Pharmacokinetic changes induced by the volume of chemotherapy solution in patients treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal mitomycin C

Comparison of EPIC Versus HIPEC in the Treatment of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases and Appendix Tumors Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

BACKGROUND

The selection of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer or appendiceal neoplasms following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) depends on the surgeon's discretion. This study was designed to compare postoperative and oncologic outcomes of HIPEC and EPIC using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

METHODS

This study included 175 patients who received HIPEC or EPIC following CRS at a single tertiary university hospital between December 1999 and December 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to control for pretreatment characteristics between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with postoperative and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

After IPTW, no significant differences in baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were observed between the two groups. The HIPEC group had a significantly longer operation time than the EPIC group. The EPIC group showed a significantly higher postoperative mortality rate than the HIPEC group. Operation time (odds ratio [OR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02; p < 0.001), bowel anastomosis (OR 7.25; 95% CI 1.16-45.2; p = 0.034), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 7.62; 95% CI 1.85-31.4; p = 0.005), and EPIC (OR 8.76; 95% CI 2.16-35.5; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for major surgical complications. No association was observed between intraperitoneal chemotherapy type and major hematologic toxicity, overall survival, progression-free survival, or peritoneal progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

EPIC was a risk factor for major surgical complications. Survival outcomes were similar between the two types of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Amplifying Curcumin's Antitumor Potential: A Heat-Driven Approach for Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Introduction

Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) present a significant clinical challenge with poor prognosis, often unresponsive to systemic chemotherapy. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment approach for select patients. The use of curcumin, a natural compound with antitumor properties, in HIPEC is of interest due to its lower side effects compared to conventional drugs and potential for increased efficacy through direct delivery to the peritoneal cavity.

Methods

An in vitro hyperthermic model was developed to simulate clinical HIPEC conditions. Three colon cancer cell lines (SK-CO-1, COLO205, SNU-C1) representing different genetic mutations (p53, KRAS, BRAF) were treated with either curcumin (25 µM) or mitomycin-C (1 µM) for 1, 2, or 3 hours. Post-treatment, cells were incubated at 37°C (normothermia) or 42°C (hyperthermia). Cell viability and proliferation were assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-treatment using Annexin V/PI, MTT assay, trypan blue exclusion, and Hoffman microscopy.

Results

Hyperthermia significantly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of curcumin, evidenced by a two-fold reduction in cell viability compared to normothermia across all cell lines. In the SNU-C1 cell line, which harbors a p53 mutation, mitomycin-C failed to significantly impact cell viability, unlike curcumin, suggesting mutation-specific differences in treatment response.

Discussion

The findings indicate that hyperthermia augments the antitumor effects of curcumin in vitro, supporting the hypothesis that curcumin could be a more effective HIPEC agent than traditional drugs like mitomycin-C. Mutation-associated differences in response to treatments were observed, particularly in p53 mutant cells. While further studies are needed, these preliminary results suggest that curcumin in HIPEC could represent a novel therapeutic strategy for CRC patients with peritoneal metastases. This approach may offer improved outcomes with fewer side effects, particularly in genetically distinct CRC subtypes.

A narrative review of what can HIPEC do

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy as in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has limited efficacy. It should not be expected to eradicate even the smallest vascularized tumor nodules. Neither should it be used in an attempt to eradicate tumor cells from within scar tissue. Perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be expected to eradicate free cancer cells or minute cancer nodules free floating in the fluid within peritoneal spaces. Also, loosely adherent tumor cells on peritoneal surfaces or within a resection site can be eradicated. This is a prevention of tumor cell entrapment. In so doing postoperative tumor progression within adhesions, within a resection site, and within scar tissue is prevented and result in improved survival. Tumor cells entrapped within scar tissue is relatively resistant to systemic chemotherapy. By eliminating tumor cell entrapment in scar HIPEC can increase the benefit of systemic chemotherapy.

Extensive Peritonectomy is an Independent Risk Factor for Cisplatin HIPEC-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

Background

Cisplatin (CDDP)-containing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is frequently applied in selected patients with peritoneal malignancies derived from ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, and primary peritoneal mesothelioma. HIPEC with CDDP increases perioperative morbidity, in particular by inducing acute kidney injury (AKI). Factors contributing to occurrence of AKI after intraperitoneal perfusion with CDDP have not been sufficiently evaluated.

Patients and Methods

Data from 63 patients treated with a CDDP-containing HIPEC regimen were retrospectively analyzed concerning demographics, underlying disease, surgery, and HIPEC details to evaluate risk factors of AKI. A preclinical rat perfusion model was applied to assess the influence of temperature, concentration, perfusate volume, perfusion flow rate, and extent of peritonectomy on drug absorption upon intraperitoneal CDDP perfusion.

Results

AKI occurred in 66.1% of patients undergoing CDDP-containing HIPEC, with total intraoperative fluid influx being a negative and the extent of parietal peritonectomy being a positive independent predictor of postoperative AKI. In a preclinical model, bilateral anterior parietal peritonectomy significantly increased systemic CDDP absorption by 1.6 to 2-fold. CDDP plasma levels in animals were significantly higher after both perfusion with increased CDDP perfusate concentrations and bilateral anterior parietal peritonectomy.

