The FLAMSA concept-past and future

Preconditioning intervention prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

The outcomes of patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remain poor despite many attempts at developing therapeutic strategies. Preconditioning interventions (PCIs) have been applied to patients with high-risk AML to reduce the disease burden before starting the conditioning regimen. A single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCI in allograft patients with high-risk AML. Thirty-three patients with a median age of 57 (16-70) years were included to the entire cohort. Among various PCI regimens, venetoclax plus azacitidine was administered to 12 patients. The median drug withdrawal day was 0 days (range, 0-12) for low-intensity PCIs and 12 days (range, 8-14) for high-intensity PCIs. With no grade 3 nonhematological adverse events during PCIs, the median blast fraction in the bone marrow before and after PCIs decreased from 12.4% to 2.1% (p = 0.001). Excluding three patients with early complication-related deaths, all 30 patients achieved engraftment within a median of 30 days. The overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates at 2 years were 67.1%, 23.9%, and 8.8%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days and chronic GVHD at 2 years were 32.4% and 23.5%, respectively. PCI may be safe and effective in promoting engraftment and reducing the risk of disease relapse without increasing the risk of NRM. Further clinical trials are warranted to establish appropriate PCI strategies.

Is There (Still) a Place for Sequential Conditioning?

There is still an unmet need for the treatment of high-risk hematological malignancies. To date, allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only chance of cure. Most patients suffering from high-risk hematological malignancies are of an older age and often present with comorbidities. Moreover, patients achieving remission often suffer from early relapse. Amongst the different treatment options, sequential conditioning has yet to prove its value against other conditioning regimens. Sequential conditioning relies on a short course of intensive chemotherapy that is quickly followed by immunosuppressive conditioning before allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Here, we will try to determine which patients can benefit from sequential conditioning. Amongst the different sequential regimens, we will also try to assess if one regimen is better than all the others. Despite the several studies conducted on sequential conditioning, very few are prospective work and head-to-head comparisons are almost inexistant. Sequential conditioning also relies on the use of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion post-transplantation. Hence, limiting non-relapse complications is of primary importance to the allow administration of post-transplant treatment. In the era of new targeting therapies, is there still a place for sequential conditioning? Can patients benefit from an association of new therapeutic agents and sequential conditioning?

Successful treatment of two cases with Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the treatments with novel immunotherapies and ponatinib

The outcomes of relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) resistant to new drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) and blinatumomab are dismal. We treated two cases of Ph+ALL resistant to these drugs that achieved long-term survival after treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy or a second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) with a sequential conditioning regimen. Case 1: A 15-year-old boy was diagnosed with Ph+ALL. Despite the second HCT after the treatment of ponatinib and blinatumomab, hematological relapse occurred. InO was ineffective and he was transferred to a CAR-T center. After the CAR-T cell therapy, negative measurable residual disease (MRD) was achieved and maintained for 38 months without maintenance therapy. Case 2: A 21-year-old man was diagnosed with Ph+ALL. Hematological relapse occurred after the first HCT. Despite of the treatment with InO, ponatinib, and blinatumomab, hematological remission was not achieved. The second HCT was performed using a sequential conditioning regimen with clofarabine. Negative MRD was subsequently achieved and maintained for 42 months without maintenance therapy. These strategies are suggestive and helpful to treat Ph+ALL resistant to multiple immunotherapies.

Early blast clearance during sequential conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

For patients with relapsed or refractory AML, sequential conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is an established and potentially curative treatment option. Early response to treatment during conditioning indicates chemotherapy-responsive disease and may have prognostic value. We retrospectively evaluated blast clearance on day 5 after melphalan, administered 11 days prior to alloSCT as part of a sequential conditioning in 176 patients with active AML. Overall survival (OS) was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45%-60%), and relapse-free survival (RFS) was 47% (95% CI 40%-55%) at 3 years. Patients who achieved early blast clearance did not show a significant improvement in OS and RFS (OS, hazard ratio [HR] HR 0.75, p 0.19; RFS, HR 0.71, p 0.09, respectively), but had a significantly lower non-relapse mortality rate (HR 0.46, p 0.017). HLA-mismatched donor, older age, adverse genetic risk and higher comorbidity scores were associated with inferior survival outcomes. A high initial blast count was only associated with inferior prognosis in patients receiving chemotherapy-only compared to total body irradiation containing conditioning therapy. These results indicate that for patients transplanted with active AML, sensitivity to chemotherapy might be of less importance, compared to other disease- and transplant-related factors.

