to represent a major clinical challenge requiring sophisticated monitoring strategies in the context of prophylactic and/or pre-emptive antiviral drugs that are associated with significant expense, toxicity, and rates of failure. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the association of polyfunctional virus-specific T-cells with protection from viral reactivation, affirmed by the ability of adoptively transferred virus-specific T-cells to prevent and treat reactivation and disease. The roles of innate cells (NK cells) in early viral surveillance, and dendritic cells in priming of T-cells have also been delineated. Most recently, a role for strain-specific humoral responses in preventing early cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation has been demonstrated in preclinical models. Despite these advances, many unknowns remain: what are the critical innate and adaptive responses over time, is the origin (e.g. recipient versus donor) and localization (e.g. in parenchymal tissue versus lymphoid organs) of these responses important, how does GVHD and the prevention/treatment thereof (e.g. high dose steroids) impact the functionality and relevance of a particular immune axis, do the immune parameters that control latency, reactivation and dissemination differ, and what is the impact of new antiviral drugs on the development of enduring antiviral immunity. Thus, whilst antiviral drugs have provided major improvements over the last two decades, understanding the immunological paradigms underpinning protective antiviral immunity after SCT offers the potential to generate non-toxic immune-based therapeutic approaches for lasting protection from viral reactivation.