Conclusion

CDDP-containing HIPEC is associated with relevant morbidity owing to its systemic toxicity. Extent of parietal peritonectomy is an independent predictor of AKI. CDDP dose reduction should be considered in case of extensive parietal peritonectomy. Cytostatic drug concentrations in HIPEC perfusate should be paid more attention to than total dose per body surface area. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm the presented preclinical findings.

A noble extended stochastic logistic model for cell proliferation with density-dependent parameters

Cell proliferation often experiences a density-dependent intrinsic proliferation rate (IPR) and negative feedback from growth-inhibiting molecules in culture media. The lack of flexible models with explanatory parameters fails to capture such a proliferation mechanism. We propose an extended logistic growth law with the density-dependent IPR and additional negative feedback. The extended parameters of the proposed model can be interpreted as density-dependent cell-cell cooperation and negative feedback on cell proliferation. Moreover, we incorporate further density regulation for flexibility in the model through environmental resistance on cells. The proposed growth law has similarities with the strong Allee model and harvesting phenomenon. We also develop the stochastic analog of the deterministic model by representing possible heterogeneity in growth-inhibiting molecules and environmental perturbation of the culture setup as correlated multiplicative and additive noises. The model provides a conditional maximum sustainable stable cell density (MSSCD) and a new fitness measure for proliferative cells. The proposed model shows superiority to the logistic law after fitting to real cell culture datasets. We illustrate both conditional MSSCD and the new cell fitness for a range of parameters. The cell density distributions reveal the chance of overproliferation, underproliferation, or decay for different parameter sets under the deterministic and stochastic setups.

Can We Reboot the Role of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis?: A Retrospective Cohort Study Regarding Minimally Invasive Surgery Conjoined with Intraperitoneal plus Systemic Chemotherapy

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is the most common form of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) and is related with a poor prognosis. Several treatment modalities including systemic chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been studied and adopted in treatment of GC patients with PC. Nevertheless, few studies have reported the comparison of the oncologic outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy for GC with PC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 74 patients who had been diagnosed as GC with PC via either intra-abdominal exploration or abdominopelvic computed tomography between January 2011 and April 2021. After performing propensity score-matching for this retrospective data, we compared the outcomes of 26 patients who underwent MIS followed by IP combined systemic chemotherapy (MIS-IP group) and 26 patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy only (SC-only group). Results: The 2-year progression free survival rate of the MIS-IP group was significantly higher than the SC-only groups (36.4% and 10.5%, respectively; p = 0.010). In multivariate analysis to detect relevant factors on PFS, IP chemotherapy (HR 0.213; p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR 3.689; p = 0.002), and the amount of ascites (p = 0.011) were significant prognostic factors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the therapeutic potential of MIS conjoined IP plus systemic chemotherapy for GC patients with PC. MIS conjoined by IP plus systemic chemotherapy can be adopted as a treatment option to reboot the role of IP chemotherapy in GC patients with PC.

A photo-responsive membrane for tailored drug delivery with spatially and temporally controlled release

Accurate delivery of therapeutics to tumor regions and effective sparing of normal tissue structures are important principles for the treatment of widespread metastases or malignant lesions in close proximity to vital organs. However, the currently available drug delivery techniques do not support precise drug release within the identified disease margins. We propose a tailored drug delivery strategy that utilizes a photo-responsive material in combination with tumor margin imaging for automated and tailored release of therapeutics. As a proof of concept, a poly(ethylene oxide)-b-PSPA (PEO-b-PSPA) diblock copolymer is synthesized by spiropyran (SP) polymerization. A photo-responsive membrane (PRM) is formed and irradiated with light sources of different wavelengths. Switching irradiation between ultraviolet light (UV) and green light (Vis) controls the permeability of the PRM in coincidence with the programmed irradiation patterns. The dynamic process of photo-switchable drug permeation through the PRM is modeled and compared with the experimental results. The strategy of tailored drug release is verified using both regular geometric shapes and metastatic cancer images. The therapeutic effect of this tailored drug release strategy is demonstrated in vitro in human breast cancer cells. Our pilot study implies the technical potential of using photo-responsive carriers for image-guided chemotherapy with precisely controlled drug release patterns.

Translational and pharmacological principles of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

The long-term survival of advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients remains poor, despite extensive cytoreductive surgery, chemotherapy, and the recent addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown survival benefit by specifically targeting peritoneal metastases, the primary site of disease recurrence. Different aspects of how HIPEC exerts its effect remain poorly understood. Improved understanding of the effects of hyperthermia on ovarian cancer cells, the synergy of hyperthermia with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of intraperitoneally administered cisplatin may help identify ways to optimize the efficacy of HIPEC. This review provides an overview of these translational and pharmacological principles of HIPEC and aims to expose knowledge gaps that may direct further research to optimize the HIPEC procedure and ultimately improve survival for women with advanced ovarian cancer.

HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization.

METHODS

A critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed.

RESULTS

The preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.