Impact on Outcome of Minimal Residual Disease after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Fludarabine, Amsacrine, and Cytosine Arabinoside-Busulfan Conditioning: A Retrospective Monocentric Study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after conditioning with a sequential association of fludarabine, amsacrine, and cytosine arabinoside (FLAMSA) followed by a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen has emerged for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially in refractory or relapsing patients. Here we aimed to address retrospectively the impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry on the outcomes of high-risk AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT after sequential FLAMSA-busulfan (FLAMSA-Bu)-based conditioning regimens. We included 165 high-risk AML patients who underwent transplantation after FLAMSA-BU in this retrospective single-center "real life" study. All patients received in vivo T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (5 mg/kg). MRD detection was based on a leukemia-associated immunophenotype using the European LeukemiaNet recommendations, with a threshold of .1%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using R version 4.1.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). With a median follow-up of 4.0 years post-transplantation, the median overall survival (OS) was 54.9 months. Overall, 41 patients (24.8%) relapsed post-transplantation, with a resulting cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 26.7% at 2 years and 34.0% at 5 years. Detectable MRD preceding allo-HSCT and refractory status were associated with worse median OS and CIR rates compared with patients without detectable MRD; however, OS was not significantly different between pre-HSCT MRD-positive and refractory patients (median, .7 year versus 2.0 years; P = .3). Conversely, pre-HSCT MRD negativity was associated with a reduced 2-year CIR. Neither European LeukemiaNet risk stratification nor age had a significant influence on OS. In the multivariate analysis, only pre-HSCT MRD positivity and lower conditioning regimen intensity were significantly associated with a poorer OS. The cumulative incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease at 2 years was 26.15%. The estimated nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of the entire cohort at 2 years was 23.1%, with age and unrelated donor identified as risk factors for higher NRM. Our data ahow that FLAMSA-Bu conditioning did not reverse the pejorative effect of detectable pre-HSCT MRD, suggesting that such patients should be offered alternative strategies before HSCT to reach deeper remission.

Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Affected by Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome: Expert Consensus and Recommendations From the EBMT Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party

Shwachman-Diamond syndrome is a rare disorder that can develop malignant and nonmalignant hematological complications. Overall, 10% to 20% of Shwachman-Diamond patients need hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but most centers have a limited experience and different approaches. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation-Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party promoted an expert consensus to propose recommendations regarding key issues in the management of Shwachman-Diamond patients with hematological complications. The main items identified as relevant for improving survival were: the importance of regular and structured hematologic follow-up, the potential reduction of transplant-related mortality by using reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, the limitation of total body irradiation, particularly for non-malignant severe cytopenia/bone marrow failure, the early diagnosis of clonal malignant evolution and early recognition of an indication for HSCT. Finally, the poor results of HSCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, irrespective of cytoreductive chemotherapy treatment received prior to transplantation, highlights the need for innovative approaches. © 2023 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Pretransplant Systemic Lipidomic Profiles in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Simple Summary

Stem cell transplantation is used in the treatment of aggressive hematological malignancies and consists of initial high-dose and potentially lethal chemotherapy, followed by rescue with the transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Transplantation with stem cells from a healthy donor (i.e., allogeneic stem cells) has the strongest anti-cancer effect, but also the highest risk of severe toxicity. Furthermore, the clinical status at the time of transplantation (inflammation, fluid overload) is associated with posttransplant mortality, and immune-mediated acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a potential lethal complication. Finally, lipid metabolism regulates the proliferation and survival of both malignant hematological cells and immunocompetent cells that cause GVHD. Our study shows that the pretransplant lipid profiles differ between allotransplant recipients and can be used for the subclassification of patients and possibly to identify patients with an increased risk of death due to disease relapse or treatment toxicity. The therapeutic targeting of lipid metabolism should therefore be further explored in these transplant recipients.