Impact of Perfusate Concentration on Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Efficacy and Toxicity in a Rodent Model

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be beneficial in treating limited peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Perfusate volume directly affects treatment concentration and therefore is a key parameter defining HIPEC; yet little is known about the impact of perfusate concentration on systemic toxicity and treatment morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PC was induced through intraperitoneal injection of human CRC cell lines. A novel perfusion model was developed to treat athymic nude mice with continuous circulation of adequately miniaturized volumes of heated perfusate. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was performed applying different volumes of perfusate with fixed doses or fixed concentrations. Early postoperative mortality and morbidity were assessed as well as long-term survival. In addition, antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of HIPEC were determined in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Perfusate concentration crucially affected the toxicity of fixed-dose oxaliplatin HIPEC as indicated by postoperative weight loss and early postoperative mortality. Applying different perfusate volumes at a fixed concentration did not influence toxicity. Adequately miniaturized HIPEC with oxaliplatin did not exert relevant cytotoxic effects toward PC arising from human CRC cells in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a novel murine model that adequately miniaturizes all physical parameters of HIPEC as applied in humans. HIPEC drug concentration is a crucial parameter determining excess toxicity and should be better standardized. HIPEC with oxaliplatin fails to induce relevant antitumor activity or to improve survival in this murine model of PC from CRC.

Dextrose-Containing Carrier Solution for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Increased Intraoperative Hyperglycemia and Postoperative Complications

PURPOSE

Intraoperative hyperglycemia is associated with infectious complications in general surgery patients. This study aimed to determine if the use of lactated Ringer's (LR) carrier solution during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) would lower the incidence of intraoperative hyperglycemia and improve postoperative outcomes when compared with a standard 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysate carrier solution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 134 patients who underwent HIPEC at the University of Colorado. Perioperative glucose levels and outcomes were compared between patients who were perfused with 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysate carrier solution (n = 68) versus LR carrier solution (n = 66).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of patients undergoing HIPEC for appendiceal (50%), colorectal (34%), mesothelioma (8%), and ovarian cancer (5%). Intraoperative severe hyperglycemia (glucose ≥ 180 mg/dL) was significantly more common among patients perfused with a dextrose-containing carrier solution versus those perfused with LR (88% vs. 21%; p < 0.001). Patients in the dextrose cohort had significantly more severe complications (39% vs. 12%; p = 0.034), infectious complications (35% vs. 15%; p = 0.011), and organ space infections (18% vs. 5%: p = 0.026) than the LR cohort. On multivariable analysis, dextrose-containing carrier solution was significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative infectious complications (HR 5.16; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative hyperglycemia is common when dextrose-containing carrier solution is used during HIPEC, and severe intraoperative hyperglycemia is strongly associated with an increased risk for infectious of complications following HIPEC. LR carrier solution should be routinely used to reduce intraoperative hyperglycemia and its associated risks.

The PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (PESUCA): A new tool to quantify the resected peritoneal surface area after cytoreductive surgery

BACKGROUND

The body surface area (BSA) is taken as a measure for the effective contact area for dosing in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Currently, the pharmacokinetic effect of the reduced peritoneal surface area (PSA) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) during HIPEC remains unclear. Here a proprietary software solution (PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (PESUCA)) to quantify the resected PSA in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) undergoing CRS and HIPEC is presented.

METHODS

The PESUCA tool was programmed as a desktop and online software solution. The applicability was evaluated in 36 patients. The programming-algorithm is briefly summarized as follows: (1) calculation of BSA, (2) correlation to PSA, (3) calculation of the relative proportion of 40 different anatomical regions to total PSA before CRS, (4) instantaneous input of each resected proportion in the 40 anatomical regions during CRS, and (5) determination of the resected and remaining PSA after CRS.

RESULTS

The proof of concept revealed a mean PSA of all patients before CRS of 18,741 ± 321 cm2 compared to 13,611 ± 485 cm2 after CRS (p<0.0001). Patients' supramesocolic and inframesocolic visceral and parietal peritoneal area before and after CRS procedure were quantitatively determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Here the first tool that enables detailed PSA quantification in patients with PSM undergoing CRS is presented. This makes the software a valuable contribution to ensue more accurate assessment and improved comparability of peritoneal disease extent. Furthermore, after external validation, PESUCA could be the basis for dose adjustment of intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens based on the remaining PSA after CRS.

Incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with cisplatin plus mitomycin-c versus melphalan in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

INTRODUCTION

Cytopenia after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported in non-comparative studies with various chemotherapeutic regimens. This study compared the incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC and received melphalan or cisplatin plus mitomycin-c (CIS + MMC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from March 2011 to March 2017 and received melphalan 60 mg/m2 or CIS 100 mg/m2 combined with MMC 30 mg/m2. Incidences and severity of leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were compared between groups.

RESULTS

This study included 46 patients who received CIS + MMC and 35 patients who received melphalan. The leukopenia incidence was 25.7% in the melphalan group and 17.3% in the CIS + MMC group (P = 0.362), with one patient (2.8%) in the melphalan group developed grade V leukopenia. The number of days to leukocyte nadir was 32.8 days for CIS + MMC group compared to 9.8 days for melphalan group(P = 0.035). Thrombocytopenia occurred at a similar rate in the melphalan (60%) and CIS + MMC (68.8%) groups (P = 0.4). Grade III thrombocytopenia developed in 3.2% and 5% of patients in the melphalan and the CIS + MMC groups, respectively. Neutropenia did not occur in any patient. In multivariate analysis, leukopenia predictors were female gender (P = 0.047) and baseline leukocyte counts (P = 0.029). Baseline platelet count predicted thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Melphalan and CIS + MMC regimens were associated with comparable incidences of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Severe leukopenia and severe thrombocytopenia were rare following CRS/HIPEC using both chemotherapy regimens.

Implications of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Perfusion-Related Hyperglycemia

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) administration can be associated with hyperglycemia during perfusion. Little is known about this effect, and no previous studies have examined patient characteristics associated with perfusion-related hyperglycemia.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified consecutive patients at a single institution treated with HIPEC from 8/2003 to 10/2016 who had intraoperative blood glucose measured. Hypertonic 1.5% dextrose-containing peritoneal dialysate was used as carrier solution in all patients. Comparisons were made using parametric [Student's t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA)], and nonparametric tests (χ ², Kruskal-Wallis) where appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 85 patients identified, with average age of 53 ± 12 years, 69 (81%) with appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal cancer. Most patients were perfused with mitomycin C (69%) or oxaliplatin (24%). Intraoperative hyperglycemia (> 180 mg/dL) affected the majority of patients (86%), with values up to 651 mg/dL. Insulin was required for treatment in 66% of patients. Peak hyperglycemia occurred within an hour of perfusion in 91%, and resolved by postoperative day one in 91% of patients. Glucose > 309 mg/dL (highest quartile) was associated with longer operating time (p = 0.03) and with use of oxaliplatin compared with mitomycin C (p = 0.01). No association was found with other comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index score, or postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients experience hyperglycemia during HIPEC. This is not clearly associated with patient factors, and may be due to use of dextrose-containing carrier solution. Since perioperative hyperglycemia has potential negative impact, use of dextrose-containing carrier solution should be questioned and is worth investigating further.

Applications of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plays a pivotal role in the current treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Since the first demonstration, benefits for patients and especially an increase in survival have been described. In recent years, feasibility, efficacy and safety of HIPEC have been improved and progress has been made in understanding its oncological mechanism. Areas covered: In this article, leading publications have been reviewed including clinical trials to describe the clinical presentation of PC due to CRC and present recent evidence of the CRS/HIPEC procedure. The surgical approach including evaluation of the extent of PC is described and, in addition, the article reports about different HIPEC techniques as well as several protocols. Furthermore, the development and prognostic benefit of the combination of intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy are outlined. Consideration has been given in particular to patient selection and the use of HIPEC if complete cytoreduction is not feasible. Expert commentary: The CRS/HIPEC procedure represents a curative approach to treat patients with PC from CRC. However, surgical skills and the HIPEC technique still require specialized oncological centers.

Pharmacological principles of intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with a significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic benefit and can, alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional chemotherapy), be used for treating primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. Due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier, high intraperitoneal drug concentration can be achieved by intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whereas systemic concentration remains low. Bidirectional chemotherapy may provide in addition adequate drug concentrations from the side of the subperitoneal space to the peritoneal tumour nodules. Major pharmacological problems of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are limited tissue penetration and poor homogeneity of drug distribution to the entire seroperitoneal surface. Significant pharmacological determinants of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are choice of drug, drug dosage, solution volume, carrier solution, intra-abdominal pressure, temperature, duration, mode of administration, extent of peritonectomy and interindividual variability. Drugs most commonly applied for intraperitoneal chemotherapy include mitomycin C, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluoruracil, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin, premetrexed and melphalan. The drugs and their doses that are used vary widely among centres. While the adequate drug choice for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy is essential, randomized clinical trials to determine the most optimal drug or drug combination are lacking, and only eight retrospective comparative clinical studies are available. Further clinical pharmacological studies are required to determine the most effective drug regimen for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy in various indications. In the future, reliable drug sensitivity testing and genetic profiling of peritoneal metastases will be needed for enabling patient-specific therapy.

Overview of the optimal perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens used in current clinical practice

Peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) is a common manifestation of digestive and gynecologic malignancies alike. At present, patients with isolated PSM are treated with a combination therapy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The combination of CRS and intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy should now be considered standard of care for PSM from appendiceal epithelial cancers, colorectal cancer and peritoneal mesothelioma. Although there is a near universal standardization regarding the CRS, we are still lacking a much-needed standardization among the various IP chemotherapy treatment modalities used today in clinical practice. Pharmacologic evidence should be generated to answer important questions raised by the myriad of variables associated with IP chemotherapy.

Incidence of leukopenia after intraperitoneal vs combined intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pseudomyxoma peritonei

AIM: To investigate the clinical impact of post-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leukopenia, intraperitoneal and combined intravenous/intraperitoneal drug administrations were compared.