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is used in the treatment of high-risk hematological malignancies. However, this treatment is associated with severe treatment-related morbidity and mortality. The metabolic status of the recipient may be associated with the risk of development of transplant-associated complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To better understand the impact of the lipidomic profile of transplant recipients on posttransplant complications, we evaluated the lipid signatures of patients with hematological disease using non-targeted lipidomics. In the present study, we studied pretransplant serum samples derived from 92 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 960 lipid biochemicals were identified, and the pretransplant lipidomic profiles differed significantly when comparing patients with and without the risk factors: (i) pretransplant inflammation, (ii) early fluid overload, and (iii) patients with and without later steroid-requiring acute GVHD. All three factors, but especially patients with pretransplant inflammation, were associated with decreased levels of several lipid metabolites. Based on the overall concentrations of various lipid subclasses, we identified a patient subset characterized by low lipid levels, increased frequency of MDS patients, signs of inflammation, decreased body mass index, and an increased risk of early non-relapse mortality. Metabolic targeting has been proposed as a possible therapeutic strategy in allotransplant recipients, and our present results suggest that the clinical consequences of therapeutic intervention (e.g., nutritional support) will also differ between patients and depend on the metabolic context.

Myeloablative conditioning with thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine does not improve the outcome of patients transplanted with active leukemia: final results of the GITMO prospective trial GANDALF-01

The outcome of refractory/relapsed (R/R) acute leukemias is still dismal and their treatment represents an unmet clinical need. However, allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potentially curative approach in this setting. A prospective study (GANDALF-01, NCT01814488; EUDRACT:2012-004008-37) on transplantation with alternative donors had been run by GITMO using a homogeneous myeloablative conditioning regimen with busulfan, thiotepa and fludarabine while GVHD prophylaxis was stratified by donor type. The study enrolled 101 patients; 90 found an alternative donor and 87 ultimately underwent allo-HSCT. Two-year overall survival of the entire and of the transplant population (primary endpoint) were 19% and 22%, without significant differences according to disease, donor type and disease history (relapsed vs refractory patients). Two-year progression-free survival was 19% and 17% respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 49% and 33% at two years. Acute grade II-IV and chronic GVHD occurred in 23 and 10 patients. Dose intensification with a myeloablative two-alkylating regimen as sole strategy for transplanting R/R acute leukemia does seem neither to improve the outcome nor to control disease relapse. A pre-planned relapse prevention should be included in the transplant strategy in this patient population.

Time-dependent analysis of adoptive immunotherapy following sequential FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk myeloid neoplasia

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are part of the sequential FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen to cure high risk myeloid neoplasia with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although DLI themselves carry significant risks, their prophylactic use has not been analyzed in a time-dependent manner. One hundred and fourteen patients underwent FLAMSA-RIC HSCT between 2013 and 2020. Next to Kaplan-Meier estimation of overall, disease-free, and graft-versus-host relapse-free survival (OS, DFS, GRFS), cumulative incidences of relapse and death in remission were calculated in a competing risk model. Additionally, the contribution of prophylactic and preemptive DLI as time-dependent covariates was assessed using a time-varying model toward DFS (Simon-Makuch method, Mantel-Byar test). At 2 years, OS was 45.2% [95% CI 36.7-55.7%], DFS 31.8% [95% CI 24-42.2%] and GRFS 11.3 [95% CI 6.5-19.8]. Neither prophylactic nor preemptive DLI showed a significant influence on DFS when considered time-dependent covariates (Mantel-Byar, p = .3). This was further corroborated in competing risk analysis with DLI as time-dependent covariates. Both prophylactic and preemptive DLI miss significance in their impact on survival within a high-risk cohort in a time-varying model. Controlled trials to address the impact of postgrafting immunotherapy approaches are needed.