METHODS: Two patient cohorts were retrospectively analyzed regarding the incidence of postoperative leukopenia. The first cohort (n = 32) received Mitomycin C (MMC)-based HIPEC intraperitoneally (35 mg/m² for 90 min) and the second cohort (n = 10) received a bi-directional therapy consisting of oxaliplatin (OX) (300 mg/m² for 30 min) intraperitoneally and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m² plus folinic acid 20 mg/m² intravenously. The following data were collected retrospectively: Age, sex, length of operation, length of hospital stay, amount of resection including extent of peritonectomy, peritoneal cancer index, CC (completeness of cytoreduction)-status and leukocyte-count before cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC, on days 3, 7 and 14 after CRS and HIPEC. HIPEC leukopenia was defined as < 4000 cells/m³.

RESULTS: Leukopenia occurred statistically more often in the MMC than in the OX/5-FU-group (10/32 vs 0/10; P = 0.042). Leukopenia set-on was on day 7 after CRS and MMC-HIPEC and lasted for two to three days. Three patients (33%) required medical treatment. Patients affected by leukopenia were predominantly female (7/10 patients) and older than 50 years (8/10 patients). The length of hospital stay tended to be higher in the MMC-group without reaching statistical significance (22.5 ± 11 vs 16.5 ± 3.5 d). Length of operation (08:54 ± 01:44 vs 09:48 ± 02:28 h) were comparable between patients with and without postoperative leukopenia. Prior history of systemic chemotherapy did not trigger post-HIPEC leukopenia. Occurrence of leucopenia did not trigger surgical site infections, intraabdominal abscess formations, hospital-acquired pneumonia or anastomotic insufficiencies.

CONCLUSION: Surgeons must be aware that there is a higher incidence of postoperative leukopenia in MMC-based HIPEC protocols primarily affecting females and older patients.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer: novel clinical and molecular outcomes

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic impact of parameters in peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We collected data from patients treated by cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Ninety-one procedures were performed. In univariate analysis, an increased peritoneal cancer index was associated with decreased survival (P < .001). The presence of signet ring cells was associated to a decrease in survival from 45.8 to 12.1 months (P < .001). Microsatellite sequences instability status was the only molecular prognostic factor correlated with an increase in median disease-free survival: 12.4 vs 24.9 months (P = .01). The presence of a mucinous component was associated with a decreased of survival from 51.9 to 35.1 months (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical factors were affecting the survival of patients. The absence of signet ring cells and mucinous component and the presence of microsatellite sequences instability may be favorable prognostic factors.

Impact of hyperthermia on pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal mitomycin C in rats investigated by microdialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with peritoneal surface malignancies are treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, commonly using mitomycin C (MMC). The purpose of this study was to investigate impact of hyperthermia on pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal MMC.

METHODS

In 14 athymic nude male rats, microdialysis (MD) probes were implanted in jugular vein (V), hind leg muscle (M) and extraperitoneal space (XP). Probes were calibrated by retrodialysis. Intraperitonal chemotherapy perfusion (IPEC) was administered over 90 min with MMC 5 mg/kg and saline 0.9% 500 ml/kg at 35 and 41°C, defining the normothermic (NG) and hyperthermic groups (HG), respectively. MD and peritoneal perfusion fluid (PPF) samples were collected at 10 min intervals to determine MMC concentration.

RESULTS

Time-concentration curves were virtually parallel between temperature groups, with equal peak concentrations (µM) of 0.3 (V), 0.7 (XP) and 0.3 (M). The following area under time-concentration curve (AUC) ratios were calculated: AUC PPF/AUC V were 69 in NG and 79 in HG (P = 0.54); AUC XP/AUC V were 2.7 in NG and 2.6 in HG (P = 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

IPEC provides high intraperitoneal MMC concentration and increased bioavailability in extraperitoneal tissue, combined with low systemic absorption. Hyperthermia at 41°C did not modify MMC pharmacokinetics.

Treatment outcomes of systemic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from gastric cancer with no measurable disease: retrospective analysis from a single center

BACKGROUND

Few studies of systemic chemotherapy have focused on gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) without measurable lesions. In the present study, we characterized the outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and prognostic factors for gastric cancer with PC, particularly in patients without measurable disease.

METHODS

Clinical data from 211 gastric cancer patients with PC (137 without and 74 with measurable disease) who had received systemic chemotherapy between January 2003 and December 2010 at a single center were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) rate of gastric cancer patients with PC with no measurable disease was significantly longer than that of patients with measurable disease (18.0 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.010). On multivariate analysis, poor performance status [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15, p < 0.001], the presence of metastatic lymphadenopathy (HR = 2.17, p < 0.001), and high-grade PC (HR = 1.83, p = 0.001) were associated with significantly decreased OS. When patients with low-grade PC were stratified by clinical PC grade, the median OS of those without measurable disease was 19.6 months. The median OS of patients with low-grade PC with no measurable disease was longer than those of patients with high-grade PC without measurable disease, patients with low-grade PC with measurable disease, and patients with high-grade PC with measurable disease (p = 0.001, p = 0.029, and p < 0.001, respectively). Among the patients with low-grade PC, patients who received a gastrectomy had longer survival than patients who did not receive a gastrectomy (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, clinically low-grade PC without measurable disease was associated with better outcomes of systemic chemotherapy than the outcomes in the other groups examined. Clinical trials in patients with gastric cancer with PC should be stratified according to PC grade.

Randomized clinical trials for colorectal cancer peritoneal surface malignancy

Upwards of 40% of patient with colorectal cancer develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRCPC). Of the 2500 patients reported in the literature, 1000 underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), resulting in median survival of 22 to 63 months. However, level I data from prospective randomized trials are limited. Further trials are indicated to identify peritoneal carcinomatosis in at-risk patients early in the natural history of the disease and confirm the efficacy of multimodality therapy (CRS/HIPEC/systemic therapy) in those with CRCPC amenable to CRS in the modern era of novel targeted and cytotoxic systemic therapy.

A prospective multicenter phase II study evaluating multimodality treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from appendiceal and colorectal cancer: the COMBATAC trial

Background

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is regarded as a common sign of advanced tumor stage, tumor progression or local recurrence of appendiceal and colorectal cancer and is generally associated with poor prognosis. Although survival of patients with advanced stage CRC has markedly improved over the last 20 years with systemic treatment, comprising combination chemotherapy +/− monoclonal antibodies, the oncological outcome—especially of the subgroup of patients with peritoneal metastases—is still unsatisfactory. In addition to systemic therapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are specific treatment options for a selected group of these patients and may provide an additional therapeutic benefit in the framework of an interdisciplinary treatment concept.

Methods/design

The COMBATAC trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, single-stage phase II trial investigating perioperative systemic polychemotherapy including cetuximab in combination with CRS and HIPEC patients with histologically proven wild-type KRAS colorectal or appendiceal adenocarcinoma and synchronous or metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis. The planned total number of patients to be recruited is 60. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), perioperative morbidity and treatment-associated toxicity, feasibility of the combined treatment regimen, quality of life (QoL) and histopathological regression after preoperative chemotherapy.

Discussion

The COMBATAC trial is designed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the combined multidisciplinary treatment regimen consisting of perioperative systemic combination chemotherapy plus cetuximab and CRS plus bidirectional HIPEC with intraperitoneal oxaliplatin.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01540344, EudraCT number: 2009-014040-11

New insight into hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: induction of oxidative stress dramatically enhanced tumor killing in in vitro and in vivo models

BACKGROUND

The aim of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is to eradicate microscopic residual tumor after radical surgical tumor excision in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The common use of antineoplastic agents such as mitomycin C, doxorubicin, or oxaliplatin with hyperthermia fails to eradicate tumors in a significant subset of patients, and alternative approaches to target chemoresistant cells are needed. The induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inhibiting the critical detoxification enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) during hyperthermia is an appealing approach to induce death of residual cancer cells.

METHODS

Human and murine colon cancer cell lines were subjected to mild hyperthermia (40-42°C), and treated with chemotherapy, similar to clinical protocols. ROS were induced by the SOD inhibitor diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC), a metabolite of the drug disulfiram. In mice, peritoneal carcinomatosis use C57Bl/6 was induced in C57Bl/6 by intraperitoneal injection of syngenic tumor cells (MC38).

RESULTS

Hyperthermia alone failed to kill cells but induced intracellular ROS and activated protective mechanisms. Chemotherapy conferred inconsistent cytotoxicity depending on the cell line and dose. In contrast, induction of ROS by DDC consistently activated apoptotic pathways, with increased cell death in combination with mild hyperthermia. In vivo, combined treatment with DDC and hyperthermia significantly delayed tumor progression in tumor-bearing mice. In addition, hyperthermic combined treatment with chemotherapy and DDC significantly improved animal survival compared with chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of DDC improves the efficacy of existing HIPEC protocols in a safe way and may open the door to a more effective, multimodal HIPEC.

Effective Delivery of PEGylated siRNA-Containing Lipoplexes to Extraperitoneal Tumours following Intraperitoneal Administration

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of small interfering RNA (siRNA) has, to date, shown promise in treating tumours located within the peritoneal cavity. The ability of these siRNA molecules to reach extraperitoneal tumours following i.p. administration is, however, yet to be investigated. Here, we examined the impact of PEGylation on the biodistribution of i.p. administered nucleic acids-containing lipoplexes. We showed that in contrast to non-PEGylated liposomes, PEGylated liposomes can deliver siRNA efficiently to extraperitoneal tumours following i.p. administration, resulting in a 45% reduction in tumour size when the oncogene-targeted siRNA was used. This difference was likely contributed by the decreased uptake of PEGylated lipoplexes in the first-pass organs, and, in particular, we observed a 10-fold decrease in the macrophage uptake of these particles compared to non-PEGylated counterparts. Overall, our results indicated the potential of using PEGylated liposomes to deliver siRNA for the treatment of i.p. localized cancer with coexisting extraperitoneal metastasis.