Dose intensity for conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: can we recommend "when and for whom" in 2021?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for various hematologic diseases. An essential component of this procedure is the pre-transplant conditioning regimen, which should facilitate engraftment and reduce or eliminate tumor cells. The recognition of the substantial association of a graft-versus- tumor effect and the high toxicity of the commonly used conditioning regimen led to the introduction of more differentiated intensity strategies, with the aim of making hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation less toxic and safer, and thus more applicable to broader populations such as older or unfit patients. In general, prospective and retrospective studies suggest a correlation between increasing intensity and nonrelapse mortality and an inverse correlation with relapse incidence. In this review, we will summarize traditional and updated definitions for conditioning intensity strategies and the landscape of comparative prospective and retrospective studies, which may help to find the balance between the risk of non-relapse mortality and relapse. We will try to underscore the caveats regarding these definitions and analyses, by missing complex differences between intensity and toxicity as well as the broad influences of other factors in the transplantation procedure. We will summarize evidence regarding several confounders which may influence decisions when selecting the intensity of the conditioning regimen for any given patient, according to the individual risk of relapse and non-relapse mortality.

Induced dendritic cells co-expressing GM-CSF/IFN-α/tWT1 priming T and B cells and automated manufacturing to boost GvL

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with minimal residual disease and receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) have poor survival. Adoptive administration of dendritic cells (DCs) presenting the Wilms tumor protein 1 (WT1) leukemia-associated antigen can potentially stimulate de novo T and B cell development to harness the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect after HCT. We established a simple and fast genetic modification of monocytes for simultaneous lentiviral expression of a truncated WT1 antigen (tWT1), granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and interferon (IFN)-α, promoting their self-differentiation into potent “induced DCs” (iDCtWT1). A tricistronic integrase-defective lentiviral vector produced under good manufacturing practice (GMP)-like conditions was validated. Transduction of CD14⁺ monocytes isolated from peripheral blood, cord blood, and leukapheresis material effectively induced their self-differentiation. CD34⁺ cell-transplanted Nod.Rag.Gamma (NRG)- and Nod.Scid.Gamma (NSG) mice expressing human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A∗0201 (NSG-A2)-immunodeficient mice were immunized with autologous iDCtWT1. Both humanized mouse models showed improved development and maturation of human T and B cells in the absence of adverse effects. Toward clinical use, manufacturing of iDCtWT1 was up scaled and streamlined using the automated CliniMACS Prodigy system. Proof-of-concept clinical-scale runs were feasible, and the 38-h process enabled standardized production and high recovery of a cryopreserved cell product with the expected identity characteristics. These results advocate for clinical trials testing iDCtWT1 to boost GvL and eradicate leukemia.

A phase II study of bisantrene in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the current role of bisantrene, an anthracene with anthracycline-like activity which was shown in earlier studies to be effective therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia with no discernible cardiotoxicity, in the treatment of patients with R/R AML.

METHODS

This phase 2, single-center study (NCT03820908) enrolled adult R/R AML to receive bisantrene (250 mg/m² daily for 7 days) which was administered via an intravenous infusion over 2 hours on days 1-7. Disease assessment included routine blood work and bone marrow studies.

RESULTS

In all, 10 patients were enrolled with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy including seven patients who had relapsed following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The most frequently reported grade ≥3 treatment-attributed hematologic AE was thrombocytopenia, whereas the most frequently reported grade ≥3 treatment-attributed non-hematologic AE was mucositis. Of the 10 patients, one (10%) achieved a complete remission and three patients achieved a partial remission resulting in an overall response rate of 40%. Next-generation sequencing of patient samples identified a wide array of mutations associated with activated signaling, splicing, and epigenetic modification.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the observed low toxicity, a follow-up study combining bisantrene with complementary anti-leukemic therapy is planned.