Impact of surgical and clinical factors on the pharmacology of intraperitoneal doxorubicin in 145 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are a combined treatment modality considered for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal and appendiceal cancer. Doxorubicin is a drug consistently used by our group in this clinical setting. The surgical and clinical factors that modify the pharmacokinetics of HIPEC may be important for the design of future perioperative chemotherapy regimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients included were 145 who had colorectal or appendiceal carcinomatosis resected using CRS prior to treatment with HIPEC with doxorubicin as part of a multidrug regimen. The effect of clinical and surgical factors on drug distribution after a single intraperitoneal bolus administration with doxorubicin was determined.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of 145 patients treated with intraperitoneal doxorubicin showed a 78 times greater exposure to peritoneal surfaces as compared to plasma. At 90 min 12% of the drug remained in the chemotherapy solution and 88% was retained in the body. The extent of visceral resection and peritonectomy increased the clearance of doxorubicin from the peritoneal space. A major resection of visceral peritoneal surface, a contracted peritoneal space, and an incomplete cytoreduction reduced drug clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical and clinical factors may require modifications of chemotherapy administration. A large visceral resection and a contracted peritoneal space caused a reduced doxorubicin clearance. Total diffusion surface is an important determinant of doxorubicin pharmacokinetics.

Changes induced by surgical and clinical factors in the pharmacology of intraperitoneal mitomycin C in 145 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are a combined treatment modality considered for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal and appendiceal cancer. Mitomycin C is a drug often used in this clinical setting. The surgical and clinical factors that may influence the pharmacokinetics of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be further elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients included were 145 who had colorectal or appendiceal carcinomatosis resected using cytoreductive surgery prior to treatment with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C as part of a multidrug regimen. The effect of clinical and surgical factors on drug distribution after single intraperitoneal bolus administration with mitomycin C was determined.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of 145 patients treated with intraperitoneal mitomycin C showed a 27 times greater exposure to peritoneal surfaces when compared to plasma. At 90 min, 29% of the drug remained in the chemotherapy solution, 62% was retained in the body, and 9% was excreted in the urine. The extent of peritonectomy increased the clearance of mitomycin C from the peritoneal space (p = 0.051). A major resection of visceral peritoneal surface and a contracted peritoneal space reduced drug clearance. A contracted peritoneal space significantly reduced (p = 0.0001) drug concentrations in the plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical and clinical factors may require modifications of drug dose or timing of chemotherapy administration. A large visceral resection and a contracted peritoneal space caused a reduced mitomycin C clearance. Total diffusion surface is an important determinant of mitomycin C pharmacokinetics.

Validation and use of microdialysis for determination of pharmacokinetic properties of the chemotherapeutic agent mitomycin C - an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Mitomycin C is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies, administered as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery. Pharmacokinetic studies have been based on analyses of blood, urine and abdominal perfusate, but actual tissue concentrations of the drug have never been determined. Microdialysis is an established method for continuous monitoring of low-molecular substances in tissues, and in the present study microdialysis of mitomycin C was studied in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Using in vitro microdialysis, relative recovery was determined when varying drug concentration, temperature and perfusion flow rate. In vivo microdialysis was performed in rats to verify long-term stability of relative recovery in four compartments (vein, peritoneum, extraperitoneal space and hind leg muscle). Subsequently, intravenous and intraperitoneal bolus infusion experiments were performed and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

In vitro, compatibility of mitomycin C and microdialysis equipment was demonstrated, and relative recovery was stable over an adequate concentration range, moderately increased by raising medium temperature and increased when flow rate was reduced, all according to theory. In vivo, stable relative recovery was observed over seven hours. Mitomycin C exhibited fast and even distribution in rat tissues, and equal bioavailability was achieved by intravenous and intraperitoneal infusion. The half-life of mitomycin C calculated after intravenous infusion was 40 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitomycin C concentration can be reliable monitored in vivo using microdialysis, suggesting that this technique can be used in pharmacokinetic studies of this drug during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Pharmacologic rationale for treatments of peritoneal surface malignancy from colorectal cancer

The peritoneal surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis are important sites for the dissemination of gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancy. Transcoelomic dissemination of cancer cells gives rise to carcinomatosis, which, without special treatment, is a fatal manifestation of these diseases. To treat peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery removes gross disease plus perioperative intraperitoneal and perioperative intravenous chemotherapy eradicates microscopic residual disease and chemical compatibilities. Chemotherapy agents are administered either by the intraperitoneal or intravenous route, based on their pharmacologic properties. A peritoneal-plasma barrier, which retards the clearance of high molecular weight chemotherapy from the peritoneal cavity, results in a large exposure of small cancer nodules on abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Tissue penetration of the intraperitoneal chemotherapy is facilitated by moderate hyperthermia (41-42°C). Targeting of intravenous chemotherapy to the peritoneal surface is facilitated by the intraperitoneal heat. A constant dose of chemotherapy agent and volume of carrier solution, based on body surface area, allows prediction of systemic drug exposure and systemic toxicity. Timing of the hyperthermic chemotherapy as a scheduled part of the surgical procedure to uniformly expose all peritoneal surfaces is crucial to success.

Evidence-based medicine in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Past, present, and future

The current treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) is moving from a nihilistic approach, into a combined modality approach offering selected patients long-term survival. As primary PSM are rare, extrapolation of data from clinical trials of related disease is necessary to develop treatment guidelines. Secondary PSM are more common, and therefore, treatment guidelines should be developed based on prospective clinical trials. We reviewed the published and ongoing clinical trials studying the treatment of PSM.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of perioperative cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy

The peritoneal surface remains an important failure site for patients with gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. During the last 2 decades, novel therapeutic approaches, combining cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative intracavitary and intravenous chemotherapy, have emerged for peritoneal carcinomatosis patients. This has resulted in remarkable clinical successes in contrast with prior failures. Although further clinical data from phase II and III trials supporting this combined treatment protocols are necessary, an optimalization of the wide variety of different perioperative cancer chemotherapy protocols used in these treatment regimens is equally important. To this date, a clear understanding of the pharmacology of perioperative chemotherapy is still lacking. The efficacy of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapy protocols is governed as much by nonpharmacokinetic variables (tumor nodule size, density, vascularity, interstitial fluid pressure, and binding) as by the pharmacokinetic variables (dose, volume, duration, pressure, and carrier solution). Our recent data support the importance of the tumor nodule as the most meaningful pharmacologic end point. Timing of perioperative intravenous chemotherapy may substantially influence the pharmacokinetics. This review aims to clarify the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data currently available regarding the intraperitoneal delivery of cancer chemotherapy agents in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Incidence, risk factors, and impact of severe neutropenia after hyperthermic intraperitoneal mitomycin C

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are considered the standard of care for patients with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal cancer and are increasingly being evaluated for use in patients with carcinomatosis from colon cancer. Mitomycin C (MMC) is one of the most frequently used HIPEC agents in the management of peritoneal-based gastrointestinal malignancies. This study analyzes the incidence and risk factors for developing neutropenia following MMC-HIPEC combined with CRS.

METHODS

All patients undergoing CRS and MMC-HIPEC for appendiceal cancer between January 1993 and October 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the development of neutropenia, defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,000/mm(3).

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty MMC-HIPEC were performed in 117 patients with appendiceal cancer. The incidence of neutropenia was 39%. Neutropenia occurred in 57.6% of female and 21.3% of male patients (p < 0.0001). Female gender and MMC dose per body surface area (BSA) were independent risk factors for neutropenia on multivariable logistic regression [odds ratio (OR) of neutropenia in females = 3.58 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.52, 8.43); OR for 5 unit (mg/m(2)) increase in MMC dose per BSA = 3.37 (95% CI: 1.72, 6.63)]. Neutropenia did not increase the risk of mortality, postoperative infection or length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Neutropenia is a frequent complication associated with MMC-HIPEC. Female sex and MMC dose per BSA are independent risk factors for neutropenia. These differences must be considered in the management of patients undergoing MMC-HIPEC to minimize the toxicity of the procedure.

Drugs, carrier solutions and temperature in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

At the Fifth International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, in Milan, the consensus on technical aspects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancy was obtained through the Delphi process. Conflicting points concerning drugs, carrier solution and optimal temperature for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were discussed.

Multimodality treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: first results of a new German centre for peritoneal surface malignancies

BACKGROUND

The presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. It was the purpose of this study to analyze morbidity, mortality, and survival after major cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis were operated between April 2004 and June 2006 with the aim of complete macroscopical cytoreduction. All had a primary colorectal carcinoma. Surgery in these patients was followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) consisting of mitomycin C and doxorubicin. Data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 16 had appendix and 16 non-appendiceal colorectal carcinoma. A macroscopically complete cytoreduction was achieved in 24 patients by parietal and visceral peritonectomy procedures. All resections were combined with HIPEC. Overall morbidity was 34%. Most frequent surgical complications were intestinal obstruction (4/32), enteric fistula (2/32), pancreatitis (2/32), and bile leakage (2/32). One patient presented grade 4 renal toxicity. There was no hospital mortality. The median follow-up was 12 months. The 1-year overall survival rate is 96%. All patients after complete cytoreduction are still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC is associated with an acceptable morbidity and low mortality. Complete cytoreduction may improve survival, particularly in well-selected patients having a low tumor volume and no extra-abdominal metastases.

Optimization of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus irinotecan at 43 degrees C after compete cytoreductive surgery: mortality and morbidity in 106 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), which has hitherto been regarded as a lethal entity, can now be cured with surgery (treating macroscopic tumor seeding) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) (treating residual microscopic disease). The purpose of this study was to analyze the morbidity and mortality of a particular approach associating optimal (R0-R1) cytoreduction, optimal HIPEC combining oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and an optimal homogeneous intraperitoneal temperature of 43 degrees C.

METHODS

A total of 106 consecutive patients were included in this prospective phase 2 study. After complete resection of the PC, HIPEC was performed by the Coliseum technique with oxaliplatin (360 mg/m2) combined with irinotecan (360 mg/m2) in 2 L/m2 of 5% dextrose, over 30 minutes at a real intraperitoneal temperature of 43 degrees C. During the hour preceding HIPEC, patients received 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2) intravenously, resulting in tritherapy.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 4% and 66%, respectively. The most frequent complications were digestive fistula (24%), lung infection (16%), and severe hematological toxicity (11%). Statistical correlation was evidenced between morbidity and the carcinomatosis score (P = .0008), the number of resected organs (P = .0001), the duration of surgery (P = .0001), and blood loss (P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This new approach, optimized in three respects (complete cytoreduction, combination oxaliplatin with irinotecan, and high temperature) has resulted in a relatively high but acceptable incidence of adverse events considering the expected advantage for survival.